EEOC Charge Conciliation: Navigating On-Site Investigations, EEOC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

eeoc charge conciliation navigating on site
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EEOC Charge Conciliation: Navigating On-Site Investigations, EEOC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A EEOC Charge Conciliation: Navigating On-Site Investigations, EEOC Conferences, Settlement Negotiations WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2015 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's

  • speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you

have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

EEOC Charge Conciliation: Navigating On-Site Investigations, EEOC Conferences, Settlement Negotiations

Today’s faculty features:

1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2015

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Judith (Jude) Biggs, Partner, Holland & Hart, Boulder, Colo. Jill Vorobiev, Partner, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, Chicago

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tips for Optimal Quality

Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality

  • f your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet

connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-370-2805 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Continuing Education Credits

In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar. A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email that you will receive immediately following the program. For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926

  • ext. 35.

FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY

slide-4
SLIDE 4

EEOC Charge Conciliation: Navigating On-Site Investigations, EEOC Conferences, Settlement Negotiations

a Webinar by Strafford Publications, Inc. Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Jill Vorobiev Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton jvorobiev@sheppardmullin.com 312-499-6309 Jude Biggs Holland & Hart LLP jbiggs@hollandhart.com 303-473-2707

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Learn to

  • provide right amount of information in

position statement

  • handle supplemental requests and on-site

investigations

  • decide when to mediate
  • preserve employer’s rights during a

conciliation conference

  • settle a charge before “probable cause”

finding is made

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Preview

  • EEOC Background Facts
  • Charge Trends
  • Charge Categories/EEOC Priorities
  • First Steps in the Process
  • The Investigation
  • To Mediate or Not
  • Position Statements
  • Supplemental Requests
  • On-site Investigations by the EEOC
  • Conciliation
  • Tips

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

EEOC Background Facts

  • EEOC
  • Created 1964
  • “Independent” federal agency
  • To rid workplace of discrimination
  • Very broad powers and discretion
  • Develops guidance and regulations
  • Investigates claims
  • May prosecute certain claims
  • Enforcement varies under each administration
  • Very aggressive in recent years

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

EEOC Background Facts

  • EEOC enforces:
  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
  • Pregnancy Discrimination Act
  • Age Discrimination in Employment Act
  • Rehabilitation Act
  • Americans with Disabilities Act
  • Equal Pay Act
  • Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act
  • But NOT Fair Labor Standards Act, Family and Medical

Leave Act, ERISA, health and safety laws, breach of contract, tort claims

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

EEOC Charge Trends

1997 2013 Total Charges 80,680 93,727 Race 36.2% 35.3% Sex 30.7% 29.5% National Origin 8.3% 11.4% Religion 2.1% 4.0% Color 0.9% 3.4% Retaliation 22.6% 41.1% Age 19.6% 22.8% Disability 22.4% 27.7% Equal Pay 1.4% 1.1%

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

EEOC Categories of Charges – 3 Types

“A” Charges

  • High priority (serious allegations, systemic or

pattern/practice allegations, hot button issues- e.g., background checks, pregnancy discrimination, LGBT discrimination)

  • Generally no mediation (but can still ask)
  • Indicates EEOC may initiate lawsuit
  • Outside factors may influence designation
  • Employer is judged based on allegations

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

EEOC Categories of Charges – 3 Types

“B” Charges (most)

  • May have some merit, but need investigation
  • Mediation is offered

“C” Charges (occasional)

  • Immediately dismissed, as untimely, issue not in

EEOC scope, or obviously no merit

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

First Steps in the Process

  • May be co-filed with state anti-discrimination

agency if work-share agreement in place

  • Statute of limitations – often 300 days; in some

states, 365 days

  • EEOC assists individual to fill out charge
  • Often very general allegations but should state

what event(s) or treatment constitutes the discrimination or retaliation

  • Discrete Events Cut Off
  • Continuing Violation Theory (harassment cases)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

First Steps in the Process

  • “No action required” notice
  • Initial Review

– Compare the last date of discrimination and date stamped on charge – Calculate statute of limitations immediately

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

First Steps in the Process

  • Letter of representation to EEOC
  • Litigation hold letter
  • Limit discussion of charge, protect confidentiality

and privilege

  • Separate employees if necessary
  • Determine if employee is represented
  • Consider ways to mitigate damages

– Offer reinstatement? – No adverse action/discipline without consultation

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

First Steps in the Process

  • Litigation hold letter

– understand where info is stored – local or centrally – who had anything to do with challenged decision – what kinds of data (sales funnel, financial data, complaints about employee, investigation file, etc.) – all emails to, from or naming plaintiff – update at least every 6 months

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

First Steps in Process

  • Documents to request (and preserve, electronic

and hard copies)

– Personnel file – Supervisor/site file – Emails to/from/about complainant – Medical/disability/FMLA/work comp files – Investigation file – Grievances – Position descriptions – Ads/postings – Payroll/time records

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

First Steps in Process

  • Other documents to request (and preserve,

electronic and hard copies)

– Policies/union agreements – Info on comparators – Records related to complainant (if a sales person, get sales record, sales funnel) – Other

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Investigation

  • Helps with decision whether to mediate
  • Steps:

– Document gathering and review – Witness interviews, statements – Adapt strategy as you go

  • You must uncover good and bad facts
  • Talk to witnesses directly, if possible
  • Evaluate risk
  • Look for the story/theme

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

To Mediate or Not

Pro

  • Free
  • More time to prepare

position statement

  • Opportunity for charging

party to be heard

  • Early discovery – may learn

you have a real issue

  • Save working relationship?
  • Save $ in long run
  • Confidential (somewhat)

Con

  • Takes time
  • Mediators – no ability to

select

  • Snowball effect with other

employees?

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Position Statements

  • “Silver bullet” at beginning and end
  • Be accurate and use correct policies

– Correct name of company – Accurate organizational chart – Policies in effect at time – Address each allegation – Identify untimely allegations – Tell story in a positive but not argumentative way – Deal with (narrow) comparators – Be brief and to the point – Incomplete or inaccurate information may trigger further inquiry

  • Inconsistencies later will be held against you
  • Cover defenses you expect to raise later
  • EEOC often gives information in position statement to charging party to

rebut

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Supplemental Requests for Information/Subpoenas

  • RFIs

– Short response time – Negotiate scope – Objections – Avoid unnecessary roadblocks

  • Subpoenas

– Can be issued at any time – Petition to revoke – Court review

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

EEOC On-Site Investigation

  • EEOC has right, more common than in the past
  • Don’t assume it means agency will find cause
  • Provide comfortable area
  • Prepare witnesses, similar to a deposition (no

volunteering) but keep tone friendly/helpful

  • Can ask about events, people not mentioned in charge
  • Attorney should be at interviews with

managers/supervisors but not with non-supervisors (but interview and tell them tell truth)

  • At end, try to get feel for any concerns of investigator

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

After the Investigation

  • EEOC issues its determination
  • Most often – “unable to conclude information

established violation” = no probable cause

  • Issues 90-day right to sue letter
  • Calendar 93 (or 90) days for deadline

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Conciliation

  • If EEOC finds “probable cause” you can

– Talk to EEOC lawyers – Request reconsideration/substantial weight review – But, neither reverses decision – they are already “anchored”

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Conciliation

  • Conciliation – required by statute

– Investigator usually handles; acts as advocate for charging party – Like mediation but both charging party and “investigator” will likely have greater demands – Some investigators imply EEOC will take case and prosecute (and often not true) – Settlement will cost more than before – Likely to go to court

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Conciliation

  • Evaluating EEOC settlement offer

– Occasionally, can correct key fact – How are damages calculated? – Has charging party mitigated damages? – Strong continuing violation theory? – EEOC likely to take case? – Probable cause finding likely to be admitted at trial? – Risks and costs of trial?

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Conciliation

  • May include non-monetary relief

– Training (and report when done) – Monitoring and reporting – Posting – Reinstatement (or pay more) – Adopt policies – Consent decree

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Conciliation

  • Employer may get important concessions

– Resignation – NDA/non-solicit/non-compete – Promise not to re-apply (easier to get at pre- investigation mediation stage; EEOC views as retaliation) – Timing of payments – Tax considerations

  • Two settlement agreements, if reach agreement

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Conciliation

  • May 2014, House Appropriations Committee expressed

concern about EEOC lack of good faith conciliation efforts

  • Based on Title VII – if violation found, EEOC

“shall endeavor to eliminate any . . . alleged unlawful employment practice by informal methods of conference, conciliation, and persuasion.” and cannot file suit unless it was “unable to secure from the respondent a conciliation agreement acceptable to the commission.”

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Conciliation

  • Recent cases challenge EEOC’s “good faith”

efforts

– Mach Mining Co. – U.S. Supreme Court

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Conciliation

  • Mach Mining, LLC v. EEOC, No. 13-1019 (S. Ct.

4/29/15).

– 7th Circuit – held conciliation not subject to judicial review/not an affirmative defense – 2nd, 5th and 11th Circuits – deep 3-part inquiry – 4th, 6th and 10th Circuits – only required “genuine effort” – S. Ct. - courts can review whether EEOC has satisfied its pre-suit obligation to attempt conciliation, but it is

  • nly a “relatively barebones review.”

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Conciliation

  • After Mach Mining, EEOC must

– tell employer about claim – what practice has harmed which person or class; and – provide employer with opportunity to discuss to achieve voluntary compliance

  • EEOC can meet with affidavit
  • Employer can challenge with affidavit
  • Court can review whether EEOC provided

information

  • If not, remedy is order sending back to EEOC for

appropriate conciliation

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Conciliation

  • Why was Mach Mining important?

– Split in circuits – Conciliation process is one of few ways employers can see into EEOC decision making – Conciliation can force EEOC to identify who members of proposed class are, how damages calculated

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conciliation

  • Preserve defense, although now weakened

– Ask EEOC to explain alleged wrongdoing and how to address, define class, no. and identities of members – Don’t be the one that walks out! – Document conciliation and both parties’ positions – Might help persuade higher up decision maker (but much of info very likely not to be admissible)

  • During conciliation, be prepared to negotiate; let

charging party vent but eventually move it to negotiation

  • Remain civil at all times

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Conciliation

  • If conciliation fails, EEOC often issues 90-day

right-to-sue

  • Or EEOC sues
  • Still have opportunity to mediate and resolve
  • Or may decide plaintiff needs time to become

realistic so prepare for discovery and possible motion for summary judgment

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Tips for Avoiding Trouble

1. Early and supplemental preservation holds 2. From day 1, keep eye on trial – work on “silver bullet” 3. Thorough investigation of facts – no matter what 4. Accurate position statements 5. Don’t be afraid to mediate 6. No cover up/hiding evidence 7. Don’t under or over estimate the power of EEOC (court case may be a more even playing field) 8. No retaliation 9. Limit damages – early mediation, offer of re-employment, etc.

  • 10. Be cooperative

36