elsa
play

ELSA Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ELSA Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario SESAR INNOVATION DAYS Tolouse, 30/11/2011 Salvatore Miccich University of Palermo, dept. of Physics ELSA Project ELSA Project Toward a complex network approach to


  1. ELSA Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario SESAR INNOVATION DAYS Tolouse, 30/11/2011 Salvatore Miccichè University of Palermo, dept. of Physics ELSA Project ELSA Project Toward a complex network approach to ATM delays analysis Toward a complex network approach to ATM delays analysis 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 1

  2. Joint work with Simone Pozzi (Project Coordinator) DEEP BLUE: Valentina Beato SNS: Fabrizio Lillo UNIPA: Rosario N. Mantegna Salvatore Miccichè Marc Bourgois: project officer 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 2

  3. FOREWORD This paper describes a project that is part of SESAR Workpackage E, which is addressing long-term and innovative research. The project was started on May 2011 so this description is limited to an outline of the project fi fi ndings early fi fi ndings . objectives augmented by some early 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 3

  4. THE ELSA ELSA Objective PROJECT » Analyse, describe and model the dynamics of the ATM system » in the current scenario » in the future SESAR scenario(s) ELSA OBJECTIVES Three main steps: » WP1 WP1 - characterisation of statistical regularities in the current scenario TOOLS » analysis of ATM data with Complex Systems techniques analysis of ATM data with Complex Systems techniques » WP2 WP2 - simulation of the emergent properties of the trajectory- DATA based SESAR scenario » development of an Agent Based Model development of an Agent Based Model RESULTS » WP3 WP3 - inform the design of a tool to monitor, predict and intervene on the ATM system » design of a prototype of a decision support tool design of a prototype of a decision support tool 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 4

  5. Complexity tools: networks Complexity tools: networks Network - it is a graph with nodes NETWORKS IN ATM connected by links 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 5

  6. Complexity tools: networks Complexity tools: networks NETWORKS IN ATM: metrics Degree Degree - number of destinations that can be reached from an airport Betweenness - This a Betweenness measure of how central is an airport in the network. The real airport network behaves quite differently from a random network 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 6

  7. DDR data: M1/M3 and ALL_FT files DATA: what we received ISSUES: What is the last filled flight plan? What is the threshold that triggers a correction in the M3 file? What exactly are the times reported in the M1/M3 files? 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 7

  8. M1/M3 and ALL_FT files DATA: CLEANING 30 segments Also, segments may 31 segments change name, …. !!! 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 8

  9. The same callsign appears with two different IFPS IDs DATA: CLEANING This makes problematic a comparison with M1/M3 files because the IFPS code does not appear in the M1/M3 files flight ID 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 9

  10. 347_ENV_20110601.ALL_FT contains: 37338 records, i.e. different IFPS IDs 33704 records relative to day 01/06/2011 29401 distinct callsigns relative to day 01/06/2011 DATA: CLEANING 20110601_m1.so6 contains 20110601_m3.so6 contains 31150 different flight IDs 31138 different flight IDs 28631 distinct callsigns 28621 distinct callsigns The overall intersection is 28613 The same for landing ? landing The same for take- -off times off times ? take 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 10

  11. M1 and M3 files SOME PRELIMINARY RESULTS: We put aside the information on segments at this stage. WHAT DATA DID WE CONSIDER? We were interested in two aspects: 1. The network network structure of the system airport airport -flights flight delays 2. A network characterization of flight delays 1. We set a link link between two airports if there is at least a at least a flight connecting them. flight connecting them. 2. We define: flight delay = (arrival time in M3) flight delay = (arrival time in M3) minus minus (arrival time in M1) (arrival time in M1) 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 11

  12. FLIGHT network: weighted and directed The weight of each link is the number of flights. The number of flights from A to B is in general different from the number of flights from B to A, although these SOME PRELIMINARY RESULTS: numbers are very close. Network of airports ROUTE network: weighted and undirected The weight of each link is the total number of flights. ECTL flights only 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 12

  13. SOME PRELIMINARY RESULTS: ROUTE network Network of Airports ROUTE NETWORK nodes - airports <k> average degree - number of connections with other airports <s> average strength - number of flights in each airport <l> average path length - minimum number of flights that connects two airports flight network highly connected system 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 13

  14. ROUTE network: some metrics SOME PRELIMINARY RESULTS: distributions Network of Airports ROUTE NETWORK (01/06/2011) Fat tails 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 14

  15. ROUTE network: Fit: 1.39 SOME PRELIMINARY RESULTS: Network of Airports ROUTE NETWORK If the number of destinations becomes twice, than the number of flights increases by a factor 2 1.39 =2.45 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 15

  16. Laplace Negative delays SOME PRELIMINARY RESULTS: delay 7 days are pooled together 15 min threshold There seem to be a tendency such that overloaded airports show larger delays. 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 16

  17. ROUTE FDR-network of airports The network includes 1_fdr: 743/1375 nodes, 804 links FUTURE WORK 1: statistically 1_fdr: 74 connected components validated networks - FDR 1_fdr: 431 nodes in largest The network includes 2_fdr: 28395/31224 nodes, 148509 links 2_fdr: 5891 connected components 2_fdr: 95 nodes in largest FDR-network of flights 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 17

  18. Bipartite system of segments and flights Bipartite system of segments and flights Segment 1 Flight 1 Nodes can be either Segment 1 Flight 2 FUTURE WORK 2: bipartite segments or flights system of segments and flights Segment 1 Flight 3 Two segments are Segment 1 Flight 4 connected if they have at Segment 1 Flight 5 least a flight in common Segment 2 Flight 2 Segment 2 Flight 3 Two flights are connected Segment 2 Flight 6 if they have at least a …. …. segment in common We can study the segments topology and how it behaves with respect to delays. Are there segments that show peculiarities with respect to delays? 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 18

  19. Once we have the networks (airports, segments, networks (airports, segments, Once we have the …) what do we do? ) what do we do? … Propagation of delays over network FUTURE WORK 3: spreading of Propagation of delays over network delays over network Divide each day in 24 intervals of 1 hour each. For each node (for example, airport, ….. and for each time interval one can consider the number of departure flights. One can compute how many are delayed (M1 vs M3 comparison) for more than15 minutes. The same for arrivals. Such analysis can give insights about the way delays spread over the network. 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 19

  20. A few issues about data are still open CONCLUSIONS The network approach seems feasible. It can prove to be extremely useful when studying the ATM system. Propagation of delays over networks at the level of airports and flight segments. 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 20

  21. THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION elsa@dblue.it salvatore.micciche@unipa.it 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 21

  22. THE ELSA PROJECT ELSA Objective » Analyse, describe and model the dynamics of the ATM system ELSA OBJECTIVES » in the current scenario » in the SESAR scenario(s) Three sub-objectives: » characterisation of statistical regularities in the current scenario » simulation of the emergent properties of the trajectory-based SESAR scenario » inform the design of a tool to monitor, predict and intervene on the ATM system 30 th November 2011 ELSA - Empirically grounded agent based models for the future ATM scenario 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend