Diamond:H/Transition Metal Oxides Transfer-Doping: Efficiency and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

diamond h transition metal oxides transfer doping
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Diamond:H/Transition Metal Oxides Transfer-Doping: Efficiency and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Diamond:H/Transition Metal Oxides Transfer-Doping: Efficiency and Transistor Performance Dr. Moshe Tordjman Prof. Jesus A. del Alamo Dr. Alon Vardi Dr. Zongyou Yin Prof. Rafi Kalish Dr. Youngtack Lee Diamond Surface Transfer Doping with


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Diamond:H/Transition Metal Oxides Transfer-Doping: Efficiency and Transistor Performance

  • Dr. Moshe Tordjman
  • Prof. Rafi Kalish
  • Prof. Jesus A. del Alamo
  • Dr. Alon Vardi
  • Dr. Zongyou Yin
  • Dr. Youngtack Lee
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Diamond Surface Transfer Doping with Adsorbates Molecules

Energy

‐4.2 eV NEA: ‐1.3 eV Diamond:H Adsorbate Acceptor

VB CB

f

E Chemical

f

Potential µ Vacuum Level

Energy

X [Å] Normal to Surface Diamond:H Adsorbate Acceptor

VB CB Chemical

f

Potential µ

f

E DHG 2

X [Å] Normal to Surface After Equilibrium State Before Electron Transfer

Drawbacks:

  • 1. Volatile and Sensitive to Atmospheric

Fluctuations.

  • 2. No Temperature Stability.
  • 3. Low Work Function Limited conductivity

e‐ φ~ 4.2eV

Strobel et.al Nature,430, (2004) ;

  • W. Chen, Prog. Surf. Sci (2009)
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Diamond Surface Transfer Doping with Transition Metal Oxides

Energy

‐4.2 eV Diamond:H

VB CB

f

E

Energy

X [Å] Normal to Surface Diamond:H TMO Surface Acceptor

VBM CBM

f

E DHG 2

X [Å] Normal to Surface After Equilibrium State Before Electron Transfer

e‐ φ> 6.7eV s Surface Acceptors: TMO

f

E VB CB VB CB

f

E

TMO Surface Acceptor

Advantages:

  • 1. Temperature Stability (up to 350-450C).
  • 2. Higher Work function  Higher conductivity.

NEA: ‐1.3 eV

Vacuum Level

Tordjman et. al. Advanced Materials Interfaces , 20130 0155, (2014).

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Diamond (100) Diamond:H Diamond:H Diamond:H

Hydrogen Plasma

In Situ Anneal 350˚C + Thermal Evaporation

3

MoO Van‐Der‐Paw Contacts Hall effect meas.

Simplified Structure Measurement

Diamond:H/TMO Transfer Doping

Acids Cleaning

TMOs come into Various:

  • 1. Crystallization Structures.
  • 2. Oxidation phases. (i.e. MoO3-x, V2O5-x , WO3-x etc..)
  • 3. Coverage Uniformity.

TMO TMO Tordjman et.al. Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 111601 (2017)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MoO3 Thermal Evaporation Integrity to FET Fabrication Process

Diamond:H Diamond:H

Thermal dep.

3

MoO S/D Contacts E‐Beam

Diamond:H

C  150 Oxide gates ALD –

2

HfO

Diamond:H

Low Budget Temp. FET Fab. Process Challenges:

  • 1. Nonhomogeneous Morphology.
  • 2. Stoichiometry Changed by Fab. Process.
  • 3. Carrier Loss due to band-energy Misalignment.

eV 5  eV 6.7 : 

Ra=0.86nm

2 ‐

cm

14

10 x 1 =

s

P

2 ‐

cm

12

10 x 4 =

s

P

Vardi et.al. EDL .35,12 (2014)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ALD 170C: Mo(CO)6 / O3  MoO3

 Roughness Quality improved.

  • 1. Electronic Gap- States- reducing WF .
  • 2. Band Energy Misalignment.

ALD MoO3 Surface Acceptor

Ra=0.36nm

Yin & Tordjman et. al. Science Advances, 4:eaau0480,(2018).

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ALD 350C: C12H20MoN4 / H2O HyMoO3

O1s XPS Mo3d XPS

ALD HyMoO3 Surface Acceptor

Yin & Tordjman et. al. Science Advances, 4:eaau0480,(2018).

3

MoO

3

MoO

3

MoO

Y

H

3

MoO

Y

H

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ALD 350C: C12H20MoN4 / H2O HyMoO3

ALD HyMoO3 Surface Acceptor

Yin & Tordjman et. al. Science Advances, 4:eaau0480,(2018).

Ra=0.30nm Hydrogen Incorporation Contributes:

  • 1. Strengthen Covalent bonds.

 No O Reduction.  No Work Function Degradation.

  • 2. Improved Surface Roughness Quality.
  • What about Energy- Band Alignment?
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Diamond:H/MoO3 Vs. HyMoO3 Properties

Diamond:H Diamond:H

ALD

3

MoO

y

H

  • r

3

MoO S/D Contacts E‐Beam

Diamond:H

C  150 Oxide gates ALD –

2

HfO C  600 RTA +

Diamond:H

High Budget Temp. FET Fab. Process

Top gate + Channel isolation

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65

MoO3-x ALD after process HyMoO3-x ALD after RTA As grown HyMoO3 ALD

2()

As grown MoO3 ALD HyMoO3-x

HyMoO3 MoO3-x MoO3

Intensity A.U

Mo3d XPS XRD Yin & Tordjman et. al. Science Advances, 4:eaau0480,(2018).

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Diamond:H/MoO3 Vs. HyMoO3 FETs

Yin & Tordjman et. al. Science Advances, 4:eaau0480,(2018). 3

MoO

y

H

3

MoO

slide-11
SLIDE 11

MoO3 Vs. HyMoO3 Band-Energy Alignment

Yin & Tordjman et. al. Science Advances, 4:eaau0480,(2018).

eV 5  eV 6.7 :  eV 5.9  eV 6 : 

3

MoO

y

H

3

MoO

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MoO3 Vs. HyMoO3 Band-Energy Alignment

Yin & Tordjman et. al. Science Advances, 4:eaau0480,(2018).

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusions

  • A Novel Advantageous Surface Acceptor: HyTMO
  • General Strategy for Integrating and Modulating Electronic States in HyTMO.
  • Diamond:H/HyMoO3 Surface Acceptor shows:

1. Improved Morphology Smoothness. 2. Immunity to Harsh Processing FET Fab. 3. Improved Cross‐Transport via band‐energy alignment.

Thank YoU