edge colored graphs as higher dimensional maps
play

Edgecolored graphs as higher-dimensional maps Valentin Bonzom LIPN, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Edgecolored graphs as higher-dimensional maps Valentin Bonzom LIPN, Paris University 13 October 17, 2016 RGP2016 Discretization of manifolds 2D discrete surfaces: triangulations, p angulations and combinatorial maps 3D


  1. Edge–colored graphs as higher-dimensional maps Valentin Bonzom LIPN, Paris University 13 October 17, 2016 RGP2016

  2. Discretization of manifolds ◮ 2D discrete surfaces: triangulations, p –angulations and combinatorial maps ◮ 3D triangulations: gluings of tetrahedra

  3. Discretization of manifolds ◮ 2D discrete surfaces: triangulations, p –angulations and combinatorial maps ◮ 3D triangulations: gluings of tetrahedra ◮ How to represent them in a suitable fashion for combinatorics? ◮ Equivalent of p –angulations? ◮ Enumeration? ◮ Topological recursion, integrable hierarchies?

  4. Combinatorial maps Graph with cyclic ordering of edges incident to each vertex � =

  5. Combinatorial maps Graph with cyclic ordering of edges incident to each vertex � = Cyclic ordering defines faces: follow the corners

  6. 2 p –angulation ◮ Faces of degree 2 p ◮ Duality: vertices of degree 2 p ◮ Euler’s relation with E ( M ) = pV ( M ) F ( M ) − E ( M ) + V ( M ) = F ( M ) − ( p − 1) V ( M ) = 2 − 2 g ( M ) Two properties of the genus to generalize ◮ g ( M ) ≥ 0 ⇒ bound on F ( M ) linear in V ( M ) ◮ Maximizing F ( M ) at fixed V ( M ) equivalent to g ( M ) = 0 Main challenge: generalize that!

  7. 2 p –angulation ◮ Faces of degree 2 p ◮ Duality: vertices of degree 2 p ◮ Euler’s relation with E ( M ) = pV ( M ) F ( M ) − E ( M ) + V ( M ) = F ( M ) − ( p − 1) V ( M ) = 2 − 2 g ( M ) Two properties of the genus to generalize ◮ g ( M ) ≥ 0 ⇒ bound on F ( M ) linear in V ( M ) ◮ Maximizing F ( M ) at fixed V ( M ) equivalent to g ( M ) = 0 Main challenge: generalize that!

  8. 2 p –angulation ◮ Faces of degree 2 p ◮ Duality: vertices of degree 2 p ◮ Euler’s relation with E ( M ) = pV ( M ) F ( M ) − E ( M ) + V ( M ) = F ( M ) − ( p − 1) V ( M ) = 2 − 2 g ( M ) Two properties of the genus to generalize ◮ g ( M ) ≥ 0 ⇒ bound on F ( M ) linear in V ( M ) ◮ Maximizing F ( M ) at fixed V ( M ) equivalent to g ( M ) = 0 Main challenge: generalize that!

  9. What do we know? Maps: from Tutte to today Enumeration ◮ Count maps with possible decorations (Ising, Potts, loops) ◮ Exact generating functions or their properties ◮ Random matrix model techniques ◮ Bijections [Cori-Vauquelin-Schaeffer, Bouttier-Di Francesco-Guitter] ◮ Tutte’s equations and topological recursion [Borot, Eynard, Orantin] Physics motivations and applications ◮ Two-dimensional quantum gravity coupled to matter ◮ Liouville theory coupled to conformal field theories ◮ Statistical mechanics ◮ Celebrated KPZ relations

  10. What do we know? II Geometric applications of bijections ◮ Two-point, three-point functions ◮ Local limit ◮ Continuum limit [Brownian sphere] Enumerative geometry ◮ Intersection numbers [Kontsevich-Witten] ◮ Hurwitz numbers ◮ Integrable hierarchies, etc.

  11. In higher dimensions First approach based on generalizing random matrices � dM e − N (tr M 2 + t tr M 4 ) = � N 2 − 2 g ( Q ) t n ( Q ) ln H N × N quadrangulations Q ◮ From matrices to tensors Local rules T cde M a 1 a 2 − → T a 1 a 2 ... a d T abc [Ambjorn-Durhuus-Jonsson, Gross, Sasakura] all in 91 T abc T ebf ◮ Tensor integrals generate T def stranded graphs T fda

  12. Problems with tensors and stranded graphs 3 origins of difficulty ◮ Random tensor techniques: non-existent Contrast with random matrices: eigenvalues and orthogonal polynomials e.g. ◮ So look at the stranded graphs directly?

  13. Problems with tensors and stranded graphs 3 origins of difficulty ◮ Random tensor techniques: non-existent Contrast with random matrices: eigenvalues and orthogonal polynomials e.g. ◮ So look at the stranded graphs directly? ◮ Topology: One can associate topology to graph, very singular! ◮ Combinatorics ◮ Closed strands represent simplices of codimension 2 ex: vertices in 2D, edges in 3D, triangles in 4D, etc. ◮ One needs to count/classify graphs w.r.t. number of closed strands Nearly impossible! ◮ As a result, essential missing piece is generalization of genus! No analytical progress for 20 years!

  14. Objectives Objectives: Family of triangulations s.t. ◮ No topological restriction ◮ Extension of genus: degree ω ( T ) of T ∆ d − 2 ( T ) − α ∆ d ( T ) = d − ω ( T ) , ω ( T ) ≥ 0 ◮ Infinite number of triangulations at fixed ω ◮ Balance on α Possible with colored triangulations!

  15. How to represent triangulations? Triangulations ◮ Gluing of simplices (tetrahedra, pentachora, etc.) ◮ Defined by attaching maps ◮ Ensemble of triangulations defined by constraints on attaching maps Various ensembles ◮ Various ensembles in topology (simplicial, CW, ∆–complexes, etc.) ◮ Not suitable for combinatorics (too wild) ◮ Digging through old work, found colored triangulations Crystallization, graph–encoded manifold: Cristofori’s talk! ◮ Nice for combinatorics: represented by edge–colored graphs

  16. Colored graphs 1 1 ( d + 1)-colored graphs 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 ◮ Bipartite graphs 3 black and white vertices 1 1 1 1 ◮ Edges colored with d + 1 2 2 possible colors 1 1 ◮ Vertices of degree d + 1 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 ◮ All colors incident exactly 3 3 1 1 1 1 once at each vertex 3 2 2

  17. Colored graphs 1 ( d + 1)-colored graphs ◮ Bipartite graphs black and white vertices 3 2 2 ◮ Edges colored with d + 1 possible colors 3 ◮ Vertices of degree d + 1 1 1 3 ◮ All colors incident exactly once at each vertex 2 Faces are closed cycles with only two colors.

  18. Colored graphs 1 ( d + 1)-colored graphs ◮ Bipartite graphs black and white vertices 3 2 2 ◮ Edges colored with d + 1 possible colors 3 ◮ Vertices of degree d + 1 1 1 3 ◮ All colors incident exactly once at each vertex 2 Faces are closed cycles with only two colors.

  19. Colored graphs 1 ( d + 1)-colored graphs ◮ Bipartite graphs black and white vertices 3 2 2 ◮ Edges colored with d + 1 possible colors 3 ◮ Vertices of degree d + 1 1 1 3 ◮ All colors incident exactly once at each vertex 2 Faces are closed cycles with only two colors.

  20. Triangulations from colored graphs  vertex d –simplex →     edge ( d − 1)–simplex  →  duality face ( d − 2)–simplex →      k -bubble ( d − k )–simplex  → ◮ Boundary triangles labeled by a color c = 0 , . . . , d 3 0 2 1 Colors identify all sub-simplices

  21. Triangulations from colored graphs  vertex d –simplex →     edge ( d − 1)–simplex  →  duality face ( d − 2)–simplex →      k -bubble ( d − k )–simplex  → ◮ Boundary triangles labeled 23 by a color c = 0 , . . . , d 03 3 ◮ Induced colorings 0 2 ◮ Edges labeled by pair of 13 colors 1 02 01 12 Colors identify all sub-simplices

  22. Triangulations from colored graphs  vertex d –simplex →      edge ( d − 1)–simplex →  duality face ( d − 2)–simplex →      k -bubble ( d − k )–simplex  → 023 ◮ Boundary triangles labeled 23 by a color c = 0 , . . . , d 03 3 ◮ Induced colorings 0 2 ◮ Edges labeled by pair of 13 013 123 colors 1 02 ◮ Nodes labeled by three colors 01 12 012 Colors identify all sub-simplices

  23. Colored attaching maps Gluing respecting all induced colorings 023 023 03 03 02 02 3 3 0 2 2 013 013 1 1 01 01 012 012 Theory of crystallization and GEMs (graph–encoded manifolds): ( d + 1)-colored graphs are dual to triangulations of pseudo-manifolds of dimension d [Pezzana, Ferri, Gagliardi, Cristofori, Casali, Lins].

  24. The 2D case 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

  25. The 2D case 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

  26. The 2D case 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

  27. The 2D case 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 p –angle ◮ Gluing of 2 p triangles with boundary of color 0 ◮ Dually: Components with all colors but 0

  28. The 3D case 0 0 3 0 2 1 0 2 3 1 1 3 0 2 0 2 1 3 0 0

  29. The 3D case 0 0 3 0 2 1 0 2 3 1 1 3 0 2 0 2 1 3 0 0

  30. The 3D case 0 0 3 0 2 1 0 2 3 1 1 3 0 2 0 2 1 3 0 0

  31. The 3D case 0 0 3 0 2 1 0 2 3 1 1 3 0 2 0 2 1 3 0 0

  32. The 3D case 3 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 3

  33. Bubbles as building blocks ◮ Colored graph with colors 0 , 1 , . . . , d (triangulation in dim d ) ◮ Bubble: connected piece with colors 1 , . . . , d Obtained by removing the color 0 ◮ All graphs obtained by gluing bubbles along edges of color 0 ◮ G ( B ) set of ( d + 1)-colored graphs where all bubbles are B 1 1 3 3 4 4 2 2 2 4 3 1

  34. Bubbles II ◮ 2D: only bubbles with 2 p vertices Cycles of colors (1 , 2) 1 2

  35. Bubbles II 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 ◮ 2D: only bubbles with 2 p vertices 2 2 Cycles of colors (1 , 2) 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 ◮ Many more in higher dimensions 4 4 3 1 1 1 ◮ Vast world to explore 3 3 4 3 4 2 2 3 4 1 1 2

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend