EAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Community Liaison - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

east don trail
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Community Liaison - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Community Liaison Committing Meeting #2 June 4, 2013 6:30 to 8:30 pm Flemingdon Park Library 2 nd Floor, Meeting Room #1 Agenda 1. Welcome 2. Relevant Planning Initiatives 3. Existing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

EAST DON TRAIL

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Community Liaison Committing Meeting #2 June 4, 2013 6:30 to 8:30 pm Flemingdon Park Library – 2nd Floor, Meeting Room #1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1. Welcome 2. Relevant Planning Initiatives 3. Existing Conditions 4. Problems and Opportunities 5. ‘Alternatives To’ the Problem/Opportunity 6. Evaluation of ‘Alternatives To’ the Problem/Opportunity 7. Next Steps 8. Closing

Agenda

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The project objectives, identified problems and

  • pportunities, and opportunity statement were created

utilizing the following planning initiatives

  • Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan (2012)
  • Toronto Bike Plan – Shifting Gears (2001)
  • A Healthy Toronto By Design Report. Road to Health:

Improving Walking and Cycling in Toronto (2012)

  • City of Toronto Walking Strategy
  • City of Toronto Parks Plan 2013-2017
  • The City of Toronto Official Plan (2006)

Relevant Planning Initiatives

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Existing Conditions

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

  • Groundwater and Baseflow
  • Stormwater Management and Water Quality

Physical Environment

  • Natural Cover: Flora; Wetlands
  • Fauna: Wildlife and Habitat; Fish and Fish Habitat
  • Potential ESA

Natural Environment

  • Land Use
  • Trails

Social and Cultural Environment

  • East Don Historical Changes
  • Geomorphic and Geotechnical Conditions

Technical /Engineering

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Sitewalk – May 30, 2013

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

On May 30, 2013 members of the CLC and Project Team went on a sitewalk to look at some of the existing conditions that exist within the Study Area.

Location 1 - Anewen Drive We will enter from Anewen Drive and head down to the large erosion scar where we will stop to discuss some of the existing conditions in this area.

  • Erosion scar
  • Potential ESA
  • Possible bridge crossings

Location 2 - Linkwood Lane Park We will park along Linkwood Lane and walk into the park where we have a good view of some of the following existing conditions:

  • Hydro Corridor
  • Flemingdon Golfcourse
  • Trail Connection

Location 3 - Don Trail System at South end of Study Area Time permitting, we will head down to the south end of the study area and the south connection point.

  • Toronto Water Access Route
  • Trail Connection
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Sitewalk

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions Insert photo Insert photo

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Groundwater and Baseflows

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

  • River flow is generally made

up of groundwater discharge (baseflow) and land surface runoff

  • Baseflow accounts for 49%
  • f mean annual discharge in

the Don

  • Rate of groundwater

recharge has been reduced due to impervious surfaces

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Stormwater Management and Water Quality

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

  • Faster flow rates, increased flood risk,

erosion, and reduced water quality as a result of urbanization and lack of modern stormwater management.

  • Combined sewers carrying both

stormwater and sanitary sewage regularly

  • verflow during rain events
  • Stormwater management pond recently

retrofitted within Moccasin Trail Park

  • Surface water quality received fairly poor

to very poor ratings, indicating very substantial organic pollution is likely

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Natural Cover: Flora

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

Vegetation Communities

  • 75 communities (local study area),

18 regionally significant (L2&3)

  • Dominated by Fresh-Moist

Manitoba Maple Lowland (L5) deciduous forest at 10.5 ha Species - 43 of regional concern (L2 and L3) Non-Native - 40% are non-native, most are invasive

Natural Cover Type Regional Study Area (ha) Local Study Area (ha) Forest 126.7 52 Successional 36.8 9.4 Meadow 28.5 5.8 Wetland 13.9 5.1 Bluffs 4.3 3.3

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Natural Cover: Flora

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

Butternut Manitoba Maple Garlic Mustard Common Reed

Species at Risk Invasive Species

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Natural Cover: Wetlands

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions Regional study area

  • 13.9ha total size, 22 community

types Local study area

  • 5.1 ha total size, 15 community

types: 10 marsh and 5 swamp

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Fauna: Wildlife and Habitat

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

Habitat

  • Quantity is low and quality is poor

– Based on patch size, shape and matrix influence

  • 12% Natural Cover
  • Ravines play an important role in

providing wildlife corridors and linking habitats

  • Atlantic and Mississippi flyways

Species

  • Includes both species of concern

and invasive species

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fauna: Wildlife and Habitat

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

  • Threatened (MNR)
  • Habitat includes

grasslands and agriculture lands European Starling Eastern Meadowlark

Species at Risk Invasive

Eastern Wood Pewee

Species of Concern

  • Special Concern

(COSEWIC)

  • Breeds in forest

habitat

  • Invasive
  • Aggressive competitors,

high reproductive ability, and adaptable to new environments

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fauna: Fish and Fish Habitat

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

  • Fragmented and degraded

habitat; aquatic ecosystem function is severely impaired

  • Low riparian cover
  • Low diversity fish and

benthic communities

  • Pollution-tolerant native fish

species

  • Exotic species include

Common carp

Blacknose Dace Longnose Dace Creek Chub White Sucker Fathead Minnow Johnny Darter Blacknose Dace Longnose Dace Creek Chub White Sucker Blacknose Dace Longnose Dace Creek Chub White Sucker Common Shiner Fathead Minnow Johnny Darter

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fauna: Fish and Fish Habitat

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

White Sucker Common Carp Longnose Dace

Common Native Species Invasive Species

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Potential ESA

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

  • Wigmore Park Ravine

Potential ESA

  • Criterion A:

– potential habitat for Butternut, 19 significant flora species, 6 significant vegetation communities, 1 significant fauna species

  • Criterion B:

– river section provides excellent examples of meandering in the Don River watershed

  • Criterion C:

– 76 L1 to L4 species, 61 vegetation communities, total area 46ha

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Land Use

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

4 Wards: 26 Don Valley West, 29 Toronto-Danforth, 31 Beaches-East York, 34 Don Valley East

36% 2% 25% 4% 5% 12% 5% 24%

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Existing Trails

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

Surrounding multiuse trails include existing East Don, Gatineau Corridor Trail, Lower Don, Taylor Creek, West Don/Wilket Creek, and Don Mills Extensive network of informal trails already present within local study area

Informal Trails

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Geomorphic and Geotechnical Analysis

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Existing Conditions

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Opportunity Statement

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Opportunity Statement:

A significant gap in the multi-use trail network exists within the East Don Corridor between Existing East Don Trail (East of Wynford Heights Crescent), Gatineau Corridor Trail (at approximately Bermondsey Drive), and the Don Trail System. The East Don Trail will fill this existing gap in the trail network thus creating a continuous connected trail network. Project Objectives:

  • Create a Connection
  • Natural Environment
  • Recreation
  • Ensure Public Safety
  • Transportation/Safe Travel Route
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Alternatives To identify ways of solving the problem in the Problem and Opportunity statement; they are solutions to the undertaking Two “Alternatives To” are being considered:

  • 1. Do Nothing
  • 2. Provide Multi-Use Trail Connection

The Alternatives To are a result of previous planning initiatives undertaken outside of the EA process by the City

  • f Toronto: The Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan and the

East Don Trail Master Plan Update

Alternatives To

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Do Nothing

– The alternative “Do Nothing” will consist of no action, no trail infrastructure will be constructed and improved access will not be created into the valley

  • lands. No improvements or changes would be made

directly to solve the problems(s) identified.

  • Provide Multi-use Trail Connection

– The Alternative “Provide Multi-use Trail Connection” will consist of constructing a multi-use trail from the existing East Don trail to the Lower Don trail, a trail connection will also be constructed to the Gatineau Corridor Trail. This option will also explore additional access points.

Alternatives To

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Broad Evaluation Criteria

  • Functional Value
  • Natural and Physical Environment
  • Social and Cultural Environment
  • Cost
  • Technical
  • Supports Planning Initiatives

Evaluation Alternatives To

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Provides trail infrastructure for a variety of users within the East Don corridor

  • No new trail infrastructure will be

provided

  • Will provide infrastructure for a broad

spectrum of users Provides connection with existing and planned adjacent trails and uses

  • No multi use trail connections will be

made

  • A significant gap will remain in the multi

use trail network

  • Will provide a critical connection in the City
  • f Toronto’s multi use trial system
  • Will connect to existing East Don Trail,

Gatineau Corridor Trail, and the Don Trail Provides access for a variety of users into the East Don corridor

  • Access will remain the same, no

additional points will be made or enhanced

  • Currently some informal access exists

that can be unsafe and limits some users from accessing

  • Will provide additional access or enhance

current access points

  • Access points will provide safe access into

the East Don Corridor for a variety of users OVERALL

  • Overall the Multi Use Trail Connection
  • ption is preferred from a Functional Value

perspective as it meets the majority of criteria for functional value

Functional Value

Evaluation Alternatives To

Broad Evaluation Criteria Sub Evaluation Criteria

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Provides trail infrastructure for a variety of users within the East Don corridor

  • No new trail infrastructure will be

provided

  • Will provide infrastructure for a broad

spectrum of users Provides connection with existing and planned adjacent trails and uses

  • No multi use trail connections will be

made

  • A significant gap will remain in the multi

use trail network

  • Will provide a critical connection in the City
  • f Toronto’s multi use trial system
  • Will connect to existing East Don Trail,

Gatineau Corridor Trail, and the Don Trail Provides access for a variety of users into the East Don corridor

  • Access will remain the same, no

additional points will be made or enhanced

  • Currently some informal access exists

that can be unsafe and limits some users from accessing

  • Will provide additional access or enhance

current access points

  • Access points will provide safe access into

the East Don Corridor for a variety of users OVERALL

  • Overall the Multi Use Trail Connection
  • ption is preferred from a Functional Value

perspective as it meets the majority of criteria for functional value

Functional Value

Evaluation Alternatives To

Broad Evaluation Criteria Sub Evaluation Criteria Alternatives To high level impact evaluation

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Provides trail infrastructure for a variety of users within the East Don corridor

  • No new trail infrastructure will be

provided

  • Will provide infrastructure for a broad

spectrum of users Provides connection with existing and planned adjacent trails and uses

  • No multi use trail connections will be

made

  • A significant gap will remain in the multi

use trail network

  • Will provide a critical connection in the City
  • f Toronto’s multi use trial system
  • Will connect to existing East Don Trail,

Gatineau Corridor Trail, and the Don Trail Provides access for a variety of users into the East Don corridor

  • Access will remain the same, no

additional points will be made or enhanced

  • Currently some informal access exists

that can be unsafe and limits some users from accessing

  • Will provide additional access or enhance

current access points

  • Access points will provide safe access into

the East Don Corridor for a variety of users OVERALL

  • Overall the Multi Use Trail Connection
  • ption is preferred from a Functional Value

perspective as it meets the majority of criteria for functional value

Functional Value

Evaluation Alternatives To

Broad Evaluation Criteria

Sub Evaluation Criteria

Alternatives To high level impact evaluation

− Least Preferred − Intermediate Preferred − Most Preferred − Not Applicable or Unknown

Summary of evaluation

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Provides trail infrastructure for a variety of users within the East Don corridor

  • No new trail infrastructure will be

provided

  • Will provide infrastructure for a broad

spectrum of users Provides connection with existing and planned adjacent trails and uses

  • No multi use trail connections will be

made

  • A significant gap will remain in the multi

use trail network

  • Will provide a critical connection in the City
  • f Toronto’s multi use trial system
  • Will connect to existing East Don Trail,

Gatineau Corridor Trail, and the Don Trail Provides access for a variety of users into the East Don corridor

  • Access will remain the same, no

additional points will be made or enhanced

  • Currently some informal access exists

that can be unsafe and limits some users from accessing

  • Will provide additional access or enhance

current access points

  • Access points will provide safe access into

the East Don Corridor for a variety of users OVERALL

  • Overall the Multi Use Trail Connection
  • ption is preferred from a Functional Value

perspective as it meets the majority of criteria for functional value

Functional Value

Evaluation Alternatives To

Broad Evaluation Criteria Sub Evaluation Criteria Alternatives To high level impact evaluation Summary of evaluation Overall evaluation for the broad Criteria

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Functional Value

Evaluation Alternatives To

Broad Evaluation Criteria Sub Evaluation Criteria Alternatives To high level impact evaluation Summary of evaluation Overall evaluation for the broad Criteria

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Provides trail infrastructure for a variety of users within the East Don corridor

  • No new trail infrastructure will be

provided

  • Will provide infrastructure for a broad

spectrum of users Provides connection with existing and planned adjacent trails and uses

  • No multi use trail connections will be

made

  • A significant gap will remain in the multi

use trail network

  • Will provide a critical connection in the City
  • f Toronto’s multi use trial system
  • Will connect to existing East Don Trail,

Gatineau Corridor Trail, and the Don Trail Provides access for a variety of users into the East Don corridor

  • Access will remain the same, no

additional points will be made or enhanced

  • Currently some informal access exists

that can be unsafe and limits some users from accessing

  • Will provide additional access or enhance

current access points

  • Access points will provide safe access into

the East Don Corridor for a variety of users OVERALL

  • Overall the Multi Use Trail Connection
  • ption is preferred from a Functional Value

perspective as it meets the majority of criteria for functional value

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection

Provides trail infrastructure for a variety of users within the East Don corridor

  • No new trail infrastructure will

be provided

  • Will provide infrastructure for a broad

spectrum of users Provides connection with existing and planned adjacent trails and uses

  • No multi use trail connections

will be made

  • A significant gap will remain

in the multi use trail network

  • Will provide a critical connection in the

City of Toronto’s multi use trial system

  • Will connect to existing East Don

Trail, Gatineau Corridor Trail, and the Don Trail Provides access for a variety of users into the East Don corridor

  • Access will remain the same,

no additional points will be made or enhanced

  • Currently some informal

access exists that can be unsafe and limits some users from accessing

  • Will provide additional access or

enhance current access points

  • Access points will provide safe

access into the East Don Corridor for a variety of users OVERALL

  • Overall the Multi Use Trail Connection
  • ption is preferred from a Functional

Value perspective as it meets the majority of criteria for functional value

Functional Value

Evaluation Alternatives To

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Evaluation Alternatives To

Natural and Physical Environment

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection

Impact on terrestrial species, communities and/or habitats

  • No change in impact
  • Currently unmanaged use of

the area (multiple information trails) is likely impacting terrestrial species, communities and habitats

  • The number and magnitude of

informal trails and access points can impact habitat fragmentation.

  • May have a negative or positive

impact

  • Provision of a single, planned

route can focus users on a single route away from more sensitive and steep areas preventing further impact

  • Access to the valley for

maintenance vehicles can provide

  • pportunities for restoration and

management of invasive species.

  • Can facilitate wildlife movement

across river and rail line

  • Some vegetation may be

removed, however tree replacement will provide an

  • pportunity to remove invasive

species and replace with native species.

  • Some wildlife and habitat may be

disrupted during construction and use of the area

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Evaluation Alternatives To

Natural and Physical Environment

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection

Impact on aquatic species, communities and/or habitats (including wetlands, riparian, and river course)

  • No change in impact
  • Currently unmanaged use of

the area (multiple informal trails) is likely impacting aquatic species, communities and habitats

  • May have a negative or positive impact
  • Construction of crossings can provide
  • pportunities for restoration, mitigation and

enhancements.

  • Provision of a single, planned route can

focus users on a single route away from current informal trails near riparian and wetland habitats.

  • Trail may cross the river at sections

disrupting the aquatic species and riparian habitat

  • Trail may cross or be located adjacent to

wetland habitat Impact to East Don River geomorphic processes (e.g. flooding, baseflows, slope stability)

  • No change in impact
  • Currently unmanaged use of

the area (multiple informal trails) could be impacting geomorphic processes

  • System is continually

degrading

  • May have a negative or positive impact
  • Construction of trail can provide opportunities

for remediation work

  • Provision of a single, planned route can

focus users on a single route away from more sensitive and steep areas preventing further impact

  • Multi use trail surface may increase runoff

entering the East Don River.

  • Construction and use of trail may impact soil

compaction and stability

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Evaluation Alternatives To

Natural and Physical Environment

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection

Impact on identified Species at Risk (SAR), species of concern, and/or potential ESA.

  • No change in impact
  • Currently unmanaged use of the area

(multiple informal trails) is likely impacting SAR, species of concern, and potential ESR

  • May have a negative or positive impact
  • The trail may travel through the potential ESA

area, however the number and magnitude of informal trails and access points may be reduced.

  • Some vegetation may be removed, however

tree replacement will provide an opportunity to remove invasive species and replace with native species

  • The route will be determined adhering to the

SAR Act

  • Trail construction and use may disrupt the

habitat of fauna species of concern

  • Provision of a single, planned route can focus

users on a single route away from SARs, species

  • f concern, or more ecologically sensitive areas
  • f the potential ESA

OVERALL

  • Overall both the Do Nothing and the

Multi Use Trail Connection options are preferred from the perspective of the Natural and Physical Environment. The Multi Use Trail Connection option is slightly preferred as impacts may

  • ccur, however this option provides an
  • pportunity for mitigation, restoration

and enhancement to improve the system.

  • Overall both the Do Nothing and the Multi Use

Trail Connection options are preferred from the perspective of the Natural and Physical

  • Environment. The Multi Use Trail Connection
  • ption is slightly preferred as impacts may occur,

however this option provides an opportunity for mitigation, restoration and enhancement to improve the system.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Evaluation Alternatives To

Social and Cultural Environment

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection

Impact to current valley lands users

  • No change in impact
  • Will improve trail infrastructure for

current users

  • Will provide safe access into the

valley lands

  • Potential for an increase in use of

the valley lands Impact on surrounding neighborhoods and communities

  • No change in impact
  • Potential for increase in users
  • n existing walkways, as the

existing East Don Trail does not connect with adjacent trails

  • Surrounding communities cut
  • ff from direct access to

adjacent trail networks

  • Increased recreational opportunities
  • Will provide connections to

communities and adjacent trails

  • Potential for increase in user activity

in communities at access points Impact on Public Safety

  • No change in impact
  • Some access points into the

valley lands pose safety risk as they are steep and on uneven ground

  • Safety concerns with users

crossing active rail line

  • Will improve public safety for users
  • Multi use surface provides even

unobstructed terrain

  • Will provide opportunities for

emergency vehicle access and use

  • f wayfinding points (unique

identifiers) to identify locations and assist in emergency response.

  • Will provide options for safe off road

active transportation and recreational use

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Evaluation Alternatives To

Social and Cultural Environment

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection

Impact to overall aesthetics of study area

  • No change in impact
  • Will provide increased opportunity for people

to enjoy aesthetic scenic views within the valley lands

  • The trail may impact the view into the valley

lands Impact on opportunities to access and enjoy natural areas within the City

  • No change in impact
  • Currently limited safe

access for some to enjoy the natural areas within the valley lands

  • Increases opportunities for public, and a

larger spectrum of users, to access and enjoy natural areas within the City Impact to cultural heritage resources, including archeological resources

  • Unknown at this time
  • Archeological Assessment

Stage 1 currently underway

  • Unknown at this time
  • Archeological Assessment Stage 1 currently

underway OVERALL

  • Overall the Multi Use Trail Connection option

is preferred from the Social and Cultural perspective as it will provide recreational

  • pportunities, increase public safety (trail use

and access), connect adjacent communities and neighborhoods, and increase opportunities to enjoy and appreciate nature.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Evaluation Alternatives To

Cost

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection

Capital cost (cost to design and implement associated works)

  • No additional cost

associated

  • A cost will be associated with

this option

  • Funding currently allocated in

Operation and maintenance cost

  • On going costs that are

currently not factored into budget planning, including emergency and maintenance access, and management of informal use.

  • A cost will be associated with

this option

  • May decrease some current

infrastructure loacated in the valley and maintenance costs. OVERALL

  • Overall both the Do Nothing

and the Multi Use Trail Connection options are preferred from the Cost

  • perspective. The Multi Use

Trail Connection Option will include a cost, however funding has already been

  • allocated. The Do Nothing
  • ption currently has costs

associated that are above and beyond the current budget.

  • Overall both the Do Nothing and

the Multi Use Trail Connection

  • ptions are preferred from the

Cost perspective. The Multi Use Trail Connection Option will include a cost, however funding has already been allocated. The Do Nothing option currently has costs associated that are above and beyond the current budget.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Evaluation Alternatives To

Technical

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection

Geotechnical considerations/feasibility

  • Not applicable
  • Feasible from a geotechnical perspective

Utility and infrastructure impacts

  • No impact
  • Limits access for

utility and park maintenance vehicles and activities in the valley lands

  • Feasible considering the current utilities

and infrastructure

  • Potential to negatively impact some

existing infrastructure and improve others

  • Supports access for utility and park

maintenance vehicles/activities (located within the East Don corridor) Constructability

  • Not applicable
  • Feasible from a construction perspective

OVERALL

  • Overall the Do Nothing and the Multi Use

Trail Connection options are technically

  • feasible. The Multi Use Trail Connection
  • ption is preferred from the Technical

perspective as it will support access for utility and park maintenance activities.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Evaluation Alternatives To

Supports Planning Initiatives

Sub evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection

Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan

  • Does not meet the
  • bjectives
  • Adheres to planning initiatives and
  • bjectives

A Healthy Toronto By Design Report: Road to Health: Improving Walking and Cycling in Toronto. April 2012

  • Does not support
  • Adheres to planning initiative

City of Toronto Walking Strategy

  • Does not support
  • Adheres to planning initiative

City of Toronto Parks Plan 2013-2017, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

  • Does not meet the
  • bjectives
  • Adheres to planning initiatives and
  • bjectives

Eglinton Crosstown LRT EA Study

  • Does not support
  • Adheres to planning initiative

The City of Toronto Official Plan

  • Does not support
  • Adheres to planning initiative

OVERALL

  • Overall the Multi Use Trail Connection
  • ption is preferred from a Planning Initiatives

perspective as it supports a number of current planning initiatives

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Evaluation criteria Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection Do Nothing Multi Use Trail Connection

Functional Value Meets the majority of criteria for functional value Natural and Physical Environment The Multi Use Trail Connection option is slightly preferred as impacts may occur, however this option provides a mechanism for managing current human use of the valley corridor and an

  • pportunity for mitigation, restoration and

enhancement to improve the system The Multi Use Trail Connection option is slightly preferred as impacts may occur, however this option provides a mechanism for managing current human use of the valley corridor and an

  • pportunity for mitigation, restoration and

enhancement to improve the system Social and Cultural Environment Will provide recreational opportunities, increase public safety (trail use and access), connect adjacent communities and neighborhoods, and increase

  • pportunities to enjoy and appreciate

nature. Cost The Multi Use Trail Connection Option will include a cost, however funding has already been allocated. The Do Nothing

  • ption currently has costs associated that

are above and beyond the current budget. The Multi Use Trail Connection Option will include a cost, however funding has already been allocated. The Do Nothing

  • ption currently has costs associated that

are above and beyond the current budget. Technical Is technically feasible, and will support access for utility and park maintenance activities Supports Planning Initiatives Supports a number of current planning initiatives Preferred Solution: 2 of 6 6of 6

Preferred Alternatives To Solution

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • Completion of survey for existing conditions

– Archeological Stage 1 – Geomorphic and fluvial geotechnical assessments

  • Refine evaluation of alternatives to
  • Draft alternative methods
  • Upcoming Public Consultation

Next Steps

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Next Steps

East Don Trail Environment Assessment

Terms of Reference/Identify Opportunity Environmental Baseline Prepare Alternatives Evaluate Alternatives Preferred Alternative Refine Preferred Alternative Environmental Study Report

TAC #1

  • Nov. 2012 - May

2013 May - Sept. 2013

  • Oct. 2013 - Jan.

2014

  • Feb. – June

2014

TAC #3 TAC #2 TAC #4 TAC #5 TAC #6 CLC #1 CLC #4 CLC #3 CLC #2 PIC #1 PIC #2 PIC #3

Review Review Review

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Questions?

East Don Trail Environment Assessment