Earnings Presentation May 6, 2011 1 May 6, 2011May 6, 2011 Safe - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

earnings presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Earnings Presentation May 6, 2011 1 May 6, 2011May 6, 2011 Safe - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

First Quarter 2011 Earnings Presentation May 6, 2011 1 May 6, 2011May 6, 2011 Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Statements made in this presentation that relate to future events or PNM


slide-1
SLIDE 1

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

1

First Quarter 2011 Earnings Presentation

May 6, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

2

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Non-GAAP Financial Measures For an explanation of the non-GAAP financial measures that appear on certain slides in this presentation (ongoing earnings, ongoing earnings per diluted share, ongoing EBITDA, and cash earnings), as well as a reconciliation to GAAP measures, please refer to the Company's website as follows: http://www.pnmresources.com/investors/results.cfm

Statements made in this presentation that relate to future events or PNM Resources’, PNM’s, or TNMP’s (collectively, the “Company”) expectations, projections, estimates, intentions, goals, targets, and strategies, are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers are cautioned that all forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and estimates and PNM Resources, PNM, and TNMP assume no obligation to update this information. Because actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, PNM Resources, PNM, and TNMP caution readers not to place undue reliance on these statements. PNM Resources’, PNM’s, and TNMP’s business, financial condition, cash flow, and operating results are influenced by many factors, which are often beyond their control, that can cause actual results to differ from those expressed

  • r implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors include: conditions affecting the Company’s ability to access the financial markets and the Company’s or Optim Energy’s ability to

negotiate new credit facilities for those expiring in 2012, including disruptions in the credit markets and actions by ratings agencies affecting the Company’s credit ratings; the potential unavailability of cash from PNM Resources’ subsidiaries or Optim Energy due to regulatory, statutory, or contractual restrictions; the impacts of decreases in the values of marketable equity securities on the trust funds maintained to provide nuclear decommissioning funding and pension and other postretirement benefits, including the levels of funding and expense; the recession and its impacts on the electricity usage of the Company’s customers; state and federal regulatory, legislative, and judicial decisions and actions, including the outcomes of PNM’s pending electric rate case and transmission rate case, and appeals of prior regulatory proceedings; the ability of PNM to successfully defend its utilization of a future test year in its current electric rate filing with the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (“NMPRC”), including PNM’s ability to withstand challenges by regulators and intervenors, in the event the pending stipulation in that case is not approved; the ability of PNM to successfully forecast and manage its operating and capital expenditures, particularly in the context of a future test year rate case; the ability of PNM and TNMP to recover their costs and earn their allowed returns in their regulated jurisdictions; the ability of PNM to meet the renewable energy requirements established by the NMPRC, including the resource diversity requirement, within the specified cost parameters; the risk that replacement power costs incurred by PNM related to not meeting the specified capacity factor for its generating units under its emergency fuel and purchased power adjustment clause will not be approved by the NMPRC; the risk that PNM may not be able to recover the increased costs of rights-of-way renewals on Native American lands through rates charged to customers; the ongoing risks relating to PNM Resources’ ownership interest in Optim Energy, including uncertainties surrounding PNM Resources’ assessment of strategic alternatives for its investment in Optim Energy, the risk that a strategic transaction involving Optim Energy may not be consummated, uncertainty regarding potential additional contributions to Optim Energy, and the possibility that PNM Resources might recognize additional gains or impairments depending on market conditions, the form and structure of a strategic transaction, and relative fair values; the risk that Optim Energy requires additional financial sources to expand its generation capacity, or

  • therwise, but is unable to identify and implement profitable acquisitions or that PNM Resources and ECJV Holdings, LLC, will not agree to make additional capital contributions to Optim

Energy; state and federal regulation or legislation relating to climate change, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, coal combustion byproducts, nitrogen oxide, and other power plant emissions, including the risk that the Company and Optim Energy may have to commit to substantial capital investments and additional operating costs to comply with new environmental requirements, including possible future requirements to address regional haze regulations and related Best Available Retrofit Technology requirements and concerns about global climate change, and the resultant impacts on the operations and economic viability of generating plants in which PNM and Optim Energy have interests; the performance of generating units, including the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, the San Juan Generating Station, the Four Corners Power Plant, and Optim Energy generating units, transmission systems, and distribution systems, which could be negatively affected by major equipment failures, major weather disruptions, disruptions in fuel supply, and other significant operational issues; the risks associated with completion of generation, transmission, distribution, and other projects, including construction delays and unanticipated cost overruns; uncertainty regarding the requirements and related costs

  • f decommissioning power plants owned or partially owned by PNM and Optim Energy and coal mines supplying certain PNM power plants, as well as the ability to recover decommissioning

costs from customers; uncertainty surrounding the status of PNM’s participation in jointly-owned generation projects resulting from the scheduled expiration of the operational documents for the projects beginning in 2016 and potential changes in the objectives of the participants in the projects; the risk that recently enacted reliability standards regarding available transmission capacity may reduce certain PNM transmission rights used to transmit its generation resources and provide access to transmission customers resulting in a need to purchase additional transmission capacity, reduce sales of transmission capacity, or operate generation less economically; changes in Electric Reliability Council of Texas (“ERCOT”) protocols; changes in the cost of power acquired by First Choice Power and changes in the retail price of power in ERCOT; the ability of First Choice Power to attract and retain customers; collections experience; fluctuations in interest rates; weather; water supply; changes in fuel costs; availability of fuel supplies; the effectiveness of risk management and commodity risk transactions; seasonality and other changes in supply and demand in the market for electric power; the impact of mandatory energy efficiency measures on customer energy usage; variability of wholesale power prices and natural gas prices; volatility and liquidity in the wholesale power markets and the natural gas markets; uncertainty regarding the ongoing validity of government programs for emission allowances; changes in the competitive environment in the electric industry; the outcome of legal proceedings; the extent of insurance coverage available for claims made in litigation; changes in applicable accounting principles; and the performance of state, regional, and national economies.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

3

Opening Remarks & Overview

Pat Vincent-Collawn

President and CEO

slide-4
SLIDE 4

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

4

First Quarter Financial Highlights

Q1 2011 Q1 2010 Ongoing EPS: $0.04 $0.06

 TNMP rate relief improves earnings  First Choice Power continues to demonstrate sustained performance  PNM remains focused on obtaining rate relief, improving credit metrics

GAAP EPS: $0.18 ($0.09)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

5

Regulatory Update

 PNM retail rate case

  • Hearing on stipulation begins May 9
  • Approximately 8 days of testimony
  • Hearing examiner’s recommended decision expected in

June

 PNM FERC transmission rate case

  • New rates to be implemented June 1, subject to refund

 TNMP AMS case

  • Hearing set for May 18-20
  • PUCT decision expected in July
slide-6
SLIDE 6

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

6

PNM TNMP Residential 2.1% 2.1% C&I (including other) 2.3% 1.8% Total Retail 2.2% 2.0% Customer Growth 0.5% 0.9% Q1 2011 vs Q1 2010

Economic Conditions and Load Growth

TX

NM U.S.

Solid load growth despite slow recovery in New Mexico and Texas

Regulated Retail Energy Sales Growth

(weather-normalized KWh)

TX U.S.

(2) (3)

Unemployment Rate

(1)

8.1% 8.1% 8.8% NM TX US

(1) U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2011 (2) Excluding Economy Service customers (3) Excluding Transmission Service customers

slide-7
SLIDE 7

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

7

Impact of Proposed Environmental Regulation

Estimated Compliance Costs (PNM Share) Comments San Juan Generating Station Clean Air Act – Regional Haze (FIP) ~$345M - $460M EPA ruling by Aug. 5 Clean Air Act – Regional Haze (SIP) ~$36M Mercury Rules None to minimal Plant already at 91% Clean Water Act - 316(b) None to minimal Low water usage Four Corners (Units 4 and 5) Clean Air Act – Regional Haze ~$69M Mercury Rules (MACT) Slight exposure APS evaluating options Clean Water Act – 316(b) None to minimal Low water usage Palo Verde Clean Water Act – 316(b) None to minimal Closed system Estimated Compliance Costs (Optim 100%) Comments Optim Energy Mercury Rules (Twin Oaks) Minimal Clean Water Act – 316(b) (Cedar Bayou 4) Slight exposure Evaluating options Transport Rules (Twin Oaks) Minimal May need limestone feed upgrade for SO2 removal

slide-8
SLIDE 8

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

8

Competitive Businesses

First Choice Power

  • Quarterly commercial volumes up 32%
  • Continue to expand residential and commercial

sales/distribution channels

  • Overall customer service scores set new high

Optim Energy

  • Power sales during February cold snap helped to increase

margins

  • Low-price ERCOT market continues to challenge generators

Natural hedge demonstrated its value during February cold snap

slide-9
SLIDE 9

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

9

Financial Overview

Chuck Eldred

Executive Vice President & CFO

slide-10
SLIDE 10

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

10

Q1 2011 Financial Summary (Ongoing)

 Ongoing EPS down from $0.06 in Q1 2010 to $0.04 in Q1 2011  Regulated business performance improving

  • TNMP on path to earning its allowed return
  • PNM making progress but still under-recovering

 As expected, competitive businesses accounted for most of decline

$0.06 $0.04 $0.03 ($0.03) ($0.01) ($0.01) Q1 2010 Q1 2011

TNMP First Choice Power Optim Energy PNM Electric

Ongoing EPS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

11

Regulated Businesses: Q1 2011 EPS (Ongoing)

PNM Electric TNMP

Q1 Key Performance Drivers r EPS Lower outage costs $0.04 Rate relief $0.02 Load growth $0.02 PV3 toll expiration ($0.06) Other ($0.03) Q1 Key Performance Drivers r EPS Rate relief $0.03 Load growth $0.01 Other ($0.01)

$0.02 $0.01 Q1 2010 Q1 2011 $0.02 $0.05 Q1 2010 Q1 2011

slide-12
SLIDE 12

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

12

First Choice Power

(In millions)

Optim Energy(1) (100%)

(In millions)

Competitive Businesses: Q1 2011 EBITDA (Ongoing)

(1) PNM Resources has 50% ownership interest in Optim Energy; gains and

losses of Optim Energy are equally shared by the owners.

Q1 Key Performance Drivers r EBITDA Lower gross margins ($2.8) February cold snap ($3.0) Lower bad debt expense $1.3 Other $0.1

$16.7 $12.3 Q1 2010 Q1 2011 $9.8 $6.9 Q1 2010 Q1 2011

Q1 Key Performance Drivers r EBITDA Twin Oaks contract expiration ($13.7) February cold snap $5.4 Emission allowance sales $3.9 Lower O&M $1.0 Other $0.5

slide-13
SLIDE 13

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

13

2011 Guidance (Ongoing)

$0.80 Consolidated EPS(1) $0.92

Regulated $0.89 - $0.96

PNM $0.62 - $0.67 TNMP $0.27 - $0.29

Competitive $0.06 - $0.16

First Choice Power $0.28 - $0.35 Optim Energy(2) ($0.22) – ($0.19)

Corp/Other ($0.17) - ($0.15)

(1) Business segment guidance ranges are not additive (2) PNMR Share 50%

Ongoing EBITDA

  • First Choice Power: $43M - $53M
  • Optim Energy (100%): $20M - $30M

Cash Earnings

  • Consolidated PNM Resources: $365M - $390M
slide-14
SLIDE 14

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

14

Key Strategic Goals and Checklist

Earn Authorized Return on Our Regulated Businesses Return to Solid Investment Grade Credit Ratings at PNMR

 Achieve successful outcomes in:

  • PNM retail rate case
  • PNM FERC transmission rate case
  • TNMP AMS case

 Maintain strong electric reliability and

power plant availability

 Control O&M and capital costs

Maximize the Value of Our Competitive Businesses

 Maintain profitability of First Choice

Power by achieving customer growth and increasing retention

 Conserve Optim Energy cash and

position generation assets to capitalize as market conditions improve

 Become fully investment grade at:

  • PNM
  • TNMP
slide-15
SLIDE 15

May 6, 2011May 6, 2011

15

Questions & Answers

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Appendix

slide-17
SLIDE 17

May 6, 2011

A-2

PNM Plant EAF and Outages

* Annual top quartile numbers from the North American Electricity Reliability Council

2011 & 2012 Outage Schedule 57.1% 55.1% 93.6% 83.2% 90.7% 97.0%

San Juan Four Corners Palo Verde

First Quarter

Q1 2010 Q1 2011 Annual Top Quartile Numbers* Coal 90% Nuclear 92%

Unit Duration (days) Time Period 1 50 Q1 - Q2 2011 4 13 Q2 2011 2 47 Q1 2012 3 47 Q1 - Q2 2012 5 24 Q2 2011 4 13 Q4 2011 5 13 Q4 2012 2 44 Q2 2011 1 45 Q4 2011 3 44 Q1 - Q2 2012 2 44 Q3 - Q4 2012 San Juan Four Corners Palo Verde

(Coal) (Nuclear) (Coal)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

May 6, 2011

A-3

Optim Energy Plant Availability

85.4% 93.7% 98.0% 88.7% 99.0% 74.1%

Twin Oaks Altura Cogen Cedar Bayou 4

First Quarter

Q1 2010 Q1 2011

Annual Top Quartile Numbers* Lignite 90% Combined Cycle 92%

* Annual top quartile numbers from the North American Electricity Reliability Council

(Lignite) (Combined-Cycle) (Combined-Cycle)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

May 6, 2011

A-4

Optim Energy EBITDA

Quarter Ended Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 March 31, 2010 Optim Energy GAAP Net Earnings (Loss) (100%) (18.2) $ (8.0) $ Interest expense 4.0 4.7 Income tax 0.1 0.0 Depreciation and amortization expense 11.6 12.1 Mark-to-market impact of economic hedges 3.2 (4.3) Purchase accounting amortizations 6.2 5.3 Ongoing Optim Energy EBITDA 6.9 9.8 50 percent of Ongoing EBITDA (PNMR share) 3.5 $ 4.9 $ (in millions)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

May 6, 2011

A-5 $134 $124 $119 $121 $124 $109 $106 $104 $101 $103 $97 $19 $16 $17 $17 $17

$11 $16 $12 $10 $9

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

(In millions)

T&D PNM Generation PNM Renewables Other (Primarily IT) TNMP Advanced Metering System

$370 $262 $252 $249 $253

(2)

PNMR 5-Year Capital Plan(1)

(1) Amounts may not visually add due to rounding (2) Pending regulatory approval

slide-21
SLIDE 21

May 6, 2011

A-6

Regulatory Information

slide-22
SLIDE 22

May 6, 2011

A-7

Aug - Dec 2011E 2012E 2013E Incremental Revenue Phase I $ 24 $ 45 $ 45 Phase II

  • 40

40 Additions Rider

  • 20

Total Increase in Revenues $24 $85 $105 After-tax impact $ 15 $ 51 $ 63 EPS at 92.1M shares $ 0.16 $ 0.56 $ 0.69 Incremental EPS (year-over-year) $0.16 $0.40 $0.13

Rate Case Stipulation - Earnings Impact

Assumptions: Approved as filed, implementation on August 1, 2011

(1) The stipulation includes the collection of an „Additions Rider‟ in 2013 to recover capital additions

made between June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2012. The rider is capped at $20 million.

(In millions, except EPS)

(1)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

May 6, 2011

A-8

NMPRC Commissioners and Districts

Name District Term Ends Party Jason Marks District 1 2012 Democrat Patrick Lyons Chairman District 2 2014 Republican Jerome Block Vice Chairman District 3 2012 Democrat Theresa Becenti-Aguilar District 4 2014 Democrat Ben Hall District 5 2014 Republican

NMPRC Districts and PNM Services Areas

slide-24
SLIDE 24

May 6, 2011

A-9

Utility Rate Base and Return

PNM Retail Current Rates March 31, 2008 $1.5B(2) 50% 10.5% Implied N/A Stipulated Rates June 30, 2010 $1.8B 52% 10.25% Implied $105M(3) PNM FERC Transmission Current Rates

  • Dec. 31, 2005

$98.1M(2) 51.8% 10.8% Implied N/A Proposed Rates

  • Dec. 31, 2011

$171.0M 49.4% 12.25% $11.1M TNMP Current Retail Rates March 31, 2010 $448.2M 45% 10.125% $10.3M Increase Test Period (1) Allowed Equity Ratio Rate Base ROE

(1) Period is for the 12 months ending on stated date (2) Excludes PNM South (formerly TNMP-New Mexico) rate base (3) Includes “Additions Rider” capped at $20 million to be recovered 2013

slide-25
SLIDE 25

May 6, 2011

A-10

Balance Sheet and Credit Metrics

slide-26
SLIDE 26

May 6, 2011

A-11

Selected Balance Sheet Information

(1) Excludes debt from affiliate.

Tables may not appear visually accurate due to rounding.

Dec 31, Mar 31,

2010 2011

(In millions)

Long-Term Debt (incl. current portion)

PNM 1,055.7 $ 1,055.8 $ TNMP 310.3 310.5 PNMR 199.8 199.8 Consolidated 1,565.8 $ 1,566.0 $

Total Debt (incl. short-term)(1)

PNM 1,245.7 $ 1,267.8 $ TNMP 310.3 310.5 PNMR 231.8 211.8 Consolidated 1,787.8 $ 1,790.0 $

slide-27
SLIDE 27

May 6, 2011

A-12 PNM Resources (1) PNM Separate TNMP Separate PNM Resources Consolidated (In millions) Financing Capacity: Revolving credit facility $ 542.0 $ 386.0 $ 75.0 $ 1,003.0 Local lines of credit (LOC) 5.0

  • 5.0

Total Capacity 547.0 386.0 75.0 1,008.0 Short-term debt & LOC balances 65.1 291.2 0.3 356.6 Remaining availability 481.9 94.8 74.7 651.4 Invested cash

  • Available Liquidity as of 4/28/11 $ 481.9

$ 94.8 $ 74.7 $ 651.4 As of 4/28/11:

Liquidity as of April 28, 2011

(1) Includes First Choice Power (2) In August 2011, the PNMR and PNM facilities will be reduced by $25M and $18M, respectively

(2)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

May 6, 2011

A-13

Credit Ratings

Senior Unsecured Debt

S&P PNM Resources BB- PNM BB+ Outlook: Stable Moody’s PNM Resources Ba2 PNM Baa3 Outlook: Stable

TNMP First Mortgage Bonds

S&P BBB- Outlook: Stable Moody's Baa1 Outlook: Stable

slide-29
SLIDE 29

May 6, 2011

A-14

Environmental Compliance

slide-30
SLIDE 30

May 6, 2011

A-15

Environmental Control Equipment at Coal Units

PNM

Coal Unit PNM Share Capacity (MW) Activated Carbon Injection (1) SNCR (2) SCR (2) Baghouse (3) Scrubbers

San Juan Unit 1 170 X X X San Juan Unit 2 170 X X X San Juan Unit 3 249 X X X San Juan Unit 4 194 X X X Four Corners Unit 4 97.5 X X Four Corners Unit 5 97.5 X X

(1) Activated carbon injection systems reduce mercury emissions. For San Juan, the installation was completed in 2009, as part of a 3-year, $320M

environmental upgrade.

(2) SNCR refers to selective non-catalytic reduction systems. SCR refers to selective catalytic reduction systems. Both systems reduce NOx emissions. (3) Baghouses collect flyash and other particulate matter. For San Juan, the installation was completed in 2009, as part of a 3-year, $320M environmental

upgrade.

Optim Energy

Coal Unit Total Capacity (MW) Activated Carbon Injection (1) SNCR (2) SCR (2) Baghouse (3) Scrubbers

Twin Oaks Unit 1 152 X X Twin Oaks Unit 2 153 X X