Data Presentation Downers Grove Grade School District 58 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
data presentation downers grove grade school district 58
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Data Presentation Downers Grove Grade School District 58 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 25, 2022 41 likes •453 views

Data Presentation Downers Grove Grade School District 58 Curriculum Workshop Matthew E. Rich, Ed. D. October 24, 2016 2016 - 17 Strategic Goals & Action Plan Differentiated & Flexible Instruction Student Engagement in and

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Data Presentation Downers Grove Grade School District 58 Curriculum Workshop

Matthew E. Rich, Ed. D. October 24, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2016 - 17 Strategic Goals & Action Plan

  • Differentiated & Flexible Instruction
  • Student Engagement in and Ownership of

Learning

  • Programs of Instruction
slide-3
SLIDE 3

2016 - 17 Strategic Goals & Action Plan

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2016 - 17 Strategic Goals & Action Plan (cont.)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

School Improvement Plans

Action-Oriented, Simplified School Improvement Plans

○ Focus on Academic Growth and Ongoing Instructional Improvement ○ Emphasis on Staff Dialogue and Work on the Learning Improvement ○ Simple Paperwork ○ Links District Goals, Common Core State Standards, & Principal Evaluation Framework

slide-6
SLIDE 6

School Improvement Plans (cont.)

Each School Improvement Plan Includes:

  • 3 Academic Goals: Reading, Math & SEL
  • Action Plans to Accomplish Goals (as

developed by Building Leadership Teams) Questions or Additional Information

  • n Specific School Improvement Plans?
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Rising Star Continuous Improvement Plan

  • Only Required for District Title I Plan
  • Areas Completed to Date:

○ IA07- In collaboration with its schools, the district will set district & school achievement targets for all students and for subgroups.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Rising Star Continuous Improvement Plan (cont.)

  • Areas of Continued Development:

○ D7- The district will monitor to ensure the intended curriculum is implemented with fidelity. ○ IC05- The district will provide a cohesive district curriculum guide aligned with state standards or

  • therwise places curricular expectations on the

school

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Title I

  • Aimed at Buildings with Low Income
  • Services Not Limited to Low Income Students
  • Services Identified for Reading and Math
  • Schools Designated as Title I

○ El Sierra, Henry Puffer, Indian Trail, & Kingsley

  • 2016-17 Allotment - $288,817
  • Carryover from 2015-16 - $107,773
  • Total Available Funds for Title I - $396,590
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Title I Expenditure Allocations 2016-17

  • Additional Non-Certified Staff in Title I

Buildings - $208,226 (salaries & benefits)

  • Support for Homeless Children - $99,750

(transportation, clothes, materials, OKEEP)

  • Additional Instructional Resources for Title I

Buildings - $88,614

  • None of our local private schools have opted to utilize

Title I funds at this time.

Title I (cont.)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Title II

  • Aimed at increasing teacher quality. Funds

are for professional development in all schools throughout district.

  • 2016-17 Allotment - $119,227
  • Carryover from 2014-15 - $56,055
  • Total Available Funds for Title II - $175,282
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Title II Expenditure Allocations 2014-15

  • Professional Development in Math and MS content areas

(ELA, Math, Science)- (Substitutes & Consultant Fees) $117,850

  • Professional Development in Core Content Areas, SEL

(Conferences & Subs) - $12,582

  • Private School Share - $28,850
  • Institute Day Trainings & 1st and 2nd Year Teacher

trainings - $16,000

Title II (cont.)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

FALL MAP Reading

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fall Reading Median Percentile Comparisons

Reading Grade comparison Fall 13 Fall 14 Fall 15 Fall 16 National Median Kindergarten 66 60 69 65 50 1st 61 61 62 67 50 2nd 70 65 70 75 50 3rd 68 68 68 73 50 4th 72 64 69 73 50 5th 66 66 68 74 50 6th 70 65 72 74 50 7th 71 71 73 76 50 8th 68 72 73 74 50

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Reading Cohort Achievement Comparison

(District Median Student Performance)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Reading Growth Comparisons

Reading % Meets Target Fall 15 to Spr 16 National Average Kdg 57.4 50 1st 71.6 50 2nd 61.7 50 3rd 56.5 50 4th 65.2 50 5th 64.7 50 6th 62.7 50 7th 56.9 50 8th 61.3 50 Reading % OPP (Percent of Total Projected Points Earned) Fall 15 to Spr 16 National Average Kdg 109.7 100 1st 122.7 100 2nd 120 100 3rd 108.7 100 4th 130.8 100 5th 130.7 100 6th 137.4 100 7th 123 100 8th 144.7 100

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FALL MAP Math

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Fall Math Median Percentile Comparisons

Math Grade comparison Fall 13 Fall 14 Fall 15 Fall 16 National Median Kindergarten 61 50 69 69 50 1st 62 65 63 71 50 2nd 59 62 67 71 50 3rd 56 62 68 69 50 4th 57 54 64 69 50 5th 56 61 59 67 50 6th 59 54 58 63 50 7th 67 63 69 70 50 8th 61 68 78 73 50

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Math Cohort Achievement Comparison

(District Median Student Performance)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Math Growth Comparisons

Math % Meets Target Fall 15 to Spr 16 National Average Kdg 63 50 1st 69.8 50 2nd 60.5 50 3rd 48.8 50 4th 56.4 50 5th 51 50 6th 69.7 50 7th 64.1 50 8th 59.3 50 Math % OPP (Percent of Total Projected Points Earned) Fall 15 to Spr 16 National Average Kdg 112.8 100 1st 121.9 100 2nd 111.1 100 3rd 99.9 100 4th 105.6 100 5th 99.3 100 6th 128.3 100 7th 120.4 100 8th 117.4 100

slide-21
SLIDE 21

FALL MAP Language Usage

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Language Usage Growth Comparisons

Lang Usage % Meets Target Fall 15 to Spr 16 National Average 2nd 71.3 50 3rd 57.7 50 4th 63.7 50 5th 58.4 50 6th 66.8 50 7th 66.7 50 8th 69.1 50 Lang Usage % OPP (Percent of Total Projected Points Earned) Fall 15 to Spr 16 National Average 2nd 125.3 100 3rd 108.3 100 4th 122.9 100 5th 112.7 100 6th 137.1 100 7th 154.5 100 8th 179.5 100

slide-23
SLIDE 23

PARCC - ELA

slide-24
SLIDE 24

PARCC - Math

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Using NWEA MAP to Help Understand our PARCC Results

MAP and PARCC Correlation

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Spring Math 2015 MAP to PARCC Correlation

Assessments Correlation MAP Percentile & PARCC Performance Level 0.83 MAP Percentile & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.85 MAP RIT & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.68

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Spring 2016 Math MAP to PARCC Correlation

Assessments Correlation MAP Percentile & PARCC Performance Level 0.80 MAP Percentile & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.82 MAP RIT & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.65

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Math PARCC to PARCC Correlation

Assessments Correlation 2015 & 2016 PARCC Performance Levels 0.76 2015 & 2016 PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.83

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Math 2016 Performance Level Distribution

PARCC Level Mean Map Percentile Standard Deviation Lower Quartile Med MAP Percentile Upper Quartile 1 27.88 19.51 11 24 42 2 43.33 18.40 30 43 57 3 62.99 15.15 53 64 74 4 83.87 10.80 78 86 92 5 95.95 3.36 94 97 98

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Spring 2015 ELA MAP to PARCC Correlation

Assessments Correlation MAP Percentile & PARCC Performance Level 0.76 MAP Percentile & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.78 MAP RIT & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.64

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Spring 2016 ELA MAP to PARCC Correlation

Assessments Correlation MAP Percentile & PARCC Performance Level 0.74 MAP Percentile & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.77 MAP RIT & PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.67

slide-32
SLIDE 32

ELA PARCC to PARCC Correlation

Assessments Correlation 2015 & 2016 PARCC Performance Levels 0.77 2015 & 2016 PARCC Overall Scale Score 0.76

slide-33
SLIDE 33

ELA 2016 Performance Level Distribution

PARCC Level Mean Map Percentile Standard Deviation Lower Quartile Med MAP Percentile Upper Quartile 1 31 22 13 30 47 2 47 20 32 48 63 3 68 17 57 70 80 4 84 12 78 87 93 5 95 5 94 97 98

slide-34
SLIDE 34

AIMSweb

Our Norms:

  • District Consistent Norms

○ Red - 15th Percentile National Norm - Tier 3 Consideration ○ Yellow - 50th Percentile National Norm - Tier 2 Consideration ○ (Many RTI Analysis - 5th Percentile Red - Tier 3 & 20th Percentile - Yellow - Tier 2)

  • Graduation Opportunity

○ At least in 3rd Grade ○ 150 words per minute average on grade level text ○ Graduation Recommendation by teacher, principal, & reading specialist

slide-35
SLIDE 35

2nd Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

slide-36
SLIDE 36

3rd Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

slide-37
SLIDE 37

4th Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

slide-38
SLIDE 38

5th Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

slide-39
SLIDE 39

6th Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

slide-40
SLIDE 40

7th & 8th Grade AIMSweb R-CBM

  • Only Administered to At-Risk/Students with

IEPs on an Individual Need Basis.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Questions, Feedback & Dialogue