Denver Gold Forum
September 2013
Denver Gold Forum September 2013 Cautionary statements A ll - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Denver Gold Forum September 2013 Cautionary statements A ll monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by -product sales unless otherwise stated CA UTIONA RY NOTE REGA RDING FORWA RD-LOOKING STA
September 2013
A ll monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by -product sales unless otherwise stated CA UTIONA RY NOTE REGA RDING FORWA RD-LOOKING STA TEMENTS Certain inf ormation contained in this presentation, including any inf ormation relating to New Gold’s f uture f inancial or operating perf ormance as well as inf ormation respecting Rainy Riv er and its assets, may be deemed “f orward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical f act that address ev ents or dev elopments that New Gold expects to occur, are “f orward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical f acts and are generally , but not alway s, identif ied by the use of f orward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “f orecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believ es” or v ariations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, ev ents or results “may ”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achiev ed” or the negativ e connotation. Without limiting the f oregoing, examples of f orward-looking inf ormation in this presentation include, among others, statements with respect to: New Gold’s guidance f or production, cash costs, all-in sustaining costs, expenditures and cash f lows, modif ications to operations, the timing of dev elopment decisions, the estimation of mineral reserv es and resources and the realization of mineral reserv es and resources, the timing and amount of estimated f uture production (including mining and milling rates), the expected lif e of New Gold’s mines, expected f uture production costs (including cash costs) and the timing of completion of the acquisition of Rainy Riv er. All such f orward-looking statements are based on the reasonable opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk f actors and uncertainties, many of which are bey ond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions. In addition to assumptions specif ically identif ied in this presentation, the key assumptions and estimates are discussed in New Gold’s most recent interim management discussion and analy sis and technical reports f iled at www.sedar.com. The estimates and assumptions upon which the f orward-looking statements in this presentation are based are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other f actors that may cause actual results, lev el of activ ity, perf ormance or achiev ements to be materially dif f erent from those expressed or implied by such f orward-looking statements. Such f actors include, without limitation: signif icant capital requirements; price v olatility in the spot and f orward markets f or commodities; f luctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile; impact of any hedging activ ities, including margin limits and margin calls; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated Reserv es and Resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recov eries; changes in national and local gov ernment legislation in Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile or any other country in which New Gold currently or may in the f uture carry on business; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic dev elopments in the countries in which New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculativ e nature of mineral exploration and dev elopment, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the v alidity and enf orceability of the necessary licences and permits and comply ing with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, including, but not limited to: in Canada, obtaining the necessary permits f or Blackwater and the Rainy Riv er Gold Project; in Mexico, where Cerro San Pedro has a history of ongoing legal challenges related to our env ironmental authorization (EIS); and in Chile, where the courts hav e temporarily suspended the approv al of the env ironmental permit f or El Morro; the lack of certainty with respect to f oreign legal sy stems, which may not be immune f rom the inf luence of political pressure, corruption or
competition; loss of key employ ees; additional f unding requirements; rising costs of labour, supplies, f uel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activ ities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies including the PEA f or Blackwater and the Rainy Riv er Feasibility Study f or the Rainy River Gold Project; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be ref ined; accidents; labour disputes; def ectiv e title to mineral claims or property or contests ov er claims to mineral properties; New Gold may be unable to successf ully complete the acquisition of all of the securities of Rainy Riv er or the completion of such acquisition may be delay ed or more costly than anticipated; uncertainties with respect to the successf ul integration of the business of Rainy Riv er within the business of New Gold; unexpected delay s and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of First Nations; and uncertainties with respect to obtaining all necessary surf ace rights f or the Rainy Riv er Project. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, dev elopment and mining, including env ironmental ev ents and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected f ormations, pressures, cav e-ins, f looding and gold bullion losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cov er these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s (and, in respect to inf ormation related to the acquisition of Rainy Riv er Resources Ltd. (“Rainy Riv er”), Rainy River and/or the Rainy Riv er Gold Project, in Rainy Riv er’s) disclosure documents f iled on and av ailable at www.sedar.com. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of f uture perf ormance, and actual results and f uture ev ents could materially dif f er f rom those anticipated in such statements. All of the f orward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualif ied by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or
All f ootnotes and endnotes hav e been shown at the conclusion of the presentation.
2
Portfolio
in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with established track record Peer-leading growth pipeline A history
creation
3
Blackwater New Afton Rainy River Mesquite Cerro San Pedro El Morro Peak Mines
Mine Life: 15+ years Mine Life: 14 years Mine Life: 15+ years Mine Life: 10+ years Mine Life: 4+ years Mine Life: 17 years Mine Life: 8 years
#2
CA NA DA
#6
UNITED STATES
#5
MEXICO
#3
CHILE
#1
AUSTRALIA
OPERATING DEVELOPMENT
4
Mining investment – country rankings(1)
(1) Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investm ent: “Where Not to Invest”.
Growing gold resource base in Canada
18.0 Canada 5.7 USA 2.9 Chile 1.7 Mexico 0.9 Australia GOLD RESERVES (Moz) 7.8 11.8 23.1 29.2 GOLD M&I RESOURCES (Moz) (1)(2) NEW GOLD PRO FORMA GOLD M&I RESOURCES (Moz) (1)
+44% per share +20% per share
since 2009
New Gold New Gold & Rainy River(3) New Gold New Gold & Rainy River(3)
5
(1) Measured and Indicated Resources inclusive of Reserves.
6
Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Robert Gallagher President & CEO Brian Penny Executive VP & CFO Ernie Mast VP Operations EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM BOARD OF DIRECTORS David Emerson Former Canadian Cabinet Minister James Estey Former Chairman, UBS Securities Canada Robert Gallagher President & CEO Vahan Kololian Founder, Terra Nova Partners Martyn Konig Former Executive Chairman, European Goldfields Pierre Lassonde Chairman, Franco-Nevada Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Raymond Threlkeld Mining Consultant
Significantly invested team
incremental margin
in cash costs(2) from 2009 to 2013E
2013 GUIDANCE – ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS ($/OZ)(3)
New Gold Mid-Tier Average(4) Senior Average(5)
$875 ~$1,050 ~$1,100
7
Lower costs driving margin expansion
2012 ACTUAL
Gold production
Gold production(1)
2013 GUIDANCE
2013 Total cash costs(2)
2013 All-in sustaining costs(2)(3)
8
By-product price assum ptions: Copper ~$3.25 per pound; Silver ~$22.50 per ounce.
2013 GUIDANCE
New Afton hitting its stride
more than 11,000 tonnes per day in Q2 – a 19% increase over Q1
tonnes per day by year-end 2013
GOLD 0.67 0.78
Q1 2013 Q2 2013
COPPER 0.79% 0.96%
Q1 2013 Q2 2013
GRADE (g/t) GRADE (%)
83% 87%
Q1 2013 Q2 2013
81% 88%
Q1 2013 Q2 2013
RECOVERY (%) RECOVERY (%)
15 22
Q1 2013 Q2 2013
12 19
Q1 2013 Q2 2013
PRODUCTION (Koz) PRODUCTION (Mlbs)
+16% +4% +46% +21% +7% +58%
9
Evaluating further throughput expansion potential
10
Design capacity
2013 year-end target
Additionalexpansion potential
as of mid-2013
New Afton C-Zone exploration program
EA-9
C-Zone B-Zone Reserve
4,900m Far East Extension / Hanging Wall Lens Targets
Drilled Planned
EA-31 EA-32 EA-34 EA-36 EA-35 EA-37* EA-33
HIGHLIGHTS POST C-ZONE RESOURCE UPDATE
Drill Hole From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Gold (g/t) Copper (%) EA-31 644 708 64 0.86 1.33 EA-32 478 622 144 0.92 1.10 EA-34 744 810 66 0.90 0.93 EA-36 592 678 86 2.32 2.61
11
resources by more than 300%
C-ZONE RESOURCE SUMMARY Measured and Indicated Inferred GOLD 0.3 Moz at 0.77 g/t 0.4 Moz at 0.62 g/t COPPER 211 Mlbs at 0.77 301 Mlbs at 0.68%
New Afton successful start with continued upside potential
ahead of schedule in mid-2012
mine life extension from 12 to 14 years
May 2013
day by end of 2013
increases in 2014 and beyond
12
Industry leading organic growth profile
production by ~1.75 times over current
increased shares outstanding by 25% for potential +150% increase in production
average cash costs at each project
Four current
Three organic projects 440–480 Koz +800 Koz Blackwater Rainy River
2013 Gold Production Guidance Annual Production Potential of Growth Assets
El Morro
13
Three world-class projects
Rainy River (97%) Blackwater El Morro (30%) Significant Gold Resource Base(1)(2) 6.2 Moz 8.6 Moz 2.9 Moz Exploration Potential Intrepid Zone/Multiple Regional T argets Capoose/Multiple Regional T argets El Morro Zone/ Block Cave Potential Jurisdiction Ontario, Canada British Columbia, Canada Chile Robust Production/ Low Cash Costs(3) ~225 Koz at below average cash costs ~500 Koz at below average cash costs ~90 Koz Au/85 Mlbs Cu at ~($700) cash costs(4)
RAINY RIVER BLACKWATER EL MORRO
14
Control of two underexplored districts
including recently discovered Intrepid Zone
15
RAINY RIVER Rainy River
Existing resource Exploration targets
Intrepid
Intrepid extension Son of Intrepid Western Zone Off Lake 5km
Control of two underexplored districts
package
Capoose ~25 km from main Blackwater resource
16
BLACKWATER Blackwater Capoose
Auro Van Tine Fawnie
Existing resource Exploration targets
10km
Limited capital required to advance projects to construction-ready status
and economic studies and permitting
RAINY RIVER SECOND HALF 2013 PROJECT SPENDING(1) BLACKWATER SECOND HALF 2013 PROJECT SPENDING(2)
Exploration(3) $5mm Engineering/Studies/ Environment/Other $20mm Exploration(3) $20mm Engineering/Studies/ Environment/Other $30mm
17
(39%) (27%) (14%) 45% 303%
Increasing Net Asset Value drives share price growth
March 2009
Net Asset Value (1)
September 2013
Mesquite, Cerro San Pedro, Peak Mines
~$875 $1,138
New Afton
~$120 $1,561
El Morro(2)
~$40 $432
Blackwater(3)
$– $808
Rainy River(4)
$– $479
18
S&P/TSX Global Gold Index FTSE Gold Mines Index HUI Index Gold Price New Gold
PRICE PERFORMANCE SINCE BUSINESS COMBINATION WITH WESTERN GOLDFIELDS IN MARCH 2009
Near-term catalysts
2013 guidance – increased resources, production growth and lower costs Blackwater resource update New Afton C-Zone exploration update Completion of Rainy River acquisition Blackwater/Rainy River/New Afton exploration updates Completion of Blackwater Feasibility Study New Afton mill to reach 12,000 tonnes per day/results of throughput increase evaluation Resolution of El Morro temporary permit suspension
19
Portfolio
in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with a history of delivering Peer-leading growth pipeline Track record
creation
21
Appendices Page 1. Financial information 22 2. Consolidated operating performance 28 3. Mesquite, Cerro San Pedro, Peak Mines 37 4. New Afton 41 5. Rainy River 45 6. Blackwater 47 7. El Morro 55 8. Reserves and resource notes 62 9. Commodity price/foreign exchange assumptions 69
22
illion of total $150 m illion currently used for Letters of Credit.
m ary of debt for detailed breakdown of com ponents of debt.
during 2012 ($300 million at 7.00%, $500 million at 6.25%)
502 million
gold hedges on May 15, 2013
Appendix 1 Cash and Equivalents(1) Undrawn Credit Facility(2)
23
Undrawn Credit Facility Senior Unsecured Notes (April 2012) Senior Unsecured Notes (November 2012) El Morro Funding Loan Face Value $150 million(1) $300 million $500 million $72 million Maturity 1 year with annual extensions permitted April 15, 2020 November 15, 2022 n/a Interest Rate See ‘Key features’ 7.00% 6.25% 4.58% Payable Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually Upon start of production Conversion price n/a n/a n/a n/a Current trading value n/a ~102 ~96 n/a Key features Normal financial covenants Interest Rate
LIBOR based on ratios
1.06%
2016 at 103.5% down to 100% of face after 2018
leverage ratio below 2:1
November 15, 2017 at par plus half coupon, declining ratably to par
leverage ratio below 2:1 New Gold to repay Goldcorp out of 80% of its 30% share of cash flow
starts production
illion currently allocated for Letters of Credit.
Appendix 1
24
future production
New Afton $110mm Peak Mines $60mm Cerro San Pedro $40mm Mesquite $20mm Blackwater $60mm New Afton $302mm Peak Mines $47mm Cerro San Pedro $11mm Mesquite $11mm Blackwater $128mm
TOTAL 2012 ACTUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES: $499 MILLION TOTAL 2013 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE ESTIMATE: $290 MILLION
Appendix 1
25
Direct investment for future production
capital and direct investments for future production growth and mine life extension
New Afton - $110 million Blackwater - $60 million Peak Mines - $60 million
Annual sustaining capital 82% 18% 100% 50% 50%
related technical services
commensurate decrease in capital
camp facilities/operation
Appendix 1
26
Cerro San Pedro - $40 million Mesquite - $20 million
75% 25% 60% 40%
phase 5 development
tire shops
Direct investment for future production Annual sustaining capital
Appendix 1
27
New Afton 40,000 metres Peak Mines 33,000 metres Blackwater 40,000 metres
Capitalized: $15 million Expensed: $15 million Expensed: $10 million Capitalized: $5 million Expensed: $5 million
Appendix 1
28
ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
ated capital expenditures excluding expenditures related to growth-related initiatives.
ent and note on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. All-in sustaining cash costs calculated using the m id-point of New Gold’s estim ated 2013 production range.
Appendix 2
Total cash costs(1) ~$350/oz General and administrative ~$60/oz Exploration expense ~$70/oz Sustaining capital(2) ~$395/oz
29
production at New Afton and increased throughput and recoveries at Peak Mines
to 88 million pounds
act as natural hedge to industry-wide cost pressures
ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
impacts consolidated cash costs by ~$45 per ounce
consolidated cash costs by ~$3 per
Appendix 2
30
ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
ptions: Silver - ~$22.50/oz; Copper - ~$3.25/lb.
ates: Gold - $570-$590/oz; Copper - $1.20-$1.30/lb.
Gold Production (Koz) Silver Production (Moz) Copper Production (Mlbs) Total Cash Costs(1)(2) ($/oz) 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E Mesquite 142 130-140
$830-$850 Cerro San Pedro 138 140-150 1.9 1.4-1.6
$375-$395 Peak Mines 96 95-105
12-14 $764 $670-$690 New Afton 37 75-85
66-74 ($1,043) ($1,410)- ($1,390)(3) 412 440-480 1.9 1.4-1.6 42 78-88 $421 ~$350
Appendix 2
$465 $418 $446 $421 $350 $478 $557 $643 $738 $200 $400 $600 $800 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E
31
id-point of New Gold 2013 cost guidance.
ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
Total Cash Costs (US$/oz)(2)
(3)
New Gold offers shareholders potential for over $375 per ounce(1) of incremental margin Appendix 2
32
ine recovery continues to track at ~75% for oxides; ~35% for sulphides.
ine recovery: Gold – ~60%; Silver – ~25%.
Mesquite Cerro San Pedro Peak Mines New Afton 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E 2012A 2013E Tonnes processed
(000 tonnes)
14,503 14,250-14,750 16,531 12,250-12,750 778 815-835 1,970 4,000-4,200 Tonnes mined
(000 tonnes)
45,666 46,000-48,000 30,905 36,000-38,000 786 1,310-1,330 903 4,300-4,500 Gold grade
(g/t)
0.46 0.41-0.45 0.47 0.58-0.63 4.18 4.1-4.3 0.73 0.67-0.71 Silver grade
(g/t)
13.0-17.0
(%)
0.80-0.84% 0.78% 0.86-0.90% Gold recovery
(%)
(1) (1) (2) (2) 91.3% 90.0-92.0% 78.8% 88.0-90.0% Silver recovery
(%)
(2)
(%)
89.0-91.0% 84.5% 88.0-90.0% Capital expenditures
($mm)
$11 $20 $11 $40 $47 $60 $302 $110 Reserve grade Gold grade
(g/t)
0.57 0.50 4.99 0.65 Silver grade
(g/t)
7.3 2.3 Copper grade
(%)
0.93%
Appendix 2
$690 2012A 2013E 142 2012A 2013E
33
Key assumptions and sensitivities
than 2012 average price paid
2012A versus 2013E
due to the planned processing of ore from an area within the mine plan that is below reserve grade
leach pad inventory working through sales and lower production base
ine recovery continues to track at ~75% for oxides; ~35% for sulphides.
ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
140 130 $850 $830
GOLD PRODUCTION(1) (Koz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(2) ($/oz)
Appendix 3
$232 2012A 2013E 138 2012A 2013E 1.9 2012A 2013E
34
Key assumptions and sensitivities
2012A versus 2013E
increase in gold grade
by-product production as well as lower price assumption
attributable to lower silver by-product revenue
ine recovery continues to track at: Gold – ~60%; Silver – ~25%.
ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
150 140 1.6 1.4 $395 $375
GOLD PRODUCTION(1) (Koz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(2) ($/oz) SILVER PRODUCTION(1) (Moz)
Appendix 3
$764 2012A 2013E 14 2012A 2013E 96 2012A 2013E
35
Key assumptions and sensitivities
pound)
2012A versus 2013E
tonne increase in tonnes processed
tonnes processed and copper recoveries offset by lower copper grades
increased gold production and lower foreign exchange rate assumption versus average 2012 exchange rate
105 95 14 12 $690 $670
ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
GOLD PRODUCTION(1) (Koz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(2) ($/oz) COPPER PRODUCTION(1) (Mlbs)
Appendix 3
36 Great Cobar
Appendix 3
28 2012A 2013E 37 2012A 2013E
37
2012A versus 2013E
partially offset by lower gold grade
copper grades and recoveries
85 75 74 66
GOLD PRODUCTION(1) (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION(1) (Mlbs)
ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”.
Appendix 4
($1,043)
2012A 2013E $656 2012A 2013E $1.40 2012A 2013E
38
Key assumptions and sensitivities
($1,390) ($1,410) $590 $570 $1.30 $1.20
TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz) (By-Product) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz) (Co-Product Copper) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz) (Co-Product Gold)
Appendix 4
39
Kenora Fort Frances Thunder Bay Rainy River Gold Project
HWY 600 Site Topography
Appendix 5
40
development
project wide
development internally
~500,000 ounces
late 2013
1,000 km2
eline which is dependent on perm it approvals.
gold resources – stockpile material of 0.9 million ounces
Measured and Indicated Gold Resources(1) – Direct Processing Material
Appendix 6
41
Development activity First Nations & Public Consultation Preliminary Economic Assessment Base Line Environmental Studies Feasibility Study Engineering Procurement Production Target Drilling Project Description/Terms of Reference Environmental Assessment Reports Provincial Approval Federal Approval Construction H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Reflects critical path in timeline
Appendix 6
42
processing plant
Appendix 6
43
from Vanderhoof and has access to low cost hydroelectric power
is inclusive of a 24% or $346 million contingency
current cost environment
assumed and the capital estimate was held constant in the economic analysis
reclamation and closure costs of $95 million and $72 million in equipment salvage value
Total development and sustaining capital estimated at $294 per recoverable gold ounce
Project Development Capital Costs Description Cost ($ million) Direct Costs Mining & Pre-production Development $208 On Site Infrastructure $181 Process $539 Tailing and Water Reclaim $74 Infrastructure (Power, Water, Road) $85 Total Direct Costs $1,087 Owner's and Indirect Costs Owner's Costs $54 EPCM $112 Other Indirects $215 Total Owner's and Indirect Costs $381 Subtotal $1,468 Contingency (24%) $346 Total Project $1,814
Appendix 6
Project Operating Costs Area Unit Cost (C$/t milled) $ per gold ounce produced Mining $6.21 $259 Processing $7.59 $317 General and Administrative $0.95 $40 Royalty (0.6%) $0.18 $8 Refining $0.23 $9 Silver by-product sales at $22.50 per ounce silver ($2.16) ($90) Total cash costs(1) net of by-product sales $13.01 $543 44
Processing Costs
ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures” and PEA additional cautionary note.
59% 11% 9% 6% 4% 4% 4% 2%
Hauling Auxiliary Blasting G&A Drilling Loading General Maint. General Mine
Mining Costs
44% 24% 17% 8% 6% 1%
Reagents Grinding Media/Liners Electricity Labour
Water Supply
Blackwater’s location near infrastructure, low stripping ratio, access to low cost power and silver by-product revenue expected to result in the Project having well below industry average cash costs
Appendix 6
Goldcorp
gold and 229 million pounds of copper to reserves(1)
environmental permit
source to northern Chilean development projects
45
and $2.75/lb copper.
Location Chile Mine type Open Pit Reserves1 – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlbs) 2.9/2,097 Resources1 – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlbs) 2.9/2,097 Estimate mine life 17 years LOM production/yr (Au Koz/Cu Mlbs)2 90/85 LOM cash costs/oz by-product3 ($700)
Appendix 7
46
– Receive cash flow from start of production – Interest rate fixed at 4.58%
– Co-product gold ~$550 per ounce – Co-product copper ~$1.45 per pound
ent and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures” .
Appendix 7
47
2012 open pit Proven and Probable reserves and Measured and Indicated resources Underground Inferred resource with block cave potential
500 metres
Appendix 7
48
ates based on Decem ber 2011 Feasibility Study.
Appendix 7
Funded by $1.2 billion interest at 4.58% ~ $2.7 billion 70% 20% 80%
30% 70% 30%
Total Capital 100% ~ $3.9 billion 100% Average annual cash flow
Carried funding repayment
Au Grade (g/t) Cu Grade (%) $91/t $44/t $41/t $27/t $53/t $52/t $42/t $33/t $31/t $30/t
0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.20% 0.40% 0.60% 0.80% 1.00% 1.20%
49
Company disclosure.
El Morro
Producing Development
Chapada Cadia-Ridgew ay Alumbrera New Afton New Prosperity Cobre Panama
Cerro Casale El Morro Agua Rica
(2)
New Afton
Appendix 7
50
ber 31, 2012 year-end resource statem ents.
m
EL MORRO WITHIN GOLDCORP PORTFOLIO
Asset Gold Reserves (Moz) Asset Gold Equivalent(2) (Moz) Penasquito 15.7 Penasquito 43.9 Pueblo Viejo 10.0 El Morro 17.4 Los Filos 7.4 Pueblo Viejo 11.7 El Morro 6.7 Los Filos 8.4 Cerro Negro 5.7 Cerro Negro 6.7
Appendix 7
51
Mineral Reserves and Resources Summary Current(1) Year End 2011(2) Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Proven and Probable Reserves 11,783 41,571 3,282 7,863 34,347 2,888 Measured and Indicated Resources (inclusive of Reserves) 29,242 159,585 4,223 18,797 115,268 3,946 Inferred Resources 6,822 88,359 1,187 6,323 76,856 2,202 M&I Resources (inclusive of Reserves) Mesquite 5,684
1,703 57,980
55,860
880 1,350 146 948 1,570 167 New Afton 2,224 7,292 1,980 1,742 5,470 1,586 Blackwater 9,497 70,128
25,774
196 9,497
26,594
6,167 13,338
n/a n/a El Morro 2,891
2,954
Total M&I 29,242 159,585 4,223 18,797 115,268 3,946
Appendix 8
52
Mineral Reserves statement as at December 31, 2012 Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Proven 13,140 0.68
114,409 0.56
127,549 0.57
Proven 21,100 0.52 17.1
11,600
26,400 0.48 17.4
14,800
47,500 0.50 17.3
26,400
Proven 2,109 5.89 7.5 1.08 399 510 50 Probable 2,118 3.82 6.8 1.18 260 466 55 Peak P&P 4,227 4.85 7.2 1.13 659 976 105 New Afton Proven
52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080 New Afton P&P 52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080 Rainy River Proven 27,700 1.14 1.94
1,728
88,600 1.06 3.01
8,587
116,300 1.08 2.76
10,315
100% Basis 30% Basis
Proven 307,949 0.57
1,705
Probable 335,152 0.37
1,186
El Morro P&P 643,101 0.47
2,891
Appendix 8
53
Measured and Indicated mineral Resource statement (inclusive of Reserves) as at December 31, 2012 Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Measured - oxide 19,100 0.51
274,100 0.38
293,200 0.39
4,900 0.88
96,000 0.61
100,900 0.62
394,100 0.45
Measured - oxide 27,100 0.34 15.0
13,100
49,000 0.24 13.0
20,480
76,100 0.28 13.7
33,580
15,200 0.47 11.9
5,800
60,400 0.41 9.6
18,600
75,600 0.42 10.1
24,400
151,700 0.35 11.9
57,980
Measured 2,700 5.74 7.5 1.05 494 647 62 Indicated 3,200 3.75 6.8 1.19 386 703 84 Peak M&I 5,900 4.66 7.1 1.13 880 1,350 146
Appendix 8
54
Measured and Indicated mineral Resource statement (inclusive of Reserves) as at December 31, 2012 Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs New Afton A&B Zones Measured 33,500 0.86 2.9 1.18 929 3,160 873 Indicated 45,900 0.67 2.4 0.89 984 3,530 896 A&B Zone M&I 79,400 0.75 2.6 1.01 1,913 6,690 1,769 C-Zone Measured 1,282 0.75 1.4 0.79 31 56 22 Indicated 11,205 0.78 1.5 0.77 280 548 189 C-Zone M&I 12,486 0.77 1.5 0.77 311 602 211 Total New Afton M&I 91,886 0.75 2.6 1.00 2,224 7,292 1,980 Blackwater Direct processing material Measured 116,955 1.04 5.6
21,057
189,044 0.78 6.0
36,467
305,999 0.88 5.8
57,524
Measured 26,521 0.30 4.1
3,496
64,382 0.30 4.4
9,108
90,903 0.30 4.3
12,604
396,902 0.74 5.5
70,128
Indicated 14,200 0.43 20.8
9,497
Measured 27,638 1.33 1.90
1,689
130,885 1.18 2.8
11,649
158,523 1.21 2.62
13,338
100% Basis 30% Basis Measured 307,949 0.57
1,705
Indicated 335,152 0.37
1,186
El Morro M&I 643,101 0.47
2,891
Appendix 8
55
Inferred Resource statement as at December 31, 2012 Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Oxide 35,200 0.33
15,700 0.55
50,900 0.40
Oxides 53,400 0.17 9.0
15,400
50,500 0.34 8.5
13,800
103,900 0.25 8.8
29,200
1,700 2.64 4.8 1.13 144 261 42 New Afton A&B-Zone 14,900 0.45 2.0 0.65 216 940 212 C-Zone 20,221 0.62 1.4 0.68 401 923 301 New Afton Inferred 35,121 0.56 1.5 0.68 617 1,863 513 Blackwater Direct processing 13,815 0.76 4.1
1,821
3,785 0.31 3.6
438
17,600 0.66 4.0
2,263
64,070 0.29 23.2
47,789
93,804 0.76 2.32
6,983
30% Basis El Morro 137,555 0.99
1,310
Appendix 8
56
Mineral reserves are contained w ithin Measured and Indicated mineral resources. Measured and Indicated mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability as defined by a technical Feasibility Study. New Gold reports its Measured and Indicated mineral resources inclusive of its mineral reserves. Inferred mineral resources are not know n w ith the same degree of certainty as Measured and Indicated resources, do not have demonstrated economic viability, and are exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral reserves have been estimated and reported in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (‘CIM’) definition standards and guidelines and Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (‘NI 43-101’). 1) Mineral Reserves for the company’s mineral properties have been calculated based on the follow ing metal prices and low er cut-off criteria: Mineral Property Gold (US$/oz) Silver (US$/oz) Copper (US$/lb) Lower Cut-off Mesquite $1,300
0.41 g/t Au – Non-oxide reserves Cerro San Pedro $1,300 $24.00
Peak Mines $1,300 $24.00 $3.00 A$120 – 253/t NSR New Afton $1,300
US$24/t NSR El Morro $1,350
0.20% CuEq Rainy River $1,250 $25.00
3.5 g/t AuEq - Underground
Appendix 8
57
2) Mineral Resources for the company’s mineral properties have been calculated based on the follow ing metal prices and low er cut-off criteria: Mineral resources have been estimated and reported in accordance with CIM definition standards and guidelines and Canadian NI 43-101. Mineral Property Gold (US$/oz) Silver (US$/oz) Copper (US$/lb) Lower Cut-off Mesquite $1,400
0.24 g/t Au – Non-oxide resources Cerro San Pedro $1,400 $28.00
0.4g/t AuEq – Open pit sulphide resources Peak Mines $1,400 $28.00 $3.25 A$97 - 137/t NSR New Afton $1,400 $28.00 $3.25 0.40% CuEq – All resources El Morro $1,500
0.15% Cu – Open pit resources 0.20% Cu – Underground resources Blackw ater $1,400
Capoose $1,400
Rainy River $1,100 $22.50
2.5 g/t AuEq – Underground 3) Mineral resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred resources and are reported based on technical and economic parameters consistent w ith the methods most suitable for their potential commercial exploitation. Where different mining and/or processing methods might be applied to different portions of a mineral resource, the designators ‘open pit’ and ‘underground’ have been applied to indicate envisioned mining method. Likew ise the designators ‘oxide’, ‘non-oxide’ and ‘sulphide’ have been applied to indicate the type of mineralization as it relates to appropriate mineral processing method and expected payable metal recoveries. Additional details regarding mineral resource estimation, classification and reporting parameters for each of New Gold’s mineral properties are provided in the respective NI 43-101 Technical Reports w hich are available on SEDAR. 4) Blackw ater April 4, 2013 update:
average metallurgical recoveries of 88.0% gold and 64.0% silver for oxide mineralization, 85.0% gold and 58.0% silver for transitional oxide/sulfide mineralization and 85.0% gold and 44.0% silver for sulfide mineralization. The 2012 year-end mineral resource estimate utilizes average metallurgical recoveries of 86% gold and 44.9% silver for all material types.
recoveries as described in Note 1 above. 5) Qualified Person: The preparation of New Gold’s mineral reserve and resource statements has been done by Qualified Persons as defined under Canadian National Instrument 43-101 under the oversight and review of Mark Petersen, a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 and employee of New Gold.
Appendix 8
58
Guidance assumptions(1) Spot:
2013 Gold price ($/oz) ~1,350 Silver price ($/oz) ~22.50 Copper price ($/oz) ~3.25 USD/AUD 1.00 USD/CAD 1.00 USD/MXN 13.00 Spot Gold price ($/oz) 1,310 Silver price ($/oz) 21.75 Copper price ($/oz) 3.20 USD/AUD 0.93 USD/CAD 0.97 USD/MXN 12.95
e of second quarter results release on July 31, 2013.
Appendix 9
Page 4 1. Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment: “Where Not to Invest”. Page 5 1. Refer to Endnotes and note under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources”. 2. Measured and Indicated Resources inclusive of Reserves. 3. Pro forma figures include Rainy River and assume 100% ow nership of Rainy River. 4. For a detailed breakdow n of Reserves and Resources, refer to: New Gold’s “Annual Information Form for the Financial Year Ended December 31, 2012” dated March 27, 2013; new s release dated April 4, 2013 “New Gold Announces Increased Gold Resources at Blackw ater Project”; new s release dated May 1, 2013 “New Gold Announces 2013 First Quarter Results – Increases Gold and Copper Resources at New Afton C-Zone by Over 300 Percent”; and new s release dated July 31, 2013 “New Gold Second Quarter Delivers Increased Production at Low er Costs
Page 7 1. Based on comparison w ith costs published by issuers listed in notes 4 and 5. The manner in w hich costs are determined may va ry from one issuer to another. 2. Refer to Endnotes and note on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 3. Refer to Endnotes and note on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 4. Mid-tier average includes: Alamos, Eldorado, Agnico Eagle, Aurico and IAMGOLD. 5. Senior average includes: Barrick, Goldcorp, Kinross and New mont. Page 8 1. Gold sales expected to be in same general range as production. 2. Refer to Endnotes on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Guidance for total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs incorporates realized prices and foreign exchange rates to June 30, 2013 and assumes commodity prices and exchange rates consistent with those at July 30, 2013 for the balance of 2013. 3. Refer to Endnotes on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Page 14 1. Refer to Appendix for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations. 2. Refer to Endnotes and note under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Measured, Indicated andInferred Resources”. Measured and Indicated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. At Blackw ater, the 8.6 million ounces of Resources referred to ab
to be stockpiled w hich has been classified as Measured and Indicated Resource. Refer to note 4 on page 5 for Reserve and Reso urce source information. 3. Refer to Endnotes on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Cash costs have been compared to industry data per GFMS reports w hich calculated an average, net of by-product credits, cash cost of $738 per ounce for the YE’2012. 4. El Morro production and cash costs based on updated December 2011 Feasibility Study.
59
Page 17 1. For period from August through December 2013. 2. For period from July through December 2013. 3. Includes both capitalized and expensed exploration. Page 18 Source: Broker Reports, Company Estimates and Announcements, Bloomberg; all amounts in USD. 1. Street consensus NAV. 2. Current street consensus NAV for El Morro; includes $50 million cash payment received from Goldcorp as part of transaction consideration. 3. New Gold acquired Richfield and Silver Quest on June 1, 2011 and December 23, 2011, respectively. 4. New Gold acquired 97.5% of Rainy River on August 9, 2013. 5. S&P/TSX Global Gold Index includes 54 gold companies in various stages of development/production. 6. FTSE Gold Mines Index includes 26 gold producing companies. 7. HUI Index includes 15 of the major global gold producers.
60
CA UTIONA RY NOTE TO U.S. REA DERS CONCERNING ESTIMA TES OF MEA SURED, INDICA TED A ND INFERRED RESOURCES Inf ormation concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar inf ormation f or United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inf erred Mineral Resource” used in this presentation are Canadian mining terms as def ined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) under guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Standards
“Inf erred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not def ined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classif ied as a “Reserv e” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the Reserv e calculation is made. As such, certain inf ormation contained in this presentation concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar inf ormation made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An “Inf erred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal f easibility . It cannot be as sumed that all or any part of an “Inf erred Mineral Resource” will ev er be upgraded to a higher category . Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inf erred Mineral Resources may not f orm the basis of f easibility or pre-f easibility studies. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all
economically or legally mineable. In addition, the def initions of “Prov en Mineral Reserv es” and “Probable Mineral Reserv es” under CIM standards dif f er in certain respects f rom the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICA L INFORMA TION The scientif ic and technical inf ormation contained in this presentation relating to the Rainy Riv er Gold Project has been rev iewed and approv ed by Garett Macdonald and Kerry Sparkes, both Qualif ied Persons under NI 43-101 and of f icers of Rainy River. The other scientif ic and technical inf ormation contained in this presentation has been rev iewed and approv ed by Mark Petersen, a Qualif ied Person under NI 43-101 and an of f icer of New Gold. Mineral Reserv es and Mineral Resources The estimates of Mineral Reserv es and Mineral Resources discussed in this presentation may be materially af f ected by env ironmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing and other relev ant issues. In addition to our February 5, 2013, April 4, 2013 and July 31, 2013 news releases, f urther details regarding Mineral Reserv e and Resource estimates, including classif ications, key assumptions and parameters used in such estimates and other related inf ormation f or each of New Gold's mineral properties are prov ided in the respectiv e NI 43-101 Technical Reports, which are av ailable at www.sedar.com. BLA CKWA TER PEA – A DDITIONA L CA UTIONA RY NOTE This note regarding the preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) is in addition to cautionary language already included in this presentation as required under NI 43-101. The Blackwater PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inf erred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculativ e geologically to hav e the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them t o be categorized as mineral reserv es, and there is no certainty that the PEA based on these mineral resources will be realized. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserv es do not hav e demonstrated economic v iability . This presentation includes inf ormation on New Gold’s PEA with respect to the Blackwater Project, which was outlined in the PEA Technical Report f iled on October 10, 2012. As disclosed in the presentation, New Gold has, since the date of the PEA, completed sev eral non-material updates of the mineral resource estimate f or the Blackwater Project. Although the PEA represents usef ul, accurate and reliable inf ormation based on the inf ormation av ailable at the time of its publication, and prov ides an important indicator as to the economic potential of the Blackwater Project, the PEA is based on mineral resources estimates with an ef f ective date of July 27, 2012, which do not ref lect drilling conducted since their ef f ective date, and the PEA does not ref lect the latest mineral resource estimate discussed in subsequent presentation. Certain assumptions used in the PEA, some of which relate to the July 27, 2012 mineral resource estimate, may hav e changed f rom those used f or the new resource estimate, causing a v ariation of parameters. Moreov er, the updated mineral resource estimate may impact how New Gold intends to dev elop the deposit, including pit outlines, production rates and mine lif e.
61
NON-GA A P MEA SURES TOTA L CA SH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce f igures are non-GAAP measures which are calculated in accordance with a standard dev eloped by The Gold Institute, which was a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products and included leading North American gold producers. The Gold Institute ceased operations in 2002, but the s tandard is widely accepted as the standard of reporting cash costs of production in North America. Adoption of the standard is v oluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. New Gold reports total cash costs on a sales basis. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing, administration, roy alties and production taxes, but are exclusiv e of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs. Total cash costs are reduced by any by -product rev enue and are then div ided by ounces sold to arriv e at the total by -product cash cost of sales. The measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of a company ’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash f low f rom its mining operations. This data is f urnished to prov ide additional inf ormation and is a non-IFRS measure. Total cash costs presented do not hav e a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation as a substitute f or measures of perf ormance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicativ e of operating costs presented under IFRS. A reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is prov ided in the MD&A accompany ing New Gold’s most recent interim f inancial statements. A LL-IN SUSTA INING COSTS Consistent with the recently announced guidance f rom the World Gold Council, an association of v arious gold mining companies f rom around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold def ines “all-in sustaining costs” as the sum of mine site operating costs net of copper and silv er by -product sales, general & administrativ e costs, accretion and amortization, capitalized and expensed exploration, mine dev elopment expenditures and sustaining capital expenditures. New Gold believ es this non-GAAP measure will prov ide f urther transparency into costs associated with producing gold. All-in sustaining costs constitute a non-GAAP measure and are intended to prov ide additional inf ormation only and do not hav e any standardized meaning under IFRS. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute f or measures of perf ormance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures dif f erently. A reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure will be prov ided in the MD&A accompany ing New Gold’s most recent interim f inancial statements.
62
63
Investor Relations Hannes Portmann Vice President, Corporate Development 416-324-6014 hannes.portmann@newgold.com