Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria
DPM COR DPM CORPORA PORATE TE P PRESE RESENT NTATION TION - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
DPM COR DPM CORPORA PORATE TE P PRESE RESENT NTATION TION - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
DPM COR DPM CORPORA PORATE TE P PRESE RESENT NTATION TION Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria Aug ugust ust 20 2016 16 FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This presentation contains forward looking information or "forward looking
TSX:DPM 2
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This presentation contains “forward looking information” or "forward looking statements" that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward looking information and forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future prices of gold and other metals, the estimation of mineral reserves and resources, the realization of mineral estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production and output, costs of production, capital expenditures (including sustaining capex, non-discretionary capex and discretionary capex), costs and timing of the development of new deposits, success of exploration activities, permitting time lines, currency fluctuations, requirements for additional capital, government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims, limitations on insurance coverage and timing and possible outcome of pending litigation. Often, but not always, forward looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations
- f such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be
- achieved. Forward looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are
made, and they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any other future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward looking statements. Such factors include, among others: the actual results of current exploration activities; actual results of current reclamation activities; conclusions of economic evaluations; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of gold; possible variations in ore grade or recovery rates; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities, fluctuations in metal prices, as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in this presentation under and in the Company’s annual information form under the heading "Risk Factors" and other documents filed from time to time with the securities regulatory authorities in all provinces and territories of Canada and available at www.sedar.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated
- r intended. There can be no assurance that forward looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events
could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements.
TSX:DPM 3
DPM’S GLOBAL PORTFOLIO OF ASSETS
Avala Serbia 100% Tsumeb Smelter Namibia 100%
2016 Adjusted EBITDA Generation (3)(5) 2016 Asset Diversification(2)
Smelter 35% Gold 45% Copper 19% Ag 1% Tsumeb 25% Chelopech 75%
Unique Assets With Commodity & Geographic Diversity 2016 Revenue Diversification (1)
Bulgaria 50% Namibia 45% Canada 5%
Operating assets Development asset Exploration assets
Chelopech Mine Bulgaria 100% Sabina Canada 11% Krumovgrad Gold Project Bulgaria 100%
1,2,3,5 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 32
TSX:DPM 4
DPM’S VISION AND STRATEGY
Optimize Portfolio Growth Innovation
- Grow production and
margins through operational excellence and high return, modest capital investments
- Maintain / extend life of
mines through near mine exploration programs
A progressive gold mining company that unlocks and delivers superior value through innovation and strong partnerships with stakeholders
- Build a pipeline of future
growth opportunities
- Acquire undervalued
assets and leverage expertise to unlock value
- Wi-Fi enabled UG mine
- Real-time operational
management
- Big data analytics to
- ptimize performance and
allow for faster better decision making
Maintain Financial Strength and Flexibility
Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria
TSX:DPM 6
CHELOPECH – A WORLD CLASS, LOW COST MINE
Recent Achievements
- Achieved capacity increase to 2M tpy in 2012
- Underpinned by underground wireless
technology & partnerships with key vendors
- DPM operating practices to take advantage of
near real-time information
- Consistent and reliable performer
Building on that Success
- Increasing Mineral Reserves and Resources,
including recently announced increase in Resources (15% including Reserves and 25% excluding Reserves)
- Moving to 2.2M tpy for 2016 after debottlenecking of
mining and milling activities
- Working on Step-Change projects to evaluate mining
at 2.5M tpy
- Assessing the options to release mill bottlenecks to
achieve 2.5M tpy
- Aggressively exploring mine upper levels to bring
resource increases into mine plans and allow an increase in mined tonnage while maintaining mine life
1.09 1.31 1.81 2.03 2.05 2.04 2.0-2.25 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F
Ore Mined (mt)
(4)
2006 2015
Ore Mined / Reserves (mt)
21.5 21.5 14.1 56 55 46 40 40 36 32-36 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F
Cash Cost / tonne of ore processed (US$/t)(3)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2016F(4) 2015
Total ore mined to date Ore Reserve
3,4 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 32
TSX:DPM 7
MINERAL RESOURCES AND RESERVES UPDATE
Comparison of MRE as at December 31, 2015 with MRE as at December 31, 2014 Mineral Resources exclude all blocks already classified as Mineral Reserves Resource Category 2015 MTonnes 2014 MTonnes Grades % Difference 2015 Cu 2014 Cu 2015 Au 2014 Au Tonnes % diff Cu % diff Au % diff (%) (%) (g/t) (g/t) Total M+I 14.2 11.3 1.06 1.13 3.37 3.58 25.34%
- 6.44%
- 5.90%
Inferred 2.8 8.3 0.82 0.91 2.44 2.66
- 66.41%
- 10.07%
- 8.10%
Chelopech Ore Reserves as at December 31, 2015 Grades Classification MTonnes Gold (g/t) Silver (g/t) Copper (%) Proven 11.88 3.06 7.89 1.02 Probable 9.64 3.29 6.08 0.84 Total Proven and Probable 21.51 3.16 7.08 0.94
The Mineral Resource update was dominated by the reclassification of 4.2 Mt of resources above 410 level from inferred to indicated. This increase was 15% of resources inclusive of reserves and 25% excluding reserves. The Mineral Reserve update is largely in line with depletion, partially offset by increases in Mineral Reserves for blocks 19, 103, 151, 149 and 149 South as a result of infill drilling in 2015.
TSX:DPM 8
CHELOPECH – HOW CROWN PILLAR MINING OPENED FORMERLY UNMINEABLE RESOURCES
Old Mining Method New Mining Method Transition Zone (Crown Pillar)
Cave zone Crown Pillar Backfilled Open Stopes
Ore t Cu, % Au, g/t Cu , t Au, Oz 531 671 2.36 4.44 12 526 75 897
Cave rock
- The 150 orebody crown pillar was successfully first mined in 2013 following extraction
design with risk mitigation
- To date 5 panels have been successfully removed with refinements based on experience
- Mining is set to continue until 2020 on block 150 crown pillar
- Additional opportunity exists at the 103 and 19 blocks and the methodology will be
developed to stabilize old cave zones to extract associated satellite resources
TSX:DPM 9
CHELOPECH – CROWN PILLAR EXTRACTION
CAVE ROCK GROUTING AND REINFORCEMENT LONG HOLE DRILLING OPEN STOPE BACK FILL
Typical Performance
- Ore 27,810t
- Cu 2.12 %
- Au 3.41 g/t
- Losses 6 %
- Dilution 4.8 %
TSX:DPM 10
CHELOPECH – MOVING CAVE ZONE RESOURCES INTO MINE PLANS
2015 Drilling
- A total of 11,720m was drilled in 2015 in Blocks 19 and
103 2016 Plans
- A total of 28,000m is planned to be drilled in 2016
Key targets:
- 7,000m in Block 19
- 7,000m in Block 150
- 4,000m adjacent to Block 150
- 5,000m between Blocks 8 and 10
- Target: start to move these resources into mine plans
in early 2017
- The total resource development drilling planned for
2016 is 44,000m
TSX:DPM 11
CHELOPECH – MORE OPPORTUNITIES TO ADD VALUE
Step-Change activity to evaluate increasing mine production to 2.5 mtpy utilizing debottlenecked existing infrastructure
- Increase mining intensity from 1050t/d/stope, targeting 3,000t/d/stope with revised
stope designs and primary mover tests in 2016
- Release SAG mill critical size to reduce power draw or increase capacity
Further progress being made on cost savings and productivity improvements
(1)
Häggloader 10 HR-B
TSX:DPM 12
CHELOPECH – BROWNFIELDS EXPLORATION UPSIDE
(2) (3),(4)
HIGHLIGHTS
- New geological model – orebodies are hosted in a diatreme that is part of a multi-phase
intrusive complex
- System is open and untested to the east and southeast
- Exploration focussed on target areas east and southeast of the 10 and 103 orebodies
- Brevene area – licence expected to be granted this year, followed by 3,500m drill program
Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria
TSX:DPM 14
TSUMEB: SMELTING PERFORMANCE
198 196 200- 220 320- 370 120 180 159 152 370
312 341 420 479 394 409 380- 425 380 310 275 265 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
- Completed major capex program to upgrade facility
to global environmental standards and invested to debottleneck facility to support increased production
- f 240K-265K tpy
- Moved from two primary furnaces to one in
Q3 2013, largely to manage occupational exposure
- Decommissioning of reverb furnace
significantly curbed emissions but exacerbated in-process inventories
- Construction nearing completion after 4
years where some process interference was experienced
- Acid plant successfully commissioned and
reached commercial production in October 2015
- Completion of the copper converters is
expected to debottleneck production, reduce inventories and improve EBITDA
- EBITDA of $8.7M in 2015 came largely from Q4
2015 confirming the smelter potential to be a major contributor to DPM
- Secured supply of third party feed to fill added
capacity and entered LT sales contracts for all acid produced
Third Party con supplied to smelter (000s) Chelopech concentrate supplied to smelter (000s) Cash cost per tonne of concentrate smelted (net of by product credits)(3)
220- 250 265- 320
Anticipated future capacity
3,4 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 32
(4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
Key Transformative Achievements
TSX:DPM 15
TSUMEB – POISED TO GENERATE SIGNIFICANT EBITDA
- The two new larger copper converters, together with their associated off-gas system and tie-ins to the acid
plant were commissioned in the first quarter of 2016 and performed as expected during Q2 2016
- The acid plant operated as planned in the first six months of 2016
- Optimize existing infrastructure and processes and reduce secondary material to normalized levels
- Advance assessment, permitting and commercial arrangements to support 370,000 tpy opportunity
Converter installation
Near Term Priorities
3 18.5 8.6 2011 2014 2015 26 63 140 130 44 24-28
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F
Total Capital Expenditures (US$M)
2012 2013
(4)
Smelter Adjusted EBITDA (US$M)
(5)
4,5 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 32 Copper Converter Offgas Scrubbing Systems
(2.5) (7)
TSX:DPM 16
OUTLOOK FOR COMPLEX CONCENTRATES
Mines In Operation Annual Tonnage As (%) Chelopech 100,000 5.5% South America(6) 150,000 – 250,000 4.0% - 8.0% Blend 30,000 – 50,000 5.5% - 7.0% TOTAL 280,000-400,000 Not in Production Annual Tonnage As (%) South America(6) 80,000 6.0+% Rest of the world 100,000 – 150,000 5.0% - 10% TOTAL 180,000-230,000
6 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 32
Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria
TSX:DPM 18
BUSINESS OUTLOOK - KRUMOVGRAD
5,7 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 32
Production and Operating Costs Annual gold production (7) 85,700 oz Annual silver production (7) 38,700 oz First concentrate production H2 2018 LOM (7) 8 years Total Annual Operating Costs / T ore processed (7) Mining costs Processing costs Tailings treatment & IMWF costs General & administration Royalty $45.41 $15.03 $19.39 $1.88 $5.33 $3.78 Capital Costs Construction capital to complete (7) Direct Costs Indirect Costs Contingency P50 (7.5% of direct + indirect costs) $178.2 million $117.1 million $48.7 million $12.4 million Sustaining Capital $6.2 million Closure and Rehabilitation Costs $6.0 million Total cash cost per oz AuEq (7) $403 Average Annual EBITDA (5,7) $66 million
Project Economics Remain Robust with a 25% after-tax IRR
TSX:DPM 19
FINAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT RECEIVED
(2) (3),(4)
- Main Detailed Development Plan (DDP) & Land Use
- Final DDP approved and in force - November
- Land redesignation approved and in force
- Land purchased
- Other DDPs / Approvals
- New Access Road – Draft DDP announced, KMC approved routing
- Water Well – DDP approved and in force, construction permit issued
- Off site offices and admin complex – DDP approved and in force
- Discharge water pipeline – municipal and Federal land use approvals received
- Powerline – approvals by power distribution company
- Existing Road Upgrade
- Scope defined, KMC to tender and award
- Social Benefit Negotiation
- Executed 2015 donation contract
- Main road upgrade; Medical centre study; Water supply study
- Archaeological Work
- All field work completed in 2015
- Final archaeology report approved by the expert committee
- Final archaeological protocols signed by the Ministry of Culture in 2015
- Construction Permit – expected mid-2016
TSX:DPM 20
Milestone Actual / Expected Completion (4) Completion of the detailed project execution plan Q1 2016 (complete) Complete detailed engineering Q1 2016 (complete) Updated capital cost estimate and baseline project schedule Q1 2016 (complete) Land re-designation and purchase Q1/2 2016 (both complete) Approval of technical packages Q2 2016 (complete) Construction permit RECEIVED AUGUST 9, 2016 DPM board approval for full release Q3 2016 Mobilize earthworks contractor to site Q3 2016 Commence construction on site Q3 2016 Commence main civil/mechanical/electrical construction Q2 2017 Commissioning and start up Q2/Q3 2018 First concentrate production H2 2018
KRUMOVGRAD – PROJECT MILESTONES
4 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 32
TSX:DPM 21
KRUMOVGRAD – REGIONAL EXPLORATION UPSIDE
(2) (3),(4)
- 2015 drilling – 3,500m
- Hole KPDD-009
intersected 8m at 12.81 g/t Au, 4.95 g/t Ag from 277m
- Follow up drilling on 3
holes completed at Kupel North prospect
- Two other high priority
targets are nearby
HIGHLIGHTS
TSX:DPM 22
KEY MILESTONES
2016 2017 2018
Q4 Expansion study to 370,000 tpy concentrate smelted
Smelter Krumovgrad
Q3 Project start H2 First concentrate production
Chelopech
Expansion study to 2.5 mtpy
- re production
Q3 BOD approval Q3 Financing plan Q2 Expansion study Detailed Engineering Q3 Ausmelt Cooling Upgrade Expansion Implementation Construction Production Ramp to 2.2 mtpy Evaluation of Mining and Milling intensity constraints Resource Development above 390 level targeted at increasing reserves Expansion Implementation
Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria
TSX:DPM 24
COMMITTED TO MAINTAINING A STRONG BALANCE SHEET
0.94 1.12 1.67 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 2013 2014 2015 180 201 187 50 100 150 200 250 300 2013 2014 2015
Net Debt / EBITDA (x) Net Debt / Capitalization (% at end of period) Total Available Liquidity (US$M at end of period)
(9)
Net Debt (US$M)
(8)
35 121 120 50 100 150 2013 2014 2015 4 15 16 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 2013 2014 2015
(8)
8,9 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 32
TSX:DPM 25
FINANCING OF EXISTING GROWTH PROJECTS
At current commodity price levels, existing cash flows and undrawn revolver capable of fully funding growth projects Moving forward with both projects requires taking additional steps to mitigate the risk of future price declines or operating shortfalls July 11, 2016 completion of C$54.65 million bought deal financing Additional by-product commodity price hedging Alternatives being considered include:
- Prepaid forward sales arrangement or stream
- Sale of partial interest in Tsumeb or other non-core assets
TSX:DPM 26
CLOSURE OF BOUGHT DEAL FINANCING
Closed July 11, 2016 Aggregate gross proceeds of C$54.65 million
Issued 18,216,000 common shares at C$3.00 per share Initial agreement to acquire 15,840,000 shares and an over-allotment option for an additional 2,376,000 shares
In addition, a non-brokered private placement of 840,000 shares at C$3.00 for additional gross proceeds of C$2.5 million sold to Dundee Corporation Use of proceeds:
Reduce drawdowns under its revolver credit facility Support advancing growth initiatives General corporate purposes
TSX:DPM 27
RARE DEEP-VALUE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY
$0.00 $20.00 $40.00 $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $120.00 $140.00 $0.00 $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 $8.00 $10.00 $12.00 2013 2012 2014
Hard Hit Sector Valuations Creating A Rare Investment Opportunity
DPM share price GDXJ performance 2015
Attractive Valuation Metrics
EV/2016F EBITDA (Cons. Est.) (4)(12) P/NAV (Cons. Est.)(12)
$0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 2013 2014 2015 Cu price 2012 Au price 2016 2016 $500 $800 $1,100 Dundee Alacer New Gold Alamos Primero Average = $890/oz
$750-850/oz
Below Average 2016F All-In-Sustaining Mine Cost (3)(4)(10)(11)(12)(14)
3,4,10,11,12,14 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 32
New Gold Argonaut Alamos Alacer DPM Primero 0.7x 1.4x 1.0x 1.0x 0.8x 0.5x Average 0.9x 18.5x 10.8x 8.7x 6.7x 6.5x 5.2x Alamos New Gold Argonaut Alacer DPM Primero Average: 9.4x
TSX:DPM 28
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS AND OUTLOOK
626 690 890 725 640 510
2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
687 750- 850 153 161 169 132- 155 143 166 217 270
2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
198 200- 220 220- 250 265- 320 370
2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
196 46 43 40 35.7- 39.7 34 36 36 37
2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
Payable Copper (Mlbs) Payable Gold (Koz) Smelter Production (Kt) All-in Sustaining Cost (US$/oz) Capital Expenditures (US$M) Smelter Cash cost (US$/t)
152
2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
216
Sustaining CAPEX Non-discretionary Growth CAPEX Discretionary Growth CAPEX
184 87 49-59 121 24 380 310 275 265
2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
27 173
(4) (4) (4) (3)(4) (3)(4) (13) (13)
380- 425 409 394 479
320- 370
3,4,13,15 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 32
(3) (4)
(15) (15)Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria
Corporate Head Office: One Adelaide Street East, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M5C 2V9 T: 416 365-5191 Investor Relations T: 416 365-2549 jreid@dundeeprecious.com TSX: DPM – Common Shares www.dundeeprecious.com
Thank You
TSX:DPM
APPENDICES
TSX:DPM 31
APPENDIX CONTENTS
Footnotes and Disclaimers…………………………………………………………………. 32 Market Cap., Major Shareholders, Analyst Coverage…………………………………… 33 2016 Guidance………………………………………………………………………………. 34 Hedge Positions at June 30, 2016….……………………………………………………. 35 Exploration – Avala Properties in Serbia….………………………………………………. 36 Exploration – Partially Owned Exploration Assets……………………………………….. 37 Details Regarding Sale of Kapan Mine……………………………………………………. 38 Chelopech Mine – Updated Mineral Reserves and Resources………………………… 39 Krumovgrad Project – Mine, Plant and IMWF details……………………………………. 40
TSX:DPM 32
FOOTNOTES AND DISCLAIMERS
1. From continuing operations 2. Estimated to end of 2016 3. A non-GAAP measure. Refer to the “non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of the Full Year 2015 MD&A for reconciliations to IFRS 4. Forecast/guidance information is subject to a number of risks. 2016F is based on guidance issued February 9, 2016 and 2017 to 2020 forecast data is based on the completion of several growth projects within currently contemplated time frames. See “Forward Looking Statements” on slide 2 5. Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before income tax plus depreciation and amortization, finance costs, losses/gains on impairment provisions and reversals, unrealized losses/gains on derivative contracts and investments at fair value, realized and unrealized losses/gains on equity settled warrants, minus interest income 6. Additional penalty income available from other deleterious elements 7. Based on 2014 Krumovgrad Technical Report; Project economics based on June 6, 2016 Krumovgrad Update; All costs expressed as Q4 2015 US$ based on a US4 / Euro exchange rate of 1.14 8. Net Debt represents term debt and amount drawn under revolving credit facility, less cash 9. Undrawn portion of RCF and cash 10. Source: company midpoints of AISC per ounce of gold guidance provided in Q4 2015 11. AISC per ounce of gold represents cost of sales at Chelopech less depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items plus treatment charges, penalties, transportation and other selling costs, sustaining capital expenditures, rehabilitation related to accretion expenses and an allocated portion of the Company’s G&A expenses less by-product revenues in respect of copper and silver including realized gains on copper derivative contracts divided by the payable gold in copper concentrate sold 12. Source: RBC as at August 18, 2016 13. Reflects payable production and, in the case of gold, includes estimated payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold 14. Excludes metals in pyrite concentrate and where applicable, the treatment charges, transportation and other selling costs related to the sale of pyrite concentrate which is reported separately 15. Excludes Kapan Without limitation to the foregoing, the following outlines certain specific forward looking statements contained in this presentation and provides certain material assumptions used to develop such forward looking statements and material risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements (which are provided without limitation to the additional general risk factors discussed herein and in the Full Year 2015 MD&A). Sustaining CAPEX, Non-Discretionary CAPEX and Discretionary CAPEX: assumes foreign exchange rates remain at or around current levels, and all capital projects proceed as planned and at a cost that is consistent with the budget established for each project. Subject to a number of risks, the more significant of which are: technical challenges; delays related to securing necessary approvals, equipment deliveries, equipment performance, and the speed with which work is performed; availability of qualified labour; and changes in project parameters, timing and decision to proceed with projects and/or any components there
- f and estimated costs, including foreign exchange impacts.
Gold and Copper Production: projected levels of metal production assumes grades and recoveries are consistent with current estimates of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves and DPM’s current expectations and construction start-up of Krumovgrad project and decision to proceed with projects and/or any components there of; and ore mined/milled is consistent with planned levels. Subject to a number of risks, the more significant of which are: lower than anticipated ore grades, recovery rates and ore mined/milled. Smelted Concentrate: assumes no significant disruption in equipment availability or concentrate supply. Subject to a number of risks, the more significant of which are: unanticipated operational issues; timing and decision to proceed with expansion projects, including the holding furnace, and/or any components there of; unanticipated issues related to the commissioning and operation of the acid plant and converters and any further expansion components including a holding furnace; lower than anticipated equipment availability; and disruptions to or changes in the supply of concentrate. Technical Information related to slide 18 – Krumovgrad Project Economics The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates and other scientific and technical information which supports this presentation was prepared by CSA Global (UK) Ltd. (“CSA”), in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and were reviewed and approved by, as relates to Mineral Resources, Galen White, BSc (Hons) FAusIMM FGS, Director and Principal Consultant of CSA, and Julian Bennett, BSc ARSM FIMMM CEng, as relates to Mineral Reserves. Both Galen White and Julian Bennett are independent Qualified Persons (“QP”), as defined under NI 43-101. The NI 43-101 technical report (the “Krumovgrad Technical Report”) entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Ada Tepe Deposit, Krumovgrad Project, Bulgaria” dated March 21, 2014, in respect of the study for the construction and operation of its Krumovgrad gold project disclosed herein, was filed March 31, 2014 on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Simon Meik, Processing, and Edgar Urbaez, formerly Corporate Director, Technical Services, both of DPM, who are QPs and not independent of the Company, have reviewed and approved the contents of this presentation. The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates contained herein may be subject to legal, political, environmental or other risks that could materially affect the potential development of such Mineral Resources. See the Krumovgrad Technical Report for more information with respect to the key assumptions, parameters, methods and risks of determination associated with the foregoing Mineral Resource estimates.
Cautionary note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Mineral Resources. These estimates have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. The terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are defined in NI 43-101 and recognized by Canadian securities laws but are not defined terms under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Guide 7 (“SEC Guide 7”) or recognized under U.S. securities laws. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be upgraded to mineral reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” will ever by upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian securities laws, estimates of “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Accordingly, these mineral resource estimates and related information may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, including SEC Guide 7.
TSX:DPM 33
MKT CAP, MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS, ANALYST COVERAGE
Share Price (C$ per share) $3.77 Shares Outstanding – Current 161M Market Capitalization – Current C$532 M 52 week low – high (C$ per share) $0.84 – $4.14
Share Capital @ August 18, 2016 Analyst Coverage
Firm Analyst BMO **In transition** CIBC Capital Markets Jeff Killeen Dundee Securities Josh Wolfson GMP Securities Oliver Turner Paradigm Capital Don MacLean Raymond James **In transition** RBC Capital Markets Sam Crittenden Scotia Capital Trevor Turnbull
Dundee Corporation 22.66% GMT Capital 11.97% Van Eck Associates 8.00% USAA Asset Mgmt. 3.54% J.P. Morgan Asset Mgmt. (UK) 3.39%
Major Shareholders
TSX:DPM 34
2016 GUIDANCE @ JUNE 30, 2016
US millions, unless otherwise indicated Chelopech Kapan (5) Tsumeb Consolidated (6) Ore mined/milled (‘000s tonnes) 2,030-2,250 131
- 2,161-2,381
Complex concentrate smelted (‘000s tonnes)
- 200-220
200-220 Metals contained in copper and zinc concentrates produced (1)(2) Gold (‘000s ounces) 108-118 6
- 114-124
Copper (million pounds) 35.0-39.0 0.7
- 35.7-39.7
Zinc (million pounds)
- 2.8
- 2.8
Silver (‘000s ounces) 204-234 111
- 315-345
Payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold (‘000s ounces) 26-40
- 26-40
Cash cost per tonne of ore processed ($) (3)(4) 32-36 81
- 32-36
Cash cost per ounce of gold sold, net of by-product credits ($) (1)(3)(4) 550-650 1,136
- 550-650
All-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold ($) (1)(3)(4)
- 750-850
Cash cost per tonne of complex concentrate smelted, net of by-product credits ($) (3)(4)
- 380-425
380-425 Cash cost per ounce of gold sold in pyrite concentrate ($) (4) 750-850
- 750-850
General & administrative expenses (3)
- 17-21
Exploration expenses (3)
- 5-6
Sustaining capital expenditures (3) 10-12 3 12-16 22-28
1) Excludes metals in pyrite concentrate and, where applicable, the treatment charges, transportation and other selling costs related to the sale of pyrite concentrate, which is reported separately. 2) Metals contained in concentrate produced are prior to deductions associated with smelter terms. 3) Based on foreign exchange rates and metal prices that approximate current rates and prices. The assumed copper price reflects the impact of 67%
- f 2016 copper production being hedged at $2.32 per pound.
4) Cash cost per tonne of ore processed, cash cost per ounce of gold sold, net of by-product credits, all-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold, cash cost per tonne of complex concentrate smelted, net of by-product credits and cash cost per ounce of gold sold in pyrite concentrate have no standardized meaning under GAAP. Refer to the “Non- GAAP Financial Measures” section of the Q2 2016 MD&A for reconciliations to IFRS. 5) As a result of the Kapan Disposition, which closed on April 28, 2016, Kapan’s operating results have been treated as a discontinued operation and its production and cost guidance reflects actual performance for the period January 1 – April 28, 2016. 6) Consolidated guidance for ore mined/milled and metals production includes results from the discontinued Kapan operation. Consolidated guidance for cash cost per tonne of ore processed, cash cost per oucne of gold sold, net of by-product credits, all-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold and capital expenditures pertains to continuing operations.
TSX:DPM 35
HEDGE POSITIONS AT JUNE 30, 2016
Year of projected payable copper production Volume Hedged (lbs) % Hedged Average fixed price ($/lb) Balance of 2016 12,632,473 73% $2.32 2017 14,550,492 38% $2.17 QP Commodity Hedged Volume Hedged % Hedged Average fixed price Payable gold 34,525 oz 100% $1,254/oz Payable copper 15,101,647 lbs 100% $2.17/lb Payable silver 67,480 oz 100% $15.91/oz Year of projected payable gold in pyrite con production Volume Hedged (oz) % Hedged
(payable gold in pyrite con production)
Average fixed price of Pyrite Production Hedges ($/oz) Balance of 2016 4,020 27% 1,150.00 Year of projected operating expenses Foreign currency hedged Amount hedged in foreign currency % Hedged Average exchange rate Foreign currency/US$ Balance of 2016 Euro South African rand 5,850,000 378,000,000 22% 65% 1.1146 13.2279 2017 Euro South African rand 10,800,000 720,000,000 21% 62% 1.1287 13.8699 Total Euro South African rand 16,650,000 1,098,000,000 1.1237 13.6420 Year of projected payable gold production Volume Hedged (oz) Average ceiling price ($/oz) Floor Price ($/oz) Balance of 2016 6,600 1,484 1,200 2017 45,000 1,497 1,200
TSX:DPM 36
EXPLORATION – AVALA PROPERTIES IN SERBIA
(2) (3),(4)
- Closing occurred April 8, 2016
- Timok Gold Project
- 2.5 million oz in resource category: 920,000 mineable oz
- 2014 PEA (using $1300 gold price and 5% discount rate)
- DPM plans to explore for additional mineable ounces
- DPM received approval for the renewal of its exploration
tenure over the southern extent of the Timok area and expanded coverage to include additional ground east of the sediment packages in an area recently made available within the Timok magmatic complex
HIGHLIGHTS
Lenovac Timok Gold Project Kiseljak Cu Au Porphry
- Kiseljak Copper Gold Porphyry Project
- 547 million tonne resource at 0.22 g/t gold and 0.23% copper
- Assess potential for higher grades close to surface
- Lenovac option agreement with Rio Tinto
- 132km2 licence south of the Freeport-Reservoir discovery at Cekaru Peki
- If Rio Tinto incurs expenditures of US$3 million by December 31, 2017, it will earn a 51% interest
project (C$1 million first year commitment)
- Rio Tinto can incur additional expenditures of US$5 million by end of 2019, for 65% interest in the
project and US$32 million by end of 2023 for 75% interest in the project
TSX:DPM 37
Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. (TSX:SBB), Nunavut
- Canadian-based, precious metals company with assets in Nunavut
- DPM holds 11.8%
- Assets include:
- High Grade Back River Gold Project:
- September 2015 updated feasibility study*:
- Mill throughput of 3,000 tpd
- Avg. annual gold production of 198,100 oz @ $US534/oz cash cost
- LOM 11.8 years
- Pre-production capital C$415M; Sustaining capital C$185M; Closure capital C$64M
- Post-tax IRR of 24.2% and NPV of C$480.3M
- Hackett River payable silver royalty from Glencore Zinc:
22.5% of first 190M oz Ag, 12.5% thereafter
PARTIALLY OWNED EXPLORATION / DEVELOPMENT ASSETS
*Calculated using US$1,150/oz Au price
TSX:DPM 38
Transaction Highlights
- Announced March 1, 2016
- Proceeds: US$25 million - US$10 million in
cash + US$15 million in Polymetal common shares - Subject to normal course working capital adjustments; 2% net smelter return royalty on future production
- Completed on April 28, 2016
- Exclusions - Certain joint venture
arrangements and related exploration assets and licenses in the central part of the country
- Implications - Strengthens balance sheet and
reduces future capital requirements; Increases focus on core portfolio of assets
2016 YTD ACCOMPLISHMENTS SALE OF KAPAN MINE
TSX:DPM 39
CHELOPECH MINE: UPDATED MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES
Chelopech Mineral Reserves – December 31, 2015 Category Tonnes (M) Gold Copper Silver Grade (g/t) Grade (%) Grade (g/t) Proven 11.88 3.06 1.02 7.89 Probable 9.64 3.29 0.84 6.08 Total 21.51 3.16 0.94 7.08 Chelopech Mineral Resources – December 31, 2015 Category Tonnes (M) Gold Copper Silver Grade (g/t) Ounces (M) Grade (%) Pounds (M) Grade (g/t) Ounces (M) Measured 8.4 3.51 0.942 1.15 211 9.91 2.66. Indicated 5.8 3.17 0.591 0.93 118 9.78 1.823 M&I 14.2 3.37 1.533 1.06 329 9.86 4.486 Inferred 2.8 2.48 0.220 0.82 51 9.08 0.817
1. The rounding of tonnage and grade figures has resulted in some columns showing relatively minor discrepancies in sum totals; 2. Mineral Reserves, Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources have been reported in accordance with NI 43-101 and the classification adopted by the CIM; 3. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are additional to the Mineral Reserves 4. Mineral Resources and Reserves may be subject to legal, political, environmental and other risks and uncertainties. Refer to the most recent annual information form of the Company filed on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com and the Company's Technical Reports for more information with respect to key assumptions, parameters and risks relating to the above estimates. 5. Mineral Reserves and Resources estimates have been reviewed and prepared by CSA, that provides multi-disciplinary services to the global resources industry and is independent of the Company; 6. Mineral Reserves and Resources estimates are based on long term metals prices of USD 1,250/oz Au, USD 23/oz Ag, and USD 2.75/lb Cu and USD 0.85/lb Zn, and as of December 31, 2015; 7. Chelopech Mineral Resources are based on a gold equivalent cut-off 3.0 g/t (Au + Cu*2.06) and a greater than USD 0 profit/tonne test using NSR analysis; 8. Chelopech Mineral Reserves are based on a gold equivalent cut-off of 3.0 g/t (Au + Cu*2.06) and a cut-off of USD 10 profit/tonne using NSR analysis. 9. A Mineral Resource is an inventory of mineralization that under realistically assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions might become economically extractable, while a Mineral Reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that are expected to occur when the material is mined. Under the previous method, when Minerals Reserves are reported as part of Measured and Indicated Resources, these diluting materials and allowances are excluded from the estimate of Resources.
TSX:DPM 40
KRUMOVGRAD OPEN PIT DESIGN AND PHASES
TSX:DPM 41
KRUMOVGRAD MINE PLAN SUMMARY
TSX:DPM 42
KRUMOVGRAD PROCESS PLANT AND SCOPE OF WORK
TSX:DPM 43
KRUMOVGRAD IMWF GENERAL OVERVIEW
TSX:DPM 44
KRUMOVGRAD IMWF CONSTRUCTION
TSX:DPM 45
KRUMOVGRAD IMWF CONSTRUCTION
TSX:DPM 46
KRUMOVGRAD HIGH LEVEL SCHEDULE
Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria
Corporate Head Office: One Adelaide Street East, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M5C 2V9 T: 416 365-5191 Investor Relations T: 416 365-2549 jreid@dundeeprecious.com TSX: DPM – Common Shares www.dundeeprecious.com