draft-denis-behave-dccp-01
BEHAVE working group meeting R´ emi Denis-Courmont
VideoLAN project, VLC
IETF71 - March 13th 2008
R´ emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01
draft-denis-behave-dccp-01 BEHAVE working group meeting R emi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
draft-denis-behave-dccp-01 BEHAVE working group meeting R emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC IETF71 - March 13th 2008 R emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01 Outline Status update 1 Open issues 2
BEHAVE working group meeting R´ emi Denis-Courmont
VideoLAN project, VLC
IETF71 - March 13th 2008
R´ emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01
1
Status update
2
Open issues
R´ emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01
Status update Open issues
removed hints at UDP tunneling restructure like BEHAVE-TCP fleshed out REQuirements for NATs
R´ emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01
Status update Open issues
very (very) much like the BEHAVE TCP document, includes the REQs explicitly hilighted differences from TCP
R´ emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01
Status update Open issues
TCP says ”SHOULD NOT” DCCP says ”MUST NOT” Is this OK?
R´ emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01
Status update Open issues
currently not mentioned NAT should certainly not modify them! should we mention this? as a new requirement?
R´ emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01
Status update Open issues
currently relying on DCCP-Sync need to adapt to the updated DCCP-SO draft
R´ emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01
Status update Open issues
Do we want this forward in BEHAVE working? Input to the V6CPE document.
R´ emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01
Status update Open issues
R´ emi Denis-Courmont VideoLAN project, VLC draft-denis-behave-dccp-01