Designers Qualify for the Research Tax Credit Presented by: Dawson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

designers qualify for the research tax
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Designers Qualify for the Research Tax Credit Presented by: Dawson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Congress Definition of R&D: Why Designers Qualify for the Research Tax Credit Presented by: Dawson Fercho, EA Corporate Tax Advisors, Inc. Dawson Fercho, Founder-Partner IRS S Enr nrolled olled Agent ent- Admitted to practice


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Congress’ Definition of R&D: Why Designers Qualify for the Research Tax Credit

Presented by: Dawson Fercho, EA Corporate Tax Advisors, Inc.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Dawson Fercho, Founder-Partner

▪ IRS S Enr nrolled

  • lled Agent

ent- Admitted to practice before the Internal Revenue service ▪ 20 years of consulting experience Small and Mid-size businesses. ▪ 14 Years exclusively focused on the Federal Research Tax Credit & 179D Energy Efficiency Deduction. ▪ Co-Founder of Corporat porate e Tax x Advisors, sors, Inc. ▪ Responsible for all areas of client service and

  • verseeing CTA’s marketing and business

development.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Agenda

➢ Overview of the R&D tax credit ➢ The definition of R&D under current law ➢ Review examples of the credit computation ➢ Important tax rules to consider ➢ Types of industries and activities that qualify for the R&D credit ➢ Financial risk required in R&D activities

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Section 41: Credit for Increasing Research Related Activities

  • Permanently Codified January 1, 2016.
  • Initially established 1981- Reagan Administration.

➢ Generates immediate cash flow by minimizing current tax liability

  • $1 for $1 tax credit- usability to pay down Federal Tax Liabilities, *State Tax Liabilities
  • Congressional Intent: Reducing the high-cost of U.S. Labor.
  • 4 Year Look. I.e. 2015-2018.
  • Open to All Tax payer entities- Sole, S. Corp, C. Corp, PSC, Partnerships etc.
  • Except non-tax paying entities. I.e. Fully owned ESOP (S. Corps), Non-Profit.
  • Primarily Direct Labor Expense Drive.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Be Aware

The Research and Development (R&D) tax credit is one of the most substantial incentives under current U.S. tax law for the A/E industry. Unlike a standard deduction, it is a dollar-for-dollar credit against your tax liability. Desig ign n Life fe Ma Maga gazin ine e 2015 15

  • Innovation begins with a design
  • Designers are by nature and profession, innovators
  • Innovation is seeing what is not working and initiating change

I.E. How many designers does it take to change a light bulb? Does it have to be a light bulb?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

What’s on a CFO’s MIND

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

What Does this Actually Mean?

At 10% At 20% At 30% Pretax margin Pretax margin Pretax margin Cash flow from R&D Tax Credit 50,000 50,000 50,000 Estimated tax rate 26% (federal & state) 26% 26% 26% Revenue required to generate cash flow created by R&D credit 675,676 337,838 225,225

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

High-Level Estimate- Mental Calculation

1) Det etermi ermine ne Avera erage ge Annual al Direct ct Labor

  • r Expen

ense se 2) 25% X’s Director Labor Expense = Qualified Research Expenses 3) 7.5% X’s Qualified Research Expenses = Annual net Federal Tax Credit 4) #3 X’s 3 =‘s Total Federal Credit Benefit for Open Tax Years 2016-20 2018 18 5) #4 X’s 15% to 25% = Potential State Research Tax Credit Benefit

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Qualifying Research Expenses

➢ WA WAGES

▪ Typically largest component ▪ Calculate the % of employees’ qualifying time/hours ▪ Multiply this % by annual wages per W-2

➢ SUP UPPLI PLIES ES

▪ Expendable materials consumed

➢ CONTRACT RACTOR OR COSTS

▪ Same pro-rata rules as above ▪ Only 65% of qualifying costs eligible

Salaries and Wages Supplies Contract Costs

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

IRC Section 41- Congresses definition of R&D: The development of a new

  • r improved business component. I.E. New or improved Design

“Four-Part Test”

Qualified Research Expenditures

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

The “Four Part” Test

Part 1: Development of New or Improved Business Component (DESIGN)

Six x ca catego gories: ies:

▪ Products

  • ducts (t

(tang ngible ible or r int ntangible), ngible), ▪ Proce cess, ss, ▪ So Software are, , ▪ Tec echni nique ues, s, ▪ Form rmulas, ulas, ▪ Invention entions

Attempting New/Improved Business Component

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

The “Four Part” Test

Appropriate and final design Part 2: Elimination of a Technical Uncertainty

Endeavoring to discover information uncertain at

  • utset
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

The “Four Part” Test

Principals of science - engineering, physics, chemistry, biology, or computer sciences must be applied Relying on Principles of!

Part 3: Technological in Nature

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

The “Four Part” Test

Part 4: Process of Experimentation Evolution of Design, Trial ial and nd Er Error

  • r

Evaluating one

  • r more

alternatives

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

What is R&D per Congress? The “Quick Test”

Qu Question stion #1

➢Did you do any conceptual thinking on a technology based problem?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

What is R&D per Congress? The “Quick Test”

Qu Question stion #2

➢ Did you attempt the above in an effort to make something better?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Types of Qualifying Activities

Design ideas that stretch current engineering expertise;

▪ Use of 3D modeling; ▪ Integrate alternate materials ▪ Improved acoustical qualities; ▪ Alternative water flow/plumbing systems; ▪ Alternative electricity conduction systems; ▪ Improving lighting; ▪ Improved ventilation; ▪ Alternative heating and cooling systems;

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Types of Qualifying Activities- Engineering

➢ Alternative structural design; ➢ Waste and toxic waste disposal processes; ➢ Product and material transportation systems; ➢ Integrating environmental impact studies; and ➢ Integration costs related to designing co-dependent features. ➢ Material Strength Testing ➢ USE of CAD/CAM to evaluate various configurations ➢ Reviewing two or more site layouts to identify the best solutions ➢ Performing roadway simulations to determine the effect on traffic patterns

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Types of Qualifying Activities: Architecture

➢ Developing unique energy efficient features ➢ Designing master plans ➢ Developing schematic designs ➢ Developing planning and elevation drawings ➢ Designing a functional site plan to incorporate or

  • vercome various environmental concerns

➢ Developing construction documents ➢ Designing and developing building facades

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Types of Qualifying Activities: Architecture

▪ Designing unique water treatment plants to optimize plant capacity or efficiency ▪ Designing innovative sanitary sewer systems for new residential communities ▪ Designing unique water pipeline and ancillary systems ▪ Designing innovative lateral force resistant systems for buildings ▪ Implementing dampening systems for buildings to account for dynamic loads ▪ Designing marinas to meet unique structural and load requirements ▪ Typically designing and developing activities (CAD,CAM) ▪ Typically not surveying or project management activities

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Regulatory Changes

➢ The requirement to disclose contemporaneous record-keeping (timesheets) was eliminated in December of 2003, along with the Discovery Test. ➢ There is significant case law supporting a taxpayer’s ability to estimate how much time is spent on Research & Development

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Funded Research

➢ Fixed ed Pric ice e Contr tracts cts The nature of fixed-price contracts puts financial risk on the taxpayer ➢ Pure re Time me and Mater erials ials and Level l of Effor

  • rt

Typically viewed as funded, but there are a few exceptions ➢ Cost st Plus/Tim us/Time e and Materials erials Contract tracts Although no inherently financial risk, the terms comprising Cost Plus and time and Materials Contracts may be balanced amongst the parties to determine which is responsible for incurring the cost, and thus the financial risk, to complete the final deliverable

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Q&A

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Contact Us

Da Dawson wson Fe Ferch cho 913-461-6179 direct dawsonf@corporatetaxadvisors wsonf@corporatetaxadvisors.com .com

If you

  • u have

e an any y questions estions ple lease ase co conta ntact: ct:

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

➢ Total QREs are computed ➢ Base Amount is calculated – this is the difference in the two methods ➢ Regular Credit Method – Fixed base percentage multiplied by average gross receipts ➢ Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method: one half of the average of prior three years QREs ➢ Costs above the base amount are multiplied by the credit rate, either 14% or 20% ➢ Result is “tax-effected” by the 280C election or the taxpayer’s actual tax rate

How is the R&D Credit Computed?

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Example Regular Credit Computation

Section A - Regular Credit 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Line 1 Certain amounts paid or incurred to energy consortia (see instructions) Line 2 Basic research payments to qualified organizations (see instructions) Line 3 Qualified organization base period amount Line 4 Subtract line 3 from line 2. If zero or less, enter -0-

  • Line 5

Wages for qualified services (do not include wages used in figuring the work opportunity credit) 548,798 594,347 763,298 1,004,874 1,167,237 1,225,599 Line 6 Cost of supplies

  • Line 7

Rental of lease costs of computers (see instructions) Line 8 Enter the applicable percentage of contract research expenses (see instructions)

  • Line 9

Total qualified research expenses. Add lines 5 through 8 548,798 594,347 763,298 1,004,874 1,167,237 1,225,599 Line 10 Enter fixed-base percentage, but not more that 16% (see instructions) 16.00% 16.00% 16.00% 16.00% 16.00% 16.00% Line 11 Enter the average annual gross receipts (see instructions) 4,078,975 4,186,317 4,356,011 4,651,306 5,527,812 6,606,799 Line 12 Multiply line 11 by the percentage on line 10 652,636 669810.65 696,962 744,209 884,450 1,057,088 Line 13 Subtract line 12 from line 9. If zero or less, enter -0-

  • 66,336

260,665 282,787 168,511 Line 14 Multiply line 9 by 50% (.50) 274,399 297,173 381,649 502,437 583,619 612,799 Line 15 Enter the smaller of line 13 or line 14

  • 66,336

260,665 282,787 168,511 Line 16 Add lines 1, 4, and 15

  • 66,336

260,665 282,787 168,511 Line 17 Are you electing the reduced credit under section 280C? If "Yes," multiply line 16 by 13% (.13). If "No," multiply line 16 by 20% (.20) and see the instructions for the statement that must be attached. Members of controlled groups or businesses under common control; see instructions for the statement that must be attached

  • 13,267

52,133 56,557 33,702

XYZ, Inc. Federal Form 6765

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Section B - Alternative Simplified Credit 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Line 18 Certain amounts paid or incurred to energy consortia (see line 1 instructions) Line 19 Basic research payments to qualified organizations (see line 2 instructions) Line 20 Qualified organization base period amount (see line 3 instructions) Line 21 Subtract line 20 from line 19. If zero or less, enter -0-

  • Line 22

Add lines 18 and 21

  • Line 23

Multiply line 22 by 20% (.20)

  • Line 24

Wages for qualified services (do not include wages used in figuring the work opportunity credit) 548,798 594,347 763,298 1,004,874 1,167,237 1,225,599 Line 25 Cost of supplies

  • Line 26

Rental or lease costs of computers (see the line 7 instructions) Line 27 Enter the applicable percentage of contract research expenses (see the line 8 instructions)

  • Line 28

Total qualified research expenses. Add lines 24 through 27 548,798 594,347 763,298 1,004,874 1,167,237 1,225,599 Line 29 Enter your total qualified research expenses for the prior 3 tax years. If you had no qualified research expenses in any one of those years, skip lines 30 and 31

  • 548,798

1,143,144 1,906,442 2,362,518 2,935,409 Line 30 Divide line 29 by 6.0

  • 91,466

190,524 317,740 393,753 489,235 Line 31 Subtract line 30 from line 28. If zero or less, enter -0- 548,798 502,880 572,774 687,134 773,484 736,364 Line 32 Multiply line 31 by 14% (.14). If you skipped lines 30 and 31, multiply line 28 by 6% (.06) 76,832 70,403 80,188 96,199 108,288 103,091 Line 33 Add lines 23 and 32 76,832 70,403 80,188 96,199 108,288 103,091 Line 34 Are you electing the reduced credit under section 280C? If "Yes," multiply line 33 by 65% (.65). If "No," enter the amount from line 33 and see the line 17 instructions for the statement that must be attached. Members of controlled groups or businesses under common control: see instruction for the statement that must be attached. 49,941 45,762 52,122 62,529 70,387 77,318

XYZ, Inc. Federal Form 6765

Example ASC Credit Computation

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Tax Considerations - AMT

➢ Effective for tax years beginning after 1/1/18, corporate AMT has been repealed. C corporations can now use research and development credits that would have otherwise been limited by AMT. ➢ As of 1/1/16, private entities under $50 million in average revenue can use research and development credits against AMT. Larger entities cannot. ➢ For C corporations, the repeal of AMT also means that any carryover credits that were pre-2016 credits limited by AMT, will not be limited by AMT any longer. ➢ Companies that did not take the credit in prior years due to AMT, need to re-examine whether they should go back to prior years to generate credits to carry them forward, with no AMT limitation.

Note:

C corporations are still subject to a usage limitation. Credits can only be used to offset the tax of 25% of the tax over $25,000.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

➢ Tax rates have decreased under the TCJA ➢ New Qualified Business Income Deduction of up to 20% ➢ The research credit is still very beneficial for pass through entities ➢ The credit can be generated at the entity level and pass through on the K-1s to the shareholder. ➢ The credit can offset tax on income generated from m the activity ivity that generated the credit. ➢ Includes both K-1 and W-2 income for S Corps and SE income for LLCs

Tax Considerations – Pass Through Entities

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

➢ 280C(c)(3) Election – More value for Pass-Through Business Owners ➢ IRC 280C(c)(3) provides taxpayers with the ability to take a “reduced” R&D Tax

Credit and forego the M-1 add-back.

➢ With the reduction in the corporate rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, the

280C(c)(3) “haircut” also drops to 21 percent. As a result, pass through business

  • wners will see an even greater benefit by making this election.

➢ We now have a greater spread between those two rates, hence a greater 280C

benefit.

➢ Fiscal year taxpayers must calculate the 280C election for the tax year including

January 1, 2018, under a “blended rate” outlined in IRC 15(e).

Tax Considerations – Net Credits

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

➢ Secti tion

  • n 199 -Domestic Production Activities Deduction (DPAD) provided a deduction

for domestically produced products. This deduction has been repealed as of 1/1/18. This deduction could be up to 9%. ➢ NOL - Under the previous law, Net Operating Losses (NOLs) were allowed to be carried back two years and carried forward 20 years. Under the TCJA, NOL’s are limited to 80% of taxable income and cannot be carried back. However, they can be carried forward indefinitely, starting in 2018. ➢ What does s all this is mean? n? With the Sec. 199 deduction and the NOL carryback repealed, the R&D Credit is a better tax savings opportunity. With no Sec. 199 deduction to reduce income, R&D credits will be needed even more to offset taxes. With no NOL carrybacks available to reduce taxes, R&D credits can be still be carried back or utilized currently to reduce taxes.

Tax Considerations – Section 199 and NOLs

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

C Corporation Taxable Income Offset

➢ Nondeductible expenses such as life insurance premiums ➢ Shareholder stock redemptions ➢ Section 179 expensing versus regular depreciation ➢ Cash basis income swings ➢ Long term debt retirement

Tax Considerations – C corporations

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

➢ The tax rate for C corporations has been reduced to 21%, many companies are discussing whether or not to convert their S corporation. ➢ Companies need to consider the implication that this will have on existing S corporation carry over credits before they do this. S corporation credits are utilized at the individual level. ➢ Any existing S corporation credits remain at the individual level and cannot be used to offset the 21% C corporation tax. ➢ A planning idea may be to compare the amount of the carry over credits and the potential tax savings that will be foregone to the reduction in the tax going from a top individual rate to the 21% rate. ➢ Careful consideration is needed before converting, as there are many other issue to consider.

Tax Considerations – Choice of Entity

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Tax Considerations – Payroll Tax Offset

➢ Qualif lified ied Small all Business iness A Qualified Small Business (QSB) is any company with less than 5 years of revenues and less than $5 million in current year revenues that has R&D

  • expenses. This definition and the associated benefit has be retained under

the TCJA. Retaining this for QSB’s provides a tremendous benefit for start-up businesses. ➢ The rul ules es for payroll

  • ll taxes

es are:

  • The maximum offset amount is $250,000 per year
  • Credits will offset FICA tax (6.2%) employer portion only
  • Credits can start to be utilized in the quarter following the filing of the entity

income tax return that generated the credit.

  • Credits must be claimed on an originally filed, timely return.
slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Q&A

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Contact Us

Da Dawson wson Fe Ferch cho 913-461-6179 direct dawsonf@corporatetaxadvisors wsonf@corporatetaxadvisors.com .com

If you

  • u have

e an any y questions estions ple lease ase co conta ntact: ct: