development of diagnostic tools for resistance screening
play

Development of Diagnostic Tools for Resistance Screening and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Name der Einrichtung/Institut Development of Diagnostic Tools for Resistance Screening and Pathotype Differentiation Dennis Reckwell, Friederike Chilla, Annette Bartkiewicz, Diro Terefe-Ayana, Marian Meyer, Kerstin Flath, Marcus Linde and Thomas


  1. Name der Einrichtung/Institut Development of Diagnostic Tools for Resistance Screening and Pathotype Differentiation Dennis Reckwell, Friederike Chilla, Annette Bartkiewicz, Diro Terefe-Ayana, Marian Meyer, Kerstin Flath, Marcus Linde and Thomas Debener Dennis Reckwell, Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019

  2. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Outline - Localization of a resistance locus against S.endobioticum pathotypes 6(O1) and 18(T1) in the potato cultivar Karolin - Characterisation of putative resistance genes against pathotypes 6(O1) and 18(T1) - Development of molecular tools to distinguish pathoytpes 1(D1), 2(G1), 6(O1) and 18(T1) - Identification of putative effector proteins of pathotype 18(T1) Seite 2 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 2

  3. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Pathotypes and Plant Resistance Federal Plant Variety Office, 2018 Seite 3 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 3

  4. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Localisation of 18(T1) Resistance Gene Locus 4n Karolin (1,2,6,18) 2n Solanum phureja X [R 1 r 2 r 3 r 4 ] IVP101 or IVP35 Identification of diploid Seedlings genotypes Identification of recombinant genotypes 2n Karolin between c1_4319 and c2_33712 Narrow down the Evaluation of potato wart resistance locus resistance (6 and 18) Seite 4 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 4

  5. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Localisation of 18(T1) Resistance Gene Locus Chromosome XI 215 genotypes of the dihaploid population were checked for recombinants - 4 recombinants -18(T1) Resistance localised to an intervall of 777 kbp (Bartkiewicz et al., 2018) 394 additional dihaploid genotypes were checked for recombinants - 12 genotypes showed recombination between the SNP markers. Resistance is under evaluation. Modified after Bartkiewicz et al., 2018 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 5 Seite 5

  6. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Localisation of 18(T1) Resistance Gene Locus Modified after Bartkiewicz et al., 2018 Modified after Bartkiewicz et al., 2018 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 6 Seite 6

  7. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Identification of Resistance Genes -The highly resistant dihaploid genotype B35B-1 was sequenced both by Illumina and PacBio. - The Illumina read contigs were mapped to the identified resistance locus on the S. phureja DM1-3 genome. - PacBio contigs were used to span gaps between the Illumina contigs. 79 % of the 777 kbp were identified - These sequences are under inverstigation to identify putative resistance genes Seite 7 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 7

  8. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Evaluation of a putative Resistance Gene The identified resistance marker sequence Kc8103 is part of a putative resistance gene: TIR-NBS-LRR gene -Kc8103gene was amplified and cloned from a resistant dihaploid genotype -The gene was cloned into a binary vector for agrobacteria-mediated transformation under the control of a double CaMV35S Promoter -Stable transformation of susceptible potato cultivars will evaluate an resistance function against 18(T1). Seite 8 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 8

  9. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Pathotype Identification - 18(T1) Transcriptome RNASeq of wart tissue infected by 18(T1) 7008 Chytrid related contigs 136.409 No Hit contigs 130.380 No Hit contigs 13.037 Transcriptome contigs Seite 9 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 9

  10. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Pathotype Identification – SCAR Markers 14425 14425P1 SCAR marker 14425P1 (Busse et al., 2017) Seite 10 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 10

  11. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Pathotype Identification – SCAR Markers  Draft genome sequence of S. endobioticum strain MB42 1(D1) (Jack Vossen; WUR).  Transcriptome of 18(T1) and No Hit sequences mapped against MB42 genome  Contigs with sequence differences between 1(D1) and 18(T1) were choosen for evaluation, 7 were confirmed by sequencing.  Pathotypes 2(G1) and 6(O1) did not differ from pathotype 1(D1) Seite 11 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 11

  12. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Pathotype Identification – SCAR Markers  SCAR marker for pathotype 18(T1): 122283P18 Seite 12 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 12

  13. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Pathotype Identification – Microsatellites Whole Genome Shotgun Sequencing of wart tissue infected by 18(T1) 915.972 DNA contigs Mapping to the Transcriptome contigs 423 DNA contigs Screening for microsatellites: SSR Locator 389 microsatellite motifs ( ≥ 3 Repeats) Seite 13 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 13

  14. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Pathotype Identification – Microsatellites - Published results: - 2 Clusters: 1, 2, 6 and 8 +18 - Differentiation between pathotypes 1, 2 and 6 unsolved. - 100 additional SSR motifs were investigated Modified after Busse et al., 2017 Seite 14 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 14

  15. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Pathotype Identification – Microsatellites SSR 7 SSR 77 I II I III I I II I 1(D1) 2(G1) 6(O1) 18(T1) 1(D1) 2(G1) 6(O1) 18(T1) 1(D1) 2(G1) 6(O1) 18(T1) SSR 7 I II I III SSR 77 I I II I Seite 15 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 15

  16. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Pathotype Identification – Microsatellites SSR 27 I II II I I II II I 1(D1) 2(G1) 6(O1) 8(F1) 18(T1) 3(M1) 39(P1) 2(Ch1) Seite 16 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 16

  17. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … 18(T1) Transcriptome – Effector Genes 7008 Chytrid related contigs Signal Peptide Prediction: SignalP; Phobius Secretome: 475 proteins Effector Prediction: EffectorP 178 proteins 112 proteins < 50 aa 66 putative effectors + 2 genes from previous analyses Seite 17 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 17

  18. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Conclusion - 18(T1) and 6(O1) resistance of cultivar Karolin colocalizes on chromosome XI in an intervall of 777 kbp, which is going to be narrowed down to less than 500 kbp. - The putative resistance gene Kc8103gene is under evaluation. Sequence data are available to identify further candidate resistance genes - Microsatellites to distinguish pathoytpes 1(D1), 2(G1), 6(O1) and 18(T1) are identified. Diagnostic value needs to be checked with further isolates and pathotypes - Four putative effector proteins of pathotype 18(T1) were identified Seite 18 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 18

  19. Name der Einrichtung/Institut … Thank you for your Attention! Department of Molecular Plant Breeding Seite 19 Dennis Reckwell , Development of Diagnostic Tools, Wageningen 27.06.2019 Slide 19

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend