bioaccessibility studies using in vitro extraction
play

Bioaccessibility studies using in vitro extraction methods on soils - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bioaccessibility studies using in vitro extraction methods on soils vitro extraction methods on soils of North America Suzette A. Morman, RN, MSc., MPH smorman@usgs.gov (303) 236-1205 David B. Smith, PhD gplumlee@usgs.gov (303) 236-1204 U.S.


  1. Bioaccessibility studies using in vitro extraction methods on soils vitro extraction methods on soils of North America Suzette A. Morman, RN, MSc., MPH smorman@usgs.gov (303) 236-1205 David B. Smith, PhD gplumlee@usgs.gov (303) 236-1204 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

  2. The Challenge Anthropogenic versus Geogenic p g g

  3. The Challenge For Particulate Matter Research (PM) Anthropogenic – Human impact on the environment ( (e.g., chemicals, pesticides, h i l ti id energy production, and mining) Geogenic – produced g p from the Earth by natural processes ( e.g., volcanic ash, windborne ash from wildfires, and mineral dusts) , ) Geoanthropogenic - produced from natural sources by processes that are modified or enhanced by human activities, e.g., dusts from lakebeds dried by human removal of water ) Aral Sea http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.ph p?id=39944

  4. The Challenge Geogenic or naturally occurring earth materials such as soils, dusts and ash may contain known h t i k or potential toxicants. Exposure levels needed Exposure levels needed to trigger disease and causal links to disease are lacking for many materials

  5. The Challenge g Occupational Environmental exposures exposures  Single element or  Element mixture mixture (metals)  Concentration  Concentration  Route of Exposure  Route of Exposure  Duration of  Duration of Exposure Exposure  Matrix composition and effects

  6. The Challenge Particle Characteristics of Particle Characteristics of Toxicological Interest  Particle mineralogy  Particle size distribution  Particle morphology  Chemical composition (bulk, and of  Ch i l iti (b lk d f different phases)  Particle biosolubility, bioreactivity,  P ti l bi l bilit bi ti it bioaccessibility along inhalation, ingestion exposure pathways p p y

  7. In Vitro Bioaccessibility Tests (IVBA) Bioaccessibility – The amount of a toxicant that is soluble in simulated body fluid and available for uptake body fluid and available for uptake. IVBA’s measure bioaccessibility in simulated body fluids (% Bioaccess. = (conc. leachate/total conc.)* 100) (% Bi ( l h t /t t l )* 100)  Fast & Inexpensive  Gastric (pH 1 5) Gastric (pH 1.5)  Gastric to Intestinal  Lung (pH 7.4)  Phagolysosomal (pH 4.5) g y (p )  Linked to detailed mineralogical, physical characterization of test materials

  8. IVBA

  9. The North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes Project. Examine size fraction (<2mm or <250µm) and variations/controls in/on bioaccessibility  N-S transect  Randomly selected  0  0 – 5 cm soil 5 il  Split, half sieved to <2mm and half to <250µm and half to 250µm  Simulated gastric leach (pH 1.5, temperature 37 ° f for 1 hour) 1 h ) (Morman et al. 2009. Applied Geochemistry, v. 24 8) Geochemistry, v. 24 8)

  10. Results - Total Chemistry (mg/kg) As Cd Cr Ni Pb Both Transects 20 8.2 6030 2820 318 Max <1 <0.1 2 2 3 Min 4.5 0.2 29 14 19 Median N-S Transect 11 0.8 79 63 93 Max <1 <1 <0.1 <0 1 4 4 4 4 7 7 Min Mi 3 0.3 31 16 17 Median Selected Samples 11 0.7 50 30 93 Max 1 <0.1 9 5 9 Min 4 0.3 34 14 17 Median

  11. Results 120 No significant difference in g median concentration values between size 100 fractions for total chemistry fractions for total chemistry ssibility or % bioaccessibility. 80 Regression analysis % Bioacces showed no correlation with 60 several ‘controls’ on mobility (soil pH, clay mobility (soil pH, clay 40 40 % content, organic C,) Cd, Ni and Pb 20 demonstrated weak correlation to total 0 µm) µm) µm) concentration µm) µm) mm) m) m) m) m) Ni (<2 mm Pb (<250 µ As (<250 µ Cr (<250 µ Ni (<250 µ Cd (<2 m Cd (<250 Pb (<2 m As (<2 m Cr (<2 m

  12. Arsenic 12.00 2% 2% As <2 mm (total, mg/kg) 10.00 5% 8.00 7% As <2 mm (mg leached/ 2% kg solid) g/kg 6 00 6.00 mg 4% 2% As <250 µm (total, mg/kg) 4.00 7% 10% 5% 2.00 As <250 µm (mg leached/ kg solid) 0.00 38-4-1-PH 34-1-2-PH 32-4-PH 31-2d-1-PH 30-1-PH 29-3d-1-PH 027-3-PH 026-1-PH 024-3d-PH 022-3-PH

  13. Arsenic Morman S Morman,S., et al, 2008, Geological Society of America Meeting et al 2008 Geological Societ of America Meeting abstracts with Program, Vol. 40, No. 6, p78

  14. Cadmium 0 50 0.50 Cd <2 mm 0.45 (total, mg/kg) 61% 58% 54% 58% 57% 55% 0.40 60% 60% 57% 68% 0.35 Cd <2 mm 65% (mg leached/ 59% 71% 0.30 kg solid) 66% 104% kg mg/k 0.25 30% Cd <250 µm 0.20 (total, mg/kg) 65% 44% 0.15 55% 55% 66% 86% 0.10 Cd <250 µm (mg leached/ 0.05 kg solid) 0.00

  15. Chromium 60.00 1% Cr <2 mm 1% 2% 2% (total, mg/kg) 2% 1% 50.00 2% 0.4% 0 4% 2% 1% 0.3% 40.00 Cr <2 mm (mg leached/ 0.7% kg solid) kg mg/k 30.00 5% Cr <250 µm 0.8% 2% 3% (total, mg/kg) 20.00 10.00 Cr <250 µm (mg leached/ kg solid) 0.00 38-4-1-PH 34-1-2-PH 32-4-PH 31-2d-1-PH 30-1-PH 29-3d-1-PH 027-3-PH 026-1-PH 024-3d-PH 022-3-PH

  16. Interferences on Cr Values  Cr measured at 52 Cr or 53 Cr  Using normal quadrupole ICP-MS false positives can result due  Using normal quadrupole ICP-MS false positives can result due to interferences at these masses from 40 Ar 12 C and 37 Cl 16 O which are formed in the plasma  Use of Dynamic Reaction Cell (DRC) ICP-MS with NH as the Use of Dynamic Reaction Cell (DRC) ICP-MS with NH 3 as the reaction gas can eliminate these interferences giving an accurate concentration for Cr background levels in the fluids  NH 3 at 0.9 and RPq at 0.65 NH 3 at 0.9 and RPq at 0.65  Both solutions were run in both modes during the same analysis Cr Concentration Normal Q-ICP-MS Q DRC-ICP-MS Lung Fluid Blank 110 ppb 0.9 ppb Gastric Fluid Blank 92 ppb 1.5 ppb

  17. Nickel 35.00 Ni <2 mm (total, mg/kg) 16% 30.00 16% 15% 19% 25.00 25% 23% Ni <2 mm (mg leached/ 9% kg solid) 20.00 kg 9% 13% mg/k 3% 14% 9% 15% 13% 15.00 Ni <250 µm 24% (total, mg/kg) 34% 15% 10 00 10.00 5% 4% Ni <250 µm 8% 5.00 (mg leached/ kg solid) 0.00 H H H H H H H H H H P P P P P P P P P P - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 4 1 1 1 3 1 d 3 - - - - - - - - - 3 4 1 2 d 0 d 7 6 2 - - - 3 2 3 3 2 2 4 2 8 4 - - 0 0 2 0 3 3 1 9 0 3 2

  18. Lead 30.00 Pb <2 mm 28% (total, mg/kg) 26% 23% 8% 18% 18% 22% 22% 16% 45% 14% 10% 20.00 44% Pb <2 mm 21% (mg leached/ 44% kg solid) 24% /kg mg/ 19% 19% 16% 22% Pb <250 µm 17% (total, mg/kg) 29% 10.00 25% Pb <250 µm (mg leached/ kg solid) 0.00 H H H H H H H H H H P P P P P P P P P P - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 4 1 1 1 3 1 d 3 - - - - - - - - 3 - 4 1 2 d 0 d 7 6 2 - - - 3 2 3 3 2 2 4 2 8 4 - - 0 0 2 0 3 3 1 9 0 3 2

  19. Conclusions  No significant difference between soil size fractions for metals examined  No strong correlations with usual controls on element mobility in soils  IVBA’s are a useful tool within context - particle characteristics, source apportionment etc.

  20. Thanks Geoff Plumlee Paul Lamothe Ruth Wolf Geoff Plumlee, Paul Lamothe, Ruth Wolf and Monique Adams

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend