decomposition rank of uhf absorbing c algebras
play

Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C -algebras Joint work with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C -algebras Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C -algebras Joint work with Hiroki Matui 12, Mar., 2013. Sde Boker . . . . . . Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C -algebras Murray-von


  1. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Joint work with Hiroki Matui 12, Mar., 2013. Sde Boker . . . . . .

  2. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence M : a finite von Neumann algebra, p, q: two projections in M . If τ ( p ) = τ ( q ) , for any tracial state τ of M , then there exists v ∈ M such that vv ∗ = q . v ∗ v = p , This condition plays an essential role in the classification theorem of injective factors. . . . . . .

  3. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence and AFD A. Connes proved that any injective factor with a separable predual is approximately finite dimensional (AFD), by using his deep study of automorphisms. And he classified injective factors of type II and type III λ , λ ̸ = 1 . . . . . . .

  4. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence and AFD A. Connes proved that any injective factor with a separable predual is approximately finite dimensional (AFD), by using his deep study of automorphisms. And he classified injective factors of type II and type III λ , λ ̸ = 1 . U. Haagerup gave an alternative proof (injectivity ⇒ AFD) without using automorphisms, and classified the injective factor of thpe III 1 . . . . . . .

  5. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence and AFD A. Connes proved that any injective factor with a separable predual is approximately finite dimensional (AFD), by using his deep study of automorphisms. And he classified injective factors of type II and type III λ , λ ̸ = 1 . U. Haagerup gave an alternative proof (injectivity ⇒ AFD) without using automorphisms, and classified the injective factor of thpe III 1 . S. Popa also gave another short proof by using excisions of amenable traces. In Connes and Haagerup’s argument, they showed AFD by using a partial isometry v which induces the Murray-von Neumann equivalence. . . . . . .

  6. ( ) Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence for C ∗ -algebras Theorem ( 1980. Cuntz-Pedersen. ) Let A be a C ∗ -algebra, p , q projections in A . If τ ( p ) = τ ( q ) for any tracial state τ of A . Then ∃ v i ∈ A , i = 1 , 2 , ..., N , such that ∑ ∑ v ∗ i v i = p , v i v ∗ i = q . . . . . . .

  7. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Murray-von Neumann equivalence for C ∗ -algebras Theorem ( 1980. Cuntz-Pedersen. ) Let A be a C ∗ -algebra, p , q projections in A . If τ ( p ) = τ ( q ) for any tracial state τ of A . Then ∃ v i ∈ A , i = 1 , 2 , ..., N , such that ∑ ∑ v ∗ i v i = p , v i v ∗ i = q . Lemma ( 2013. Matui-Sato ) Let A be a C ∗ -algebra with strict comparison for projections, p , q projections in A . If τ ( p ) = τ ( q ) for any tracial state τ of A . Then ∃ v i ∈ A ⊗ M n , i = 1 , 2 , such that ∑ ∑ v ∗ i v i ≈ 4 / n p ⊗ 1 n , v i v ∗ i ≈ 4 / n q ⊗ 1 n . . . . . . .

  8. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Main theorem Theorem ( 2013. H. Matui - Y. Sato ) Let A be a unital separable, simple, C ∗ -algebra with a unique tracial state. Then A is nuclear, with strict comparison, and is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ dr( A ) < ∞ , (in particular dr( A ) ≤ 3 ). . . . . . .

  9. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Main theorem Theorem ( 2013. H. Matui - Y. Sato ) Let A be a unital separable, simple, C ∗ -algebra with a unique tracial state. Then A is nuclear, with strict comparison, and is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ dr( A ) < ∞ , (in particular dr( A ) ≤ 3 ). If A is in the above theorem, ⇒ A ⊗ Z ∼ A has strict comparison ⇐ = A . . . . . . .

  10. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Murray-von Neumann equivalence Main theorem Theorem ( 2013. H. Matui - Y. Sato ) Let A be a unital separable, simple, C ∗ -algebra with a unique tracial state. Then A is nuclear, with strict comparison, and is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ dr( A ) < ∞ , (in particular dr( A ) ≤ 3 ). If A is in the above theorem, ⇒ A ⊗ Z ∼ A has strict comparison ⇐ = A . → ∏ M k n / ⊕ M k n , A is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ A ֒ D. Voiculescu. . . . . . .

  11. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Decomposition rank Definition (2002. E. Kirchberg - W. Winter.) Let A be a separable C ∗ -algebra. A has decomposition rank at most N , dr( A ) ≤ N , if → ⊕ N ∃ φ n : A − i =0 M k i , n : c.p.c, ∃ ψ i , n : M k i , n − → A : order zero (disjointness preserving), c.p.c such that ∑ ψ i , n is also contractive, ∥ ( ∑ ψ i , n ) ◦ φ n ( a ) − a ∥ → 0 , ∀ a ∈ A , where we simply write ( ∑ ψ i , n )( ⊕ x i ) := ∑ ψ i , n ( x i ) . . . . . . .

  12. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Decomposition rank Definition (2002. E. Kirchberg - W. Winter.) Let A be a separable C ∗ -algebra. A has decomposition rank at most N , dr( A ) ≤ N , if → ⊕ N ∃ φ n : A − i =0 M k i , n : c.p.c, ∃ ψ i , n : M k i , n − → A : order zero (disjointness preserving), c.p.c such that ∑ ψ i , n is also contractive, ∥ ( ∑ ψ i , n ) ◦ φ n ( a ) − a ∥ → 0 , ∀ a ∈ A , where we simply write ( ∑ ψ i , n )( ⊕ x i ) := ∑ ψ i , n ( x i ) . dr( A ) < ∞ = ⇒ A is quasidiagonal, Kirchberg-Winter. . . . . . .

  13. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Decomposition rank Definition (2002. E. Kirchberg - W. Winter.) Let A be a separable C ∗ -algebra. A has decomposition rank at most N , dr( A ) ≤ N , if → ⊕ N ∃ φ n : A − i =0 M k i , n : c.p.c, ∃ ψ i , n : M k i , n − → A : order zero (disjointness preserving), c.p.c such that ∑ ψ i , n is also contractive, ∥ ( ∑ ψ i , n ) ◦ φ n ( a ) − a ∥ → 0 , ∀ a ∈ A , where we simply write ( ∑ ψ i , n )( ⊕ x i ) := ∑ ψ i , n ( x i ) . dr( A ) < ∞ = ⇒ A is quasidiagonal, Kirchberg-Winter. ⇒ A ⊗ Z ∼ dr( A ) < ∞ = = A , 2007 Winter. . . . . . .

  14. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Decomposition rank Definition (2002. E. Kirchberg - W. Winter.) Let A be a separable C ∗ -algebra. A has decomposition rank at most N , dr( A ) ≤ N , if → ⊕ N ∃ φ n : A − i =0 M k i , n : c.p.c, ∃ ψ i , n : M k i , n − → A : order zero (disjointness preserving), c.p.c such that ∑ ψ i , n is also contractive, ∥ ( ∑ ψ i , n ) ◦ φ n ( a ) − a ∥ → 0 , ∀ a ∈ A , where we simply write ( ∑ ψ i , n )( ⊕ x i ) := ∑ ψ i , n ( x i ) . dr( A ) < ∞ = ⇒ A is quasidiagonal, Kirchberg-Winter. ⇒ A ⊗ Z ∼ dr( A ) < ∞ = = A , 2007 Winter. A ⊗Z ∼ = A = ⇒ A has strict comparison, 2001 M. Rørdam. . . . . . .

  15. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Main theorem Theorem ( 2013. H. Matui - Y. Sato ) Let A be a unital separable, simple, C ∗ -algebra with a unique tracial state. Then A is nuclear, with strict comparison, and is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ dr( A ) < ∞ , (in particular dr( A ) ≤ 3 ). If A is in the above theorem, ⇒ A ⊗ Z ∼ A has strict comparison ⇐ = A . → ∏ M k n / ⊕ M k n , A is quasidiagonal ⇐ ⇒ A ֒ D. Voiculescu. . . . . . .

  16. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Toms - Winter conjecture Conjecture ( 2009. A. Toms, W. Winter. ) Let A be a unital separable simple nuclear finite C ∗ -algebra with infinite-dimension. Then the following are equivalent. (i) A ⊗ Z ∼ = A . . . . . . .

  17. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Toms - Winter conjecture Conjecture ( 2009. A. Toms, W. Winter. ) Let A be a unital separable simple nuclear finite C ∗ -algebra with infinite-dimension. Then the following are equivalent. (i) A ⊗ Z ∼ = A . (ii) A has the strict comparison. (i) ⇒ (ii) 2001. M. R ø rdam. . . . . . .

  18. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Toms - Winter conjecture Conjecture ( 2009. A. Toms, W. Winter. ) Let A be a unital separable simple nuclear finite C ∗ -algebra with infinite-dimension. Then the following are equivalent. (i) A ⊗ Z ∼ = A . (ii) A has the strict comparison. (iii) dr( A ) < ∞ (i) ⇒ (ii) 2001. M. R ø rdam. (iii) ⇒ (i) 2009. W. Winter. Corollary of the main theorem Suppose that A is a unital separable simple nuclear C ∗ -algebra. Assume that A is quasidiagonal and with a unique tracial state. Then (ii) = ⇒ (iii). . . . . . .

  19. Decomposition rank of UHF-absorbing C ∗ -algebras Decomposition rank Without Q.D. Here we assume that the T. W. conjecture has been completely proved without Q.D. For a unital separable simple nuclear C ∗ -algebra A it follows that A ⊗ Z also absorbs Z ((i) in the T. W. conjecture.), . . . . . .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend