Eighth International Planning Competition: Deterministic Part Luk - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

eighth international planning competition deterministic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Eighth International Planning Competition: Deterministic Part Luk - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Eighth International Planning Competition: Deterministic Part Luk a s Chrpa Mauro Vallati Thomas L. McCluskey PARK research group School of Computing and Engineering University of Huddersfield IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Eighth International Planning Competition: Deterministic Part

Luk´ aˇ s Chrpa Mauro Vallati Thomas L. McCluskey

PARK research group School of Computing and Engineering University of Huddersfield

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 1 / 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclaimer

From the IPCs 2006-11

Please note that with our evaluation by no means we intend to imply that

  • ne particular planner is better than the other ones in general. There can

be other evaluation criteria that give different results. Results of IPC 2014 will be available soon. You are strongly encouraged to analyse them and derive your own conclusion.

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 2 / 1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Apology

From the IPCs 2008-11

There are too many planners, domains and results than could be properly introduced in 20 minutes. IPC website: http://helios.hud.ac.uk/scommv/IPC-14/ All information regarding domains, planners, data and documentation.

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 3 / 1

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Acknowledgements

To all the participants! Carlos Linares L´

  • pez

Jaanus Piip, Juhan Ernits Patrik Haslum Simon Parkinson John Brennan J¨

  • rg Hoffmann

Jussi Rintanen To the Sportsman Pub To the HPC group Sergio Jim´ enez Nathan Robinson, Christina Muise, Charles Gretton William Westerman Ibad Kureshi Daniel Kovacs H´ ector Palacios Tom` as de la Rosa Raquel Fuentetaja

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 4 / 1

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Outline

Before we start... Setting Planners Results Conclusion

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 5 / 1

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Competition Setting

Providing continuity with the previous competitions: All tracks clearly defined before the competition The scoring rules clearly stated before the competition Blind planner submission Explicit requirement to publish source code and papers No language extensions at all!

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 6 / 1

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Planners submission

As in IPCs 2008-11: Planners submitted before knowing the domains All experiments run by the organisers Domains have been kept secret Bug fixes were possible New in the IPC 2014: The DES system. Participants had to configure, compile and submit their system on the same premises used to run the competition. A special award for innovative planning techniques

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 7 / 1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The PDDL language

As in IPC 2011: No extensions have been introduced But ... In Sequential tracks the core features that planners have to support have been extended. Fostering features support and promoting planners that can be easily exploited in real-world applications.

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 8 / 1

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The IPC 2014 Competition tracks

Four different tracks were announced, but only three took place: Sequential

◮ Features: action costs, negative preconditions, conditional effects ◮ Objective: minimise action cost (sum of action costs)

Agile

◮ Features: action costs, negative preconditions, conditional effects ◮ Objective: minimise CPU time

Temporal

◮ Features: durative actions, metric quantities ◮ Objective: minimise total time (makespan)

A satisficing, optimal and multi-core subtrack were arranged for the Sequential track.

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 9 / 1

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Planners

Sequential satisficing: 43 registered, 21 submitted, 1 withdrawn Sequential optimal: 34 registered, 17 submitted Sequential multi-core: 17 registered, 9 submitted Agile: 21 registered, 15 submitted Temporal satisficing: 9 registered, 6 submitted Temporal optimal: 6 registered, 1 submitted, cancelled Preferences satisficing: 5 registered, 2 submitted, cancelled Preferences optimisation: 4 registered, 0 submitted, cancelled 67 planners in total from 66 people from 15 countries. Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Iran, Israel, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Venezuela, USA.

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 10 / 1

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ranking the planners

10–14 domains per tracks, 20 tasks each. Each planner gets a score 0.00–1.00 for each solved task in every domain. The scoring functions (speed and quality) are the same of IPC-2011. Highest aggregate score wins. Score depends on plan quality in all the tracks but Agile, in which

  • nly CPU time is considered.

Bounds per tracks: 30 minutes (Agile: 5 minutes), 4 Gb RAM, 200 Gb HD.

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 11 / 1

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Outline

Before we start... Setting Planners Results Conclusion

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 12 / 1

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Sequential Satisficing track (I)

ArvandHerd: Richard Valenzano, Hootan Nakhost, Martin M¨ uller, Jonathan Schaeffer, Nathan R. Sturtevant BFS(f): Nir Lipovetzky, Miquel Ramirez, Christian Muise, Hector Geffner BiFD: Vidal Alc´ azar, Susana Fern´ andez, Daniel Borrajo DAE-YAHSP: Johann Dreo, Pierre Sav´ eant, Marc Schoenauer, Vincent Vidal DPMPlan: Sergio N´ u˜ nez, Daniel Borrajo, Carlos Linares L´

  • pez

Fast Downward Cedalion: Jendrik Seipp, Silvan Sievers, Frank Hutter

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 13 / 1

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Sequential Satisficing track (II)

Fast Downward Stone Soup 2014: Gabriele R¨

  • ger, Florian

Pommerening, Jendrik Seipp Fast Downward Uniform: Jendrik Seipp, Manuel Braun, Johannes Garimort Freelunch: Tom´ aˇ s Balyo IBaCoP and IBaCoP2: Isabel Cenamor, Tom´ as de la Rosa, Fernando Fern´ andez Jasper: Fan Xie, Martin M¨ uller, Robert Holte Mercury: Michael Katz, J¨

  • rg Hoffmann

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 14 / 1

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sequential Satisficing track (III)

MIPlan: Sergio N´ u˜ nez, Daniel Borrajo, Carlos Linares L´

  • pez

NuCeLaR: Sergio N´ u˜ nez, Isabel Cenamor, Jes´ us Virseda Planets: Jonathan Teutenberg RPT: Vidal Alc´ azar, Susana Fern´ andez, Daniel Borrajo, Manuela Veloso USE: Reza Sadraei, Atefeh Ahmadi YAHSP3 and YAHSP3-MT: Vincent Vidal

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 15 / 1

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Sequential Optimal track (I)

AllPACA: Yuri Malitsky, David Wang, Erez Karpas cGamer: ´ Alvaro Torralba, Vidal Alc´ azar, Peter Kissmann, Stefan Edelkamp DPMPlan: Sergio N´ u˜ nez, Daniel Borrajo, Carlos Linares L´

  • pez

Dynamic-Gamer and Gamer: Peter Kissmann, Stefan Edelkamp, J¨

  • rg

Hoffmann Fast Downward Cedalion: Jendrik Seipp, Silvan Sievers, Frank Hutter hflow: Blai Bonet, Menkes van den Briel h++ and h++

ce : Patrik Haslum

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 16 / 1

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Sequential Optimal track (II)

Metis: Yusra Alkhazraji, Michael Katz, Robert Mattm¨ uller, Florian Pommerening, Alexander Shleyfman, Martin Wehrle MIPlan: Sergio N´ u˜ nez, Daniel Borrajo, Carlos Linares L´

  • pez

NuCeLaR: Sergio N´ u˜ nez, Isabel Cenamor, Jes´ us Virseda RIDA: Santiago Franco, Mike Barley, Pat Riddle Rational Lazy A*: Erez Karpas, David Tolpin, Tal Beja, Solomon Eyal Shimony, Ariel Felner SPM&S: ´ Alvaro Torralba, Vidal Alc´ azar, Carlos Linares L´

  • pez, Daniel

Borrajo, Peter Kissmann, Stefan Edelkamp SymBA*-1 and SymBA*-2: ´ Alvaro Torralba, Vidal Alc´ azar, Daniel Borrajo, Peter Kissmann, Stefan Edelkamp

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 17 / 1

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Sequential Satisficing Multi-core

ArvandHerd: Richard Valenzano, Hootan Nakhost, Martin M¨ uller, Jonathan Schaeffer, Nathan R. Sturtevant DAE-YAHSP: Johann Dreo, Pierre Sav´ eant, Marc Schoenauer, Vincent Vidal IBaCoP and IBaCoP2: Isabel Cenamor, Tom´ as de la Rosa, Fernando Fern´ andez MIPlan: Sergio N´ u˜ nez, Daniel Borrajo, Carlos Linares L´

  • pez

NuCeLaR: Sergio N´ u˜ nez, Isabel Cenamor, Jes´ us Virseda Planets: Jonathan Teutenberg USE: Reza Sadraei, Atefeh Ahmadi YAHSP3-MT: Vincent Vidal

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 18 / 1

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Agile track (I)

ArvandHerd: Richard Valenzano, Hootan Nakhost, Martin M¨ uller, Jonathan Schaeffer, Nathan R. Sturtevant BFS(f): Nir Lipovetzky, Miquel Ramirez, Christian Muise, Hector Geffner Fast Downward Cedalion: Jendrik Seipp, Silvan Sievers, Frank Hutter Freelunch: Tom´ aˇ s Balyo IBaCoP and IBaCoP2: Isabel Cenamor, Tom´ as de la Rosa, Fernando Fern´ andez

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 19 / 1

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Agile track (II)

Jasper: Fan Xie, Martin M¨ uller, Robert Holte Madagascar and Madagascar-pC: Jussi Rintanen Mercury: Michael Katz, J¨

  • rg Hoffmann

PROBE and SIW: Nir Lipovetzky, Miquel Ramirez, Christian Muise, Hector Geffner USE: Reza Sadraei, Atefeh Ahmadi YAHSP3 and YAHSP3-MT: Vincent Vidal

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 20 / 1

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Temporal Satisficing

DAE-YAHSP: Johann Dreo, Pierre Sav´ eant, Marc Schoenauer, Vincent Vidal ITSAT: Masood Feyzbakhsh Rankooh, Gholamreza Ghassem-Sani tBURTON: David Wang, Brian Williams Temporal Fast Downward: Patrick Eyerich, Thomas Keller, Johannes Aldinger, Christian Dornhege YAHSP3 and YAHSP3-MT: Vincent Vidal

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 21 / 1

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Outline

Before we start... Setting Planners Results Conclusion

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 22 / 1

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Overview

New and old domains for previous IPCs

◮ Sequential and Agile tracks: seven new domains. 14 domains ◮ Temporal track: two new domains. 10 domains

No baseline planner has been used Hard testing problems 23 domains in total!

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 23 / 1

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Domains

Barman Sequential Parking Sequential, Temporal Cave Diving Sequential RTAM Temporal Childsnack Sequential Satellite Temporal Citycar Sequential Storage Temporal Driverlog Temporal Tetris Sequential Floortile Sequential, Temporal Thoughtful Sequential GED Sequential Tidybot Sequential Hiking Sequential Tms Temporal Maintenance Sequential Transport Sequential Mapanalyser Temporal TurnandOpen Temporal Matchcellar Temporal Visitall Sequential Openstacks Sequential

(Reused domains in blue and new ones in red)

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 24 / 1

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Sequential Optimal track: Results

17 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 25 / 1

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Sequential Optimal track: Results

17 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE SymBA*-1 143/280 1st cGamer 120/280 2nd SPM&S 114/280 3rd RIDA 113/280 4th Dynamic-Gamer 99/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 25 / 1

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Sequential Optimal track: Results

17 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE SymBA*-1 143/280 1st cGamer 120/280 2nd SPM&S 114/280 3rd RIDA 113/280 4th Dynamic-Gamer 99/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 26 / 1

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Sequential Optimal track: Results

17 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE SymBA*-1 143/280 1st cGamer 120/280 2nd SPM&S 114/280 3rd RIDA 113/280 4th Dynamic-Gamer 99/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 27 / 1

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Sequential Optimal track: Results

17 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE SymBA*-1 143/280 1st cGamer 120/280 2nd SPM&S 114/280 3rd RIDA 113/280 4th Dynamic-Gamer 99/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 28 / 1

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Sequential Optimal track: Results

17 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE SymBA*-2 151/280 1st SymBA*-1 143/280 1st cGamer 120/280 2nd SPM&S 114/280 3rd RIDA 113/280 4th Dynamic-Gamer 99/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 29 / 1

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Sequential Optimal track: Awards

Winner

SymBA*-2: ´ Alvaro Torralba, Vidal Alc´ azar, Daniel Borrajo, Peter Kissmann, Stefan Edelkamp

Runner-up

cGamer: ´ Alvaro Torralba, Vidal Alc´ azar, Peter Kissmann, Stefan Edelkamp

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 30 / 1

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Sequential Multi-core track: Results

9 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 31 / 1

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Sequential Multi-core track: Results

9 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE ArvandHerd 153.30/280 1st IBaCoP 121.92/280 2nd SPM&S 108.55/280 3rd RIDA 113/280 4th NuCeLaR 83.40/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 31 / 1

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Sequential Multi-core track: Results

9 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE ArvandHerd 153.30/280 1st IBaCoP 121.92/280 2nd SPM&S 108.55/280 3rd IBaCoP2 90.29/280 4th NuCeLaR 83.40/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 32 / 1

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Sequential Multi-core track: Results

9 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE ArvandHerd 153.30/280 1st IBaCoP 121.92/280 2nd USE 108.55/280 3rd IBaCoP2 90.29/280 4th NuCeLaR 83.40/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 33 / 1

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Sequential Multi-core track: Results

9 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE ArvandHerd 153.30/280 1st IBaCoP 121.92/280 2nd USE 108.55/280 3rd IBaCoP2 90.29/280 4th NuCeLaR 83.40/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 34 / 1

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Sequential Multi-core track: Results

9 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE ArvandHerd 153.30/280 1st IBaCoP 121.92/280 2nd USE 108.55/280 3rd IBaCoP2 90.29/280 4th NuCeLaR 83.40/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 35 / 1

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Sequential Multi-core track: Awards

Winner

ArvandHerd: Richard Valenzano, Hootan Nakhost, Martin M¨ uller, Jonathan Schaeffer, Nathan R. Sturtevant

Runner-up

IBaCoP: Isabel Cenamor, Tom´ as de la Rosa, Fernando Fern´ andez

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 36 / 1

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Agile track: Results

15 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 37 / 1

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Agile track: Results

15 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE YAHSP3 81.62/280 1st Madagascar-pC 69.96/280 2nd Madagascar 67.63/280 3rd PROBE 66.70/280 4th BFS(f ) 62.87/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 37 / 1

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Agile track: Results

15 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE YAHSP3 81.62/280 1st Madagascar-pC 69.96/280 2nd Madagascar 67.63/280 3rd PROBE 66.70/280 4th BFS(f ) 62.87/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 38 / 1

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Agile track: Results

15 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE YAHSP3 81.62/280 1st Madagascar-pC 69.96/280 2nd Madagascar 67.63/280 3rd PROBE 66.70/280 4th BFS(f ) 62.87/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 39 / 1

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Agile track: Results

15 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE YAHSP3 81.62/280 1st Madagascar-pC 69.96/280 2nd Madagascar 67.63/280 3rd PROBE 66.70/280 4th BFS(f ) 62.87/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 40 / 1

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Agile track: Results

15 planners submitted. Showing the top FIVE YAHSP3 81.62/280 1st Madagascar-pC 69.96/280 2nd Madagascar 67.63/280 3rd PROBE 66.70/280 4th BFS(f ) 62.87/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 41 / 1

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Agile track: Awards

Winner

YAHSP3: Vincent Vidal

Runner-up

Madagascar-pC: Jussi Rintanen

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 42 / 1

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Sequential Satisficing track: Results

20 planners. Showing the top FIVE

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 43 / 1

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Sequential Satisficing track: Results

20 planners. Showing the top FIVE IBaCoP2 162.73/280 1st Mercury 153.04/280 2nd MIPlan 150.00/280 3rd Jasper 144.89/280 4th FD-Uniform 143.25/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 43 / 1

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Sequential Satisficing track: Results

20 planners. Showing the top FIVE IBaCoP2 162.73/280 1st Mercury 153.04/280 2nd MIPlan 150.00/280 3rd Jasper 144.89/280 4th FD-Uniform 143.25/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 44 / 1

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Sequential Satisficing track: Results

20 planners. Showing the top FIVE IBaCoP2 162.73/280 1st Mercury 153.04/280 2nd MIPlan 150.00/280 3rd Jasper 144.89/280 4th FD-Uniform 143.25/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 45 / 1

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Sequential Satisficing track: Results

20 planners. Showing the top FIVE IBaCoP2 162.73/280 1st Mercury 153.04/280 2nd MIPlan 150.00/280 3rd Jasper 144.89/280 4th FD-Uniform 143.25/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 46 / 1

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Sequential Satisficing track: Results

20 planners. Showing the top FIVE IBaCoP2 166.21/280 1st IBaCoP 162.73/280 1st Mercury 153.04/280 2nd MIPlan 150.00/280 3rd Jasper 144.89/280 4th FD-Uniform 143.25/280 5th

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 47 / 1

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Sequential Satisficing track: Awards

Winner

IBaCoP2: Isabel Cenamor, Tom´ as de la Rosa, Fernando Fern´ andez

Runner-up

Mercury: Michael Katz, J¨

  • rg Hoffmann

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 48 / 1

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Temporal Satisficing track: Results

6 submitted planners. Showing the top THREE

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 49 / 1

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Temporal Satisficing track: Results

6 submitted planners. Showing the top THREE YAHSP3-MT 86.5/200 1st Temporal-FD 79.2/200 2nd YAHSP3 66.6/200 3rd

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 49 / 1

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Temporal Satisficing track: Results

6 submitted planners. Showing the top THREE YAHSP3-MT 86.5/200 1st Temporal-FD 79.2/200 2nd YAHSP3 66.6/200 3rd

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 50 / 1

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Temporal Satisficing track: Results

6 submitted planners. Showing the top THREE YAHSP3-MT 86.5/200 1st Temporal-FD 79.2/200 2nd YAHSP3 66.6/200 3rd

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 51 / 1

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Temporal Satisficing track: Awards

Winner

YAHSP3-MT: Vincent Vidal

Runner-up

Temporal Fast Downward: Patrick Eyerich, Thomas Keller, Johannes Aldinger, Christian Dornhege

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 52 / 1

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Innovative Planner Award

Two main criteria: Planner exploits techniques that are “new” for deterministic AI Planning. Planner performed reasonably well in the competition.

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 53 / 1

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Innovative Planner Awards

RPT: Vidal Alc´ azar, Susana Fern´ andez, Daniel Borrajo, Manuela Veloso Mercury: Michael Katz, J¨

  • rg Hoffmann

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 54 / 1

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Outline

Before we start... Setting Planners Results Conclusion

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 55 / 1

slide-61
SLIDE 61

How far have we got?

How planners from past IPCs would have performed in IPC-8?

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 56 / 1

slide-62
SLIDE 62

How far have we got?

How planners from past IPCs would have performed in IPC-8? In Sequential Satisficing track, LAMA-11 (winner of Sequential Satisficing track of IPC-7) would have been 12th out of 21. In Agile track, LPG and FF would have been, respectively, 13th and 17th out of 17.

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 56 / 1

slide-63
SLIDE 63

The take-home messsage

A large number of high-performance planners is available, mainly because of the availability of well documented and supported platforms (FD, FF, ..)

◮ 29 planners out of 67 built on top of FD.

Portfolio-based systems are now a concrete reality.

◮ 29 portfolios in IPC-8; 3 awarded.

On the other hand...

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 57 / 1

slide-64
SLIDE 64

The take-home messsage

A large number of high-performance planners is available, mainly because of the availability of well documented and supported platforms (FD, FF, ..)

◮ 29 planners out of 67 built on top of FD.

Portfolio-based systems are now a concrete reality.

◮ 29 portfolios in IPC-8; 3 awarded.

On the other hand... We observed a worrying small number of planners able to deal with preferences and temporal models.

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 57 / 1

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Our two cents for the next IPC

Organising the IPC is an enriching experience. (Sometimes we also had time to sleep). Increase testing instances complexity:

◮ Extend the set of required core features ◮ Use real-world problems

Allow participants to test and compile their systems on the competition premises. Relate to other competitions (ICKEPS?) Do not allow another three years gap!

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 58 / 1

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Thank you!

Congratulations to the winners!

IPC-8 Deterministic (2014) University of Huddersfield 59 / 1