diakoptic analysis of complex 3 d electromagnetic systems
play

DIAKOPTIC ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX 3-D ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS 1 School - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A.R. Djordjevi 1 , D.I. Ol an 1 , B.M. Kolundija 1 , J.R. Mosig 2 , I.M. Stevanovi 3 DIAKOPTIC ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX 3-D ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS 1 School of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Serbia 2 Ecole Polytechnique


  1. A.R. Djordjevi � 1 , D.I. Ol � an 1 , B.M. Kolundžija 1 , J.R. Mosig 2 , I.M. Stevanovi � 3 DIAKOPTIC ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX 3-D ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS 1 School of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Serbia 2 Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland 3 Freescale Semiconductor, Geneva, Switzerland COST Action IC0603 Workshop Cyprus, April 2008

  2. Contents � Present status of research and software development � Plans for future work � Collaboration among universities and STSMs

  3. Diakoptics � Split the original system into smaller nonoverlapping subsystems � Solve each subsystem individually � Combine partial solutions to obtain the solution of the whole system � Diakoptic approach is based on � surface integral-equation (SIE) formulation � equivalence theorem (Huygens’ Principle) � Diakoptic surface integral equation (DSIE) formulation

  4. DSIE efficacy � One outer subsystem (for open systems) and K congruent inner subsystems � The total number of ports for the circuit is KM � Brute-force solution, using tableau system of equations, with total of 2 KM unknowns � More sophisticated solution results in KM unknowns � If topological elimination is used, then the solution time is negligible � Nesting

  5. DSIE efficacy � Assumptions/conditions: � matrix inversion time dominates � K congruent subsystems, each with N unknowns � 2 M unknowns for each diakoptic surface � Total number of unknowns for circuit solution: KM � Efficient when overhead is small ( M << N ) 2 ( ) m KN DSIE � � s � Storage reduction 2 2 m ( ) ( ) � � � N M KM SIE � � =1 for closed systems, � =2 for open systems

  6. DSIE efficacy 3 ( ) t KN DSIE � � Acceleration a 3 3 t ( ) ( ) � � � N M KM SIE

  7. DSIE applications so far � 2-D electrostatic problems with piecewise- homogeneous dielectrics � 3-D electrostatic problems with piecewise- homogeneous dielectrics new results � 2-D quasi-static and dynamic problems (TM,TE) with piecewise-homogeneous media � 3-D dynamic problems with piecewise- homogeneous media NEW

  8. 3D electrostatics: 2 cubes � Two metallic cubes 2 Original system z [m] 0 6 -2 4 2 2 0 0 x [m] -2 -2 y [m] Inner subsystems Outer subsystem

  9. 3D electrostatics: potential � Potential (verification) Original system Inner subsystems Outer subsystem

  10. 3D electrostatics: DSIE performance 6 � Error 5 4 3 � [%] 2 1 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 M 6 � Acceleration 5 4 3 a 2 1 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 M 2.5 � Storage reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 s 0.5 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 M

  11. 3D electrostatics: diakoptic surfaces � Metallic spheres with dielectric coating � Diakoptic surfaces can be arbitrary; they need not touch each other

  12. 3D electrostatics: diakoptic surfaces cut the structure � Metallic patches on dielectric substrate � Diakoptic surfaces penetrate into dielectric

  13. 3D dynamic: simple scatterer � Metallic plates (scatterers) in dielectric cubes Current distribution Near field 0 1.2 MoM-SIE -2 DSIE 1.0 Real MoM-SIE -4 Imag MoM-SIE -6 0.8 Real DSIE J s [mA/m] -8 Imag DSIE E z [V/m] 0.6 -10 -12 0.4 -14 0.2 -16 -18 0.0 -1.00 -0.75 -0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 z - coordinate y [mm]

  14. 3D dynamic: simple scatterer � Radar (monostatic) cross section (RCS) 3.25 3.00 MoM-SIE 2.75 DSIE 2.50 2.25 2.00 1.75 2 1.50 � / � 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 � [deg]

  15. 3D dynamic: complex scatterer � Metallic cubes (1250) One cluster Outer subsystem One inner subsystem

  16. Complex scatterer: MoM vs. DSIE � RCS � -cut � -cut 15 10 DSIE DSIE 10 MoM-SIE 0 MoM-SIE 5 -10 0 -5 2 [dB] 2 [dB] -20 -10 -30 -15 � / � � / � -20 -40 -25 -50 -30 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 � [deg] � [deg] 39 . 7 � 24 557 s 619 s a SIE � DSIE � t t 30 . 5 � 3 . 6 GB 59 MB s SIE � DSIE � m m

  17. 3D dynamic: patch antenna array � Patch antennas (cookies) 10 0 g [dB] ( � = 0) -10 -20 -30 -40 Int. Acc. 0 Int. Acc. 2 Int. Acc. 4 Int. Acc. 6 -50 -180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180 � [deg]

  18. 3D dynamic: 10 x 10 array � Patch antennas (cookies) � congruent subsystems

  19. Patch arrays: DSIE vs MoM Coefficients Coefficients DSIE Storage reduction Acceleration Array MoM-SIE 3 288 240 13.7 11.8 ��� 7 398 540 43.5 21.4 ��� 13 152 960 68.7 51.1 ��� 20 550 1 500 81.6 107.0 ��� 29 592 2 160 87.5 142.3 ��� 40 278 2 940 90.3 228.1 ��� 52 608 3 840 91.7 349.8 ��� 66 582 4 860 92.5 617.5 ��� 82 200 6 000 93.0 771.9 �����

  20. Future work � Evaluation for arbitrary 3D dynamic problems and comparison with other techniques, STSM (Belgrade, Lausanne, Louvain, Barcelona) � antennas, large arrays � printed circuits, microwave devices � Fully incorporate the diakoptics into existing software based on MoM-SIE (Wipl-D) � subdomain and entire-domain basis functions � Software implementations of DSIE on clusters and parallel-processing computers

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend