Development of Non-Scaling FFAG
Takeichiro Yokoi
John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University
RCNP 研究会「ミュオン科学と加速器研究」20/10/2008
Development of Non-Scaling FFAG Takeichiro Yokoi John Adams - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Development of Non-Scaling FFAG Takeichiro Yokoi John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University RCNP 20/10/2008 Introduction ... FFAG( F ixed F ield A lternating G
RCNP 研究会「ミュオン科学と加速器研究」20/10/2008
Particle physics ν-factory, muon source, proton driver FFAG Medical Particle therapy, BNCT, X-ray source FFAG Energy ADSR, Nucl. Transmutation FFAG EMMA PAMELA (PAMELA)
rapid particle acceleration with large beam acceptance. ⇒ wide varieties of applications
for Oncology, Research and Medicine
EMMA ( PM: R.Edgecock )
Rutherford Appleton Lab Daresbury Lab. Cockcroft Ins. Manchester univ. John Adams Ins. BNL (US) FNAL (US) CERN LPNS (FR) TRIUMF (CA)
PAMELA (PM: K.Peach)
Rutherford Appleton Lab
Daresbury Lab. Cockcroft Ins. Manchester univ. Oxford univ. John Adams Ins. Imperial college London Brunel univ. Gray Cancer Ins. Birmingham univ. FNAL (US) LPNS (FR) TRIUMF (CA)
⇒ Fixed field ring accelerator with “small dispersion linear lattice”
① Orbit shift during acceleration is small ⇒Small Magnet aperture, energy variable extraction ② Path length variation during acceleration is small ⇒ fixed frequency rf can be employed for relativistic particle acceleration ① Simple and flexible lattice configuration ⇒ tunability of operating point ② Large acceptance ③ Large tune drift ( focusing power ∝B/p ) ⇒ Fast acceleration is required ~20mm ∆r/r<1%
Kinetic Energy(MeV) TOF/turn(ns)
|df/f|~0.1%
B0 = Δx × B
1
10MeV 20MeV
/cell /cell
Electron NS-FFAG as a proof of principle is to be built as 3-year project.
(host lab: Daresbury lab.)
It is also a scaled-down model of muon accelerator for neutrino factory.
Research items are . . .
(1) Research of beam dynamics of NS-FFAG (2) Demonstration of NS-FFAG as a practical accelerator (3) Demonstration of fast acceleration with fixed frequency RF
3mm(normalized) Acceptance 1.3GHz RF 10~20MeV(variable) Extraction energy 10~20MeV(variable) Injection energy 16.57m Circumference 42 (doublet Q) Number of Cell
Muon Acceleration
* In EMMA, Acceleration completes within 10turns(~500ns) EMMA is a unique system to observe transient process of resonance precisely. ⇒ Unique playground for nonlinear dynamics !!
Kinetic Energy(MeV) TOF/turn(ns)
10MeV 20MeV
/cell /cell
|df/f|~0.1% 10MeV 20MeV
PAMELA : design study of particle therapy facility for proton and carbon using NS-FFAG ( prototype of slow accelerating NS-FFAG ⇒ Many applications!!! Ex. ADSR ) Difficulty is resonance crossing in slow acceleration
Dose uniformity should be < ~2% ⇒To achieve the uniformity, precise intensity modulation is a must IMPT (Intensity Modulated Particle Therapy) Beam of FFAG is quantized. ⇒At the moment, instead of modulating the intensity of injected beam, shooting a voxel with multiple bunches is to be employed.
SOBP is formed by
superposing Bragg peak
time Integrated current
Synchrotron & cyclotron
Gate width controls dose
time Integrated current
FFAG
Step size controls dose “Analog IM” “Digital IM”
If 1kHz operation is achieved, more than 100 voxel/sec can be scanned even for the widest SOBP case. ⇒ 1 kHz repetition is a present goal (For proton machine : 200kV/turn)
Field imperfection severely affects beam blow up in the resonance crossing
rf: 5kv/cell dx: 100µm(RMS) dx: 10µm(RMS) dx: 1µm(RMS)
Beam blow-up rate can be estimated quantitatively Integer resonance Half integer resonance
Linear NS-FFAG (200kV/turn, average B0;n,, w/o ∆B1,σx=100µm)
For slow acceleration case, (~200keV/turn)
integer resonance crossing should be avoided.
Single half integer resonance crossing would
be tolerable
Structure resonance also should be
circumvented. σpos(m) eV(MeV/turn)
Integer resonance (ν=6,1πmm mrad.norm)
Integer resonance blowup constant
210 210 260 260 320 320 70 70 70 90 90 90 kV/turn
σ(µm)
Theoretical value
~2m
Integer resonance crossing must be circumvented. ⇒ Tune-stabilization by introducing higher order multipole field is required One option : Non-Linear NS-FFAG (simplified scaling FFAG) : B=B0 (R/R0)k ⇒ B=B0 [1+k∆R/R0+k(k-1)/2 (∆R /R0 )
2 ····]
* Eliminating higher order multipoles (1) Long straight section (~2m) (2) Small tune drift ( <1) (3) Short beam excursion(<20cm) (4) Limited multipoles (Up to decapole)
by S. Machida(RAL)
by H.Witte (JAI)
Dipole Quadrupole Decapole Octapole Sectapole
Applicable to superconducting magnet
~17cm
40cm
⇒ Feasible option for magnet !!
Well-controlled field quality Present lattice parameters are within engineering
limit
Dipole Quadrupole Sextapole Octapole
(1) Half integer resonance (2) 3rd integer resonance
Nominal blow-up margin : 5
(1πmm mrad → 5πmm mrad)
With modest field gradient error (2×10-3),
acceleration rate of 50kV/turn can suppress blow up rate less than factor of 5.
For the considered range, 3rd integer resonance
will not cause serious beam blow-up ⇒ Required accelerating rate : >50kV/turn ε1/ε0-1
eV/turn (MeV)
∆B2/B2
eV/turn (MeV)
ε1/ε0
∆B1/B1
∆B1/B1 ε1/ε0 1:50kV/turn ∆B1/B1 ε1/ε0 :200kV/turn ∆B1/B1
eV/turn(MeV)
P = (ΣV)2 R dt
(ΣV)2 ≡ (ΣVisin[ fi(t)])2 = Σ
i (Visin[ fi(t)])2 + Σ i≠ j(Visin[ fi(t)]⋅V jsin[ f j(t)])
1 T dt → 0
∫ time Energy 1ms
Option 1
time Energy 1ms
Option 2 Option 1: P∝ Nrep
2
Option 2: P∝ Nrep
Multi-bunch acceleration is preferable from the viewpoint of efficiency and upgradeability Repetition rate: 1kHz ⇔ min. acceleration rate : 50kV/turn (=250Hz) ⇒ How to bridge two requirements ?? Low Q cavity (ex MA) can mix wide range of frequencies
2-bunch acceleration using POP-FFAG : Mori et al. (PAC 01 proceedings p.588)
Multi-bunch acceleration has already been demonstrated In the lattice considered, typical synchrotron tune <0.01 ⇒ more than 20 bunches can be accelerated simultaneously (6D Tracking study is required) “Hardware-wise, how many frequencies can be superposed ??”
Extraction (5.5MHz) 50kV
Injection (2.3MHz) 50kV
PRISM RF
PRISM rf can provide 200kV/cavity
It covers similar frequency region Brf-wise, MA can superpose more than
20 bunches ⇒ Now, experiment using PRISM cavity is under planning ( in this October)
EADF parameters
ADS will be used for ADSR, nucl.
transmutation.
ADS will employ high power low energy
proton accelerator as proton driver (<1GeV, >1mA)
FFAG, cyclotron, LINAC are the
candidates
Key issues are cost and reliability (how to
realize redundancy ?)
From the view point of redundancy, FFAG
is a competitive candidate. ⇒ Proton driver for ADS is one of main applications for PAMELA type FFAG.
Bkicker
∆x ~ aperture
Circulating bunch = extracted bunch
⇒ Low bunch intensity for spot scanning
For energy variable extraction, extraction system is required to be moves
mechanically due to the radial orbit shift especially for HI ring (problems: response time, reliability)
Number of bunch accelerated simultaneously is limited by kicker aperture.
( For the kicker aperture of 2cm, minimum orbit separation is ~4cm. ) ⇒ charge exchange injection is preferable from this point of view
( Life time of kicker ? : ex 106 msec = 1000 sec = 17min ) For the application of ADSR, pulsed beam structure might not be
preferable from the viewpoint of ADS core damage
∆νv<0.5 ~2% of F/D ratio can change the vertical tune more than 0.5 ⇒ In a lattice with vertical tune drift, by changing the F/D ratio, resonance energy can be varied ⇒ Half integer resonance can be used for the extraction : “ Energy variable multi-turn extraction in fixed field accelerator”
”With present design strategy, is it possible to develop a lattice with
vertical tune drift of less than 0.5? ” ⇒ If it is realized, it will solve almost all the problems in PAMELA
Slow extraction (vertical)
HI ring Proton ring
Fast extraction (horizontal)
p HI
1turn injection (horizontal) Charge exchange injection(horizontal) Fast extraction (horizontal)
PAMELA is in a position of prototype machine of NS-FFAG
for non-relativistic particle
It has wide range of application like medical machine and
proton driver for ADS.
Intensive study is going on (dynamics, rf, magnet, clinical
requirement etc.)
Lattice requirements is now getting clear. For acceleration, multi-bunch acceleration provides efficient
and upgradeable option but still needs investigation. ⇒ By the end of next year , hope an doable overall scenario is proposed .