DETERMINANTS OF FOOD WASTE BEHAVIOUR IN GREEK HOUSEHOLDS T. KRITIKOU, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

determinants of food waste behaviour in greek households
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

DETERMINANTS OF FOOD WASTE BEHAVIOUR IN GREEK HOUSEHOLDS T. KRITIKOU, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DETERMINANTS OF FOOD WASTE BEHAVIOUR IN GREEK HOUSEHOLDS T. KRITIKOU, D. PANAGIOTAKOS AND K. LASARIDI HAROKOPIO UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS The global food security crisis, The average annual quantity of food poses a serious threat to peace waste in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

DETERMINANTS OF FOOD WASTE BEHAVIOUR IN GREEK HOUSEHOLDS

  • T. KRITIKOU, D. PANAGIOTAKOS AND K. LASARIDI

HAROKOPIO UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The average annual quantity of food waste in developed countries is almost equal to the total food production in Sub‐Saharan Africa The global food security crisis, poses a serious threat to peace and security in the world

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Food waste is a social problem, with a solution lying

  • n social interventions

The consumption behaviour of households is as important as the technical or economic aspects in waste management research and decision making

Αim of the study:

  • To analyse Greek consumers’ food waste

behaviour

  • To investigate the most important determinants

that influence the intention to reduce food waste

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Sample survey with a

structured questionnaire based mainly on the Theory

  • f Planned

Behaviour (TPB) Setting Goal, theoretical framework and research hypothesis Setting Goal, theoretical framework and research hypothesis

  • 921 Greeks between

the age of 18 and 75 completed the questionnaire in the period between April and July 2017 (response rate 92%) Data collection. Convenience sampling Data collection. Convenience sampling

  • STATA 12
  • Exploratory Factor

Analysis‐EFA

  • Confirmatory Factor

Analysis‐CFA

  • Structural Equation

Models‐SEM Statistical analysis and conclusions Statistical analysis and conclusions

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The questionnaire includes 67 questions concerning :

TPB

  • Attitudes towards food waste
  • Perceived behavioural control on capability to deal with household food‐

related activities

TPB

  • Perceived expectations of other people, who are important, to food

waste

  • Intention to reduce food waste

Additional variables

  • Knowledge of the problem related to food waste
  • Food‐related routines and habits (planning, shopping, cooking)
  • Moral norms
  • General environmental awareness and routines
  • Socio‐demographic characteristics
  • Self‐reported amounts of Food Waste
slide-6
SLIDE 6

37 % 63 %

SEX

MALE FEMALE

18‐24 11 % 25‐34 11 % 35‐44 27 % 45‐54 33 % 55‐64 13 % > 64 5 %

AGE

Primary school 4 % Gymnasium 6 % Lyceum 30 % Vocational Training Institute 11 % Technological Educational Institutes 12% University 23 % MSc 11 % Phd 3 %

EDUCATION

SOCIO‐DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAMPLE

slide-7
SLIDE 7

29 % 60 % 11 %

MARITAL STATUS

Unmarried Married Divorsed / widower Full time 56 % Part time 9 % Unemployed 7 % Student 8 % Retired 7 % Freelance 8 % Domestically 5 %

PROFESSIONAL STATUS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Very much (>50%) 4% Not very much (31%‐50 %) 6% Enough (16%‐30%) 11% a little (< 15% ) 46% minimum to none 33%

SELF‐REPORTED AMOUNTS OF FOOD WASTE

slide-9
SLIDE 9

4 factors were extracted by EFA:

1

  • Attitude towards food waste

2

  • Environmental knowledge

3

  • General environmental attitude

4

  • Locus of control

RESULTS FROM EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS‐EFA

These factors interpret 44% of the variability of the dependent variable "Food Waste Prevention Intention " (R‐squared = 0,44). The most important factor in predicting “ Food waste prevention intention" was “Attitude towards Food Waste“ as it emerged from Linear Regression

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 Larger food waste prevention intension

t‐test analysis indicated that women have :

  • Food Waste Prevention Behaviour does not show statistically significant differentiation between

men and women (p=0,8).

  • Τhis result contrasts with the results of other studies showing that women throw away more food

than men (Gallo, 1980; Buzby and Guthrie, 2002; Koivupuro et al., 2012)  Better attitude toward food waste

slide-11
SLIDE 11

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

18‐24 25‐34 35‐44 45‐54 55‐64 >65

Mean Age

Dependence of food waste prevention intention on age

People aged 45‐54 have the greatest food waste prevention intention

‐0,30 ‐0,20 ‐0,10 0,00 0,10 0,20 0,30 0,40 0,50 0,60 0,70

18‐24 25‐34 35‐44 45‐54 55‐64 >65

Mean Age

Dependence of the factor “attitude towards food waste” on age

People aged 45‐54 have the best attitude towards food waste

slide-12
SLIDE 12

0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5

18‐24 25‐34 35‐44 45‐54 55‐64 >65

Mean Age

Dependence of food waste prevention behavior from age Self‐reported Food Waste Prevention Behaviour improves with age increase

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mean Number of household members

Dependence of food waste prevention intention on the number of household members Food waste prevention intention increases as the number of household members increases, except for the extreme groups with low participation rates (0.1% the last and 12.8% the first)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

There was no statistically significant effect of the different levels of education on the food waste prevention intention and on the food waste prevention behavior There was no statistically significant effect of the professional status on the food waste prevention intention and on the food waste prevention behavior There was no statistically significant effect of the income on the food waste prevention intention and on the food waste prevention behavior There is no statistically significant correlation of "Food Waste Prevention Behaviour" with the number of household members.

CONCLUSIONS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Thank you