directives have we solved
play

directives have we solved the problems? Roger Morris Bright Angel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dredging and environmental directives have we solved the problems? Roger Morris Bright Angel Coastal Consultants http://bacoastal.co.uk What does dredging do? Deepening changes the energy regime. Can change tidal propagation.


  1. Dredging and environmental directives – have we solved the problems? Roger Morris Bright Angel Coastal Consultants http://bacoastal.co.uk

  2. What does dredging do? • Deepening changes the energy regime. • Can change tidal propagation. • Removes sub-tidal animal and plant communities. • Creates a sink for suspended sediment. • Creates sediment plumes - potentially affecting BOD. • Creates underwater noise. http://bacoastal.co.uk

  3. Impacts on wildlife • Reduces sediment availability. • Changes levels of inter-tidal exposure. • Removes certain habitats. • Smothers some habitats such as biogenic reefs • Impacts upon water quality: • Mobilises sediments, affecting BOD. • Re-mobilises contaminants. • Affects fish movement. http://bacoastal.co.uk

  4. Reduced sediment availability • Dredging leads to a requirement for maintenance dredging. • Maintenance dredging removes sediment that might otherwise be deposited on foreshores. • Reduced sediment load changes the relationship between deposition and erosion - erosion is countered to a lesser extent than previously. http://bacoastal.co.uk

  5. We can predict changes to tidal propagation • Harwich Haven Capital dredge • Immediate loss of 4.5 ha of inter-tidal through reduced exposure. • Proposed Southampton Capital Dredge • Mixture of reduced exposure and increased exposure - less mud and more sand • 1996 Southampton Capital Dredge • Illustrated how cut sediment could be used to provide a one-off foreshore replenishment. http://bacoastal.co.uk

  6. Sediment loss = condition change • Sea level rise is affecting sedimentation - need more sediment to feed mudflats and saltmarshes. • Reduced sediment load = potential for winnowing - system becomes sandier. This potentially changes in-fauna and bird carrying capacity. http://bacoastal.co.uk

  7. Sub-tidal habitat loss • Rarely an issue for Natura 2000. • But, Falmouth is an exception. • But, potentially an issue under the WFD: • Loss of extent of habitat. • Increase in extent of modification (shift from Unmodified to heavily modified = shift away from GEC). http://bacoastal.co.uk

  8. Is dredging a Habitats Regulations issue? • YES • Loss of extent. • Changes to foreshore evolution - erosion. • Possible impacts on some sub-tidal habitats (e.g. maerl). • Possible impacts on protected species, especially Atlantic Salmon. http://bacoastal.co.uk

  9. WFD Impacts • Changes to hydromorphology • Changes extent of modification • Impacts on water quality • Impacts on fish • Loss of biological assemblages http://bacoastal.co.uk

  10. Do we have solutions? • YES & NO • We understand sediment management issues. • We have no solution to loss of sub-tidal habitats or to some water quality problems. http://bacoastal.co.uk

  11. Dredging solutions in the UK • Changes to tidal propagation can be measured and compensated for. • Reduced sediment loads can be offset …. • … or can they? • Timing can be varied ….. • … or can it? • Sub-tidal impacts will be re- colonised ….. • … or will they? http://bacoastal.co.uk

  12. Are known solutions compatible with all the issues? • NO • Sediment feeding is compatible with geomorphological objectives (which in the UK have taken priority). • Sediment feeding is ok in muddy estuaries but not in clear-water estuaries. • Sediment feeding can have an impact on BOD and water quality, especially in clear water estuaries http://bacoastal.co.uk

  13. What does this mean in real terms 1? • Techniques for sediment feeding may not be acceptable: • Rainbowing • Overspilling • Timing for sediment feeding may be confined to the wrong time of year. http://bacoastal.co.uk

  14. What does this mean in real terms 2? • Some dredges are not compatible with EU Environmental Directives. • The impacts are most likely to be severe in clear-water estuaries. http://bacoastal.co.uk

  15. What does this mean in real terms 3? • Port expansion may not be possible in some Atlantic coast locations. • Guidance on port development needs to be better differentiated between North Sea, Atlantic, Mediterranian, Baltic and Black Sea environments. http://bacoastal.co.uk

  16. Some concluding thoughts • The arrival of the WFD re-introduces a new tension. • Some water quality objectives may not accord with N2k geomorphological objectives. • There is much more to do! http://bacoastal.co.uk

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend