Curriculum Work with PFRH Sara Hill September 19, 2013 Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

curriculum work with pfrh
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Curriculum Work with PFRH Sara Hill September 19, 2013 Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Curriculum Work with PFRH Sara Hill September 19, 2013 Overview Faculty Support Course Audits Curriculum Alignment 2 Curriculum Process Course Audits inputs and outputs Teaching = input Learning = output 3


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Curriculum Work with PFRH

Sara Hill September 19, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Faculty Support
  • Course “Audits”
  • Curriculum Alignment

2

Overview

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Course “Audits” inputs and outputs

  • Teaching = input
  • Learning = output

3

Curriculum Process

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Evidence of Teaching (inputs)

  • Course observations
  • Course syllabi/Course sites
  • Course evaluations

4

Course Audit

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Evidence of Learning (outputs)

  • Learning Objectives
  • Course syllabi/ Course sites
  • Learning activities
  • Assessments

5

Course Audit

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Course Audit

Cognitive Level of LOs

  • Bloom’s Taxonomy
  • SOLO Taxonomy
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Bloom’s Taxonomy

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Alignment

8

Image Source: Public Domain Pictures.net

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Role of Learning Objectives

  • Course design
  • Guide for students
  • “Evidence” of learning
  • Alignment with competencies
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Problem Learning Objectives

  • Describe
  • Remembering/ reproducing Explain?
  • Identify
  • An existing trend? Something new?
  • Discuss
  • Context? Evidence of achievement?
slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Course Audit

Learning Activities

  • Active
  • Passive
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Why Use Active Learning?

12

Students taught through active learning methods learn two to three times more than those taught through traditional lectures

Source: Hake, R. R. (2002) Lessons from the physics-education-reform effort. Ecology and Society 5(2) Article 28.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Role of Lectures

13

“It is the one who does the work who does the learning.”

  • - Terry Doyle

Source: Doyle, T. (2011). Learner Centered Teaching: Putting the Research on Learning into Practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Lecture Best Practices

  • No more than 20 minutes
  • Minimize/avoid bulleted PPT
  • Engage students
  • Polling
  • Small groups
  • 2-minute writing assignments
  • See Classroom Assessment Techniques
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Stepping out from behind the Curtain

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Variety

16

Image Source: Wikimedia Commons

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Elements of Active Learning

Doing and Reflecting

  • Critical thinking
  • Individual responsibility for learning
  • Open ended
  • Well-designed, aligned
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Active Learning During Class Sessions

  • Discussion
  • Student-led review sessions
  • Debates
  • Problem-based learning
  • Case-based learning
  • Brief written responses

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Active Learning & Technology

Explore, Create, Curate, Review, Share

  • Polling
  • Wolfram Alpha
  • VoiceThread
  • YouTube
  • Discussion forums
  • Twitter
  • Wikis / basic web pages

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Course Audit

Learning Assessment

  • Formative (few courses)
  • Summative
slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Formative Assessment

Lets students and faculty monitor progress You do not have to grade/read everything!

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Formative Assessment

  • Required but not graded
  • Can be anonymous
  • In class or before/ after class
  • Technology or index cards
  • Peer review
slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Summative Assessment

  • Exams
  • Allow time to write strong

questions

  • Papers
  • Clear purpose
  • Consider length/grading /deadlines
slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Summative Assessment

  • “Authentic”
  • Redundancy/guidelines
  • Memos
  • Policy briefs
  • Presentations
slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Guest Lecturers

  • Course objectives
  • Presentation objectives
  • Review content & alignment
  • Frame or ask students to

frame

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Competency Alignment

Changes Alignment based upon evidence of learning NOT course descriptions

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Aligning Courses & Competencies

  • Different format
  • Different criteria
slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Competency Doc from 2006

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Current Competency Doc

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Depth of Competency Achievement

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Process, not a product
  • Changes in knowledge, beliefs,

behaviors or attitudes

  • Not done to students, but rather

something students themselves do

31

Quality Learning

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Concept

Image Source: Wisconsin.gov

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Formative Stage

Image Source: Heartfelt (E-bay)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Quality Learning--Innovation

Image Source: http://www.solidform.co.uk/blog/2012/10/30/the-galaxy-soho-beijing-china-by-zaha-hadid-architects.html

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Resources and References

  • Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning,

teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational

  • Objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Berry, W. (2008). Surviving the lecture: A pedagogical alternative. College

Teaching, 56(3). 149-154.

  • Biggs, T. and Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. New

York: McGraw Hill

  • Bonwell. C. C. & Eison, J. A. (1991) Active learning: Creating excitement in the
  • classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.1. Washington DC: George

Washington University.

  • Doyle, T. (2011). Learner centered teaching: Putting the research on learning

into practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

  • Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2009). Active learning: An introduction, ASQ Higher

Education Brief, 2 (4).

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Resources and References

  • Hansen, E. J. (2011). Idea-based learning: A course design process to

promote conceptual understanding. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing LLC.

  • Maki, P.L. (2004). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment

across the institution. Sterling, VA: Stylus/Association for American Higher Education

  • Marton, F., and Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-
  • utcome and process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
  • Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. A. (2005). Understanding by design.

Washington, DC: ASCD