Decay Electron Analysis for Energy-Scale group: SKdetsim meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

decay electron analysis for energy scale group skdetsim
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Decay Electron Analysis for Energy-Scale group: SKdetsim meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Decay Electron Analysis for Energy-Scale group: SKdetsim meeting Josh Albert Duke University March 4/5, 2009 Sample Makeup The sample used for this is made up of data and MC events for SK-IV which are identified as stopping muons. Then


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Decay Electron Analysis for Energy-Scale group: SKdetsim meeting

Josh Albert Duke University March 4/5, 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Sample Makeup

  • The sample used for this is made up of data and

MC events for SK-IV which are identified as stopping muons. Then apply:

  • pass stmufit goodness (bgood != -1)
  • one probable decay electron found
  • no other cuts applied on the muon position or

direction, for this particular analysis

  • Newest plots have 5777 MC events, and 40893

data events, before any decay-e selection cuts are applied.

  • For comparison, old plots have 14044 MC events,

30479 data events.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Selection Cuts

  • The following cuts were used, attempting

to duplicate Ishihara-san’s cuts:

  • 2µs<t<8µs
  • n50 (# hits in 50 µs time window)>60
  • egood (e recon goodness)>0.5
  • Electron reconstructed vertex in FV
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Plots

  • All plots are scaled to the number of MC

events

  • Error bars are sqrt(N) before scaling.
  • Red for MC, Blue for data, and Green for

true information, if applicable.

  • We changed a few things in the last couple

days, affecting our plots...

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Recent Changes

  • New waterjob! Attenuation length and

PMT gain have been adjusted.

  • MC generation fixed for raw

charge→corrected charge calculation.

  • Cut based on MC truth info removed.
  • MC now includes both µ+ and µ-. Before,
  • nly µ- was included.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

s) µ t ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Count

2

10

3

10

Decay Time

Data MC

OLD

slide-7
SLIDE 7

s) µ t ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10

2

10

Time to decay

Data MC True

NEW

slide-8
SLIDE 8

s) µ t ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10

2

10

Time to decay

Electron Positron

NEW

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Momentum (MeV/c) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Count 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Reconstructed Momentum of Michelle Electron

Data MC

OLD

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Momentum (MeV/c) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 50 100 150 200 250

Reconstructed Momentum of Michelle Electron

Data MC

NEW

slide-11
SLIDE 11

n 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

n50

Data MC

OLD

n50 is the number of hits within a 50 µs time window around decay

slide-12
SLIDE 12

n 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 50 100 150 200 250

n50

Data MC

NEW

slide-13
SLIDE 13

All remaining plots are

NEW

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Electron Decay Vertices Data MC True

x (cm) −1500 −1000 −500 500 1000 1500 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

decay e vertex x

y (cm) −1500 −1000 −500 500 1000 1500 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

decay e vertex y

z (cm) −1500 −1000 −500 500 1000 1500 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

decay e vertex z

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Momentum (MeV/c) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

s) µ Reconstructed Momentum of Electron (2−4

Momentum (MeV/c) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

s) µ Reconstructed Momentum of Electron (4−6

Momentum (MeV/c) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

s) µ Reconstructed Momentum of Electron (6−8

Electron Momentum

2-4 µs 4-6 µs 6-8 µs Data MC

slide-16
SLIDE 16

n 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

s) µ n50 (2−4

n 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

s) µ n50 (4−6

n 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 5 10 15 20 25 30

s) µ n50 (6−8

Number of hits in 50 µs time window

2-4 µs 4-6 µs 6-8 µs Data MC

slide-17
SLIDE 17

dist (cm) 50 100 150 200 250 100 200 300 400 500

electron vertex recon distance

Difference between true and reconstructed vertex in MC

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Quantitative results

  • Mean reconstructed e-momentum and hits

in 50µs time window as a function of decay time:

2-4µs 4-6µs 6-8µs amome MC 39.2 MeV 38.4 MeV 39.2 MeV amome data 39.0 MeV 39.0 MeV 39.3 MeV n50 MC 224.6 221.6 225.4 n50 data 219.6 220.2 221.5

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

  • The Data and MC seem to match up pretty well.
  • µ+ and µ- spectra differ slightly, this probably

caused some of the earlier data/MC differences, matching is now improved

  • There is no clear trend in the data or MC for

effect of decay time on other parameters.

  • More statistics needed before final e-scale can be

calculated.