decision trees
play

DecisionTrees MachineLearning10601 GeoffGordon,MiroslavDudk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DecisionTrees MachineLearning10601 GeoffGordon,MiroslavDudk ([[[partlybasedonslidesofCarlosGuestrinandAndrewMoore] hHp://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ggordon/10601/


  1. Decision
Trees
 Machine
Learning
‐
10601
 Geoff
Gordon,
Miroslav
Dudík
 ([[[partly
based
on
slides
of
Carlos
Guestrin
and
Andrew
Moore] 
 hHp://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ggordon/10601/
 October
21,
2009



  2. Non‐linear
Classifiers
 Dealing
with
non‐linear
decision
boundary
 1. add
“non‐linear”
features
 to
a
linear
model
(e.g.,
logisUc
regression) 
 2. use
non‐linear
learners
 (nearest
neighbors,
decision
trees,
arUficial
neural
nets,
...) 
 k‐Nearest
Neighbor
Classifier
 simple,
oWen
a
good
baseline
 • can
approximate
arbitrary
boundary:
 non‐parametric
 • downside: 
stores
all
the
data
 •

  3. A
Decision
Tree
for
 PlayTennis
 Each
internal
node:
 test
one
feature 
 X j
 Each
branch
from
a
node:
 select
one
value
for 
 X j
 Each
leaf
node
node:
 predict 
 Y 
 






































or
 P(Y
|
X
 ∈ 
leaf) 


  4. Decision
trees
 How
would
you
represent
 Y
=
A
 ∨ 
B 




( A
or
B ) 


  5. Decision
trees
 How
would
you
represent
 Y
=
(A ∧ B)
 ∨ 
( ¬ A ∧ C) 




( (A
and
B)
or
(not
A
and
C) ) 


  6. OpUmal
Learning
of
 Decision
Trees
is
Hard
 • learning
the
smallest
(simplest)
decision
tree
 is
NP‐complete
(exisUng
algorithms
exponenUal)
 • use
“greedy”
heurisUcs:
 – start
with
an
empty
tree
 – choose
the
 next
best 
aHribute
(feature)
 – recurse


  7. A
small
dataset:
 predict
 miles
per
gallon
(mpg)


  8. A
Decision
Stump


  9. Recursion
Step


  10. Recursion
Step


  11. Second
Level
of
Tree


  12. The
final
tree


  13. Which
aHribute
is
the
best?
 X 1 
 X 2 
 Y
 T
 T
 T
 T
 F
 T
 A
good
split:
 T
 T
 T
 increases
certainty 
about
 T
 F
 T
 classificaUon
 aKer
split
 F
 T
 T
 F
 F
 F
 F
 T
 F
 F
 F
 F


  14. Entropy
=
measure
of
uncertainty
 Entropy
 H(Y) 
of
a
random
variable
 Y:
 m 






H(Y)
=

–
∑
P(Y=y i )
log 2 
P(Y=y i )
 i=1 H(Y) 
is
the
expected
number
of
bits
needed
to
encode
a
 randomly
drawn
value
of
 Y


  15. Entropy
=
measure
of
uncertainty
 Entropy
 H(Y) 
of
a
random
variable
 Y:
 m 






H(Y)
=

–
∑
P(Y=y i )
log 2 
P(Y=y i )
 i=1 H(Y) 
is
the
expected
number
of
bits
needed
to
encode
a
 randomly
drawn
value
of
 Y
 Why?


  16. Entropy
=
measure
of
uncertainty
 Entropy
 H(Y) 
of
a
random
variable
 Y:
 m 






H(Y)
=

–
∑
P(Y=y i )
log 2 
P(Y=y i )
 i=1 H(Y) 
is
the
expected
number
of
bits
needed
to
encode
a
 randomly
drawn
value
of
 Y
 Why?
 InformaUon
Theory: 
 most
efficient
code
assigns 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

–
log 2 
P(Y=y i )
bits
 to
message 
Y=y i 


  17. Entropy
=
measure
of
uncertainty
 Y 
binary
 



P(Y=t)
=
θ

 



P(Y=f)
=
1
–
θ

 H(Y) 
 H(Y)
=
θ
log 2 
θ

+
(1
–
θ)
log 2 
(1
–
θ)
 θ 


  18. InformaUon
Gain
 X 1 
 X 2 
 Y
 T
 T
 T
 =
 reducUon
in
uncertainty
 T
 F
 T
 T
 T
 T
 T
 F
 T
 Entropy
of
Y
before
split: 
 F
 T
 T
 H(Y)
 F
 F
 F
 Entropy
of
Y
aKer
split: 
 (weighted
by
probability
of
each
branch)
 k m 



H(Y|X)
=
–

∑

P(X=x j )


∑

P(Y=y i |X=x j )
log 2 
P(Y=y i |X=x j )
 j=1 i=1 InformaUon
gain
=
difference:

 IG(X)
=
H(Y)
–
H(Y|X) 


  19. Learning
decision
trees
 • start
with
an
empty
tree
 • choose
the
 next
best 
aHribute
(feature)
 – for
example,
one
that
 maximizes
 informaUon
gain
 • split
 • recurse


  20. l


  21. A
Decision
Stump


  22. Base
Case 
 One 


  23. Base
Case 
 Two 


  24. Base
Case
Two: 
 aHributes
cannot
 disUnguish
classes 


  25. Base
cases


  26. Base
cases:
An
idea


  27. Base
cases:
An
idea


  28. The
problem
with
Base
Case
3


  29. If
we
omit
Base
Case
3:


  30. Basic
Decision‐Tree
Building
 Summarized:


  31. MPG
test
set
 error 


  32. MPG
test
set
 error 


  33. Decision
trees
overfit!
 Standard
decision
trees:
 • 

 training
error
always
zero 
(if
no
label
noise)
 • 

 lots
of
variance 


  34. Avoiding
overfigng
 • fixed
depth
 • fixed
number
of
leaves
 • stop
when
splits
not
staUsUcally
significant


  35. Avoiding
overfigng
 • fixed
depth
 • fixed
number
of
leaves
 • stop
when
splits
not
staUsUcally
significant
 OR:
 • grow
the
full
tree,
 then
 prune
 (collapse
some
subtrees)


  36. Reduced
Error
Pruning
 Split
available
data
into
 training 
and
 pruning 
sets
 1. Learn
tree
that
classifies
 training
set
perfectly 

 2. Do
 unUl
further
pruning 
is
 harmful 
over
pruning
set
 consider
pruning
each
node
 – collapse
the
node
that
best
 – improves
pruning
set
accuracy 

 This
produces
smallest
version
of
 most
accurate
tree
(over
the
pruning
set)



  37. Impact
of
Pruning


  38. A
Generic
Tree‐Learning
Algorithm
 Need
to
specify:
 • an
objecUve
to
select
 splits 
 • a
criterion
for
 pruning 
(or
 stopping )
 • parameters
 for
pruning/stopping
 (usually
determined
by
 cross‐validaUon )


  39. “One
branch
for
each
 numeric
value”
idea:
 Hopeless: 

with
such
high
 branching
factor,
we
will
 sha^er
the
dataset 
and
 overfit


  40. A
beHer
idea:
 thresholded
splits
 • Binary
tree,
split
on
aHribute
X:
 – one
branch:
 X
<
t
 – other
branch:
 X
≥
t
 • Search
through
 all
possible
values
of
t
 – seems
hard,
but
only
finite
set
relevant
 – sort
values
of
X:
{x 1 ,…,
x m }
 – consider
splits
at
t
=
(x i
 +
x i+1 )/2
 • InformaUon
gain
for
 each
split 
 as
if
a
 binary
variable :
“true”
for
X
<
t
 








 
 
 
 
 
“false”
for
X
≥
t
 
 


  41. Example
tree
using
reals


  42. What
you
should
know
 about
decision
trees
 • among
 most
popular 
data
mining
tools:
 – easy
to
understand
 – easy
to
implement
 – easy
to
use
 – computaUonally
fast
(but
only
a
greedy
heurisUc!)
 • not
only
 classificaUon ,
also
 regression ,
 density
 esUmaUon
 • meaning
of
informaUon
gain
 • decision
trees
overfit!
 – many
pruning/stopping
strategies


  43. Acknowledgements
 Some
material
in
this
presentaUon
is
courtesy
of
 Andrew
Moore ,
from
his
collecUon
of
ML
tutorials: 
 hHp://www.autonlab.org/tutorials/


  44. LEARNING
THEORY 


  45. ComputaUonal
Learning
Theory
 What
general
laws
constrain
“ learning” ?
 • how
many
 examples 
needed
to
learn
 a
 target
concept
 to
a
given
 precision ?
 • what
is
the
impact
of:
 – complexity
of
the
 target
concept ?
 – complexity
of
our
 hypothesis
space ?
 – manner 
in
which
examples
presented?
 • random
samples—what
we
mostly
consider
in
this
course
 • learner
can
make
queries
 • examples
come
from
an
“adversary”
 (worst‐case
analysis,
no
staUsUcal
assumpUons)


Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend