Draw Underground Water October 24, 2012 Team 01 Beau Drumright, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

draw underground water
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Draw Underground Water October 24, 2012 Team 01 Beau Drumright, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Alternative Power Source To Draw Underground Water October 24, 2012 Team 01 Beau Drumright, Patrick Schimmelbauer, Grant Masters, Emerson Jones, Nathan Heckathorne College of Engineering, Forestry, and Natural Sciences. Northern Arizona


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Alternative Power Source To Draw Underground Water

October 24, 2012 Team 01 Beau Drumright, Patrick Schimmelbauer, Grant Masters, Emerson Jones, Nathan Heckathorne

1

College of Engineering, Forestry, and Natural Sciences. Northern Arizona University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

Project Description Problem Statement Concept Generation Concept Selection Gantt Chart Conclusion References

Nathan Heckathorne 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Description

  • Cemex

– Mining pit on Babbitt Ranches – Pump 0.3 m3/min from 520 meters

Nathan Heckathorne 3 Courtesy: NASA

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Problem Statement

The Client requests a solution that will draw water from 520 meters while maintaining the current flow rate of 0.3 m3/min while reducing

  • verall cost.

Nathan Heckathorne 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Concept Generation

Grant Masters 5 www.nrel.gov

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Concept Generation

Grant Masters 6 www.solarrochester.com

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Concept Generation

Grant Masters 7 www.evworld.com

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Concept Generation

Emerson Jones 8

Capture

Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Solar PV array Concentrator--Steam Concentrator--Sterling Engine Wind Wind Turbine Array of Turbines Vertical Axis Geothermal Vertical Loop Buried Loops Bio-Mass Wood Old Construction Materials Cellulose

Back Up

Thermal Diesel Gas Turbines Electric Batteries Water Storage Status Quo Increase Capacity Dig Water Pit

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Concept Refinement

  • Geothermal

– Lack of availability in Northern Arizona

  • Biomass

– Associated transportation cost

  • Battery Backup

– Insufficient to meet power demands

  • Natural Gas

– No readily available source

Emerson Jones 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Evaluation Criteria

Patrick Schimmelbauer 10

Performance Level Criteria Metrics Value Cost $ Power (kW) Perfect 10 <100,000 >100 Excellent 9 <200,000 >90 Very Good 8 <300,000 >80 Good 7 <400,000 >70 Satisfactory 6 <500,000 >60 Adequate 5 <600,000 >50 Tolerable 4 <700,000 >40 Poor 3 <800,000 >30 Very Poor 2 <1,000,000 >20 Inadequate 1 <1,500,000 >10 Useless >2,000,000 <10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Decision Matrix

Criteria Units Design Option Solar (PV array) Wind (Turbine) Stirling engine Raw Score Value on Scale Raw Score Value on Scale Raw Score Value on Scale Cost $ 305000 7.9 380000 7.2 1100000 1.8 Power kW 50 5 50 5 50 5 Total 12.9 12.2 6.8 Normalized total 0.40 0.38 0.21

Patrick Schimmelbauer 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Looking Forward

Beau Drumright 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Gantt Chart

Beau Drumright 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

References

Doug Stevens – Cemex Bill Cardasco – Babbitt Ranches www.energy.ca.gov www.lipower.org www.usasolarwind.com http://www.azgs.az.gov/geothermal nau.edu

14