Dust evolution in protoplanetary disks: Effect on observations of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dust evolution in protoplanetary disks effect on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dust evolution in protoplanetary disks: Effect on observations of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Workshop on Magneto-Rotational I nstability in Protoplanetary Disks Dust evolution in protoplanetary disks: Effect on observations of dust emission H. Nomura 1 , Y. Aikawa 2 , Y. Nakagawa 2 (1. Kyoto Univ., 2. Kobe Univ.) 1 I ntroduction


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dust evolution in protoplanetary disks: Effect on observations

  • f dust emission
  • H. Nomura1, Y. Aikawa2, Y. Nakagawa2

(1. Kyoto Univ., 2. Kobe Univ.)

Workshop on Magneto-Rotational I nstability in Protoplanetary Disks

slide-2
SLIDE 2

§1 I ntroduction

slide-3
SLIDE 3

↓ Collisional growth, Planet formation ↓ Gas dispersal → Planetary system formation

From protoplanetary disk to planets

Dust size growth & settling ↓ Planetesimal formation

(e.g., Hayashi et al. 1985)

( 東工大H P より)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

S t a r D i s k

(Kitamura et al. 2002)

  • Obs. of Dust Emission from PPDs

D u s t O p t i c a l

I R

S t a r D i s k

Thermal dust emission

(Furlan et al. 2006)

10 μm Si feature Dust scattering

b y S u b a r u G G T a u

(Itoh et al. 2002)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Planet formation

t= 0yr 107yr t= 0yr 107yr (Dullemond & Dominik 2005) (Tanaka et al. 2005) 107yr 104yr

Dust Evolution & SED

Quiescent disk Turbulent disk

Dust evolution in disks

→ SED model calculation

Unable to reproduce

  • bservations especially

in turbulent disks

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How to Supply Small Dust Grains?

→ Fragmentation ?

(Nomura et al. 2007)

Turbulent disk,

R= 1AU, t= 106yr

1μm 1mm

a[μm]

2H Z= H 3.5H 0.25H Z= H Z= 0.25H 1μm 1mm Δv= 1m/ s

a[μm]

Δv= 1km/ s

Supply of small dust grains to inner disk Vertical: cloud → disk midplane Radial: migrate with gas accretion flow

slide-7
SLIDE 7

§2 Size growth, settling, & migration

  • f dust particles and

Disk model

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Dust size growth, settling, migration

Coagulation eq. for dust particles

∑ ∑

= − = − −

− = ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂

N 1 j j j i, i i 1 i 1 j j j i j j, i i z i R i i

φ β φ m φ φ β m 2 1 z ) v (φ R ) v (Rφ R 1 t φ

βi-j,j= π(ai-j+ aj)2Δv ps/mi-jmj Δv ai-j aj ai

Turbulent mixing

( )

( )

z / φ D φ z/D Ω φ V

i i 2 z i z

∂ ∂ − − =

( )

/D Ω 1 H/ αc D

K s

+ =

/a c ρ D

s gas

=

z

R sticking

Vacc Vff nout

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Velocity of Dust particles (VR&VZ)

  • Eq. of motion for dust

R GM ) D( dt d

3 *

≈ − − − = R u U U

V= U-vK 、v= u-vK

ρ ρ P R GM ) D( ρ ρ dt d

gas gas gas 3 * gas dust

≈ ⋅ ∇ + ∇ − − − − = σ R U u u

a : dust radius

K 2 2 2 2 2 K dust gas gas R

v ζ Ω D 2D η Ω D 2DΩ ρ ρ ρ V

K K

⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + + + + − =

2 K gas gas

RΩ 1 R p ρ 1 2 1 η ∂ ∂ − =

( )Z

/D Ω V

2 K z

− =

( )

2 K K s gas gas

RΩ 1 hΩ αc Rρ R R ρ 1 2 1 ζ ∂ ∂ − =

/a c ρ D

s gas

=

z

R

Vacc Vff nout

  • Eq. of motion for gas
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Gas Density Profile

z

x

3/2 2 2 * z

) z (x z ρGM ρg dz dP + − = − = Hydrostatic equilibrium in z-direction

P= ρkT/ μmp , M* = 0.5 Ms

⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ − =

  • 2

/ 1 * 3 * 2 s0

x R 1 x 8π M 3GM Ω Σαc 4 9

Macc= 1x10-8Ms/ yr (= const.), α= 0.01

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Gas & Dust Temperature Profile

Gas: Thermal equi. ( ΓX+ Γpe+ Lgr-Λline= 0)

Heating: Irradiation from central star Cooling: Dust thermal radiation

ΓX : X-ray heating

(H, H2 ionization)

Γpe: FUV heating

(grain photoelectric)

Λline: Rad. cooling

(Lyα, OI, CII, CO lines)

Lgr: Gas-dust

collisions

中心星

∫ ∫ ∫

∞ ∞

=

gr ν ν ν ν

) (T B κ dν 4 dΩ I κ dν π

slide-12
SLIDE 12

§3 Resulting Dust Size & Spatial Distributions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Dust size distribution (only Vz)

2H Z~ H zcoag a[μm] a[μm]

t= 10

6yr

1μm 1μm 1mm 1mm

t= 106yr: large dust → settle, R → φi/ ρdust,0

nout= 10

4cm

  • 3

R= 1AU

Quiescent

2H Z~ H zcoag

R= 10AU R= 100AU R= 1AU t= 10

2yr

z

R

Vff nout

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Dust size distribution (only Vz)

a[μm] a[μm]

t= 10

6yr

1μm 1μm 1mm 1mm

Large grains exist due to turbulent mixing

nout= 10

4cm

  • 3

R= 1AU

Turbulent

R= 10AU R= 100AU R= 1AU t= 10

2yr

2H H zcoag Z~ 0.25H 2H H zcoag Z~ 0.25H

z

R

Vff nout

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Small-dust/ Gas Ratio (only Vz)

Surface layer (

zfric< z, ρgas: small)

z r GM DV dz dV

* z z

− − =

gas drag gravity

Middle layer (

zcoag< z< zfric)

Vertical velocity of dust

z Dr GM V

* z =

R

z

dust infall nout zfric zcoag zcoag zcoag zfric zfric R= 1AU 10AU 100AU Z/ R

fdust

Small dust

= da da z) dn(R, πa z) A(R,

2

Vz : free-fall (only graviry) → f

d u s t

∝1 / ρg

a s

gravity~ gas drag → f

d u s t

∝1 / z

/a c ρ D

s gas

=

fdust(R, z) = A(R, z)/A0(R, z)

nout= 10

4cm

  • 3

t= 10

6yr

Turbulent Quiescent

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Small-dust/ Gas Ratio (only Vz)

(Nomura et al. 2007)

Midplane (

z< zcoag, ρdust: large)

, τ τ

sed coag <

( ),

ΔV πa n 1/ ~ τ

z 2 dust coag

z sed

z/V ~ τ

zfric zcoag zcoag zcoag zfric zfric R= 1AU 10AU 100AU Z/ R

fdust

zfric zcoag zcoag zcoag zfric zfric R= 1AU 10AU 100AU Z/ R

ρdust

Small dust Total dust → fdust : small (smaller in turbulent disk)

Turbulent Quiescent

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Effect of radial migration: VR vs. VZ

α= 0.01 Z= H α= 0.001 α= 0.0001 α= 0 Z= 0.5H Z= 2H

a[μm]

R= 1AU

1μm 1m 1mm

Amount of small dust grains ⇔ dust inflow in vertical & radial directions ⇔ nout &α

VZ VR

K 2 2 2 2 2 K dust gas gas R

v ζ Ω D 2D η Ω D 2DΩ ρ ρ ρ V

K K

⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + + + + − =

/a c ρ D

s gas

=

2 K gas gas

RΩ 1 R p ρ 1 2 1 η ∂ ∂ − =

( )Z

/D Ω V

2 K z

− =

( )

2 K K s gas gas

RΩ 1 hΩ αc Rρ R R ρ 1 2 1 ζ ∂ ∂ − =

z

R

Vacc Vff nout

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Dust size distribution (Vz & Vz)

α= 0.01

20AU R= 3AU 100AU a[μm] a[μm]

  • n

l y V

R

t= 10

6yr

z= H

1μm 1μm 1mm 1mm

α= 0.001

nout= 10

4cm

  • 3

V

R &

V

Z

  • n

l y V

R

V

R &

V

Z

20AU R= 3AU 100AU

nout= 104cm-3

→ accretion flow dominant if α > 10-2~ -3

slide-19
SLIDE 19

§4 Effects on Dust Continuum Emission

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Effect of dust inflow on SED

No dust inflow

→ Model cannot reproduce observations

  • Obs. towards

CTTSs

(D’Alessio et al. 2006)

λ [μm] λFλ [ergs/ cm2/ s]

t= 1x10

6yr

Disk temp. & density + Dust evolution + Dust opacity + Rad. transfer → SED

Turbulent Quiescent No dust inflow (nout= 0, α= 0) Dark clouds dust

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Effect of dust inflow on SED

nout> 104cm-3 or α > 10-2~ -3

→ consistent with observations

  • Obs. towards

CTTSs

(D’Alessio et al. 2006)

λ [μm] λFλ [ergs/ cm2/ s]

t= 1x10

6yr

Disk temp. & density + Dust evolution + Dust opacity + Rad. transfer → SED

Turbulent Quiescent No dust inflow (nout= 0, α= 0) Dark clouds dust dust inflow

(nout= 104cm-3)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Spatial distri. of dust emission

Dependence of spatial distribution of dust flux ratio on dust evolution → Observable by ALMA

R [AU]

ALMA 5σ detection limit

50 antennas, 0”.1, 600s

λ= 450μm λ= 850μm

R [AU]

w/ o dust evolution with dust evolution (Quiescent disk)

Dust evolution →

F850μm/ F450μm

@ inner disk

slide-23
SLIDE 23

§5 Summary

Dust size growth, settling, and radial migration in protoplanetary disks Supply of small dust grains to inner disk Vertical: cloud → disk midplane ⇔ nout Radial: migrate with gas accretion ⇔ α SED model calculations

nout> 104cm-3 or α > 10-2~ -3

→ consistent with observations Effects on spatial distri. of dust emission

: F850μm/ F450μm @ inner disk

→ Observational diagnostics by ALMA