ed facts data submissions changes for sy 2017 18
play

ED Facts Data Submissions: Changes for SY 2017-18 Migrant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ED Facts Data Submissions: Changes for SY 2017-18 Migrant Education Program (MEP) Webinar December 13, 2018 3:00 pm 4:30 pm ET OME Missio n T o pro vide e xc e lle nt le a de rship, te c hnic al a ssista nc e , a nd fina nc ia l


  1. ED Facts Data Submissions: Changes for SY 2017-18 Migrant Education Program (MEP) Webinar December 13, 2018 3:00 pm – 4:30 pm ET OME Missio n T o pro vide e xc e lle nt le a de rship, te c hnic al a ssista nc e , a nd fina nc ia l suppo rt to impro ve the e duc a tio na l o ppo rtunitie s a nd a c a de mic suc c e ss o f mig ra nt c hildre n, yo uth, a g ric ultura l wo rke rs, fishe rs, a nd the ir fa milie s.

  2. Legal References for ED Facts Collection Title VIII. General Provisions : Part C, Section 8303, Consolidated Reporting (ESEA, as amended through P.L. 114-95). Code of Federal Regulations : 34 CFR 76.720 Applies to a State’s reports required under 2 CFR 200.328 (Monitoring and Reporting of Program Performance) and 2 CFR 200.327 (Financial Reporting). Guidance: MEP Guidance, March, 2017, Chapter IX. Program Performance and Child Count Reporting, pages 96-105. 2

  3. Purpose of ED Facts Webinar OME seeks to:  Improve resources to assist State Migrant Education Programs (MEPs) in fulfilling data reporting requirements, and  Improve “first-submission” accuracy by providing examples and data quality tools to State MEPs. 3

  4. ED Facts Webinar Objectives Participants will: 1) Review School Year (SY) 2016-17 Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) data quality results, 2) Review the SY 2016-17 CSPR top data quality issues, 3) Review changes to the MEP Reporting Process and ED Facts files specifications for SY 2017-18. …So that MEP directors may accurately submit SY 2017- 18 ED Facts files. 4

  5. Webinar Objective 1: SY 2016-17 CSPR Data Quality Results 5

  6. CSPR Comparison Data SY 2011-12 through SY 2016-17 Total Number of Data Quality Errors 300 245 250 200 174 140 150 104 107 100 68 50 0 SY 2011-12SY 2012-13SY 2013-14SY 2014-15SY 2015-16SY 2016-17 6

  7. SY 2016-17 CSPR Results: No Significant Data Quality Issues  Alaska  Arizona  California  Colorado 100% Within Data  Georgia Check Sheet  Idaho Parameters  Indiana  Iowa  Michigan  New Hampshire  New York  Ohio  Oregon Bold and Italicized =  Pennsylvania Minimum Three Consecutive Years  South Dakota  Vermont  Washington 7

  8. Webinar Objective 2: SY 2016-17 CSPR Top Data Quality Issues 8

  9. SY 2016-17 CSPR Results Number of Part 2.3 Data Quality Issues 60 2.3.1 Child Counts and Narratives 2.3.2 Eligible Migrant Children 39 40 2.3.3 RY Services 33 2.3.4 S/I Services 20 2.3.5 Performance Period Services 13 2.3.6 School Data RY 6 6 5 5 2.3.7 MEP Project Data 0 9

  10. SY 2016-17 CSPR General Information and Top Data Quality Issues  2.3.1. Child Counts and Narratives  2.3.5. Performance Period Services 10

  11. 2.3.1 Child Counts Data Quality Issue #1 11

  12. 2.3.1 Child Counts  Address ALL the requirements for Methods Used to Count Children (2.3.1.3.3). Specifically, address how the State MEP counts two-year-olds who turn three years of age; how high school graduates will NOT be included in the subsequent year’s counts .  Address the requirements for Quality Control Processes (2.3.1.3.4). OME has clarified re-interviewing questions.  Counts of eligible children in grades three through eight and high school who were assessed normally should be a subset of counts of eligible children in these grades. 12

  13. 2.3.5 Performance Period Services Data Quality Issue #2 13

  14. 2.3.5 Performance Period Services igible population)  Nested Data (compared to el  Increases/decreases of >25% 14

  15. Webinar Objective 3: SY 2017-18 Changes to ED Facts File Specifications 15

  16. SY 2017-18 MEP CSPR Changes  NO CSPR Submission  2.3.1.2. Explanations for Category 1 Child Count Increases/Decreases  2.3.2.1. Explanations for Category 2 Child Count Increases/Decreases  2.4.3.1. Methods Used to Count Children  2.4.3.2. Quality Control Processes  2.4.5.2. HSED Counts  Student Information System, Type of MEP Project 16

  17. MEP ED Facts File Specification Changes Where are the changes in file specifications?  Multiple File Specifications  C121  C192 17

  18. MEP ED Facts File Specification Changes: Multiple Files  Updated “Migrant” to “Migratory” when referencing children (C054, C121, C122, C145, C165) 18

  19. MEP ED Facts File Specification Changes: File C121, MEP Students Eligible  “Limited English Proficient” is now “English Learner.”  Category Sets F (QAD-RY) & G (Referrals) are optional. 19

  20. MEP ED Facts File Specification Changes: File C192, MEP Students Priority for Service  The collection of PFS served in Regular SY and Summer/Intersession is optional. 20

  21. How to Explain Increases and Provide Comments: Option 1  Option 1: Provide explanations for Category 1 and Category 2 counts “Over 10%/Under 10%” and all other counts “Over 25%/Under 25%” in Column K on your State’s MEP Data Check Sheet, and attach your completed Data Check Sheet in an email to Edward.Monaghan@ed.gov by February 13, 2019. 21

  22. How to Explain Increases and Provide Comments: Option 2  Option 2: Provide explanations for Category 1 and Category 2 counts “Over 10%/Under 10%” and all other counts “Over 25%/Under 25%” in a Word file, and attach your document in an email to Edward.Monaghan@ed.gov by February 13, 2019. 22

  23. ED Facts Data Submission Due Dates  ED Facts Migrant file submissions are due by Wednesday, February 13, 2019, at 5:00 pm ET.  If required, resubmission of Ed Facts files will occur in spring 2019. ALL data submissions must be corrected and submitted during this period, as there will be no “Limited Re-Open” data resubmission period for the SY 2017-18 ED Facts collection. 23

  24. Questions? Please submit any questions that you may have about the webinar’s content through the conversation box. 24

  25. State MEP Data Check Sheets OME will email State MEP Data Check Sheets and Word file templates and their instructions by December 31, 2018. Please contact Edward.Monaghan@ed.gov if you have any questions on how to use the Data Check Sheets. 25

  26. Please Tell Us How to Improve! We have five questions that we will ask you to answer, and then we’ll provide a chance for you to suggest improvements to this webinar. Let’s go… 26

  27. Thank you for completing the survey! According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is voluntary. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210-4537 or email ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1800-0011. 27

  28. THANK YOU! Edward Monaghan Edward.Monaghan@ed.gov Preeti Choudhary Preeti.Choudhary@ed.gov Partner Support Center (PSC) Contact Information: Telephone: 877-457-3336 (877-HLP-EDEN) Fax: 888-329-3336 (888-FAX-EDEN) TTY/TDD: 888-403-3336 (888-403-EDEN) E-mail: EDEN_SS@ed.gov Website: EDFacts Initiative Hours of Operation: 8:00 am - 6:00 pm ET, Monday-Friday, excluding federal holidays. 28

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend