Duncan Stewart, PE Agenda 1. The Enterprise Scheduling Model - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

duncan stewart pe agenda
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Duncan Stewart, PE Agenda 1. The Enterprise Scheduling Model - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

McDONOUGH BOLYARD PECK CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING Enterprise Schedule Management in Support of Dynamic Construction Simulations Duncan Stewart, PE Agenda 1. The Enterprise Scheduling Model Overview 2. Disadvantages of the Traditional Paradigm


slide-1
SLIDE 1

McDONOUGH BOLYARD PECK

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING

Enterprise Schedule Management in Support of Dynamic Construction Simulations

Duncan Stewart, PE

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • 1. The Enterprise Scheduling Model Overview
  • 2. Disadvantages of the Traditional Paradigm
  • 3. CPM Scheduling Methods and Procedures
  • 4. Risk Management through Enterprise Scheduling
  • 5. 3-Dimensional Drawings and 4-D Schedules
slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Enterprise Model

3

Enterprise vs. Traditional

Project Files are Co-located, Sever Based Files are stored on Hard Drives, Stand- alone Resources may be shared between Projects Resources are available only to the Project Tasks/Activities between Projects may interact Networks must be contained within the Project May be Web-enabled for remote ‘two- way’ access Web access is ‘read-only’

Additional Features:

  • Dashboard
  • Process Refinement
  • Total Project Documentation
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why Enterprise Scheduling?

4

  • Collaboration is now facilitated by co-locating files
  • Files are now more securely stored
  • Now PM’s tie-in to each other’s projects
  • Resources are now managed ‘globally’
  • ‘Ripple effects’ can now be modeled
slide-5
SLIDE 5

“In P3, individual projects are managed separately by

  • ne
  • r

more project managers, each with their own set of codes, resources, calendars, reports, and so on.” “[P3’s]16-bit technology is quickly becoming outdated.” “In addition, a database structure provides better data security.”

Source: Migrating from P3 to Primavera v5.0, published by Primavera Systems Inc.

P6 vs. P3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Typical CPM Schedule

6

Data Date Completed Work Original & Remaining Durations Late Start & Finish Dates Early Start & Finish Dates Planned Work Work Activities & Milestones Float

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Typical Scheduling Issues:

  • Resource over allocation
  • Isolation of projects

The enterprise level scheduling system allows us to mange resources globally and simulate interconnectivity between multiple projects.

Managing Risk

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Resource Allocation

PROJECT A PROJECT B 2007 2008 RESOURCE CONFLICT RESOURCE X RESOURCE X

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Inter-Project Relationships

slide-15
SLIDE 15

3-D, 4-D and BIM

15

Advantages:

  • Visualize the project over time
  • Avoid conflicts caused by phasing

Computer/Software Driven:

  • Bentley MicroStation
  • AutoDesk Revit Achitecture
  • Innovaya Visual Simulation 3.0
slide-16
SLIDE 16

MicroStation

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

AutoDesk Revit Architecture

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Innovaya Visual Simulation

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Summary

19

  • Traditional ‘stand-alone’ schedules inhibit collaboration
  • Current technology allows enterprise level scheduling
  • Facilitates program-wide management and simulations
  • Additional features: ‘dashboards’ and contract management
  • Scheduling can improve with BIM and 4D