CRTs Are Back, Alive and Well!
Allyson Simpson
Senior Director, Office of Gift Planning
Western Regional Planned Giving Conference Costa Mesa, California May 29, 2015
CRTs Are Back, Alive and Well! Allyson Simpson Senior Director, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CRTs Are Back, Alive and Well! Allyson Simpson Senior Director, Office of Gift Planning Western Regional Planned Giving Conference Costa Mesa, California May 29, 2015 A Quick Primer on Charitable Remainder Trusts A Quick Primer on
Western Regional Planned Giving Conference Costa Mesa, California May 29, 2015
contributes cash or other assets to a trust and names one or more persons to receive the income for life or a term of years, with the remainder distributed to one or more charities when the trust terminates
between different parties
Tax Reform Act of 1969. CRT’s are closely regulated by the IRS
percentage (irrevocable); lifetime term or term of years; four-tier taxation of payments
present value of ultimate remainder gift to charity
amend the agreement only in the agreement at the time the trust is set up, not after the fact
CRAT’s
funding assets (primarily stock and real estate) running high (cash and highly appreciated assets are the most popular CRT funding assets)
retrenched in an effort to save value where they could and hold on to their wealth
the trust, even those who had assets found the prospect of declining payments from a CRUT undesirable
and real estate has gradually rebounded, asset appreciation and confidence have started to return
was added in 2013 against dividend, interest and royalty income for persons above certain AGI limits
a tax effective income stream
70 is the most popular age range for setting up a CRUT
appreciated funding assets and allows reinvestment of the capital gains in those assets in a diversified portfolio
income stream
payout rate to trust market value on a certain date
income, education costs, health care costs) – income receipt can be deferred to a future date through a Flip CRUT
tax liability
taxation of income payments
beneficiaries are other than donor or spouse
which can only have a maximum of two)
include CRT’s in their gift discussions even if the organization is not able to serve as trustee – the donor, a trusted advisor or a professional trustee can serve in that capacity and the charity can still be the remainder beneficiary
reasonably be performed by charity or other prospective trustee and there is a market for the sale of the assets (but no prearranged “buyer in the wings”)
Case Study #1 – Mr. Taylor
moderate and reasonably consistent annual fund donor over the years but has never really responded to your outreach regarding a more substantial and impactful gift. He always seems to have a reason not to make such a gift – he is not a “wealthy” man and will need all his cash and other assets for retirement and possible health care costs in the
CRUT with appreciated real property and gives you a call. He provides a new piece of information – he has owned an eight unit apartment building for 30 years and is tired of being a landlord. Since he bought it for $100,000 and it is now worth $2 million, he can’t afford to sell it and pay the capital gains taxes. He wants to know more about “these CRUT’s” that you featured in the newsletter.
provides for donor’s right to change)
environmental impact report, leases/notices to tenants/possible UBTI
Case Study #2 – Jim and Jane Evans Jim and Jane Evans have been supporters of your organization for a long
beneficiary of their seven figure estate (they have no children). You have a close relationship with them and they feel comfortable discussing financial matters with you. Jim e-mails you one day wanting to discuss a potential income tax problem they may be facing in the near future. They hold a large number of shares of Pharma Corporation which Jane received many years ago when she worked for Pharma Corporation. Their acquisition basis in the stock is close to zero. They have received notice that a foreign corporation is planning to acquire Pharma Corporation in an “inversion” transaction which will cause Jim and Jane to incur a substantial capital gains liability. Jim asks for your help since time is of the essence.
provides for donor’s right to change)
Case Study #3 – Mr. Northrup
willing to act as trustee for a CRUT funded with an interest in a partnership that holds a large parcel of income property. Mr. Northrup is not currently affiliated with your organization and his name is unfamiliar to you, so you thank the attorney for his client’s interest and ask him how Mr. Northrup came to the decision to benefit your organization. He replies that Mr. Northrup’s mother once worked for your
since the partnership has decided to sell the income property, which was acquired for a very low cost several years ago. The property’s value has now increased ten fold, and Mr. Northrup wants to get out of the partnership with the least amount of tax liability. The idea of receiving a lifetime income with beneficial tax treatment and an income tax deduction is also attractive to him.
interests an acceptable funding asset?
interest to a third party
provides for donor’s right to change)
environmental impact report, leases/notices to tenants, possible UBTI
to have workable and clear gift acceptance policies and procedures in place so you are in the position to accept or decline a gift when appropriate
if your organization is not in a position to act as trustee
unless the shareholder is willing to give up the “S Corp” election (which is rare)
growth in the principal of the trust
CGA)
the trust