economic viewpoint on risk transfer
play

Economic viewpoint on risk transfer Eric Marsden - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Economic viewpoint on risk transfer Eric Marsden <eric.marsden@risk-engineering.org> How much risk should my organization take up? 1 Understand difgerent methods for transferring the fjnancial component of risk 2 Understand concepts of


  1. Economic viewpoint on risk transfer Eric Marsden <eric.marsden@risk-engineering.org> How much risk should my organization take up?

  2. 1 Understand difgerent methods for transferring the fjnancial component of risk 2 Understand concepts of expected value , expected utility and risk aversion 3 Know how to calculate the value of insurance (risk premium) 2 / 24 Learning objectives

  3. 1000 € for sure 50% chance of winning 3000 € 50% chance of winning 0€ Option A Option B 3 / 24 Which do you prefer?

  4. 1000 € for sure 50% chance of winning 3000 € 50% chance of winning 0€ Option A Option B 𝔽(𝐵) = 1000 € 3 / 24 Which do you prefer? 𝔽(𝐶) = 1 2 × 3000 € + 1 2 × 0 = 1500 €

  5. 1000 € for sure 50% chance of winning 3000 € 50% chance of winning 0€ Option A Option B 𝔽(𝐵) = 1000 € When comparing two gambles, a reasonable start is to compare their expected value 3 / 24 Which do you prefer? 𝔽(𝐶) = 1 2 × 3000 € + 1 2 × 0 = 1500 €

  6. probability of that outcome 𝔽(𝑡𝑗𝑢𝑣𝑏𝑢𝑗𝑝𝑜) = ∑ 𝑝𝑣𝑢𝑑𝑝𝑛𝑓𝑡 𝑗 Pr (𝑗) × 𝑋(𝑗) ▷ Interpretation: the amount that I would earn on average if the gamble were repeated many times • if all probabilities are equal, it’s the average value ▷ For a binary choice between 𝐵 and 𝐶 : wealth if outcome 𝐵 occurs 4 / 24 Expected value ▷ Expected value of a gamble: the value of each possible outcome times the 𝔽(𝑋) = Pr (𝐵) × 𝑋 𝐵 + (1 − Pr (𝐵)) × 𝑋 𝐶

  7. Playing black 13 in roulette → Each time you place a bet in the roulette table, you should expect to lose 5.26% of your bet Note: initial bet is returned as well as 35€ for each euro bet Tie expected value of betting 1€ on black 13 in American roulette (which has 38 pockets numbered 1 5 / 24 to 36 plus 0 plus 00, and a payout for a single winning number of 35 to one) is 35 € × 1 38 + −1€ × 37 38 = −0.0526 € 1 3% 1 Win 35,00 € 35,00 € roll Bet on black 13 -0,05 € 37 97% 2 Lose -1,00 € -1,00 €

  8. ▷ Risk in fjnance (portfolio risk): anticipated variability of the value of my portfolio ▷ Standard deviation of the expected value of the return on my portfolio • return on an investment = next value - present value ▷ In general, riskier assets have a higher return ▷ A portfolio manager can reduce risk by diversifying assets 6 / 24 Finance: risk as standard deviation of expected value

  9. and type of equipment sold ▷ Conclusion : company should sell both to reduce risk Expected profit as a function of weather 30 k€ 12 k€ Heaters 12 k€ 30 k€ AC Cold Hot Weather 7 / 24 • σ(profjt) = 0€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells both • σ(profjt) = 9 k€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells only heaters • σ(profjt) = 9 k€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells only ac ▷ Assume equiprobability of hot and cold weather ▷ Example: company selling air conditioners and heaters are not closely related Diversifjcation: example ▷ Diversifjcation = reducing risk by allocating resources to difgerent activities whose outcomes

  10. and type of equipment sold ▷ Conclusion : company should sell both to reduce risk Expected profit as a function of weather 30 k€ 12 k€ Heaters 12 k€ 30 k€ AC Cold Hot Weather 7 / 24 • σ(profjt) = 0€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells both • σ(profjt) = 9 k€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells only heaters • σ(profjt) = 9 k€ • 𝔽 (profjt) = 21 k€ ▷ If company sells only ac ▷ Assume equiprobability of hot and cold weather ▷ Example: company selling air conditioners and heaters are not closely related Diversifjcation: example ▷ Diversifjcation = reducing risk by allocating resources to difgerent activities whose outcomes

  11. ▷ You fmip a coin repeatedly until a tail fjrst appears • the pot starts at 1€ and doubles every time a head appears • you win whatever is in the pot the fjrst time you throw tails and the game ends ▷ For example: • T (tail on the fjrst toss): win 1€ • H T (tail on the second toss): win 2€ • H H T: win 4€ • H H H T: win 8€ ▷ Which would you prefer? A 10€ for sure B the right to play the St. Petersburg game 8 / 24 The Saint Petersberg game

  12. • 1 st round: Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 2 nd round: Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 3 rd round: Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 𝑙 𝑢ℎ round: • with probability ½ you win 1€, ¼ you win 2€, 1 ⁄ 8 you win 4€, 1 ⁄ 16 you win 8€ … • 𝔽(𝑥𝑗𝑜) = 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + … = ∞ ▷ How much can you expect to win on average? 9 / 24 2𝑙 1 8 4 2 ▷ Tie probability of throwing a tail on a given round: The Saint Petersberg game ▷ What is the expected value of the St. Petersburg game?

  13. 9 / 24 8 ▷ Tie probability of throwing a tail on a given round: ▷ How much can you expect to win on average? 2 2𝑙 4 1 The Saint Petersberg game ▷ What is the expected value of the St. Petersburg game? • 1 st round: Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 2 nd round: Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 3 rd round: Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝐼𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑡) × Pr (𝑈𝑏𝑗𝑚𝑡) = 1 • 𝑙 𝑢ℎ round: • with probability ½ you win 1€, ¼ you win 2€, 1 ⁄ 8 you win 4€, 1 ⁄ 16 you win 8€ … • 𝔽(𝑥𝑗𝑜) = 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 + … = ∞

  14. ▷ Expected value of the game is infjnite, and yet few people would be willing to pay more than 20€ to play • “the St. Petersburg Paradox” ▷ Bernoulli (1738): • the “value” of a gamble is not its monetary value • people attach some subjective value, or utility , to monetary outcomes ▷ Bernoulli’s suggestion: people do not seek to maximize expected values, but instead maximize expected utility • marginal utility declines as wealth increases (poor people value increments in wealth more than rich people do) • an individual is not necessarily twice as happy getting 200€ compared to 100€ • people are “risk averse” 10 / 24 The Saint Petersberg game

  15. ▷ Utility: measure of goal attainment or want satisfaction • 𝑉(𝑦) = utility function for the good 𝑦 ▷ Utility functions are monotonically increasing: more is preferred to less • 𝑉’(𝑦) > 0 ▷ Marginal utility of 𝑦 : the change in utility resulting from a 1 unit change in 𝑦 Δ𝑦 ▷ Principle of diminishing marginal utility • each successive unit of a good yields less utility than the one before it Image source: Banksy 11 / 24 Utility in classical microeconomics • 𝑁𝑉(𝑦) def = Δ𝑉(𝑦)

  16. ▷ Expected utility is the probability weighted average of the utility from the potential monetary values ▷ 𝔽(𝑉) = ∑ 𝑝𝑣𝑢𝑑𝑝𝑛𝑓𝑡 Pr (𝑝𝑣𝑢𝑑𝑝𝑛𝑓 𝑗 ) × 𝑉(𝑝𝑣𝑢𝑑𝑝𝑛𝑓 𝑗 ) ▷ 𝑉 is the person’s von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function 12 / 24 Expected utility ▷ Expected value is the probability weighted average of the monetary value

  17. Future state is unknown. Probability of each possibility is well-known. Risk Possible future states are known. Probability of each possibility is not well-known. Uncertainty Future states are not well known or delimited. Radical uncertainty 13 / 24 Terminology: risk and uncertainty Terminology developed in economics, following the work of F. Knight [1923]

  18. ▷ People’s preferences can be represented by a function 𝑉 • where 𝑉(𝐵) > 𝑉(𝐶) ifg 𝐵 ≻ 𝐶 ( 𝐵 is preferred to 𝐶 ) ▷ 𝑉 is a way of modeling people’s behaviour when faced with risk Tie expected utility framework is useful for reasoning about behaviour in situations of risk, but is not a full explanation. Tie economist Maurice Allais showed that one of the axioms of EU, independence (two gambles mixed with a third one maintain the same preference order as when the two are presented independently of the third one), does not model real behaviour. Prospect theory is a more recent theory which models a wider range of real behaviour. 14 / 24 Expected utility hypothesis

  19. Risk aversion (psychology & economics) Reluctance of a person to accept a gamble with an uncertain payofg rather than another gamble with a more certain, but possibly lower, expected payofg. ▷ I have 10€. Suppose I can play a gamble with 50% chance of winning 5€, and 50% chance of losing 5€. ▷ If I refuse to play: • Expected value of wealth = • Expected utility = ▷ If I play: • Expected value of wealth = • Expected utility = 15 / 24 Risk aversion

  20. Risk aversion (psychology & economics) Reluctance of a person to accept a gamble with an uncertain payofg rather than another gamble with a more certain, but possibly lower, expected payofg. ▷ I have 10€. Suppose I can play a gamble with 50% chance of winning 5€, and 50% chance of losing 5€. ▷ If I refuse to play: • Expected value of wealth = 10€ • Expected utility = ▷ If I play: • Expected value of wealth = • Expected utility = 15 / 24 Risk aversion

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend