Development and application of an in vitro human neural crest cell - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

development and application of an in vitro
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Development and application of an in vitro human neural crest cell - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Development and application of an in vitro human neural crest cell migration assay Johanna Nyffeler, PhD student, University of Konstanz, Germany Outline 2 1. Introduction 2. Develop a NCC migration assay suitable for high throughput 3.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Development and application of an in vitro human neural crest cell migration assay

Johanna Nyffeler, PhD student, University of Konstanz, Germany

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

1. Introduction 2. Develop a NCC migration assay

suitable for high throughput

3. Application of the assay:

Screen of a compound library

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What are neural crest cells (NCCs)?

3

Gammill et al., 2003 Knecht et al., 2002

Migration Delamination from the neural tube Differentiation into several cell types:

  • enteric neurons
  • sensory neurons
  • cartillage & bone
  • melanocytes

Neural crest cells

Proliferation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Consequences of disturbed NCC function: Neurocristopathies

4

Migration Proliferation

Hirschsprung‘s disease:

  • enteric neurons missing
  • genes: RET, EDN3

Treacher-Collins syndrome:

  • craniofacial malformations

retinoic acid ethanol triazole fungizides cyclopamine

Establish a test system for

  • screening
  • mechanistic exploration

Generation of neural crest cells

from human pluripotent stem cells

Giorgia Pallocca

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Goal: „Ring Assay“

  • low throughput
  • varying scratch widths
  • manual image acquisition

5 Zimmer et al. 2012

MINC assay cMINC assay

  • high throughput
  • experimenter-independent
  • automated image aquisition
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Assay Development

2.

  • ALTEX. 2017;34(1):75-94
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Assay Principle

7

day -1 day 0 day 2

6.35 mm 2 mm

Calcein Calcein viability measure migration measure stopper

cytotoxic specific effect

  • n migration
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Assay setup with controls:

8

endpoint-specific control known positive control

“24 h“ assay able to detect specific NCC migration-inhibition

48 h 24 h

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Testing new compounds

9

specific unspecific proliferation-inhibitor

new „hits“ identified proliferation as

confounding factor

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Proliferation in the 24 h setup

10

compounds from group III

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Prediction Model

11

EC90V/EC90M

taxol 24 CdCl2  8.3 PCB180 6.6 LiCl  4.8 AraC 3.9 CytoD 3.6 retinoic acid 3.1 As2O3 2.8 acrylamide 2.7 staurosporine 2.6 colchicine 2.1 aphidicolin 2.0 AgNO3 1.5 MG-132 1.5 triton X-100 1.4 L-homocysteine 0.98

EC90V/EC75M

taxol 4.79 CdCl2  4.60 PCB180 4.43 LiCl  2.31 retinoic acid 2.20 CytoD 2.13 As2O3 1.51 acrylamide 1.50 colchicine 1.37 staurosporine 1.11 triton X-100 1.06 AgNO3 1.05 L-homocysteine 0.70 MG-132 0.69 AraC 0.43 aphidicolin 0.23

Migration inhibition at EC90V [%]

PCB180  91.0 retinoic acid 66.9 CdCl2  56.6 LiCl  55.3 CytoD  53.4 taxol 49.6 As2O3 40.9 colchicine 40.4 acrylamide 39.9 triton X-100 29.6 AgNO3 27.6 staurosporine 27.6 AraC 17.9 MG-132 16.9 aphidicolin 13.7 L-homocysteine 9.3

endpoint-specific control positive control unspecific compound

Viability ≥ 90% and migration < 75%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusion part ‚Assay setup‘

  • advantages of the cMINC assay:
  • experimenter-independent
  • software for automated image analysis
  • high reproducibility
  • medium to high throughput
  • broad set of compounds tested:

tool compounds, positive controls, negative controls, etc...

  • special focus on proliferation
  • preliminary prediction model

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Application: Screening

3.

Arch Toxicol. 2017, in press

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Procedure

14

flame retardants 12 pesticides 17 drug-like compounds 15 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbo ns 17 industrial chemicals 9 negative controls 5

Screening cMINC assay single concentrations viability > 85% AND migration < 80% NO Hit confirmation testing concentration-response curves YES viability > 90% AND migration < 75% NO YES compound is „negative“ compound is a „positive hit“

Follow-up assays „NTP80-list“ (75 compounds)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Screening

15

26/75 potential positive compounds

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Hit Confirmation

  • 23 of 26 compounds confirmed
  • hits fall all into 3 classes:
  • 10 flame retardants
  • 7 pesticides
  • 6 drug-like compounds
  • many halogenated compounds

i.e. organochlorines

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Follow-up assays

17

Transwell migration Manual cell tracking

 all compounds confirmed  but not identical results

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Conclusion part ‚Screening‘

  • assay suitable for a screening
  • new migration-inhibiting compounds detected

especially organochlorine and organophoshorous compounds

  • compounds confirmed in other migration assays

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Take home messages

1.

NCCs are an embryonic cell type & target of developmental (neuro)toxicants

2.

NCC migration can be assessed in vitro

3.

cMINC assay is promising to screen for D(N)T compounds

4.

Be careful when setting up an assay!

  • use positive and negative controls
  • confounding factors (i.e. proliferation)

5.

different assays test for different biological processes

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Marcel Leist Tanja Waldmann Christiaan Karreman

THANK YOU!

Xenia Dolde Heidrun Leisner Giorgia Pallocca Alice Krebs