Developments in Frequency Response Place your chosen image here. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

developments in frequency response
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Developments in Frequency Response Place your chosen image here. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Developments in Frequency Response Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. 17 th February 2015 Adam Sims Frequency


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line.

Developments in Frequency Response

Adam Sims 17th February 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Frequency Response Spend

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Why Develop Frequency Response?

 System Operability Framework 2014 conclusion:

System inertia is expected to reduce, requiring high RoCoF settings or alternative protection approaches Without these measures, there could be a significant increase in volume of response required

 Conventional plant is closing, alternative sources of response are required  Need to ensure frequency response services are economic and fit for future requirements

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Why Develop Frequency Response?

Technically Available Response

Commercially Available Response

BM repositioning costs High Holding Prices

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Commercially Available Response in 2013

5

Holding Price

Commercially Available Response

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Developments in Frequency Response

 Remove barriers to participation  Change Response Energy Payment for low-fuel  Non-BM IT project  FFR bridging/growth contract  Improve FFR market  e-tendering  Split products  Weekly tenders  Develop new services  Rapid Frequency Response (<5s)  Enhanced Frequency Control Capability (<1s)

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Remove barriers to participation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Response Energy Payment

 Concerns with some wind generators pricing themselves out of the response market  One reason given is the calculation of the REP, which is supposed to reflect the cost of providing the energy  REP is predicated on conventional generation, i.e. where a fuel is consumed at a cost

For an increase in output, generator receives MIP*1.25 For a decrease in output, generator pays MIP*0.75

 For low fuel cost plant (e.g. wind) the REP calculation is not cost reflective

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why is this a Problem?

 The REP does not reflect the costs experienced by these generators in providing frequency response  This is deterring participation in the response market by members of a sizeable and growing market segment  Lack of liquidity in the market will result in increased balancing costs  Some wind generators are pricing themselves out of the market entirely

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Submitted Holding Price Bands (Primary)

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Proposed CUSC Change

 Original Proposal:  For plant with no fuel cost, the REP is settled at £0/MWh  No change to plant with a fuel cost  Workgroup consultation has identified a number of alternative approaches, these are now under investigation by the Workgroup  Aim for Ofgem determination by summer

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Non-BM IT Project

Current State

  • Limited fully integrated IT to contract, optimise,

despatch and settle Non-BM

Scope

  • Consider IT options available against the requirement to

innovate and increase Non-BM balancing services

Goal

  • Pathway to increasing National Grid’s effective use of

Non-BM services

Driver

  • IT assets for Standing Reserve Despatch (SRD) and

Frequency Control by Demand Management (FCDM) are limited in capability / functionally

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Non-BM IT Project

 Lessons learnt from DSBR is that an end-to-end solution is preferred by customers  Therefore the project will look to cover procurement/tendering through to settlement  Requirements stage of the project started in January, due to report back in August  Customer feedback is very much part of this development process

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

FFR Bridging Contract

Lack of liquidity in FFR market Interest from non- BM aggregators Trial bilateral growth contract

  • 1-2 year fixed

term

  • Fixed price per

service option

February launch

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line.

Improve FFR market

slide-16
SLIDE 16

FFR e-Tendering

February FFR e-tendering (Ariba)

  • Market Day 2nd February
  • No obligation at this stage to use

Similar format to STOR e-tender Ability to use paper tenders initially, intention is to phase out

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Unbundled Products

 Currently, tenders are for bundled products, i.e. Primary & High or Primary, Secondary & High  Anecdotal evidence that there are parties who can only provide individual products  Would splitting out Primary, Secondary and High increase liquidity in the FFR market?  Intention to investigate this once the e-tendering platform is established (March 2015)  If successful, could be considered for mandatory market

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Weekly Tenders

 FFR tender is a monthly process  Some providers, particularly wind, cannot predict output that far ahead  This is a barrier to wind taking part in FFR  We are therefore investigating moving to a weekly tender, subject to:

Industry engagement e-tendering Resourcing and processes for back-office functions

 Aspiration to publish open letter in March

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line.

Develop New Services

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Rapid Frequency Response

 Rapid Frequency Response (<5 second response)  Response of this speed may already be available from some wind farms  Analysis for GCRP indicates a benefit from RFR on 60% of summer days and 24% of winter nights in 2020/21  However, no consensus at GCRP as to whether this should be a mandatory service  Further Grid Code discussion due to take place in April

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Rapid Frequency Response

 We believe that there is value in developing a commercial service in parallel with Grid Code discussions  Areas of current work:

What volumes should be sought from the market How to value it against existing services

 Future work:

Identify technical parameters required for despatch, monitoring, settlement Seek expressions of interest from industry

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Enhanced Frequency Control Capability

 The Network Innovation Commission agreed funding for a three year study on <1 second response from different types of provider  Collaboration between National Grid, Centrica, Flexitricity, Alstom, Belectric and the Universities of Manchester and Strathclyde  Covers conventional, wind, demand and storage providers  8 workstreams will look at everything from monitoring and control through to developing contractual terms for a new service

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line.

Summary

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Summary

 The requirement for response is increasing  The volume of commercially available response is decreasing  We are looking at multiple solutions to ensure secure and economic operation of the network

24