demystifying medicine 2019 cellular immunotherapy of
play

Demystifying Medicine 2019 Cellular Immunotherapy of Cancer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Demystifying Medicine 2019 Cellular Immunotherapy of Cancer Improved Survival by Study Era 100 1996-2000 1989-1995 80 1983-1988 60 1978-1983 1975-1977 40 1972-1975 20 1970-1972 1968-1970 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Data courtesy of GH


  1. Demystifying Medicine 2019 Cellular Immunotherapy of Cancer

  2. Improved Survival by Study Era 100 1996-2000 1989-1995 80 1983-1988 60 1978-1983 1975-1977 40 1972-1975 20 1970-1972 1968-1970 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Data courtesy of GH Reaman, H Sather, Children ’ s Oncology Group

  3. Sun/Whitlock, Leukemia, 2018

  4. Blinatumomab

  5. TCR vs CAR-T Cell Structure Fesnak et al. Nature Review Clin. Oncology, 2016

  6. Image, Courtesy of NIH Medical Arts

  7. CD19 CAR Clinical Updates (NCI-POB) Lee et al. Lancet 2015 67% CR rate (ITT) All responders with CRS

  8. CD19 CAR Clinical Updates (Novartis) 81% Complete remission rate (not ITT)

  9. Cytokine Release Syndrome Images, Courtesy of NIH Mediccal Arts Lee/Mackall Lancet 2015

  10. Oh Where… Oh Where... Has my CD19 gone? Sotillo/Thomas-Tikhonenko, Cancer Discovery 2015

  11. Lineage Switch (ALL à AML) • MLL -rearranged B-ALL (11q23) rearrangement • “Infant” ALL à VERY poor prognosis • Gardner et al. • 7 of 7 with MLLr -ALL attained MRD neg CR post –CD19 CAR • Relapses seen in 2 with myeloid phenotype • Similar experience seen in MLLr -ALL treated with blinatumomab • Jacoby et al. • CD19 CAR immune pressure induces lineage switch Gardner/Turtle, Blood 2015 O’Brien, Pediatric Blood Cancer 2016 Jacoby/Fry Nat Commun 2016

  12. 100 Absolute change in marrow blasts (%) 50 Dose Level 1 Dose Level 2 Dose Level 3 # # # # # # # # # * 0 No CRS Grade 1 CRS Grade 2 CRS -50 -100 8 5 6 3 2 7 0 1 4 2 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 9 0 1 1 Patient # 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 Individual ALL patients (n=21) Fry TJ, Nat. Medicine 2018

  13. CD22 Antigen Expression at Relapse • Decrease in Site Density Patient 2 10000 Patient 8 Patient 11 CD22 Site Density, Sites/cell Patient 9 • Antigen loss 1000 Patient 15 • Both 100 • No 10 1 Pre-Treatment Relapse

  14. Options for Simultaneous Targeting of CD19 and CD22 (Fry Lab) Bivalent-Bispecific Receptor + Co-administration Co-expression

  15. Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of Anti-CD19/CD22 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells in Children and Young Adults with Recurrent or Refractory CD19/CD22-expressing B Cell Malignancies • Hypothesis: Simultaneous Loop CAR: Linker 1 Linker 2 Linker 1 CD22VH CD22VL CD19VL CD19VH CD3 z targeting of CD19 and CD22 CD8 4-1BB 5 aa 18 aa 5 aa could diminish the risk of CD22VH CD19VL CD19VH CD3 z CD22VL CD8 4-1BB antigen loss escape • Novel bivalent, bispecific CAR None CD19 CD22 Loop CAR Day 3 to be tested in the clinic Day 6 • Actively enrolling Day 10 Day 17 XXXXX Day 23 Activity of Bispecific CAR: In vivo activity against CD19+/22+ B-ALL Qin et. al. Molecular Therapy Oncolytics

  16. Acknowledgements • Terry J. Fry • Steve Highfill • Brigitte Widemann • David Stroncek • John Glod • Haiying Qin • Haneen Shalabi • Naoza Collins-Johnson • Bonnie Yates • Staci Martin • Cindy Delbrook • Lori Wiener • Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson • Sima Zadeh • Constance Yuan • Joan Galil A special thanks to all our patients, • Leah Hoffman • KamilleWest particularly those who are no longer with Cathy Cantilena • Pamela Wolters us, their families and referring teams. • Paul Jarosinski • Crystal L. Mackall Their memory lives on in our work. • Nursing • Daniel ”Trey” Lee • Rimas Orentas

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend