Denver Gold Forum September 2013 Cautionary statements A ll - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

denver gold forum
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Denver Gold Forum September 2013 Cautionary statements A ll - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Denver Gold Forum September 2013 Cautionary statements A ll monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by -product sales unless otherwise stated CA UTIONA RY NOTE REGA RDING FORWA RD-LOOKING STA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Denver Gold Forum

September 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cautionary statements

A ll monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by -product sales unless otherwise stated CA UTIONA RY NOTE REGA RDING FORWA RD-LOOKING STA TEMENTS Certain inf ormation contained in this presentation, including any inf ormation relating to New Gold’s f uture f inancial or operating perf ormance as well as inf ormation respecting Rainy Riv er and its assets, may be deemed “f orward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical f act that address ev ents or dev elopments that New Gold expects to occur, are “f orward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical f acts and are generally , but not alway s, identif ied by the use of f orward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “f orecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believ es” or v ariations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, ev ents or results “may ”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achiev ed” or the negativ e connotation. Without limiting the f oregoing, examples of f orward-looking inf ormation in this presentation include, among others, statements with respect to: New Gold’s guidance f or production, cash costs, all-in sustaining costs, expenditures and cash f lows, modif ications to operations, the timing of dev elopment decisions, the estimation of mineral reserv es and resources and the realization of mineral reserv es and resources, the timing and amount of estimated f uture production (including mining and milling rates), the expected lif e of New Gold’s mines, expected f uture production costs (including cash costs) and the timing of completion of the acquisition of Rainy Riv er. All such f orward-looking statements are based on the reasonable opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk f actors and uncertainties, many of which are bey ond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions. In addition to assumptions specif ically identif ied in this presentation, the key assumptions and estimates are discussed in New Gold’s most recent interim management discussion and analy sis and technical reports f iled at www.sedar.com. The estimates and assumptions upon which the f orward-looking statements in this presentation are based are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other f actors that may cause actual results, lev el of activ ity, perf ormance or achiev ements to be materially dif f erent from those expressed or implied by such f orward-looking statements. Such f actors include, without limitation: signif icant capital requirements; price v olatility in the spot and f orward markets f or commodities; f luctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile; impact of any hedging activ ities, including margin limits and margin calls; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated Reserv es and Resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recov eries; changes in national and local gov ernment legislation in Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile or any other country in which New Gold currently or may in the f uture carry on business; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic dev elopments in the countries in which New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculativ e nature of mineral exploration and dev elopment, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the v alidity and enf orceability of the necessary licences and permits and comply ing with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, including, but not limited to: in Canada, obtaining the necessary permits f or Blackwater and the Rainy Riv er Gold Project; in Mexico, where Cerro San Pedro has a history of ongoing legal challenges related to our env ironmental authorization (EIS); and in Chile, where the courts hav e temporarily suspended the approv al of the env ironmental permit f or El Morro; the lack of certainty with respect to f oreign legal sy stems, which may not be immune f rom the inf luence of political pressure, corruption or

  • ther f actors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; the uncertainties inherent to current and f uture legal challenges N ew Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of Reserv es;

competition; loss of key employ ees; additional f unding requirements; rising costs of labour, supplies, f uel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activ ities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies including the PEA f or Blackwater and the Rainy Riv er Feasibility Study f or the Rainy River Gold Project; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be ref ined; accidents; labour disputes; def ectiv e title to mineral claims or property or contests ov er claims to mineral properties; New Gold may be unable to successf ully complete the acquisition of all of the securities of Rainy Riv er or the completion of such acquisition may be delay ed or more costly than anticipated; uncertainties with respect to the successf ul integration of the business of Rainy Riv er within the business of New Gold; unexpected delay s and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of First Nations; and uncertainties with respect to obtaining all necessary surf ace rights f or the Rainy Riv er Project. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, dev elopment and mining, including env ironmental ev ents and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected f ormations, pressures, cav e-ins, f looding and gold bullion losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cov er these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s (and, in respect to inf ormation related to the acquisition of Rainy Riv er Resources Ltd. (“Rainy Riv er”), Rainy River and/or the Rainy Riv er Gold Project, in Rainy Riv er’s) disclosure documents f iled on and av ailable at www.sedar.com. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of f uture perf ormance, and actual results and f uture ev ents could materially dif f er f rom those anticipated in such statements. All of the f orward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualif ied by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or

  • bligation to update or rev ise any f orward-looking statements whether as a result of new inf ormation, ev ents or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

All f ootnotes and endnotes hav e been shown at the conclusion of the presentation.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Portfolio

  • f assets

in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with established track record Peer-leading growth pipeline A history

  • f value

creation

New Gold investment thesis

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Portfolio of assets in top-rated jurisdictions

Blackwater New Afton Rainy River Mesquite Cerro San Pedro El Morro Peak Mines

Mine Life: 15+ years Mine Life: 14 years Mine Life: 15+ years Mine Life: 10+ years Mine Life: 4+ years Mine Life: 17 years Mine Life: 8 years

#2

CA NA DA

#6

UNITED STATES

#5

MEXICO

#3

CHILE

#1

AUSTRALIA

OPERATING DEVELOPMENT

4

Mining investment – country rankings(1)

(1) Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investm ent: “Where Not to Invest”.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Portfolio of assets in top-rated jurisdictions

Growing gold resource base in Canada

18.0 Canada 5.7 USA 2.9 Chile 1.7 Mexico 0.9 Australia GOLD RESERVES (Moz) 7.8 11.8 23.1 29.2 GOLD M&I RESOURCES (Moz) (1)(2) NEW GOLD PRO FORMA GOLD M&I RESOURCES (Moz) (1)

+44% per share +20% per share

=

Canada

= =

+62%

  • 18 million ounces in Canada
  • 84% increase in M&I resources per share

since 2009

New Gold New Gold & Rainy River(3) New Gold New Gold & Rainy River(3)

5

(1) Measured and Indicated Resources inclusive of Reserves.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Invested and experienced team Collectively ~$85 million invested in New Gold

6

Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Robert Gallagher President & CEO Brian Penny Executive VP & CFO Ernie Mast VP Operations EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM BOARD OF DIRECTORS David Emerson Former Canadian Cabinet Minister James Estey Former Chairman, UBS Securities Canada Robert Gallagher President & CEO Vahan Kololian Founder, Terra Nova Partners Martyn Konig Former Executive Chairman, European Goldfields Pierre Lassonde Chairman, Franco-Nevada Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Raymond Threlkeld Mining Consultant

Significantly invested team

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Among lowest-cost producers with established track record(1)

  • Generating ~$200 per ounce

incremental margin

  • More than $100 per ounce decrease

in cash costs(2) from 2009 to 2013E

  • Copper and silver create effective hedge

2013 GUIDANCE – ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS ($/OZ)(3)

New Gold Mid-Tier Average(4) Senior Average(5)

$875 ~$1,050 ~$1,100

7

Lower costs driving margin expansion

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2012 ACTUAL

Gold production

412 Koz

Gold production(1)

440–480 Koz

2013 GUIDANCE

2013 Total cash costs(2)

~$350/oz

2013 All-in sustaining costs(2)(3)

~$875/oz

8

Among lowest-cost producers with established track record(1)

By-product price assum ptions: Copper ~$3.25 per pound; Silver ~$22.50 per ounce.

2013 GUIDANCE

slide-9
SLIDE 9

New Afton hitting its stride

  • Mining and milling rates averaged

more than 11,000 tonnes per day in Q2 – a 19% increase over Q1

  • Targeting throughput of 12,000

tonnes per day by year-end 2013

GOLD 0.67 0.78

Q1 2013 Q2 2013

COPPER 0.79% 0.96%

Q1 2013 Q2 2013

GRADE (g/t) GRADE (%)

83% 87%

Q1 2013 Q2 2013

81% 88%

Q1 2013 Q2 2013

RECOVERY (%) RECOVERY (%)

15 22

Q1 2013 Q2 2013

12 19

Q1 2013 Q2 2013

PRODUCTION (Koz) PRODUCTION (Mlbs)

+16% +4% +46% +21% +7% +58%

9

Among lowest-cost producers with established track record(1)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Evaluating further throughput expansion potential

10

Among lowest-cost producers with established track record(1)

Design capacity

  • 11,000 tonnes per day

2013 year-end target

  • 12,000 tonnes per day

Additionalexpansion potential

  • 50 drawbells needed to support 11,000 tonnes per day – 68 completed

as of mid-2013

  • Crusher capacity – 20,000 tonnes per day (commissioned January 2013)
  • Conveyor capacity – 14,500 tonnes per day
  • Record daily mill throughput – 18,638 tonnes
slide-11
SLIDE 11

New Afton C-Zone exploration program

EA-9

C-Zone B-Zone Reserve

4,900m Far East Extension / Hanging Wall Lens Targets

Drilled Planned

EA-31 EA-32 EA-34 EA-36 EA-35 EA-37* EA-33

HIGHLIGHTS POST C-ZONE RESOURCE UPDATE

Drill Hole From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Gold (g/t) Copper (%) EA-31 644 708 64 0.86 1.33 EA-32 478 622 144 0.92 1.10 EA-34 744 810 66 0.90 0.93 EA-36 592 678 86 2.32 2.61

11

Among lowest-cost producers with established track record(1)

  • May 2013 update increased

resources by more than 300%

  • C-Zone remains open down plunge

C-ZONE RESOURCE SUMMARY Measured and Indicated Inferred GOLD 0.3 Moz at 0.77 g/t 0.4 Moz at 0.62 g/t COPPER 211 Mlbs at 0.77 301 Mlbs at 0.68%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

New Afton successful start with continued upside potential

  • Achieved commercial and full production

ahead of schedule in mid-2012

  • 2012 exploration work led to two-year

mine life extension from 12 to 14 years

  • +300% increase in C-Zone resources in

May 2013

  • Targeting throughput of 12,000 tonnes per

day by end of 2013

  • Evaluating potential for further throughput

increases in 2014 and beyond

12

Among lowest-cost producers with established track record(1)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Peer-leading growth pipeline

Industry leading organic growth profile

  • Growth projects expected to increase gold

production by ~1.75 times over current

  • perations
  • Blackwater and Rainy River acquisitions

increased shares outstanding by 25% for potential +150% increase in production

  • Projecting below current industry

average cash costs at each project

Four current

  • perations

Three organic projects 440–480 Koz +800 Koz Blackwater Rainy River

2013 Gold Production Guidance Annual Production Potential of Growth Assets

El Morro

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Peer-leading growth pipeline

Three world-class projects

Rainy River (97%) Blackwater El Morro (30%) Significant Gold Resource Base(1)(2) 6.2 Moz 8.6 Moz 2.9 Moz Exploration Potential Intrepid Zone/Multiple Regional T argets Capoose/Multiple Regional T argets El Morro Zone/ Block Cave Potential Jurisdiction Ontario, Canada British Columbia, Canada Chile Robust Production/ Low Cash Costs(3) ~225 Koz at below average cash costs ~500 Koz at below average cash costs ~90 Koz Au/85 Mlbs Cu at ~($700) cash costs(4)

RAINY RIVER BLACKWATER EL MORRO

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Peer-leading growth pipeline

Control of two underexplored districts

  • +169 km2 land package
  • Multiple targets

including recently discovered Intrepid Zone

  • Two drills active

15

RAINY RIVER Rainy River

Existing resource Exploration targets

Intrepid

Intrepid extension Son of Intrepid Western Zone Off Lake 5km

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Peer-leading growth pipeline

Control of two underexplored districts

  • +1,000 km2 land

package

  • Initial resource at

Capoose ~25 km from main Blackwater resource

  • Multiple regional targets
  • Five drills active

16

BLACKWATER Blackwater Capoose

Auro Van Tine Fawnie

Existing resource Exploration targets

10km

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Peer-leading growth pipeline

Limited capital required to advance projects to construction-ready status

  • Simultaneously advancing Rainy River and Blackwater through remaining technical

and economic studies and permitting

  • Regional exploration continues at both projects
  • Project development and sequencing decision expected in second half of 2014

RAINY RIVER SECOND HALF 2013 PROJECT SPENDING(1) BLACKWATER SECOND HALF 2013 PROJECT SPENDING(2)

Exploration(3) $5mm Engineering/Studies/ Environment/Other $20mm Exploration(3) $20mm Engineering/Studies/ Environment/Other $30mm

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

(39%) (27%) (14%) 45% 303%

A history of value creation

Increasing Net Asset Value drives share price growth

March 2009

Net Asset Value (1)

September 2013

Mesquite, Cerro San Pedro, Peak Mines

~$875 $1,138

New Afton

~$120 $1,561

El Morro(2)

~$40 $432

Blackwater(3)

$– $808

Rainy River(4)

$– $479

18

S&P/TSX Global Gold Index FTSE Gold Mines Index HUI Index Gold Price New Gold

PRICE PERFORMANCE SINCE BUSINESS COMBINATION WITH WESTERN GOLDFIELDS IN MARCH 2009

slide-19
SLIDE 19

A history of value creation

Near-term catalysts

2013 guidance – increased resources, production growth and lower costs Blackwater resource update New Afton C-Zone exploration update Completion of Rainy River acquisition Blackwater/Rainy River/New Afton exploration updates Completion of Blackwater Feasibility Study New Afton mill to reach 12,000 tonnes per day/results of throughput increase evaluation Resolution of El Morro temporary permit suspension

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Establishing the leading intermediate gold company

New Gold investment thesis

Portfolio

  • f assets

in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with a history of delivering Peer-leading growth pipeline Track record

  • f value

creation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Appendix

21

Appendices Page 1. Financial information 22 2. Consolidated operating performance 28 3. Mesquite, Cerro San Pedro, Peak Mines 37 4. New Afton 41 5. Rainy River 45 6. Blackwater 47 7. El Morro 55 8. Reserves and resource notes 62 9. Commodity price/foreign exchange assumptions 69

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Capitalization and liquidity

22

  • 1. Cash and equivalents as at June 30, 2013.
  • 2. $50 m

illion of total $150 m illion currently used for Letters of Credit.

  • 3. See Appendix 1 – Sum

m ary of debt for detailed breakdown of com ponents of debt.

  • All corporate debt due in 2020
  • r beyond(3)
  • Two senior unsecured note offerings

during 2012 ($300 million at 7.00%, $500 million at 6.25%)

  • Total common shares outstanding of

502 million

  • Paid $66 million to eliminate legacy

gold hedges on May 15, 2013

Liquidity Position $563mm $100mm

$663mm

Appendix 1 Cash and Equivalents(1) Undrawn Credit Facility(2)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Summary of debt

23

Undrawn Credit Facility Senior Unsecured Notes (April 2012) Senior Unsecured Notes (November 2012) El Morro Funding Loan Face Value $150 million(1) $300 million $500 million $72 million Maturity 1 year with annual extensions permitted April 15, 2020 November 15, 2022 n/a Interest Rate See ‘Key features’ 7.00% 6.25% 4.58% Payable Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually Upon start of production Conversion price n/a n/a n/a n/a Current trading value n/a ~102 ~96 n/a Key features Normal financial covenants Interest Rate

  • 3.00-4.25% over

LIBOR based on ratios

  • Standby fee of 0.75-

1.06%

  • Senior unsecured
  • Redeemable after April 15,

2016 at 103.5% down to 100% of face after 2018

  • Unlimited dividends if

leverage ratio below 2:1

  • Senior unsecured
  • Redeemable after

November 15, 2017 at par plus half coupon, declining ratably to par

  • Unlimited dividends if

leverage ratio below 2:1 New Gold to repay Goldcorp out of 80% of its 30% share of cash flow

  • nce El Morro

starts production

  • 1. $50 m

illion currently allocated for Letters of Credit.

Appendix 1

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

  • New Gold’s 2013 estimated capital expenditures of $290 million are down 42% from 2012
  • Capital includes costs related to ongoing annual sustaining capital as well as investments for

future production

  • Capital estimates by site are shown below:

New Afton $110mm Peak Mines $60mm Cerro San Pedro $40mm Mesquite $20mm Blackwater $60mm New Afton $302mm Peak Mines $47mm Cerro San Pedro $11mm Mesquite $11mm Blackwater $128mm

2012 and 2013 capital expenditures by site

TOTAL 2012 ACTUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES: $499 MILLION TOTAL 2013 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE ESTIMATE: $290 MILLION

Appendix 1

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Direct investment for future production

  • The below breaks down capital expenditures at each site into two categories – annual sustaining

capital and direct investments for future production growth and mine life extension

New Afton - $110 million Blackwater - $60 million Peak Mines - $60 million

Annual sustaining capital 82% 18% 100% 50% 50%

  • $90 million – continued cave and drawbell development as well as

related technical services

  • Total of ~90 drawbells expected to be completed by end of 2013
  • Annual drawbell development to decrease over mine life with

commensurate decrease in capital

  • $15 million – capitalized exploration
  • $45 million – Feasibility and related engineering studies, permitting,

camp facilities/operation

  • $30 million – underground development and capitalized exploration
  • $30 million – equipment, mine and mill projects/maintenance

2013 capital expenditures by category

Appendix 1

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Cerro San Pedro - $40 million Mesquite - $20 million

75% 25% 60% 40%

  • $30 million – final leach pad expansion and capitalized stripping for

phase 5 development

  • $10 million – site maintenance/processing improvements
  • $12 million – two additional trucks and construction of new welding and

tire shops

  • $8 million – equipment components/site maintenance

2013 capital expenditures by category

Direct investment for future production Annual sustaining capital

New Gold’s 30% share of estimated El Morro capital cost of $23 million fully carried by Goldcorp Inc.

Appendix 1

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

  • New Gold’s estimated exploration budget for 2013 is $50 million
  • Capitalized: $20 million
  • Expensed: $30 million
  • Additional $5 million of exploration at Rainy River post acquisition

New Afton 40,000 metres Peak Mines 33,000 metres Blackwater 40,000 metres

Capitalized: $15 million Expensed: $15 million Expensed: $10 million Capitalized: $5 million Expensed: $5 million

2013 exploration program overview

Appendix 1

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

  • 2. Sustaining capital based on New Gold’s total 2013 estim

ated capital expenditures excluding expenditures related to growth-related initiatives.

  • 3. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. All-in sustaining cash costs calculated using the m id-point of New Gold’s estim ated 2013 production range.

2013 estimated all-in sustaining costs

Appendix 2

Total cash costs(1) ~$350/oz General and administrative ~$60/oz Exploration expense ~$70/oz Sustaining capital(2) ~$395/oz

ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(3)

~$875/oz

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

  • Gold production growth through full year of

production at New Afton and increased throughput and recoveries at Peak Mines

  • Copper production forecast to double to 78

to 88 million pounds

  • Copper and silver by-products continue to

act as natural hedge to industry-wide cost pressures

  • By-product price assumptions:
  • Copper ~$3.25 per pound(3)
  • Silver ~$22.50 per ounce(3)
  • 1. Gold sales range forecast to be 440,000 to 480,000 ounces.
  • 2. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

  • 3. Based on year-to-date average realized price through June 30, 2013 and $3.25 per pound and $20 per ounce for balance of year.
  • By-product sensitivities:
  • $0.25 per pound change in copper

impacts consolidated cash costs by ~$45 per ounce

  • $1.00 per ounce change in silver impacts

consolidated cash costs by ~$3 per

  • unce

2013 guidance

Gold production(1) 440 - 480Koz Total cash costs(2) ~$350/oz

Appendix 2

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

  • 2. By-product price assum

ptions: Silver - ~$22.50/oz; Copper - ~$3.25/lb.

  • 3. New Afton co-product cost estim

ates: Gold - $570-$590/oz; Copper - $1.20-$1.30/lb.

Gold Production (Koz) Silver Production (Moz) Copper Production (Mlbs) Total Cash Costs(1)(2) ($/oz) 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E Mesquite 142 130-140

  • $690

$830-$850 Cerro San Pedro 138 140-150 1.9 1.4-1.6

  • $232

$375-$395 Peak Mines 96 95-105

  • 14

12-14 $764 $670-$690 New Afton 37 75-85

  • 28

66-74 ($1,043) ($1,410)- ($1,390)(3) 412 440-480 1.9 1.4-1.6 42 78-88 $421 ~$350

2012 actuals versus 2013 guidance

Appendix 2

slide-31
SLIDE 31

$465 $418 $446 $421 $350 $478 $557 $643 $738 $200 $400 $600 $800 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E

31

  • 1. Calculated based on YE’2012 GFMS industry average less m

id-point of New Gold 2013 cost guidance.

  • 2. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

  • 3. Industry data per GFMS reports calculated net of by-product credits as at YE’2012.

Total Cash Costs (US$/oz)(2)

Incremental Margin to New Gold Shareholders

(3)

Lower costs driving margin expansion

New Gold offers shareholders potential for over $375 per ounce(1) of incremental margin Appendix 2

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

  • 1. Mesquite life-of-m

ine recovery continues to track at ~75% for oxides; ~35% for sulphides.

  • 2. Cerro San Pedro life-of-m

ine recovery: Gold – ~60%; Silver – ~25%.

Detailed operating results and assumptions

Mesquite Cerro San Pedro Peak Mines New Afton 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E Tonnes processed

(000 tonnes)

14,503 14,250-14,750 16,531 12,250-12,750 778 815-835 1,970 4,000-4,200 Tonnes mined

(000 tonnes)

45,666 46,000-48,000 30,905 36,000-38,000 786 1,310-1,330 903 4,300-4,500 Gold grade

(g/t)

0.46 0.41-0.45 0.47 0.58-0.63 4.18 4.1-4.3 0.73 0.67-0.71 Silver grade

(g/t)

  • 21.43

13.0-17.0

  • Copper grade

(%)

  • 0.97%

0.80-0.84% 0.78% 0.86-0.90% Gold recovery

(%)

(1) (1) (2) (2) 91.3% 90.0-92.0% 78.8% 88.0-90.0% Silver recovery

(%)

  • (2)

(2)

  • Copper recovery

(%)

  • 86.0%

89.0-91.0% 84.5% 88.0-90.0% Capital expenditures

($mm)

$11 $20 $11 $40 $47 $60 $302 $110 Reserve grade Gold grade

(g/t)

0.57 0.50 4.99 0.65 Silver grade

(g/t)

  • 17.3

7.3 2.3 Copper grade

(%)

  • 1.13%

0.93%

Appendix 2

slide-33
SLIDE 33

$690 2012A 2013E 142 2012A 2013E

33

Key assumptions and sensitivities

  • Diesel comprises ~25% of Mesquite’s total costs
  • Rack diesel price most correlated to Brent oil price
  • Budgeted diesel price in 2013 is 8% higher

than 2012 average price paid

  • Every 10% change in diesel price has ~$20 per
  • unce impact on costs

2012A versus 2013E

  • Production expected to decline moderately

due to the planned processing of ore from an area within the mine plan that is below reserve grade

  • Increase in costs attributable to higher cost

leach pad inventory working through sales and lower production base

  • 1. Mesquite life-of-m

ine recovery continues to track at ~75% for oxides; ~35% for sulphides.

  • 2. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

140 130 $850 $830

Mesquite

GOLD PRODUCTION(1) (Koz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(2) ($/oz)

Appendix 3

slide-34
SLIDE 34

$232 2012A 2013E 138 2012A 2013E 1.9 2012A 2013E

34

Key assumptions and sensitivities

  • Silver price - $30.00 per ounce (2012A - $30.78 per
  • unce)
  • Mexican peso: U.S. foreign exchange – 13:1
  • $1.00 per ounce change in silver equals ~$10 per
  • unce change in Cerro San Pedro cash costs
  • $1.00 change in Mexican peso equals ~$25 per
  • unce change in Cerro San Pedro cash costs

2012A versus 2013E

  • Targeting 5% increase in gold production
  • Decrease in tonnes processed offset by

increase in gold grade

  • Increase in costs primarily driven by lower silver

by-product production as well as lower price assumption

  • ~$95 per ounce of increase in costs

attributable to lower silver by-product revenue

  • Silver grades decreasing by ~25%
  • 1. Cerro San Pedro life-of-m

ine recovery continues to track at: Gold – ~60%; Silver – ~25%.

  • 2. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

150 140 1.6 1.4 $395 $375

Cerro San Pedro

GOLD PRODUCTION(1) (Koz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(2) ($/oz) SILVER PRODUCTION(1) (Moz)

Appendix 3

slide-35
SLIDE 35

$764 2012A 2013E 14 2012A 2013E 96 2012A 2013E

35

Key assumptions and sensitivities

  • Copper price - $3.50 per pound (2012A - $3.51 per

pound)

  • Australian dollar: U.S. foreign exchange – 1:1
  • $0.25 per pound change in copper equals ~$35 per
  • unce change in Peak Mines cash costs
  • $0.01 change in Australian dollar equals ~$10 per
  • unce change in Peak Mines cash costs

2012A versus 2013E

  • Increased gold production driven by 50,000

tonne increase in tonnes processed

  • Similar copper production a result of increased

tonnes processed and copper recoveries offset by lower copper grades

  • Reduction in estimated cash costs a result of

increased gold production and lower foreign exchange rate assumption versus average 2012 exchange rate

105 95 14 12 $690 $670

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Peak Mines

GOLD PRODUCTION(1) (Koz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(2) ($/oz) COPPER PRODUCTION(1) (Mlbs)

Appendix 3

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36 Great Cobar

~9 kilometres

Peak corridor map

Appendix 3

slide-37
SLIDE 37

28 2012A 2013E 37 2012A 2013E

37

2012A versus 2013E

  • New Afton entering first full year of production in 2013 after successful 2012 start-up
  • Increased gold production driven by a full year of operations as well as continued recovery improvements,

partially offset by lower gold grade

  • Copper production expected to more than double, driven by full year of production as well as increases in

copper grades and recoveries

85 75 74 66

New Afton

GOLD PRODUCTION(1) (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION(1) (Mlbs)

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

Appendix 4

slide-38
SLIDE 38

($1,043)

2012A 2013E $656 2012A 2013E $1.40 2012A 2013E

38

Key assumptions and sensitivities

  • Copper price - $3.50 per pound (2012A - $3.58 per pound)
  • Canadian dollar: U.S. foreign exchange – 1:1
  • $0.25 per pound change in copper equals ~$220 per ounce change in New Afton by-product cash costs
  • $0.01 change in Canadian dollar equals ~$15 per ounce change in New Afton by-product cash costs

($1,390) ($1,410) $590 $570 $1.30 $1.20

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statement and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.

New Afton (cont’d)

TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz) (By-Product) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz) (Co-Product Copper) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz) (Co-Product Gold)

Appendix 4

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Kenora Fort Frances Thunder Bay Rainy River Gold Project

  • Mining friendly Northwestern Ontario
  • 65 km northwest of Fort Frances
  • 80 km south of Kenora
  • Within 25 km of rail and power
  • Local skilled labour force

HWY 600 Site Topography

Rainy River – Location

Appendix 5

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

  • Central British Columbia near infrastructure
  • Year-round accessibility for drilling/

development

  • Total 2012 drilling over 270,000 metres

project wide

  • Ability to fund continued exploration/

development internally

  • Tax synergies with New Afton
  • PEA completed September 2012
  • Targeting annual gold production of

~500,000 ounces

  • Targeting completion of Feasibility Study by

late 2013

  • Targeting production in 2017
  • Consolidated significant land position –

1,000 km2

  • 1. Refer to appendix 8 for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations.
  • 2. Blackwater start date based on indicative tim

eline which is dependent on perm it approvals.

  • Additional Measured and Indicated

gold resources – stockpile material of 0.9 million ounces

Blackwater – A robust project

Measured and Indicated Gold Resources(1) – Direct Processing Material

8.6 Moz

Appendix 6

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

  • 1. Indicative timeline is dependent on permit approvals. There is no assurance this timeline will be achieved nor that the d eposit will ever reach the production stage.

Development activity First Nations & Public Consultation Preliminary Economic Assessment Base Line Environmental Studies Feasibility Study Engineering Procurement Production Target Drilling Project Description/Terms of Reference Environmental Assessment Reports Provincial Approval Federal Approval Construction H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Reflects critical path in timeline

Blackwater – Indicative timeline

Appendix 6

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

  • Start of production in 2017
  • Conventional truck and shovel open pit mine with 60,000 tonnes per day

processing plant

  • Life-of-mine strip ratio of ~2.4 to 1
  • Low grade stockpiling strategy
  • Simple, conventional flowsheet using whole ore leach process
  • Life-of-mine gold and silver recoveries of 87% and 53%, respectively
  • Conventional waste rock and Tailings Storage Facility
  • Power supply from the hydroelectric power grid, via 133 kilometre transmission line
  • Minimal off-site infrastructure required
  • Good existing access road; water supply within 15 kilometres
  • Low environmental risk and facility designed for closure

Blackwater – Project overview

Appendix 6

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

  • Project is located 112 kilometres southwest

from Vanderhoof and has access to low cost hydroelectric power

  • Development capital estimate of $1.8 billion

is inclusive of a 24% or $346 million contingency

  • Development capital estimated based on the

current cost environment

  • A parity foreign exchange rate was

assumed and the capital estimate was held constant in the economic analysis

  • Sustaining capital of $537 million,

reclamation and closure costs of $95 million and $72 million in equipment salvage value

Blackwater PEA costs – Capital

Total development and sustaining capital estimated at $294 per recoverable gold ounce

Project Development Capital Costs Description Cost ($ million) Direct Costs Mining & Pre-production Development $208 On Site Infrastructure $181 Process $539 Tailing and Water Reclaim $74 Infrastructure (Power, Water, Road) $85 Total Direct Costs $1,087 Owner's and Indirect Costs Owner's Costs $54 EPCM $112 Other Indirects $215 Total Owner's and Indirect Costs $381 Subtotal $1,468 Contingency (24%) $346 Total Project $1,814

Appendix 6

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Project Operating Costs Area Unit Cost (C$/t milled) $ per gold ounce produced Mining $6.21 $259 Processing $7.59 $317 General and Administrative $0.95 $40 Royalty (0.6%) $0.18 $8 Refining $0.23 $9 Silver by-product sales at $22.50 per ounce silver ($2.16) ($90) Total cash costs(1) net of by-product sales $13.01 $543 44

Processing Costs

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures” and PEA additional cautionary note.

Blackwater PEA costs – Operating

59% 11% 9% 6% 4% 4% 4% 2%

Hauling Auxiliary Blasting G&A Drilling Loading General Maint. General Mine

Mining Costs

44% 24% 17% 8% 6% 1%

Reagents Grinding Media/Liners Electricity Labour

  • Maint. Materials

Water Supply

Blackwater’s location near infrastructure, low stripping ratio, access to low cost power and silver by-product revenue expected to result in the Project having well below industry average cash costs

Appendix 6

slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • Goldcorp – 70% partner and project operator
  • New Gold’s 30% share of capital fully funded by

Goldcorp

  • Current resource entirely within La Fortuna deposit
  • Neighbouring El Morro deposit underexplored
  • 2012 year end update added 0.4 million ounces of

gold and 229 million pounds of copper to reserves(1)

  • Addressing recent temporary suspension of

environmental permit

  • Chile evaluating various alternatives for a power

source to northern Chilean development projects

45

  • 1. New Gold’s attributable 30% share. Refer to Appendix 8 for detailed disclosure on reserve and resource calculations.
  • 2. Refer to Cautionary Statements.
  • 3. Refer to Cautionary Statements and note on total cash cost under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Life of mine co-product costs estimated at $550/oz gold and $1.45/lb copper at commodityprice assumptions of $1,200/oz gold

and $2.75/lb copper.

Location Chile Mine type Open Pit Reserves1 – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlbs) 2.9/2,097 Resources1 – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlbs) 2.9/2,097 Estimate mine life 17 years LOM production/yr (Au Koz/Cu Mlbs)2 90/85 LOM cash costs/oz by-product3 ($700)

El Morro (30%)

2.9 Moz Gold Reserve(1) 2.1 Blbs Copper Reserve(1)

Appendix 7

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

  • El Morro Feasibility Study was updated in December 2011
  • Key parameters for New Gold include:
  • 30% share of estimated development capital, or $1.2 billion, carried by Goldcorp

– Receive cash flow from start of production – Interest rate fixed at 4.58%

  • Base 17-year mine life
  • 30% share of annual production: ~90,000 ounces of gold and ~85 million pounds
  • f copper
  • Estimated total cash costs(1), net of by-products ($700) per ounce

– Co-product gold ~$550 per ounce – Co-product copper ~$1.45 per pound

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statem

ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures” .

El Morro overview of updated Feasibility Study

Appendix 7

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

2012 open pit Proven and Probable reserves and Measured and Indicated resources Underground Inferred resource with block cave potential

500 metres

La Fortuna deposit

Appendix 7

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

  • 1. Capital estim

ates based on Decem ber 2011 Feasibility Study.

El Morro (30%) – Funding structure(1)

Appendix 7

Funded by $1.2 billion interest at 4.58% ~ $2.7 billion 70% 20% 80%

  • New Gold’s 30% share of development capital 100% carried
  • Interest fixed at 4.58%

30% 70% 30%

Total Capital 100% ~ $3.9 billion 100% Average annual cash flow

Carried funding repayment

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Au Grade (g/t) Cu Grade (%) $91/t $44/t $41/t $27/t $53/t $52/t $42/t $33/t $31/t $30/t

  • 0.10

0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.20% 0.40% 0.60% 0.80% 1.00% 1.20%

49

Company disclosure.

  • 1. Circle sizes are representative of contained metal value of the reserves per tonne of reserve. Contained metal value calculated using Street research consensus long-term commodity pricing.
  • 2. Includes “Cadia East Underground” and “Ridgeway Underground” reserves as indicated in Newcrest’s February 8, 2013 press release; does not include “Other” Cadia province reserves.

El Morro

Producing Development

Chapada Cadia-Ridgew ay Alumbrera New Afton New Prosperity Cobre Panama

  • Mt. Milligan

Cerro Casale El Morro Agua Rica

(2)

New Afton

Selected porphyry gold/copper deposits/mines(1)

Appendix 7

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

  • 1. Based on Goldcorp’s Decem

ber 31, 2012 year-end resource statem ents.

  • 2. Gold equivalent calculated based on the following com

m

  • dity prices: Gold - $1,600/oz; Silver - $30.00/oz; Copper - $3.50/lb; Lead - $0.90/lb; Zinc - $0.90/lb.

El Morro relative positioning(1)

EL MORRO WITHIN GOLDCORP PORTFOLIO

Asset Gold Reserves (Moz) Asset Gold Equivalent(2) (Moz) Penasquito 15.7 Penasquito 43.9 Pueblo Viejo 10.0 El Morro 17.4 Los Filos 7.4 Pueblo Viejo 11.7 El Morro 6.7 Los Filos 8.4 Cerro Negro 5.7 Cerro Negro 6.7

Appendix 7

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

  • 1. Year end 2012 Mineral Resources updated for Blackwater Resource update on April 4, 2013 and New Afton C-Zone updated on May 1, 2013.
  • 2. Year end 2011 Mineral Resources presented at Investor Day on February 2, 2012.
  • 3. Rainy River shown on a 100% basis.

Reserves and resources summary

Mineral Reserves and Resources Summary Current(1) Year End 2011(2) Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Proven and Probable Reserves 11,783 41,571 3,282 7,863 34,347 2,888 Measured and Indicated Resources (inclusive of Reserves) 29,242 159,585 4,223 18,797 115,268 3,946 Inferred Resources 6,822 88,359 1,187 6,323 76,856 2,202 M&I Resources (inclusive of Reserves) Mesquite 5,684

  • 5,534
  • Cerro San Pedro

1,703 57,980

  • 1,812

55,860

  • Peak Mines

880 1,350 146 948 1,570 167 New Afton 2,224 7,292 1,980 1,742 5,470 1,586 Blackwater 9,497 70,128

  • 5,423

25,774

  • Capoose

196 9,497

  • 384

26,594

  • Rainy River

6,167 13,338

  • n/a

n/a n/a El Morro 2,891

  • 2,097

2,954

  • 2,193

Total M&I 29,242 159,585 4,223 18,797 115,268 3,946

Appendix 8

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Mineral Reserves statement as at December 31, 2012 Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Proven 13,140 0.68

  • 287
  • Probable

114,409 0.56

  • 2,055
  • Mesquite P&P

127,549 0.57

  • 2,342
  • Cerro San Pedro

Proven 21,100 0.52 17.1

  • 353

11,600

  • Probable

26,400 0.48 17.4

  • 407

14,800

  • CSP P&P

47,500 0.50 17.3

  • 760

26,400

  • Peak Mines

Proven 2,109 5.89 7.5 1.08 399 510 50 Probable 2,118 3.82 6.8 1.18 260 466 55 Peak P&P 4,227 4.85 7.2 1.13 659 976 105 New Afton Proven

  • Probable

52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080 New Afton P&P 52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080 Rainy River Proven 27,700 1.14 1.94

  • 1,015

1,728

  • Probable

88,600 1.06 3.01

  • 3,017

8,587

  • Rainy River P&P

116,300 1.08 2.76

  • 4,031

10,315

  • El Morro

100% Basis 30% Basis

Proven 307,949 0.57

  • 0.56

1,705

  • 1,135

Probable 335,152 0.37

  • 0.44

1,186

  • 962

El Morro P&P 643,101 0.47

  • 0.49

2,891

  • 2,097

Appendix 8

  • 1. Year end 2012 Mineral Resources updated for Blackwater Resource update on April 4, 2013 and New Afton C-Zone updated on May 1, 2013.
  • 2. Rainy River shown on a 100% basis.
slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

  • 1. Year end 2012 Mineral Resources updated for Blackwater Resource update on April 4, 2013 and New Afton C-Zone updated on May 1, 2013.

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Measured and Indicated mineral Resource statement (inclusive of Reserves) as at December 31, 2012 Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Measured - oxide 19,100 0.51

  • 313
  • Indicated - oxide

274,100 0.38

  • 3,349
  • Meqsuite M&I - oxide

293,200 0.39

  • 3,662
  • Measured - non oxide

4,900 0.88

  • 139
  • Indicated - non oxide

96,000 0.61

  • 1,883
  • Mesquite M&I - non oxide

100,900 0.62

  • 2,022
  • Total Mesquite M&I

394,100 0.45

  • 5,684
  • Cerro San Pedro

Measured - oxide 27,100 0.34 15.0

  • 303

13,100

  • Indicated - oxide

49,000 0.24 13.0

  • 380

20,480

  • CSP M&I - oxide

76,100 0.28 13.7

  • 683

33,580

  • Measured - sulphide

15,200 0.47 11.9

  • 229

5,800

  • Indicated - sulphide

60,400 0.41 9.6

  • 791

18,600

  • CSP M&I - sulphide

75,600 0.42 10.1

  • 1,020

24,400

  • Total CSP M&I

151,700 0.35 11.9

  • 1,703

57,980

  • Peak Mines

Measured 2,700 5.74 7.5 1.05 494 647 62 Indicated 3,200 3.75 6.8 1.19 386 703 84 Peak M&I 5,900 4.66 7.1 1.13 880 1,350 146

Appendix 8

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Measured and Indicated mineral Resource statement (inclusive of Reserves) as at December 31, 2012 Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs New Afton A&B Zones Measured 33,500 0.86 2.9 1.18 929 3,160 873 Indicated 45,900 0.67 2.4 0.89 984 3,530 896 A&B Zone M&I 79,400 0.75 2.6 1.01 1,913 6,690 1,769 C-Zone Measured 1,282 0.75 1.4 0.79 31 56 22 Indicated 11,205 0.78 1.5 0.77 280 548 189 C-Zone M&I 12,486 0.77 1.5 0.77 311 602 211 Total New Afton M&I 91,886 0.75 2.6 1.00 2,224 7,292 1,980 Blackwater Direct processing material Measured 116,955 1.04 5.6

  • 3,896

21,057

  • Indicated

189,044 0.78 6.0

  • 4,729

36,467

  • M&I (direct processing)

305,999 0.88 5.8

  • 8,624

57,524

  • Stockpile material

Measured 26,521 0.30 4.1

  • 256

3,496

  • Indicated

64,382 0.30 4.4

  • 617

9,108

  • M&I (stockpile)

90,903 0.30 4.3

  • 873

12,604

  • Total Blackwater M&I

396,902 0.74 5.5

  • 9,497

70,128

  • Capoose

Indicated 14,200 0.43 20.8

  • 196

9,497

  • Rainy River

Measured 27,638 1.33 1.90

  • 1,182

1,689

  • Indicated

130,885 1.18 2.8

  • 4,985

11,649

  • Total Rainy River M&I

158,523 1.21 2.62

  • 6,167

13,338

  • El Morro

100% Basis 30% Basis Measured 307,949 0.57

  • 0.56

1,705

  • 1,135

Indicated 335,152 0.37

  • 0.44

1,186

  • 962

El Morro M&I 643,101 0.47

  • 0.49

2,891

  • 2,097

Appendix 8

  • 1. Year end 2012 Mineral Resources updated for Blackwater Resource update on April 4, 2013 and New Afton C-Zone updated on May 1, 2013.
  • 2. Rainy River shown on a 100% basis.
slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)

Inferred Resource statement as at December 31, 2012 Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Oxide 35,200 0.33

  • 373
  • Non oxide

15,700 0.55

  • 278
  • Mesquite Inferred

50,900 0.40

  • 651
  • Cerro San Pedro

Oxides 53,400 0.17 9.0

  • 300

15,400

  • Sulphides

50,500 0.34 8.5

  • 550

13,800

  • CSP Inferred

103,900 0.25 8.8

  • 850

29,200

  • Peak Mines

1,700 2.64 4.8 1.13 144 261 42 New Afton A&B-Zone 14,900 0.45 2.0 0.65 216 940 212 C-Zone 20,221 0.62 1.4 0.68 401 923 301 New Afton Inferred 35,121 0.56 1.5 0.68 617 1,863 513 Blackwater Direct processing 13,815 0.76 4.1

  • 337

1,821

  • Stockpile

3,785 0.31 3.6

  • 38

438

  • Blackwater Inferred

17,600 0.66 4.0

  • 375

2,263

  • Capoose

64,070 0.29 23.2

  • 595

47,789

  • Rainy River

93,804 0.76 2.32

  • 2,280

6,983

  • 100% Basis

30% Basis El Morro 137,555 0.99

  • 0.70

1,310

  • 632

Appendix 8

  • 1. Year end 2012 Mineral Resources updated for Blackwater Resource update on April 4, 2013 and New Afton C-Zone updated on May 1, 2013.
  • 2. Rainy River shown on a 100% basis.
slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Mineral reserves are contained w ithin Measured and Indicated mineral resources. Measured and Indicated mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability as defined by a technical Feasibility Study. New Gold reports its Measured and Indicated mineral resources inclusive of its mineral reserves. Inferred mineral resources are not know n w ith the same degree of certainty as Measured and Indicated resources, do not have demonstrated economic viability, and are exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral reserves have been estimated and reported in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (‘CIM’) definition standards and guidelines and Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (‘NI 43-101’). 1) Mineral Reserves for the company’s mineral properties have been calculated based on the follow ing metal prices and low er cut-off criteria: Mineral Property Gold (US$/oz) Silver (US$/oz) Copper (US$/lb) Lower Cut-off Mesquite $1,300

  • 0.21 g/t Au – Oxide reserves

0.41 g/t Au – Non-oxide reserves Cerro San Pedro $1,300 $24.00

  • US$4.33 /t NSR

Peak Mines $1,300 $24.00 $3.00 A$120 – 253/t NSR New Afton $1,300

  • $3.00

US$24/t NSR El Morro $1,350

  • $3.00

0.20% CuEq Rainy River $1,250 $25.00

  • 0.30 g/t AuEq – Open Pit

3.5 g/t AuEq - Underground

Reserves and resources notes

Appendix 8

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

2) Mineral Resources for the company’s mineral properties have been calculated based on the follow ing metal prices and low er cut-off criteria: Mineral resources have been estimated and reported in accordance with CIM definition standards and guidelines and Canadian NI 43-101. Mineral Property Gold (US$/oz) Silver (US$/oz) Copper (US$/lb) Lower Cut-off Mesquite $1,400

  • 0.12 g/t Au – Oxide resources

0.24 g/t Au – Non-oxide resources Cerro San Pedro $1,400 $28.00

  • 0.1g/t AuEq – Open pit oxide resources

0.4g/t AuEq – Open pit sulphide resources Peak Mines $1,400 $28.00 $3.25 A$97 - 137/t NSR New Afton $1,400 $28.00 $3.25 0.40% CuEq – All resources El Morro $1,500

  • $3.50

0.15% Cu – Open pit resources 0.20% Cu – Underground resources Blackw ater $1,400

  • 0.40 g/t AuEq

Capoose $1,400

  • 0.40 g/t AuEq

Rainy River $1,100 $22.50

  • 0.35 g/t AuEq – Open Pit

2.5 g/t AuEq – Underground 3) Mineral resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred resources and are reported based on technical and economic parameters consistent w ith the methods most suitable for their potential commercial exploitation. Where different mining and/or processing methods might be applied to different portions of a mineral resource, the designators ‘open pit’ and ‘underground’ have been applied to indicate envisioned mining method. Likew ise the designators ‘oxide’, ‘non-oxide’ and ‘sulphide’ have been applied to indicate the type of mineralization as it relates to appropriate mineral processing method and expected payable metal recoveries. Additional details regarding mineral resource estimation, classification and reporting parameters for each of New Gold’s mineral properties are provided in the respective NI 43-101 Technical Reports w hich are available on SEDAR. 4) Blackw ater April 4, 2013 update:

  • 1. Mineral resources are reported within a conceptual open pit shell based on metal prices of $1,400/oz gold and $28.00/oz silver. The March 2013 mineral resource estimate utilizes

average metallurgical recoveries of 88.0% gold and 64.0% silver for oxide mineralization, 85.0% gold and 58.0% silver for transitional oxide/sulfide mineralization and 85.0% gold and 44.0% silver for sulfide mineralization. The 2012 year-end mineral resource estimate utilizes average metallurgical recoveries of 86% gold and 44.9% silver for all material types.

  • 2. Total contained metal is calculated based on Tonnes*Grade / 31.10348 grams per troy ounce.
  • 3. Gold-equivalent cut-off grade estimates are based on $1,400/oz gold and $28.00/oz silver and average metal recoveries as described in Note 1 above.
  • 4. Direct processing material is defined as mineralization above a 0.40 g/t AuEq cut-off and likely to be mined and processed directly.
  • 5. Stockpile material is defined as mineralization betw een a 0.30 g/t AuEq and a 0.40 AuEq cut-off that is suitable for stockpiling and future processing based on average metallurgical

recoveries as described in Note 1 above. 5) Qualified Person: The preparation of New Gold’s mineral reserve and resource statements has been done by Qualified Persons as defined under Canadian National Instrument 43-101 under the oversight and review of Mark Petersen, a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 and employee of New Gold.

Reserves and resources notes (cont’d)

Appendix 8

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

Guidance assumptions(1) Spot:

2013 Gold price ($/oz) ~1,350 Silver price ($/oz) ~22.50 Copper price ($/oz) ~3.25 USD/AUD 1.00 USD/CAD 1.00 USD/MXN 13.00 Spot Gold price ($/oz) 1,310 Silver price ($/oz) 21.75 Copper price ($/oz) 3.20 USD/AUD 0.93 USD/CAD 0.97 USD/MXN 12.95

  • 1. Based on year-to-date average realized prices through June 30, 2013 and prevailing prices at tim

e of second quarter results release on July 31, 2013.

Commodity price/foreign exchange assumptions

Appendix 9

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Notes

Page 4 1. Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment: “Where Not to Invest”. Page 5 1. Refer to Endnotes and note under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources”. 2. Measured and Indicated Resources inclusive of Reserves. 3. Pro forma figures include Rainy River and assume 100% ow nership of Rainy River. 4. For a detailed breakdow n of Reserves and Resources, refer to: New Gold’s “Annual Information Form for the Financial Year Ended December 31, 2012” dated March 27, 2013; new s release dated April 4, 2013 “New Gold Announces Increased Gold Resources at Blackw ater Project”; new s release dated May 1, 2013 “New Gold Announces 2013 First Quarter Results – Increases Gold and Copper Resources at New Afton C-Zone by Over 300 Percent”; and new s release dated July 31, 2013 “New Gold Second Quarter Delivers Increased Production at Low er Costs

  • Second Half of 2013 Remains on Track to Provide Strong Finish to the Year”.

Page 7 1. Based on comparison w ith costs published by issuers listed in notes 4 and 5. The manner in w hich costs are determined may va ry from one issuer to another. 2. Refer to Endnotes and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 3. Refer to Endnotes and note on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 4. Mid-tier average includes: Alamos, Eldorado, Agnico Eagle, Aurico and IAMGOLD. 5. Senior average includes: Barrick, Goldcorp, Kinross and New mont. Page 8 1. Gold sales expected to be in same general range as production. 2. Refer to Endnotes on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Guidance for total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs incorporates realized prices and foreign exchange rates to June 30, 2013 and assumes commodity prices and exchange rates consistent with those at July 30, 2013 for the balance of 2013. 3. Refer to Endnotes on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Page 14 1. Refer to Appendix for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations. 2. Refer to Endnotes and note under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Measured, Indicated andInferred Resources”. Measured and Indicated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. At Blackw ater, the 8.6 million ounces of Resources referred to ab

  • ve excludes 0.9 million ounces of material

to be stockpiled w hich has been classified as Measured and Indicated Resource. Refer to note 4 on page 5 for Reserve and Reso urce source information. 3. Refer to Endnotes on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Cash costs have been compared to industry data per GFMS reports w hich calculated an average, net of by-product credits, cash cost of $738 per ounce for the YE’2012. 4. El Morro production and cash costs based on updated December 2011 Feasibility Study.

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Notes continued

Page 17 1. For period from August through December 2013. 2. For period from July through December 2013. 3. Includes both capitalized and expensed exploration. Page 18 Source: Broker Reports, Company Estimates and Announcements, Bloomberg; all amounts in USD. 1. Street consensus NAV. 2. Current street consensus NAV for El Morro; includes $50 million cash payment received from Goldcorp as part of transaction consideration. 3. New Gold acquired Richfield and Silver Quest on June 1, 2011 and December 23, 2011, respectively. 4. New Gold acquired 97.5% of Rainy River on August 9, 2013. 5. S&P/TSX Global Gold Index includes 54 gold companies in various stages of development/production. 6. FTSE Gold Mines Index includes 26 gold producing companies. 7. HUI Index includes 15 of the major global gold producers.

60

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Endnotes

CA UTIONA RY NOTE TO U.S. REA DERS CONCERNING ESTIMA TES OF MEA SURED, INDICA TED A ND INFERRED RESOURCES Inf ormation concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar inf ormation f or United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inf erred Mineral Resource” used in this presentation are Canadian mining terms as def ined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) under guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Standards

  • n Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserv es adopted by the CIM Council on Nov ember 27, 2010. While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and

“Inf erred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not def ined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classif ied as a “Reserv e” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the Reserv e calculation is made. As such, certain inf ormation contained in this presentation concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar inf ormation made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An “Inf erred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal f easibility . It cannot be as sumed that all or any part of an “Inf erred Mineral Resource” will ev er be upgraded to a higher category . Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inf erred Mineral Resources may not f orm the basis of f easibility or pre-f easibility studies. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all

  • r any part of Measured or Indicated Resources will ev er be conv erted into Mineral Reserv es. Readers are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “Inf erred Mineral Resource” exists, or is

economically or legally mineable. In addition, the def initions of “Prov en Mineral Reserv es” and “Probable Mineral Reserv es” under CIM standards dif f er in certain respects f rom the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICA L INFORMA TION The scientif ic and technical inf ormation contained in this presentation relating to the Rainy Riv er Gold Project has been rev iewed and approv ed by Garett Macdonald and Kerry Sparkes, both Qualif ied Persons under NI 43-101 and of f icers of Rainy River. The other scientif ic and technical inf ormation contained in this presentation has been rev iewed and approv ed by Mark Petersen, a Qualif ied Person under NI 43-101 and an of f icer of New Gold. Mineral Reserv es and Mineral Resources The estimates of Mineral Reserv es and Mineral Resources discussed in this presentation may be materially af f ected by env ironmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing and other relev ant issues. In addition to our February 5, 2013, April 4, 2013 and July 31, 2013 news releases, f urther details regarding Mineral Reserv e and Resource estimates, including classif ications, key assumptions and parameters used in such estimates and other related inf ormation f or each of New Gold's mineral properties are prov ided in the respectiv e NI 43-101 Technical Reports, which are av ailable at www.sedar.com. BLA CKWA TER PEA – A DDITIONA L CA UTIONA RY NOTE This note regarding the preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) is in addition to cautionary language already included in this presentation as required under NI 43-101. The Blackwater PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inf erred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculativ e geologically to hav e the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them t o be categorized as mineral reserv es, and there is no certainty that the PEA based on these mineral resources will be realized. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserv es do not hav e demonstrated economic v iability . This presentation includes inf ormation on New Gold’s PEA with respect to the Blackwater Project, which was outlined in the PEA Technical Report f iled on October 10, 2012. As disclosed in the presentation, New Gold has, since the date of the PEA, completed sev eral non-material updates of the mineral resource estimate f or the Blackwater Project. Although the PEA represents usef ul, accurate and reliable inf ormation based on the inf ormation av ailable at the time of its publication, and prov ides an important indicator as to the economic potential of the Blackwater Project, the PEA is based on mineral resources estimates with an ef f ective date of July 27, 2012, which do not ref lect drilling conducted since their ef f ective date, and the PEA does not ref lect the latest mineral resource estimate discussed in subsequent presentation. Certain assumptions used in the PEA, some of which relate to the July 27, 2012 mineral resource estimate, may hav e changed f rom those used f or the new resource estimate, causing a v ariation of parameters. Moreov er, the updated mineral resource estimate may impact how New Gold intends to dev elop the deposit, including pit outlines, production rates and mine lif e.

61

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Endnotes continued

NON-GA A P MEA SURES TOTA L CA SH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce f igures are non-GAAP measures which are calculated in accordance with a standard dev eloped by The Gold Institute, which was a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products and included leading North American gold producers. The Gold Institute ceased operations in 2002, but the s tandard is widely accepted as the standard of reporting cash costs of production in North America. Adoption of the standard is v oluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. New Gold reports total cash costs on a sales basis. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing, administration, roy alties and production taxes, but are exclusiv e of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs. Total cash costs are reduced by any by -product rev enue and are then div ided by ounces sold to arriv e at the total by -product cash cost of sales. The measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of a company ’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash f low f rom its mining operations. This data is f urnished to prov ide additional inf ormation and is a non-IFRS measure. Total cash costs presented do not hav e a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation as a substitute f or measures of perf ormance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicativ e of operating costs presented under IFRS. A reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is prov ided in the MD&A accompany ing New Gold’s most recent interim f inancial statements. A LL-IN SUSTA INING COSTS Consistent with the recently announced guidance f rom the World Gold Council, an association of v arious gold mining companies f rom around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold def ines “all-in sustaining costs” as the sum of mine site operating costs net of copper and silv er by -product sales, general & administrativ e costs, accretion and amortization, capitalized and expensed exploration, mine dev elopment expenditures and sustaining capital expenditures. New Gold believ es this non-GAAP measure will prov ide f urther transparency into costs associated with producing gold. All-in sustaining costs constitute a non-GAAP measure and are intended to prov ide additional inf ormation only and do not hav e any standardized meaning under IFRS. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute f or measures of perf ormance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures dif f erently. A reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure will be prov ided in the MD&A accompany ing New Gold’s most recent interim f inancial statements.

62

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Contact information

63

Investor Relations Hannes Portmann Vice President, Corporate Development 416-324-6014 hannes.portmann@newgold.com