D ISTRACTION O STEOGENESIS Shelby Marks, Kijeon Choi, Taylor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

d istraction o steogenesis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

D ISTRACTION O STEOGENESIS Shelby Marks, Kijeon Choi, Taylor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

D ISTRACTION O STEOGENESIS Shelby Marks, Kijeon Choi, Taylor Tebano, Stanley Gelin, and Sarah Bradner L EARNING O BJECTIVES To understand the advancement of bone elongation techniques that lead to modern day practice. Be able to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS

Shelby Marks, Kijeon Choi, Taylor Tebano, Stanley Gelin, and Sarah Bradner

slide-2
SLIDE 2

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

 To understand the advancement of bone elongation

techniques that lead to modern day practice.

 Be able to describe what distraction osteogenesis is

and how it works.

 Identify and compare the different distraction

  • steogenetic surgical processes to achieve skeletal

reconstruction.

 Understand the many causes/diseases for which

distraction osteogenesis is used.

 Recognize the complications and risks associated

with the process and identify post-operative care.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS

 Surgical reconstruction of skeletal

deformities and lengthening of the long bones of the body

 Procedure that moves 2 bone segments apart

using an external saw and allows new bone in gap

 Many FDA approved distraction devices

slide-4
SLIDE 4

HISTORY

  • Skeletal traction was described as long ago as

by Hippocrates (460-377 B.C.) when traction on long bones was performed by means of rubber straps

  • Alessandro Codivilla (1861 -1912), Pioneer of

bone elongation techniques

  • Italian Surgeon
  • Published 1905 case report of femoral

extension using axial forces

  • Introduced Limb lengthening techniques that

had a high complication rate

  • Popularized by Russian orthopedic surgeon

Gavril Ilizarov

slide-5
SLIDE 5

GAVRIL ILIZAROV

– Gavriil Abramovich Ilizarov was born in Caucasus (former USSR) in 1921 – No formal schooling till age 11 – Lone physician in Kurgan, Serbia – Developed Ilizarov method – An external fixator to regenerate bone under tension – modular ring – Died July 24 1992 in Kurgan, Russia due to heart failure

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RUSSIAN ILIZAROV SCIENTIFIC CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE TRAUMATOLOGY AND ORTHOPAEDICS

  • Founded in 1971 in Kurgan, Serbia
  • Home to Ilizarov method
  • The first department in Russia for

managing bone infection

  • Place where limb lengthening techniques

were first devised and introduced into clinical practice.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HOW DOES IT WORK?

 Must be gradual

too quick: fibrous union instead of osseointegration too slow: early bone union Steps:

1)

Surgeon makes ostectomy (break) in abnormal bone and places distraction device. Allowed to start a few days of healing.

2)

Parent/ guardian turns a screw on distractor after surgery at home to stretch healing tissue (stretch~1mm/day)

3)

Stretch regenerated tissue forms into new bone

  • ver next 2 months

4)

After bone is formed at necessary length, device is removed through a 2nd surgery

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CELLULAR LEVEL:

 Aka callus distraction  Inflammation: formation of

blood clot and ingrowth of angiogenic elements

 Soft callus: replacement of

blood clot with granulation tissue and fibrocartilage

 Hard Callus: granulation and

fibrocartilage is is replaced with woven bone

 Remodeling: woven bone is

replaced with lamellar bone

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TECHNIQUES

RIGID external device (RED) Frames surgery Intramedullary Nail

  • Albizzia
  • Guichet
  • FITbone
  • ISKD

LRS

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • I. RIGID EXTERNAL DEVICE (RED)

 Found to give reliable results, control bone

movements

 easy removal  Cranial halo (semicircular piece) encircles front

  • f patients forehead and secured with pins. Pins

touch but do not penetrate bone.

 Cranial halo is attached to vertical graphite

slide-11
SLIDE 11

EXTERNAL DEVICE

Ex: Midface advancement

  • metal “halo” device and dental splint remain after
  • peration during healing (10weeks)
  • 2nd surgery removes halo & splint
  • caregiver turns twice a day
  • 1/8th inch scar on lower eyelid but heals well
slide-12
SLIDE 12

MIDFACE ADVANCEMENT

 Make cut in bones of face at specific points  Loosen midface from rest of skull  Advance into correct position

New advantages:

  • bone grafts from rib and skull are no longer

needed with plates and screws

  • larger advances in midface are achievable
  • skin and muscles are now stretched too and

do not fight to push back

  • duration of procedure is shorter
slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • II. FRAMES SURGERY “ILIZAROV

SURGERY”

 Oldest and most common

method

 Application of circular frame

  • r external fixator

 Most common

1) Ilizarov frame 2) Taylor Spatial frame

slide-14
SLIDE 14

FRAME MAKE-UP

 Frames are circular external

fixators that surround limb

 Consists of 4-6 rings made of

stainless steel or carbon fiber

 Thin wires and half pins are fixed

to rings and pass through skin to bone Half pins: attached on one side of frame Wires: other side through bone and attached and held under tension Rods and struts: between rings for stability and adjustment

slide-15
SLIDE 15

INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ALBIZZIA- DR. GUICHET 1987

 Internal telescopic nail with

lengthening mechanism

 Lengthening achieved by

rotation

 Rotation makes “click” noise  Click allows higher

accuracy, patient knows how much they lengthened it

 15 clicks~1 mm  Fully implantable nail

allows for full weight bearing

 4 inch gain  Small scar

slide-17
SLIDE 17

GUICHET- ADVANCED ALBIZZIA (2009)

 Improved method  Stronger steel makes it weight bearing  No longer “one size fits all”  Can accommodate different sized limbs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

FITBONE (FULLY INTEGRATED TELESCOPIC BONE)

 Nail is distraction

device powered by internal engine

 Engine activated by

hand remote

 Activates distraction

by sending messages to receiver below skin

slide-19
SLIDE 19

HOW DOES IT WORK?

 Similar function as car antenna  Fitbone elongation is propelled by gear  Inserted through “model entrance point”  Tiny scar

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • III. ISKD (INTRAMEDULLARY SKELETAL

KINETIC DISTRACTOR)

 Activated by polar movements through

small rotation of bone segment being lengthened

 Amount of length is determined pre-op

and set at time of insertion

 Allows 3’’ gain

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • IV. LRS (LIMB RECONSTRUCTION

SYSTEM)

 Includes different clamps

that slide on rigid rail and connected with distraction units

 Relies on callus

distraction

 Stability by allowing

different bone screw position in clamp along length of bone

 Rail length pick

depending on size of limb

 Osteotite bone screws

with hydroxyapetite coating

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Distraction Osteogenesis for Congenital Deformities

Types of Congenital Deformities:

limb lengthening

facial deformities

amputation at the elbow

correction of airway obstruction in micrognathia

Fibular hemimelia

Hemihypertrophy

Olliers disease

slide-24
SLIDE 24

LIMB LENGTHENING

Procedure:

a bone segment is surgically cute and a distraction device is used to slowly pull the two ends apart.

After the desired lengthening has been achieved, the bone consolidates until the lengthened gap has completely calcified.

Distraction phase and Consolidation Phase in distraction osteogenesis.

History: Discovered by Russian Orthopedic Gavril Ilizarov

Technique: external fixator

Today: minimally invasive techniques performed with internal distraction device

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

AMPUTATION AT THE ELBOW

  • Patients with short congenital amputations below the elbow
  • ften function as if they have had a disarticulation of the elbow
  • Patients had lengthening of stumps by the Ilizarov technique to

improve fitting of prostheses

slide-27
SLIDE 27

CONGENITAL FACIAL DEFORMITIES

 Hemifacial Microsomia: a rare congenital disease

characterized by facial asymmetry

 Cleft palate: separation of the roof of the mouth that

  • ccurs in early development of fetus

 Severe mandibular hypoplasia (small lower jaw):

causes breathing problems includes conditions as:

 Brachygnathia: abnormal shortness or recession of

the lower jaw

 Micrognathia: an abnormally small, lower jaw and

chin.

 Why?

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Hemifacial Microsomia

Distraction Process

Bimaxillary distraction osteogenesis allows correction of mandibular asymmetry with simultaneous correction of the position of the maxilla

Cleft Palate

slide-29
SLIDE 29

CORRECTION OF AIRWAY

OBSTRUCTION

 Micrognathia

 Can use tracheostomy: May be life saving but is associated

with complications and developmental problems

 Alternative: internal mandibular distraction osteogenesis

slide-30
SLIDE 30

FACIAL DEFORMITIES

 Treacher-Collins syndrome: a condition that affects the

development of bones and other tissues in the face

 Pierre-Robin Sequence: a group of disorders occurring

together that includes a small, lower jaw, breathing problems, and a tongue that tends to ball up at the back of the mouth

 Facial Injuries:

 cause damage to the maxilla or mandible  most common condition for which distraction osteogenesis is

performed

slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32

MAXILLOFACIAL DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS

 Two Main Uses:

  • 1. Congenital

Craniofacial Defects

  • 2. Facial injuries from

trauma/ impact

 Requires making

bones longer

slide-33
SLIDE 33

MAXILLOFACIAL DO PROCESS

 Bonus Question:  Why is it the hardest

to grow bone in the face considering the current methods?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

MAXILLOFACIAL DO

 Bone movements

must be carefully planned before a device is implanted

 There are no devices

that can change trajectory mid-course

slide-35
SLIDE 35

MAXILLOFACIAL DO PROCEDURES

 Current Methods:  External and linear

(one dimension)

 Future device goals  Curvilinear devices

(capable of moving bone in 3 dimensions)

 Move bone

continuously, not in increments of 1mm

 Causes less pain,

wouldn’t require patient compliance, might promote faster bone growth

slide-36
SLIDE 36

DEVELOPMENTAL DEFORMITIES

 Clavicle Lengthening  Reconstruction of forearm

deformity

 Foot deformities  Bow legs

slide-37
SLIDE 37

CLAVICLE LENGTHENING

 Clavicular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis for

congenital clavicular hypoplasia enables gradual correction of deformity

 Has potential to improve shoulder pain, function, range

  • f movement and cosmesis.
slide-38
SLIDE 38

FOREARM DEFORMITY

 Deformity caused by osteochondromas corrected using an external

fixator for ulnar lengthening and radial deformity.

 Why? Cosmetic and functional problems

slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40

FOOT DEFORMITIES

 Distraction osteogenesis used for the treatment

  • f brachymetatarsia:

 Condition in which there are one or more abnormally

short metatarsals, making the toe short as well

slide-41
SLIDE 41

BOW LEGS

 Blount’s Disease: In some cases, abnormal growth of the bone

causes the bowing to get worse instead of better over time

 Caused by a growth disorder in the upper part of the tibial

bone

slide-42
SLIDE 42

DISTRACTION

AFTER TUMOR RESECTION

After Bone Tumor

slide-43
SLIDE 43

POST-TRAUMATIC INJURIES

 Growth Plate

Fractures

 Malunion  Shortening and

deformity

 Bone defects

slide-44
SLIDE 44

INFECTION: OSTEOMYELITIS

 Lansana’s Story:

 13 year old boy from

Sierra Leone was bitten by a snake while chasing a soccer ball into a bush

 Infection set in his tibia,

which led to a massive bone loss of his tibia and his ankle joint

 Right leg was 6 inches

shorter then left, with a 45 degree internal rotation

slide-45
SLIDE 45

COSMETIC USE

 Short Stature  Normal people that

are unhappy with their height

 Dwarfism  Achondroplasia

slide-46
SLIDE 46

SHORT STATURE

 Generally

Discouraged

 Breaking perfectly

functioning limbs

 Confining themselves to

wheelchairs or crutches for over a year

 Voluntarily subjecting

themselves to pain and discomfort

 Exposed to unnecessary

risk of infection, damaged nerves and blood vessels, and fat embolism

 Expen$ive procedure   Before procedure, they

must pass the body image assessment (US)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

COSMETIC - CHINESE

 National Geographic Video

slide-48
SLIDE 48

DWARFISM

Achondroplasia:

 Arms:  Often times, the humerus

is much shorter than the radius and ulna

 Forearm:  More complex nerve

arrangement so few lengthenings are performed on that region

 Legs:  Femur and Tibia are

lengthened

 Fibula is cut and

separated alongside the tibia

slide-49
SLIDE 49

BEFORE & AFTER SURGERY

slide-50
SLIDE 50

POST-SURGERY

 Often prescribed painkillers and unable to work

while undergoing rehabilitation

 Following initial surgery:  Demanding Physical Therapy  Purpose:  Avoid stiffness and to stimulate the muscles, nerves,

and blood vessels to grow alongside the bone

slide-51
SLIDE 51

WEIGHT BEARING

 Depends on design of fixator and

bony contact

 Volume of regenerate will affect

stability

 Initially want strong support for

early weight bearing

 Gradually remove wires and pins

so bone take on more load

slide-52
SLIDE 52

MID FACE DISTRACTION: POST-SURGERY CARE

 Hygiene – do not submerge device, soft

toothbrush, no mouthwashes

 Diet – soft foods  Medications – antibiotics, tylenol  Activity – no sports, sitting and walking upright

good for healing/decrease swelling

slide-53
SLIDE 53

THINGS TO LOOK

OUT FOR IN FACIAL

DISTRACTION

 Persistant fever or

headache

 Fall or blow to device  Increased swelling

after initial post-op swelling

  • Loosening
  • Redness or pus near pin sites
slide-54
SLIDE 54

COMPLICATIONS

 Axial deformity  Pin tract infection  Fixator instability  Stress fractures in surrounding

bone

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Axial Deformation

slide-56
SLIDE 56

PIN TRACT INFECTION

 Disrupt blood supply  Local inflammation  Swelling

slide-57
SLIDE 57

FIXATOR INSTABILITY

 Excessive motion

in between bone segments

 Premature

consolidation

slide-58
SLIDE 58

NEW BONE PROPERTIES

 Approx. 50% mechanical stiffness during axial,

torsional, and bending loading after fixator removal up to 6 weeks

 Peak tensile forces increase with time after

completion

 Torsional loads to failure decrease with time -

Why?

slide-59
SLIDE 59

FORCES DURING DISTRACTION

 Strain gauges  Distraction load (resistance to

distraction) increases with every turn

 Frictional forces – Where?

slide-60
SLIDE 60

MONOBODY VERSUS CIRCULAR

Good for: Humerus and femur Until recently – preference in U.S. Less awkward/more comfort Less bulk (Clothing

  • ptions)

Protect skin and provide elevation Prevent cantilever bending Additional rings – more support Hinges for across joints

slide-61
SLIDE 61

CIRCULAR FIXATOR - STABILITY

 Smaller the diameter the better  However not too close to skin, avoid

compression

 Extra ring – no attachment to bone

but can be used to increase stability

slide-62
SLIDE 62

VETERINARY CARE

 Canine limb