1
Direct Measurement of Neutrino Mass -2
Flavio Gatti University and INFN of Genoa E.Fermi School, ISAPP 2011 Varenna August 2nd, 2011
Direct Measurement of Neutrino Mass -2 Flavio Gatti University and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Direct Measurement of Neutrino Mass -2 Flavio Gatti University and INFN of Genoa E.Fermi School, ISAPP 2011 Varenna August 2nd, 2011 1 Calorimetric spectroscopy Initial motivation: perform a model independent measurement. External
1
Flavio Gatti University and INFN of Genoa E.Fermi School, ISAPP 2011 Varenna August 2nd, 2011
Initial motivation: perform a model independent measurement.
External source spectrometers need a precise model of the atom- molecule to calculate in particular the so called “final states effect”
External source spectrometers need also a model of the energy losses in the source material, scattered trajectories,…
Models contains unknown systematics (see problem of m2 <0
excluded all these determinations)
2
In a calorimeter the energy Ei= E(bi)+Di is measured for each event
Then the spectrum become dN(E) = A Si wi (Ei-E0)2dE
3
Advantages:
no model dependent corrections for atomic and molecular final states.
no correction for nuclear recoil energy and for electron energy losses. Drawbacks:
Beta source inside the detector: whole spectrum must be acquired and the interesting area is proportional only to (mc2/E0 )3
Needed to work with Low Q Value Isotopes
187Re : lowest Q ~ 2.5 keV. 187Re: (mc2/E0 )3 ~1/400 of H3
4
Counts in DE below the
Counts at mn=0 Counts at mn≠0 Pileup counts Sensitivity
5
6
The first calorimetric experiment applied to the beta
At that time it was established that “a-ray” were
But the “b-ray” behavior is in sharp contrast to this:
“ b-spectrum is continuum because of the slowing down in the
material” (Lisa Meitner) or “in collision with atomic electron” (E.Rutherford)
The results was <E> calorimeter= 0.33±0.03 MeV/atom against
Emax=1.05 MeV/atom
”Not conservation of energy” (N.Bohr) Emax-<E> “carried out by escaping particle” (Heisemberg) Pauli conjecture of the neutrino (1930)
First fully calorimetric detector for b-decay even if not able to detect single particle.
Single particle detection with thermal detector in1949: a technique incredibly similar to the present one
Apparatus
R(E)
Initial state: implanted 3H moves under the effect of channeling and places as neutral atoms in the tetragonal structure od Si atomic
3H in well defined site.
Final state: 3He+ in 1s or 2s (+ possible shake-off processes) recombination processes:
(a) second electron in 1s (1S0)(<10ns),
(b) in 2s (meta-stable if free) but it decays faster (radiatively) , due to screening of Si electrons and/or via Stark mixing with 2p1/2 to 1S in t<ns (58,4 nm emission).
The main de-excitation processes involves emission of several tens
w=3.66 eV (F.Sholze, JAP(1998)),
It can be considered an Energy Dispersive “charge calorimeter” for beta decay.
1985 – Dan Mc Cammon (Univ.
a fast thermal calorimeter to tritium beta decay spectroscopy (AIP Conf. Proc. 1985)
1985 - First conceptual proposal
spectroscopy method of determining neutrino mass by using 187-Re (S.Vitale, Univ. INFN Genova) INFN Report /BE- 85/2)
185Re75 5/2+ 187Os76, 1/2-
b
HCP lattice Tc=1.69 K = 21 g/cm3 T(Debye)= 460 K M.P.=3000 K Z=75 A=185(37%), 187(63%) 1/2 Re-187=4x1010 y
Initial and final states are in the crystal
The spectrum end-point energy is lower than the one of isolated isotope.
Eendpoint=(Q-mec2)-(ef+EFermi)-DBlattice where
EFermi =11.2 eV,
Work function f =5.1 eV
Crystal binding energy Blattice = 16.9 eV
Change of binding from Re->Os DBlattice =2.7% Blattice
16
75 Re [Xe] 4f14 5d5 6s2 , Etot= -429402.3 eV
76 Os+ [Xe] 4f14 5d6 6s1, Etot= -443164.5 eV
76 Os [Xe] 4f14 5d6 6s2 Etot=-443172.8 eV
DBcoul =13.7KeV greater than DEnucl
the bare 187-Re cannot undergo continuum b-decay. Bound state decay of 187Re75+ has been observed in storage ring having 32 y half life and 63KeV Q value
During the decay the beta particle pass through the atom. The electron may not have the time to rearrange the electrons, the atomic binding energy difference Re-Os+ is very close to the binding energy difference of the initial end final atomic state
Being the energy of the final state Os+ after the decay almost that one of the ground state of Os+, high excited state of te final atom are very unlikely
Further, due to the very similar atomic wave-function the probability of a transition toward an excited state is very small being Os eigenstate
Recoil energy at level of few meV respect to several eV per
dislocations; recoil contribute directly to the generation of phonon of elastic branch.
Recoil free beta decay (not yet observed) but extending
Mossbauer and tacking into account the so small recoil effect, this should be negligible.
Shake off probability at 1% level only for N and O shells, that
can emits photons of 50 eV (avg) or Auger electron. They are fully absorbed in hundreds of Ang.
Inner Bremsstrahlung: same Q value but larger penetration
depth, however at um level
Esternal Bremsstrahlung: can be fully contained as before Collective excitation based on long living quasi-particle states
Collective Excitations: Phonon and qp after the primary events: simulation at 6keV
Heat promtly read out by calorimeter Energy trapped in qp. Recondense from us to 100 ms depending on T/Tc What is the prompt thermalization efficiency? Ecal/Eparticle
20
Residuals from spectrum fitting
Eb >>E(Fermi) beta electrons interacts with atomic cores.
k2=2m(E(b)-V)/h2 ,,
If V ~ -15 eV l(100 eV) ~ 0.2A, l(1000) ~0.04A
a=2.76A, c=4.45 A, c/a=1.61A (1.63 A).
Self interference of outgoing and reflected waves from atomic shells:
Oscillation (backscattering amplitude) x (self- interference amplitude on Re nucleus from each atomic shell) x (number of atoms of shell)
Thermal motion energy: T0 ~ exp( 2k2 /MQD)
b wave attenuation (“range”): ~ exp(-gR), g ~3-20 A
First hypothesis: S.E.Koonin in 91(Nature 354,486), never observed.
Thermal model contains non- linear terms
Linearized equations give simple exponential thermal response
C(T)
G(T,Tb) Tb
R(T) Pg Plin
k .
Insert Sensor Model
Insert bias power for sensor readout
Improve the model taking into account of all C and G terms including their models
Set of non-linear equation…
2 2
( ) 1 1
T T T T s
R T R R e H e
2 2 1 2 n n n n TES TES Abs TES TES h x TES b n n Abs Abs Abs TES b st b x TES b p b
dT C K T T K T T R T I dt dT C K T T P t dt dI q R I t I R T I L dt C dq I dt
b
-
a= (T/R) dR/dT Sensor sensitivity
Main concept of the whole dynamic response of the TES coupled calorimeter: the bias power act as negative feedback reducing thermal swing and time response more linear and fast response
Parameter of ETF : L = aPbias /GTb =(C/G) 1(1+L)
L range: 10-102
, , , , y0b S1 y1b S1 Ib S1
2 .10 5 4 .10 5 6 .10 5 8 .10 5 1 .10 4 0.0829 0.0831 0.0833 0.0835 0.0837 0.0839
TES w ETF Abs w ETF TES absorber
t [s] T [K]
ETF effect
Temperature fluctuations are caused by the
Average phonons <N>= U/kT = CT/kT Internal energy fluctuation DUrms= (N)1/2 x kT=
RMS Intrinsic Energy Noise = (kT2C)1/2 Ex: T=0.1 K, C=10-13 J/K DUrms≈ 1eV
T G Tb Phonon casual motion
Including all the noise sources (Phonon, Johnson…), the intrinsic thermal resolution contains sensor and conductance parameters: a and n (G~Tn).
Values better than 1 eV are predicted
30
31
Mo/Au TES Electron-beam deposited Tc ~ 0.1 K Noise-mitigating normal-metal stripes Absorbers joined to TES in micro- fabrication “Mushroom” shaped to cover the gaps Emphasis on absorbers needed for Constellation-X reference design 0.25 mm pitch (TES is 0.13 mm wide) 92% fill factor 95% QE at 6 keV
Bi Cu nitride
35
163Ho 163Dy* + ne
We have already (10 year ago) performed some test experiment with EC capture decay of Fe-55 (g-g), Ho-163(g-g) (1997), and Be- 7(g-e,g)
The major problem has been the preparation of the absorbers for such kind of materials that easily form oxides.
Ho-oxide
37
38
Needed a dedicated Ho-163 production
There are several nuclear reaction
Er-162(nth,g)Er-163Ho-163 has 480 barn (good!)
Er-162 have 0.2% natural abundance
Needed enriched Er-162 at level
Needed pure sample of Er (oxide)
Other stable isotopes: 164,166,167,168 don’t give out long lived radioactive contaminant
Yield: 2x1011 Ho-163/3x1015 Er- 162 (100h irradiation in 1MW reactor)
First production has been tested using a calorimeter as external detector for simplicity
39
Si Ir Bi
Drop of Ho-Cl
40
TES array NASA/GSFC type
163Ho
In the next months one of these array will be charged with Ho-163 for preliminary test
MARE experiment is moving towards the Ho-163 isotope
detectors with 1-2 eV FWHM in array of 32x32 pixels
Ho-163 embedding process (under study) doesn’t
Readout is already developed and tested as prototype
We can seriously start producing the TDR for
41