Congress’ Definition of R&D: Why Designers Qualify for the Research Tax Credit
Presented by: Dawson Fercho, EA Corporate Tax Advisors, Inc.
Designers Qualify for the Research Tax Credit Presented by: Dawson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Congress Definition of R&D: Why Designers Qualify for the Research Tax Credit Presented by: Dawson Fercho, EA Corporate Tax Advisors, Inc. Dawson Fercho, Founder-Partner IRS S Enr nrolled olled Agent ent- Admitted to practice
Presented by: Dawson Fercho, EA Corporate Tax Advisors, Inc.
2
▪ IRS S Enr nrolled
ent- Admitted to practice before the Internal Revenue service ▪ 20 years of consulting experience Small and Mid-size businesses. ▪ 14 Years exclusively focused on the Federal Research Tax Credit & 179D Energy Efficiency Deduction. ▪ Co-Founder of Corporat porate e Tax x Advisors, sors, Inc. ▪ Responsible for all areas of client service and
development.
3
➢ Overview of the R&D tax credit ➢ The definition of R&D under current law ➢ Review examples of the credit computation ➢ Important tax rules to consider ➢ Types of industries and activities that qualify for the R&D credit ➢ Financial risk required in R&D activities
4
➢ Generates immediate cash flow by minimizing current tax liability
5
The Research and Development (R&D) tax credit is one of the most substantial incentives under current U.S. tax law for the A/E industry. Unlike a standard deduction, it is a dollar-for-dollar credit against your tax liability. Desig ign n Life fe Ma Maga gazin ine e 2015 15
I.E. How many designers does it take to change a light bulb? Does it have to be a light bulb?
6
7
At 10% At 20% At 30% Pretax margin Pretax margin Pretax margin Cash flow from R&D Tax Credit 50,000 50,000 50,000 Estimated tax rate 26% (federal & state) 26% 26% 26% Revenue required to generate cash flow created by R&D credit 675,676 337,838 225,225
8
1) Det etermi ermine ne Avera erage ge Annual al Direct ct Labor
ense se 2) 25% X’s Director Labor Expense = Qualified Research Expenses 3) 7.5% X’s Qualified Research Expenses = Annual net Federal Tax Credit 4) #3 X’s 3 =‘s Total Federal Credit Benefit for Open Tax Years 2016-20 2018 18 5) #4 X’s 15% to 25% = Potential State Research Tax Credit Benefit
9
➢ WA WAGES
▪ Typically largest component ▪ Calculate the % of employees’ qualifying time/hours ▪ Multiply this % by annual wages per W-2
➢ SUP UPPLI PLIES ES
▪ Expendable materials consumed
➢ CONTRACT RACTOR OR COSTS
▪ Same pro-rata rules as above ▪ Only 65% of qualifying costs eligible
Salaries and Wages Supplies Contract Costs
10
IRC Section 41- Congresses definition of R&D: The development of a new
11
Six x ca catego gories: ies:
▪ Products
(tang ngible ible or r int ntangible), ngible), ▪ Proce cess, ss, ▪ So Software are, , ▪ Tec echni nique ues, s, ▪ Form rmulas, ulas, ▪ Invention entions
Attempting New/Improved Business Component
12
Endeavoring to discover information uncertain at
13
Principals of science - engineering, physics, chemistry, biology, or computer sciences must be applied Relying on Principles of!
14
Evaluating one
alternatives
15
Qu Question stion #1
➢Did you do any conceptual thinking on a technology based problem?
16
Qu Question stion #2
➢ Did you attempt the above in an effort to make something better?
17
Design ideas that stretch current engineering expertise;
▪ Use of 3D modeling; ▪ Integrate alternate materials ▪ Improved acoustical qualities; ▪ Alternative water flow/plumbing systems; ▪ Alternative electricity conduction systems; ▪ Improving lighting; ▪ Improved ventilation; ▪ Alternative heating and cooling systems;
18
➢ Alternative structural design; ➢ Waste and toxic waste disposal processes; ➢ Product and material transportation systems; ➢ Integrating environmental impact studies; and ➢ Integration costs related to designing co-dependent features. ➢ Material Strength Testing ➢ USE of CAD/CAM to evaluate various configurations ➢ Reviewing two or more site layouts to identify the best solutions ➢ Performing roadway simulations to determine the effect on traffic patterns
19
➢ Developing unique energy efficient features ➢ Designing master plans ➢ Developing schematic designs ➢ Developing planning and elevation drawings ➢ Designing a functional site plan to incorporate or
➢ Developing construction documents ➢ Designing and developing building facades
20
▪ Designing unique water treatment plants to optimize plant capacity or efficiency ▪ Designing innovative sanitary sewer systems for new residential communities ▪ Designing unique water pipeline and ancillary systems ▪ Designing innovative lateral force resistant systems for buildings ▪ Implementing dampening systems for buildings to account for dynamic loads ▪ Designing marinas to meet unique structural and load requirements ▪ Typically designing and developing activities (CAD,CAM) ▪ Typically not surveying or project management activities
21
➢ The requirement to disclose contemporaneous record-keeping (timesheets) was eliminated in December of 2003, along with the Discovery Test. ➢ There is significant case law supporting a taxpayer’s ability to estimate how much time is spent on Research & Development
22
➢ Fixed ed Pric ice e Contr tracts cts The nature of fixed-price contracts puts financial risk on the taxpayer ➢ Pure re Time me and Mater erials ials and Level l of Effor
Typically viewed as funded, but there are a few exceptions ➢ Cost st Plus/Tim us/Time e and Materials erials Contract tracts Although no inherently financial risk, the terms comprising Cost Plus and time and Materials Contracts may be balanced amongst the parties to determine which is responsible for incurring the cost, and thus the financial risk, to complete the final deliverable
23
24
If you
e an any y questions estions ple lease ase co conta ntact: ct:
25
➢ Total QREs are computed ➢ Base Amount is calculated – this is the difference in the two methods ➢ Regular Credit Method – Fixed base percentage multiplied by average gross receipts ➢ Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method: one half of the average of prior three years QREs ➢ Costs above the base amount are multiplied by the credit rate, either 14% or 20% ➢ Result is “tax-effected” by the 280C election or the taxpayer’s actual tax rate
26
Section A - Regular Credit 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Line 1 Certain amounts paid or incurred to energy consortia (see instructions) Line 2 Basic research payments to qualified organizations (see instructions) Line 3 Qualified organization base period amount Line 4 Subtract line 3 from line 2. If zero or less, enter -0-
Wages for qualified services (do not include wages used in figuring the work opportunity credit) 548,798 594,347 763,298 1,004,874 1,167,237 1,225,599 Line 6 Cost of supplies
Rental of lease costs of computers (see instructions) Line 8 Enter the applicable percentage of contract research expenses (see instructions)
Total qualified research expenses. Add lines 5 through 8 548,798 594,347 763,298 1,004,874 1,167,237 1,225,599 Line 10 Enter fixed-base percentage, but not more that 16% (see instructions) 16.00% 16.00% 16.00% 16.00% 16.00% 16.00% Line 11 Enter the average annual gross receipts (see instructions) 4,078,975 4,186,317 4,356,011 4,651,306 5,527,812 6,606,799 Line 12 Multiply line 11 by the percentage on line 10 652,636 669810.65 696,962 744,209 884,450 1,057,088 Line 13 Subtract line 12 from line 9. If zero or less, enter -0-
260,665 282,787 168,511 Line 14 Multiply line 9 by 50% (.50) 274,399 297,173 381,649 502,437 583,619 612,799 Line 15 Enter the smaller of line 13 or line 14
260,665 282,787 168,511 Line 16 Add lines 1, 4, and 15
260,665 282,787 168,511 Line 17 Are you electing the reduced credit under section 280C? If "Yes," multiply line 16 by 13% (.13). If "No," multiply line 16 by 20% (.20) and see the instructions for the statement that must be attached. Members of controlled groups or businesses under common control; see instructions for the statement that must be attached
52,133 56,557 33,702
XYZ, Inc. Federal Form 6765
27
Section B - Alternative Simplified Credit 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Line 18 Certain amounts paid or incurred to energy consortia (see line 1 instructions) Line 19 Basic research payments to qualified organizations (see line 2 instructions) Line 20 Qualified organization base period amount (see line 3 instructions) Line 21 Subtract line 20 from line 19. If zero or less, enter -0-
Add lines 18 and 21
Multiply line 22 by 20% (.20)
Wages for qualified services (do not include wages used in figuring the work opportunity credit) 548,798 594,347 763,298 1,004,874 1,167,237 1,225,599 Line 25 Cost of supplies
Rental or lease costs of computers (see the line 7 instructions) Line 27 Enter the applicable percentage of contract research expenses (see the line 8 instructions)
Total qualified research expenses. Add lines 24 through 27 548,798 594,347 763,298 1,004,874 1,167,237 1,225,599 Line 29 Enter your total qualified research expenses for the prior 3 tax years. If you had no qualified research expenses in any one of those years, skip lines 30 and 31
1,143,144 1,906,442 2,362,518 2,935,409 Line 30 Divide line 29 by 6.0
190,524 317,740 393,753 489,235 Line 31 Subtract line 30 from line 28. If zero or less, enter -0- 548,798 502,880 572,774 687,134 773,484 736,364 Line 32 Multiply line 31 by 14% (.14). If you skipped lines 30 and 31, multiply line 28 by 6% (.06) 76,832 70,403 80,188 96,199 108,288 103,091 Line 33 Add lines 23 and 32 76,832 70,403 80,188 96,199 108,288 103,091 Line 34 Are you electing the reduced credit under section 280C? If "Yes," multiply line 33 by 65% (.65). If "No," enter the amount from line 33 and see the line 17 instructions for the statement that must be attached. Members of controlled groups or businesses under common control: see instruction for the statement that must be attached. 49,941 45,762 52,122 62,529 70,387 77,318
XYZ, Inc. Federal Form 6765
28
➢ Effective for tax years beginning after 1/1/18, corporate AMT has been repealed. C corporations can now use research and development credits that would have otherwise been limited by AMT. ➢ As of 1/1/16, private entities under $50 million in average revenue can use research and development credits against AMT. Larger entities cannot. ➢ For C corporations, the repeal of AMT also means that any carryover credits that were pre-2016 credits limited by AMT, will not be limited by AMT any longer. ➢ Companies that did not take the credit in prior years due to AMT, need to re-examine whether they should go back to prior years to generate credits to carry them forward, with no AMT limitation.
Note:
C corporations are still subject to a usage limitation. Credits can only be used to offset the tax of 25% of the tax over $25,000.
29
➢ Tax rates have decreased under the TCJA ➢ New Qualified Business Income Deduction of up to 20% ➢ The research credit is still very beneficial for pass through entities ➢ The credit can be generated at the entity level and pass through on the K-1s to the shareholder. ➢ The credit can offset tax on income generated from m the activity ivity that generated the credit. ➢ Includes both K-1 and W-2 income for S Corps and SE income for LLCs
30
➢ 280C(c)(3) Election – More value for Pass-Through Business Owners ➢ IRC 280C(c)(3) provides taxpayers with the ability to take a “reduced” R&D Tax
Credit and forego the M-1 add-back.
➢ With the reduction in the corporate rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, the
280C(c)(3) “haircut” also drops to 21 percent. As a result, pass through business
➢ We now have a greater spread between those two rates, hence a greater 280C
benefit.
➢ Fiscal year taxpayers must calculate the 280C election for the tax year including
January 1, 2018, under a “blended rate” outlined in IRC 15(e).
Tax Considerations – Net Credits
31
➢ Secti tion
for domestically produced products. This deduction has been repealed as of 1/1/18. This deduction could be up to 9%. ➢ NOL - Under the previous law, Net Operating Losses (NOLs) were allowed to be carried back two years and carried forward 20 years. Under the TCJA, NOL’s are limited to 80% of taxable income and cannot be carried back. However, they can be carried forward indefinitely, starting in 2018. ➢ What does s all this is mean? n? With the Sec. 199 deduction and the NOL carryback repealed, the R&D Credit is a better tax savings opportunity. With no Sec. 199 deduction to reduce income, R&D credits will be needed even more to offset taxes. With no NOL carrybacks available to reduce taxes, R&D credits can be still be carried back or utilized currently to reduce taxes.
32
C Corporation Taxable Income Offset
➢ Nondeductible expenses such as life insurance premiums ➢ Shareholder stock redemptions ➢ Section 179 expensing versus regular depreciation ➢ Cash basis income swings ➢ Long term debt retirement
33
➢ The tax rate for C corporations has been reduced to 21%, many companies are discussing whether or not to convert their S corporation. ➢ Companies need to consider the implication that this will have on existing S corporation carry over credits before they do this. S corporation credits are utilized at the individual level. ➢ Any existing S corporation credits remain at the individual level and cannot be used to offset the 21% C corporation tax. ➢ A planning idea may be to compare the amount of the carry over credits and the potential tax savings that will be foregone to the reduction in the tax going from a top individual rate to the 21% rate. ➢ Careful consideration is needed before converting, as there are many other issue to consider.
34
➢ Qualif lified ied Small all Business iness A Qualified Small Business (QSB) is any company with less than 5 years of revenues and less than $5 million in current year revenues that has R&D
the TCJA. Retaining this for QSB’s provides a tremendous benefit for start-up businesses. ➢ The rul ules es for payroll
es are:
income tax return that generated the credit.
35
36
If you
e an any y questions estions ple lease ase co conta ntact: ct: