Downtown Parking Study Committee Meeting Barriers to Residential - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

downtown parking study committee meeting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Downtown Parking Study Committee Meeting Barriers to Residential - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Downtown Parking Study Committee Meeting Barriers to Residential Development June 4, 2019 Hood River City Hall + Public Outreach 1 Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Approve Meeting #3 Notes William Reynolds Group 3. Debrief 5/28 City Council


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Committee Meeting

June 4, 2019 Hood River City Hall

1

Downtown Parking Study

Barriers to Residential Development + Public Outreach

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • 1. Introductions
  • 2. Approve Meeting #3 Notes

William Reynolds

3. Debrief 5/28 City Council &Short-term Actions

Group

  • 4. Residential Barriers (WP #4)

William Reynolds

  • 5. June Public Outreach

William/Rick

  • 6. Preview: Fee-in-Lieu (WP #5)

Rick Williams

  • 7. Next Steps
  • July 2, 2019 Ad Hoc Committee

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Approve Meeting #3 Notes

3

Refer to Handout

slide-4
SLIDE 4

City Council Debrief

4

  • Input from those who attended

 Important messages?  Additional study needs?  Other considerations?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Barriers to Residential Development

5

Major Categories

  • Economic Barriers
  • Zoning and City Policy Barriers
  • Downtown Livability Barriers
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Economic Barriers

  • Total $ / ft2
  • Land
  • Construction/renovation
  • Parking
  • Parking
  • Construction
  • Construction + FEL
  • FEL

$230 / ft2 $490 / ft2

Stalls Built Construction Fee-in-Lieu Total 2.0 stalls $80,000

  • $40,000 each

1.5 stalls $60,000

  • $40,000 each

1.0 stalls $40,000 $2,000 $42,000 each 0.5 stalls $20,000 $13,000 $66,000 each No stalls

  • $24,000

(No stalls)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Zoning and City Policy Barriers

  • Permitted vs. Conditional Use
  • Commercial (Permitted)
  • Residential (Permitted)
  • Comm. + Res. (Conditional)
  • Height Restrictions
  • Commercial (45’)
  • Residential (35’)
  • Comm. + Res. (45’)
  • Historic Buildings
  • Few parking options
  • Inconsistency within Code
  • 1.5 stalls per units (by code) or;
  • 1.2 stalls per 1,000 ft2 (from fee-in-lieu)

45’ 35’ 45’ Com. Res. Com. + Res.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Downtown Livability Barriers

  • Amenities
  • Bike storage? Gym?
  • Outdoor shared space?
  • Access to Services and Supplies
  • Grocery Store
  • Hardware Store
  • Gym
  • Multimodal Options
  • Transit
  • Short-term rental car options
  • Vehicle Storage
  • Off-site options?

35’

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Public Outreach

9

Discussion Topics

  • Online-Survey
  • Intercept Surveys
  • Focus Groups
  • Open House
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Online Survey

  • Business Owners
  • Name/address of business
  • Product or service
  • Total employees
  • Employees on site each day
  • Mornings (7 am – 11 am)
  • Midday (11 am – 3 pm)
  • Afternoons (3 pm – 7 pm)
  • Evenings (7 pm – 11 pm)
  • Overnight (11 pm – 7 am)
  • Parking for employees
  • TDM programs (transit, bike, carpool)
  • Level of satisfaction
  • Downtown Employees
  • Commute mode by day
  • Home address
  • Level of satisfaction
slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Online Survey

  • Downtown Residents
  • Car ownership
  • Location of overnight parking
  • Pay for parking? (yes/no)
  • Move car by 9 am?
  • Location of work/school/other activity
  • Level of satisfaction
  • All Respondents (Including Visitors)
  • Typical mode (to shop/dine
  • Location of parking (if applicable)
  • Payment preference (meter, kiosk)
  • Level of difficulty finding parking
  • Email address
  • Priority investment (Up to 3)
  • Better sidewalks/crosswalks
  • Better bike lanes/paths
  • More off-street public parking
  • Additional paid parking kiosks
  • Pay-by-phone options for parking
  • Improved wayfinding/directional signs to

parking options

  • More long-term parking options (longer than 3

hours)

  • More very-short term/drop-off parking options

(15 minutes or less)

  • Improved public transit/circulator shuttle
  • Priority amenities (Up to 3)
  • Dog park
  • Grocery store
  • Grade school
  • Open space/green space
  • Playground
  • More residential units
  • More restaurants/bars
  • More retail shops
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

In-Person Events

  • Intercept survey
  • Last 7 questions from online survey
  • + Facebook Page Link
  • + Open House Announcement
  • Farmer’s market?
  • Focus Groups
  • Downtown business owners
  • Downtown employees
  • Downtown residents
  • Hood River residents
  • Open House
  • Preferred date
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fee-in-Lieu

13

Key Purpose

Fees-in-lieu allows a new or intensified development to buy out of a requirement to provide a minimum number of parking stalls. Fees paid by the developer are used by the City to fund development of new public parking facilities.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fee-in-Lieu

14

Hood River: Issues to Consider

  • Clarity on the strategic intent for use
  • f the fees collected. City role and

responsibility.

  • Are there expectations of an access

entitlement that may or may not be granted to fee payers?

  • A consistent and market-based

methodology for calculating fees.

  • Planning for use of fees collected with
  • ther funding sources to support new

supply.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fee-in-Lieu

15

2019/2020 Fee Schedule

Type of Use Fee-in-lieu Residential $22,088 per space (first 2/3rd) + $2,142 per space (last 1/3rd) Commercial $1,226 per space Industrial $1,226 per space

  • Appears to favor commercial/industrial?
  • Would suggest disincentive to residential?
  • Would suggest plan for other funds to

accommodate new supply for commercial/industrial?

“Fees-in-lieu are generally calibrated to the level of commitment the City makes to the payer for access to an off- site parking supply: an “entitlement” to parking access.”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Next Steps

16

  • Meeting #5: July 2 2019
  • Fee-in-lieu detail
  • Existing Conditions (WP #6)
  • Public Outreach Update
  • What more would the

Committee like to see?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

THANK YOU!