Detection of On-Road Vehicles Emanating GPS Interference Gorkem Kar - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

detection of on road vehicles
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Detection of On-Road Vehicles Emanating GPS Interference Gorkem Kar - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Detection of On-Road Vehicles Emanating GPS Interference Gorkem Kar Hossen Mustafa Yan Wang Yingying Chen Wenyuan Xu Marco Gruteser Tam Vu Winlab Winter Research Review ACM CCS 2014 1 GPS in Critical Infrastructures 2 GPS Jammers 3


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Detection of On-Road Vehicles Emanating GPS Interference

Gorkem Kar Hossen Mustafa Yan Wang Yingying Chen Wenyuan Xu Marco Gruteser Tam Vu

1

Winlab Winter Research Review ACM CCS 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

GPS in Critical Infrastructures

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

GPS Jammers

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Newark Airport Incident

  • In 2010, ground GPS receivers did not work for

a few minutes repeatedly over couple of months.

  • It took 3 months to locate the problem.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Current Solutions

  • Handheld devices

– Works only in static scenarios – Used manually for a short time

  • Standard wireless localization techniques

– Not sufficient to pinpoint a vehicle in dense traffic

5

What is needed?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What is Needed?

  • A detection and identification system that is;

– automated, with high accuracy, and at a low cost,

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Overview of Jamming Detection System

7

Jammer Monitoring Point Mobile Phone

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Multiple Monitoring Points

8

Jammer is detected with MP1 @ time t1 MP 2 MP 1

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Multiple Monitoring Points

Jammer is detected with MP2 @ time t2 MP 2 MP 1

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Monitoring Points

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Experimental Setup

11

USRP

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MP Location

12

Camera Monitoring Point

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Detection Zone

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Identified Vehicle Positions at tm

14

(m) (m)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Single Monitoring Point Case

15

@ MP 1 @ MP 2

We could uniquely identify the transmitting car with 65% @ MP 1 and 35% @ MP 2 with NO false positive rate.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Multiple Monitoring Case

  • The detection rate can be improved by

combining the information collected from both zones.

– Intersect the candidate vehicle sets @ MP1 and MP2.

16

This resulted in only a single detected vehicle and a correct identification of our transmitter vehicle in all cases.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Passive Roadside Monitoring

  • 5 locations are chosen in NJ and SC; 200 hours of

monitoring passively,

– a major highway, – one of the busiest toll road, – and an urban road

  • Two suspicious interference incidents are

detected.

  • May not come from real jammer, but still proves

the interference exist @ L1 frequency band (which is GPS band, 1.5 GHz).

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Mobile Detectors

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

How to Detect the Interference via Mobile Phones?

Profiling

– Use Android API to get the current SNR(Signal-to-Noise Ratio) value of the location – Create a SNR profile of a sample route by matching SNR with GPS position (expected SNR)

Anomaly Detection

– Compare current reading(SNR) of the mobile detector with the expected SNR from profiling stage – If current reading of SNR is lower than the expected SNR, there should be an interference at L1 freq., central office should be notified.

19

Average SNR (dB)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Conclusion

  • Presented a low-cost jammer identification

system that can be mass deployed in roadways to automatically detect and identify the vehicles with GPS jammers.

  • The key components of the system are

monitoring stations and mobile detectors.

  • Our mobile detector can detect interfering signals

based on measurements that are readily available in most GPS receivers

– Thus, it is possible to detect jammers via crowdsourcing.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

THANKS!

  • Any questions?