Economic Development Economic Development REPORT REPORT Programs - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

economic development economic development
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Economic Development Economic Development REPORT REPORT Programs - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OPEGA REVIEW FINAL FINAL Economic Development Economic Development REPORT REPORT Programs in Maine Programs in Maine a repor a report by by the Office of Program Evaluation & Government Accountability November 2006 2006 About


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Economic Development Economic Development Programs in Maine Programs in Maine

a repor a report by by

the Office of Program Evaluation & Government Accountability

FINAL FINAL REPORT REPORT

November

2006 2006

OPEGA REVIEW

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 2 Slide 2

About the Review About the Review

slide-3
SLIDE 3

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 3 Slide 3

Purpose ―――――――――――――――――

1) Are sufficient program controls in place to assure that Economic Development programs are cost-beneficial and effective? 2) Which economic development programs should be considered for a more in-depth review? OPEGA Sought to Answer the Questions … OPEGA Sought to Answer the Questions …

OPEGA also assessed the degree of transparency and accountability provided by the overall framework of the State’s economic development programs.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 4 Slide 4

  • researched relevant State statutes, history, and processes

related to economic development programs as well as national trends in monitoring their effectiveness;

  • tested compliance with certain statutory provisions in 5

MRSA §§13070-J,K &O for the 13 programs of specific interest to AFA;

  • created a working definition to identify “similar” programs;
  • gathered information on 46 programs meeting the working

definition; and

  • performed a risk assessment of the 46 programs based on

information provided by the managing agencies.

Methods ―――――――――――――――――

To answer these questions, OPEGA ……. To answer these questions, OPEGA …….

slide-5
SLIDE 5

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 5 Slide 5

Activities which distribute, impact or risk State funds, where the primary purpose is to stimulate the economy, expand or maintain employment

  • pportunities, or encourage the establishment

and growth of commerce and industry.

Methods ――――――――――――――――

Since there is no one generally accepted definition of Economic Development Programs, OPEGA created the definition below with the help of representatives from the primary State agencies involved in the review.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 6 Slide 6

Background Background

slide-7
SLIDE 7

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 7 Slide 7

Federal Agencies Federal Agencies State & Quasi-State Agencies State & Quasi-State Agencies Regional COGs & DCs Regional COGs & DCs Comm Community Agencies unity Agencies

Background ――――――――――――――

High-level Funding Flow for Economic Development Programs High-level Funding Flow for Economic Development Programs

slide-8
SLIDE 8

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 8 Slide 8

State resources distributed or revenue forgone for the State resources distributed or revenue forgone for the programs revi programs reviewed as p ewed as per r the administering agencies the administering agencies

  • $602,181,397 for period 2003 through 2005
  • $200,727,132 annual average

Additional administrative costs reported for 21 of the 46 Additional administrative costs reported for 21 of the 46 programs programs

  • $21,922,486 for period 2003 through 2005
  • $7,307,495 annual average

Background ――――――――――――――

slide-9
SLIDE 9

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 9 Slide 9 0, 0, 0% 0% 4% 4% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 10% 10% 79% 79% Ta Tax I Incentives ives Lo Loan an S Support Gr Grants Lo Loan ans Traini ning ng/Assi ssist stance ce Ot Other

xx xx

Perc rcent o

  • f A

Avg A Annua nnual Funds Funds Dis Distribut ributed d 2 12 12 8 3 6 15 15

Percent of Funds & Number of Programs by Type of Funding Percent of Funds & Number of Programs by Type of Funding

Number of Number of programs reviewed programs reviewed

Background ――――――――――――――――

slide-10
SLIDE 10

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 10 Slide 10

0.1% 43% 43% 7% 0% 3% 2% 2%

Agriculture/Aquaculture Technologies Shipbuilders Other Misc Business Stage or Size All or Many Businesses Manufacturing

x

Percent of Avg Annual Funds Distributed

11 11 1

1

7 5 15 15 6

Percent of Funds & Number of Programs by Market Segment Percent of Funds & Number of Programs by Market Segment

Background ――――――――――――――――

Number of Number of programs reviewed programs reviewed

slide-11
SLIDE 11

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 11 Slide 11

Primary State and quasi-state agencies managing Primary State and quasi-state agencies managing the programs reviewed the programs reviewed

  • Department of Labor – 2 programs
  • Maine Revenue Services – 12 programs
  • Department of Agriculture, Food & Rural Resources –

6 programs

  • Finance Authority of Maine – 11 programs
  • Department of Economic and Community Development –

2 programs

Background ――――――――――――――

slide-12
SLIDE 12

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 12 Slide 12

Current relevant statutes Current relevant statutes

  • Individual enacting statutes and related rules for each

program

  • 5 MRSA §§13051-13060 (establishes and describes

responsibilities of DECD)

  • 5 MRSA §§13070-J, K & O (specifies monitoring and

reporting requirements for a few specific programs)

Background ――――――――――――――

slide-13
SLIDE 13

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 13 Slide 13

Background ――――――――――――――――

  • Any legislative committee may be involved in the creation
  • r oversight of these programs.
  • These bills may be referred to any joint standing

committee.

  • EDPs are proposed in various types of bills, including

single topic, larger multi-purpose, or biennial budget bills.

  • Reports are not standardized, are given to one of several

different joint standing committees, or may not be formally presented to any committee.

Creation and Oversight of Programs Creation and Oversight of Programs

slide-14
SLIDE 14

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 14 Slide 14

Background ――――――――――――――

2006 2006 2001 2001 1999 1999 1997 1997 1987 1987 1985 1985

AFA Committee requests OPEGA revi AFA Committee requests OPEGA review of economic development ew of economic development programs programs EDIC releases final report and sunsets soon after EDIC releases final report and sunsets soon after 5 MRS 5 MRSA §13070-O req §13070-O requires evalu ires evaluation of ne ion of new economic w economic development proposals development proposals 5 MRS 5 MRSA §13070-J creates the EDIC a §13070-J creates the EDIC and reporting requ d reporting requirements irements for some programs for some programs Joint Select Committee on Econom Joint Select Committee on Economic ic Development releases report Development releases report and DECD is created and DECD is created Joint Standing Committee on Stat Joint Standing Committee on State Government releases report e Government releases report

  • n economic development
  • n economic development

Timeline of Key Legislative Activity on Economic Development Timeline of Key Legislative Activity on Economic Development

slide-15
SLIDE 15

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 15 Slide 15

Best Practices Best Practices

slide-16
SLIDE 16

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 16 Slide 16

Best Practices ―――――――――――――

Evaluation & Monitoring Of Economic Development Programs

  • Purpose -

Purpose - what problem is the program meant to address? hat problem is the program meant to address?

  • Clear & measurable goals directly supporting the purpose

Clear & measurable goals directly supporting the purpose

  • Relevant, meaningful and auditable measures

Relevant, meaningful and auditable measures

  • Collection of accurate and reliable data

Collection of accurate and reliable data

  • Independent audits

Independent audits

OPEGA studied reports from many private, non-profit and government

  • groups. These reports explain the need for many factors required for

successful evaluation and monitoring of economic development

  • programs. The following list is a summary from those reports:
slide-17
SLIDE 17

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 17 Slide 17

Best Practices ―――――――――――――

Evaluation & Monitoring Of Economic Development Programs (continued)

  • Well defined applicant eligibility criteria

Well defined applicant eligibility criteria

  • A fair and objective application process

A fair and objective application process

  • Reports on the measures that are:

Reports on the measures that are: Standardized, clear & understandable Standardized, clear & understandable Readily & publicly available Readily & publicly available Used to judge the program's performance relative to Used to judge the program's performance relative to strategic goals strategic goals

  • Review of potential overlap with other programs

Review of potential overlap with other programs

  • Regular review of program costs, benefits, funding &

Regular review of program costs, benefits, funding & purpose purpose

slide-18
SLIDE 18

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 18 Slide 18

Best Practices ―――――――――――――

Economic Development Program Management - the Portfolio Model

Understand what we are trying to achieve, both long & short term, Select individual investments based on historical risk/return, Understand standardized reports of financial performance, Obtain data and reports subject to audit & verification, Weigh the mix of investment choices for a balance of risk/return, Do a periodic review of the entire portfolio to decide whether we need to invest more/less, or change your investment mix, and Make decisions on individual investments: decide what to keep in the portfolio & what to change. Application of the investment Application of the investment portfolio management model helps portfolio management model helps us: s:

slide-19
SLIDE 19

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 19 Slide 19

Best Practices ―――――――――――――

Project-centric Enterprise & Strategic Focus

Create investment awareness

Ad hoc, unstructured, and unpredictable investment

  • processes. Little relationship between the success or

failure of individual projects.

Build the investment foundation

Selection by project based criteria; benefit , risk, and

  • rganizational priorities. Executive oversight applied on

a project-by-project basis.

Develop a complete investment portfolio

The organization has a well-defined investment portfolio; sound selection criteria and mature, evolving, and integrated selection, control, and evaluation processes.

Improve the investment process

The organization is focused on evaluation techniques to improve its investment processes and portfolio, while maintaining mature selection and control techniques.

Leverage for strategic results

Selection, control, and valuation processes mastered. Organization now benchmarks its investment processes relative to other "best-in-class" organizations.

1 2 3 5 5 4

Five Step Investment Management Maturity Mod Five Step Investment Management Maturity Model

Shortened from GAO original version

slide-20
SLIDE 20

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 20 Slide 20

Risk Assessment Risk Assessment

slide-21
SLIDE 21

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 21 Slide 21

What did the Risk Assessment Ask?―――

Can we determine if programs meet Can we determine if programs meet Leg Legislative Purpose? ative Purpose? How much funding is at risk if the How much funding is at risk if the program is not performing to purpose? program is not performing to purpose? Is it Acceptable? Is it Acceptable? What risks are there that could What risks are there that could reduce accountability & transparency? reduce accountability & transparency? Are reports available? Is the program Are reports available? Is the program reviewed regularly & accounts audited? reviewed regularly & accounts audited?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 22 Slide 22

Risk Assessment Results ―――――――――

  • The majority of programs reviewed lack standard

program controls necessary for performance evaluation (such as: adequate purpose, goals and

  • bjectives, performance measures);
  • there are no meaningful or effective efforts to

coordinate all programs at a state level; and

  • the capture and reporting of relevant, verifiable

information is inadequate at both the program and portfolio level.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 23 Slide 23

Risk Assessment Results ―――――――――

Of the programs reviewed:

  • 20% have no clearly stated public purpose.
  • 24% lack specific and measurable goals and objectives.
  • 26% do not have adequate performance measures.
  • 33% do not report performance regularly or reports are

not easily & readily accessible.

  • 54% did not provide administrative costs, even though

encouraged to give estimates.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 24 Slide 24

Risk Assessment Results ―――――――――

Of the programs reviewed:

  • 35% do not have their funding reviewed/reconsidered
  • n a regular basis.
  • 43% are not subject to regular independent financial

audits.

  • 46% were established 15 or more years ago.
  • 13% are very complex, 26% moderately complex.
slide-25
SLIDE 25

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 25 Slide 25

Risk Assessment Results ―――――――――

Econ

  • nom
  • mic D

Developmen ent P t Prog

  • grams -
  • R

Risk A Assess ssment

Base sed o

  • n ag

agency cy-reported su surv rvey re resu sults f s from 4 46 P Program rams

0% 0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% P u r p G

  • a

l s M e a s u r e s R p t s O v r L a p A d m i n $ $ R e v i e w A u d i t A p p l i c M

  • n

i t

  • r

C

  • m

p l e x A g e $ D i s t Lo Low Ri Risk Me Med r risk Hi High R Risk

slide-26
SLIDE 26

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 26 Slide 26

Risk Assessment Results ―――――――――

Le Levels ls o

  • f O

Overall R ll Risk b by T Type o

  • f P

Program

0% 0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100%

T T a x a x i i n c n c e n e n t t i v i v e e s s G G r a r a n n t s t s L L

  • a
  • a

n n S u S u p p p

  • p
  • r

r t t C C

  • m

b m b i n i n a t a t i i

  • n
  • n

L

  • L
  • a

a n n s s B B u s u s . . A s A s s i s i s t s t a n a n c c e e T r T r a a i i n n i i n n g g O O t t h e h e r r A l A l l l P P r r

  • g
  • g

r r a a m m s s

Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk

slide-27
SLIDE 27

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 27 Slide 27

Conclusions Conclusions

slide-28
SLIDE 28

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 28 Slide 28

  • Maine citizens make substantial investments in economic

Maine citizens make substantial investments in economic development programs each year development programs each year

  • Accurate and reliable information about EDPs

Accurate and reliable information about EDPs is needed to is needed to facilitate transparency and accountability facilitate transparency and accountability

  • Past attempts to improve accountability and coordination

Past attempts to improve accountability and coordination have produced limited results have produced limited results

  • Critical elements necessary for performance evaluation are

Critical elements necessary for performance evaluation are still lacking still lacking

  • Weaknesses exist within indivi

Weaknesses exist within individual programs and State’s dual programs and State’s

  • verall structure for managing them
  • verall structure for managing them

Conclusions

slide-29
SLIDE 29

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 29 Slide 29

Conclusions

Lack of clarity and consistency ck of clarity and consistency in the legislative foundation in the legislative foundation Fragmented overall structure Fragmented overall structure for ma for managi naging & m ng & moni

  • nitori

toring ng EDP EDPs Insufficient data Insufficient data collection & reporting collection & reporting Weak evaluat Weak evaluation

  • n

and accountability and accountability Clear and consistent definitions, roles, r and consistent definitions, roles, responsibilities, mandates and pro responsibilities, mandates and processes esses Well-defi Well-defined structure for ned structure for managi managing & moni ng & monitori toring EDP port ng EDP portfolio folio Sufficient high-quality Sufficient high-quality data data co colle llected & reported cted & reported Strong evaluation Strong evaluation and accountability and accountability

Next Next Steps Steps

Current State Current State Desired State esired State

Key Elements for Sufficient Per Key Elements for Sufficient Performance Evaluation and Accountability

  • rmance Evaluation and Accountability
slide-30
SLIDE 30

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 30 Slide 30

Findings, Management Actions & Recommendations for Legislative Action

slide-31
SLIDE 31

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 31 Slide 31

Finding #1 was Developed from the Risk Assessment

The risk assessment was primarily designed to determine which economic development programs should be considered for a more in-depth review.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 32 Slide 32

Finding Finding

Existing economic development programs may be ineffective or inefficient. OPEGA’s risk assessment revealed multiple indicators

  • f concern.

Recommendations Recommendations

  • Initiate an in depth review of

highest risk programs.

  • Review existing portfolio to

identify opportunities for reducing costs or # of programs.

  • Establish a review process for

new programs.

Finding 1 ――――――――――――――――――

slide-33
SLIDE 33

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 33 Slide 33

Programs recommen Programs recommended for more in-dep ded for more in-depth review: h review:

Finding 1 ――――――――――――――――――

  • All 15 tax incentive programs either

individually or as a group

  • Revenue Obligations Securities

Program (SMART and SMART-E)

  • Regional Economic Development

Revolving Program

  • Agricultural Water Management and

Source Development Program

  • Potato Marketing Improvement

Fund Program

  • Maine Manufacturing Extension

Partnership

  • Agricultural Marketing Loan Fund
  • Maine Apprenticeship
  • Farms for the Future Program
  • Economic Recovery Loan Program
  • Governor’s Training Initiative
  • Commercial Loan Insurance

Program

  • Milk Commission
slide-34
SLIDE 34

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 34 Slide 34

Findings 2-6 deal with overall oversight and management of the State’s economic development portfolio.

Findings 2-6 Relate to Overall Program Management

slide-35
SLIDE 35

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 35 Slide 35

Finding Finding

Maine does not have a sufficient definition

  • f what constitutes an

economic development program.

Recommendations Recommendations

  • Replace current statutory definition of

EDIs with the new definition. Incorporate new definition in statute as needed to clarify roles & responsibilities.

  • Clarify what is meant by “all economic

assistance programs” in 5 MRSA 13070-J.3.B.

Finding 2 ――――――――――――――――――

Management Action Management Action

DECD will draft a definition by 6/15/07 for the Legislature’s consideration.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 36 Slide 36

Finding Finding

There is no meaningful statewide coordination that facilitates understanding or effective management of the State’s entire portfolio of economic development programs.

Finding 3 ――――――――――――――――――

Recommendations Recommendations

Consider seeking similar proposals from other existing non-State

  • rganizations that may be capable
  • f filling this coordination role.

Management Action Management Action

DECD will prepare a proposal for expanding it’s role to include coordination of the State’s EDPs.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 37 Slide 37

Finding Finding

Processes for assuring program controls are established for all EDPs are not effective.

Finding 4 ――――――――――――――――――

Recommendations Recommendations

  • Amend existing statute to strengthen & clarify

program control requirements.

  • Consider directing all EDP administrators to

assess their programs against the criteria in 5 MRSA 13070-J.3.B.

  • Create a process to ensure DECD is aware of all

new EDP proposals.

Management Action Management Action

  • DECD will begin reviewing all new EDP

proposals as required in statute.

  • DECD will assess the Pine Tree Zones program

against the criteria in 5 MRSA 13070-O as required by statute.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 38 Slide 38

Finding Finding

EDP performance data currently being collected does not provide a clear or complete picture of program results.

Finding 5 ――――――――――――――――――

Recommendations Recommendations

Consider giving data collectors the authority needed to compel businesses to provide data.

Management Action Management Action

  • DECD is streamlining data collection & will

recommend additional data to be collected.

  • DECD will work with reporting agencies to

eliminate, or make transparent, double- counting in data.

  • DECD will recommend measures to ensure

adequate data collection for all EDPs.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 39 Slide 39

Finding Finding

Current EDP reporting does not:

  • provide transparency &

accountability;

  • allow performance & cost

comparison; and,

  • facilitate understanding the

State’s entire portfolio of programs.

Finding 6 ――――――――――――――――――

Recommendations Recommendations

Consider modifying statute to require DECD Commissioner’s report to be written.

Management Action Management Action

  • DECD will design a reporting

template for all agencies to use.

  • Commissioner of DECD will begin

satisfying reporting requirements in 5 MRSA 13058-5 by providing written reports.

  • DECD will make EDP reports and

data more accessible.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

OPEGA Final Report: Ec OPEGA Final Report: Economic Developmen

  • nomic Development Programs in Main

t Programs in Maine e Slide 40 Slide 40

Questions?