Data Update : DPI Ac c o unta b ility Re po rt Ca rds Ba c kg ro - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Data Update :

DPI Ac c o unta b ility Re po rt Ca rds

Ba c kg ro und

• De sig ne d a nd pro vide d b y DPI to he lp ide ntify sc hool pe r

for manc e

a nd ar

e as of impr

• ve me nt
• Sc o re s b a se d o n WKCE

pe rfo rma nc e a nd g ro wth, ACT

pe rfo rma nc e , atte ndanc e, a nd gr

aduation

–

WK CE re sults fro m No ve mb e r 2011, 2012, 2013 (plus No v. 2009 a nd 2010 fo r g a ps)

–

Atte nda nc e , a b se nte e ism, g ra d ra te s fro m 2012-13 sc ho o l ye a r (plus 2010 thro ug h 2012 fo r g ra d ra te g a ps)

• Distric ts a nd sc ho o ls re c e ive ove r

all sc or e s a nd subsc or e s fo r

Stude nt Ac hie ve me nt, Stude nt Gro wth, Clo sing Ga ps, a nd On-T ra c k a nd Po stse c o nda ry Re a dine ss

• Sc ho o ls a nd distric ts ma y re c e ive 5 o r 10 po int pe na ltie s fo r lo w te st

pa rtic ipa tio n, hig h a b se nte e ism, o r hig h dro po ut ra te s

DPI Re po rt Ca rds vs. SI P

• SIP use s MAP and E

PAS asse ssme nts, while DPI

Re po rt Ca rds use WK CE a nd ACT da ta

• SIP data is a ll fro m 2013- 14, while DPI

re po rt c a rds inc lude da ta fro m prio r ye a rs

–

E xa mple : a tte nda nc e , a b se nte e ism, a nd g ra d da ta fo r DPI re po rt c a rds a ll fro m 2012-13

• SIP data fo c use s o n E

ng lish L a ng ua g e L e a rne rs (E

L L le ve ls 1- 6),

while DPI re po rt c a rds fo c us o n L imite d E ng lish Pro fic ie nt stude nts (E L L le ve ls 1-5)

• SIP data use s high sc hool c omple tion (inc luding HSE

Ds), while DPI re po rt c a rds use c o nve ntio na l diplo ma s o nly

Ac c o unta b ility Re po rt Ca rd L a yo ut

Overall Score and Rating Subscores Student Engagement Indicators (possible deductions) WSAS history for school/district and state School/district demographic information Five Categories

Distric t Ove ra ll Sc o re

• 1.3 po int o ve ra ll impro ve me nt
• Big g e st impro ve me nt in Stude nt Gro wth (4.3 po ints)

MMSD Sc o re s

MMSD Schools Score Distribution Category Score Range Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Significantly Exceeds Expectations 83-100 5 4 Exceeds Expectations 73-82.9 12 14 Meets Expectations 63-72.9 20 22 Meets Few Expectations 53-62.9 11 8 Fails to Meet Expectations 0-52.9

No schools scored in “Fails to Meet Expectations” either year

MMSD Sc o re s

Highest Scoring Schools Lowest Scoring Schools

Van Hise Elementary 90.4 Allis Elementary 59.3 Shorewood Elementary 88.3 Midvale Elementary 59.1 Hamilton Middle 85.2 East High 57.1 Franklin Elementary 84.1 Falk Elementary 55.7

Scores by Attendance Area

East La Follette Memorial West Significantly Exceeds Expectations 4 Exceeds Expectations 3 1 6 4 Meets Expectations 8 5 6 3 Meets Few Expectations 3 4 1 4 of 4 “Significantly Exceeds Expectations” schools 7 of 8 “Meets Few Expectations” schools

I mpro ve me nt a nd De c line 2012 to 2013

Greatest Improvement Greatest Decline

School Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Change School Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Change La Follette High 59.1 66.8 7.7 Midvale Elementary 64.0 59.1

• 4.9

Nuestro Mundo Elementary 61.0 68.6 7.6 Lapham Elementary 85.3 81.1

• 4.2

Chavez Elementary 69.9 76.0 6.1 East High 60.9 57.1

• 3.8

Black Hawk Middle 60.1 65.7 5.6 Marquette Elementary 80.2 76.8

• 3.4
• 32 of 49 r

ate d sc hools impr

• ve d, 16 de c line d, 1 staye d the same
• Re sults for

any K- 2 loc ation ar e base d on Gr ade 3 r e sults at the ir fe e de r sc hool. Be c ause this r e pr e se nts a c ompar ative ly small numbe r

• f stude nts and the c omposition of the se stude nts c hange s e ntir

e ly, r e sults for the se sc hools e xpe r ie nc e a lot of volatility fr

• m one ye ar

to the ne xt.

Sta te Co nte xt

Category Score Range Districts Schools Significantly Exceeds Expectations 83-100 9 116 Exceeds Expectations 73-82.9 159 752 Meets Expectations 63-72.9 247 824 Meets Few Expectations 53-62.9 7 159 Fails to Meet Expectations 0-52.9 1 66 As a distric t, MMSD sc ore d 69.8, in the “Me e ts E xpe c ta tions” c a te g ory a nd be low the sta te a ve ra g e distric t sc ore of 72.2. T his g ra ph shows the distribution of sc hool sc ore s for MMSD a nd the sta te .