Different Post-treatments September 15, 2016 Funding provided by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

different post treatments
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Different Post-treatments September 15, 2016 Funding provided by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transformations of Organic Carbon in three Greywater Recycling Systems employing Different Post-treatments September 15, 2016 Funding provided by The Bill and Melinda Chris Ziemba Gates Foundation Odile Lariv Eberhard Morgenroth Three


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Transformations of Organic Carbon in three Greywater Recycling Systems employing Different Post-treatments

September 15, 2016 Chris Ziemba Odile Larivé Eberhard Morgenroth

Funding provided by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Three water demands

Hand washing Personal hygiene Flushing basin

slide-3
SLIDE 3

5,9 l GAC

Post- Treatment Storage

Use Use Biologically- Activated Membrane Bioreactor (BAMBi) Storage Post- Treatment

Water recycling system overview

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Goals for Post-Treatment 1. Remove color 2. Prevent pathogen regrowth Transformations and removals of

  • rganic carbon
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Non-selective Post-treatment Selective Post-treatment

Transformations and removals of

  • rganic carbon

Goals for Post-Treatment 1. Remove color 2. Prevent pathogen regrowth

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Three Post-Treatments to test

Ozone Electrolysis GAC

Oxidation: Hydroxyl radical:

  • 2.7 eV
  • xidation potential
  • lifetime in H20 < sec.

Non-Selective Oxidation: Ozone:

  • 2.07 eV
  • xidation potential
  • lifetime in H20~20 min.

Selective for aromatics and double bonds Sorption/ Biodegradation: Selective for non-polar/ biodegradable compounds

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Experimental approach

Ozone Electrolysis GAC

Batch experiments with real permeate

  • Targeting maximum carbon removal
  • Monitor

DOC Color Liquid chromatography profiles (size) Assimilable Organic Carbon (AOC)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

DOC batch profile

Exposure Exposure Exposure

Energy (kWhr L-1) 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Energy (kWhr L-1) Energy (kWhr L-1) 0 67 133 200 0 0.005 0.009 0.014 Times passed through GAC

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Color removal and DOC concentrations

Color Good enough Cannot see any color

Exposure

slide-11
SLIDE 11

AOC and DOC

AOC DOC

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Liquid Chromatography – Organic Carbon Detector

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ozone – size chromatography

1 2 3 4 4 5

# indicated peak order ( # means size)

AOC generation may be linked to increases in Building Blocks, Low Mol.

  • Wt. Humics and Neutrals
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Electrolysis – size chromatography

1 2 3 4 4 5

# indicated peak order ( # means size)

AOC production is not clearly linked to increases in LC-OCD fractions

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Biological stability through AOC

Biological stability AOC threshold

?

Exposure Exposure Exposure

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Combining color removal and biological stability

Exposure Exposure Exposure

Biological stability AOC threshold

?

Color Good enough Cannot see any color

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusions

  • Ozone, Electrolysis and GAC are able to remove color
  • Only GAC is able to demonstrate reliable biological stability

by AOC measurement

  • Ozone and Electrolysis may be able to achieve biological

stability through antimicrobial residual (ozone and chlorine)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

END

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

  • Ozone (more strongly) and Electrolysis demonstrate preferences for

removal of color relative to DOC, and target the humic substance fraction of the LC-OCD profile. GAC treatment is non-selective.

  • Both Ozone and Electrolysis demonstrate AOC production at different

points in the batch DOC removal profile.

  • The production of AOC by electrolysis may be linked to increases in

Building Blocks, Low Mol. Wt. Humics and Neutrals.

  • Biological stability (by AOC) requires more treatment than color removal.
  • Ozone may be able to achieve biological stability.
  • Electrolysis failed to achieve biological stability.
  • GAC is able to achieve biological stability.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Experimental approach

Ozone Electrolysis GAC

  • Boron-doped diamond
  • 14 V 2.4 A
  • 5 min. polarity reversal

(with 1 min. off)

  • 0.7 L/min recirculation
  • temperature controlled
  • Corona-discharge
  • zone generator
  • 300 mg/hr at generator
  • bubbled (2 L/min air)
  • 3-4 mm ø bubbles
  • 2 meter tall column
  • Repeated pouring

through GAC column

  • 1-1.4 mm grain size
  • 0.3L GAC (170 dry g)

1 Batch experiments with real permeate

  • Targeting maximum carbon mineralization / removal
  • Monitor DOC, Color, Chromatography (size), Assimilable Organic Carbon
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Current Prototype uses Electrolysis

5,9 l GAC  Mineralization of Carbon  Production of Chloride

  • H2O

HO*

+

B

+

B

+

H+ HO* RO+H+ R H+ H+ H2 H2 e- Cathode Anode e- R= organics B= Boron dopant HO*= hydroxyl rad

Oxidation potential 2.7 eV =

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Color loss by spectrophotometer

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Size exclusion chromatography

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Many System Iterations

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Liquid Chromatography – Organic Carbon Detector

slide-26
SLIDE 26

DOC Color DOC Color DOC Color

Summary

  • Ozone produces delayed AOC increase
  • Maybe linked to increases in specific LC-OCD fractions
  • Electrolysis immediately produces AOC increase
  • not clearly linked to a LC-OCD fraction
  • GAC does not produce Ozone

Ozone Electrolysis GAC Removal preference Sufficient Color Removal YES YES YES Biological Stability (AOC) ??? NO YES

slide-27
SLIDE 27

5,9 l GAC

1250 mg/L TOC 45-50 mg/L TOC ~8 mg/L TOC 1212 mg/L TOC 1202 mg/L TOC ~2 mg/L TOC ~12 mg/L TOC ~18 mg/L TOC Activated Carbon Electrolysis No Post- treatment

Impacts on full-scale bioreactor operation

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Stercobilin Urobilinogen

Color contributing chemicals of Urine and Feces