CRTPA Board Retreat: November 26, 2018 Projec ect Go Goals - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

crtpa board retreat november 26 2018 projec ect go goals
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CRTPA Board Retreat: November 26, 2018 Projec ect Go Goals - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CRTPA Board Retreat: November 26, 2018 Projec ect Go Goals Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists Make walking and biking predictable and more convenient in Tallahassee and Leon County Project B Backgr ground Project Kickoff


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CRTPA Board Retreat: November 26, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Projec ect Go Goals  Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists  Make walking and biking predictable and more convenient in Tallahassee and Leon County

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project B Backgr ground

  • Project Kickoff in March 2018
  • Project Team consists of staff from:
  • CRTPA
  • Blueprint
  • TLC Planning Department
  • Data Collection – ongoing
  • Stakeholder Meetings – completed
  • Focus Area Workshops – ongoing
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project A Approach

  • Previous Master Plan focused on implementing facilities on every

road, everywhere

  • Focus areas with localized trips
  • Current approach is to develop recommendations based on:
  • Bicycle Comfort Level
  • Urban Bikeway Network
  • Public Input
  • Fulfillment of evaluation criteria
  • Sidewalks – fill gaps and improve crossings
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Bi Bicycle Co Comfort Level

  • Data driven analysis:
  • Traffic Volumes
  • Number of Lanes
  • Speed
  • Existing Bicycle Facilities
  • Relate the results of this analysis back to the types of cyclists who would

ride on each road based on existing conditions

  • Mapped roadway grade in relation to Bicycle Comfort Level to determine

“ideal” roadways

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Types o

  • f Cy

Cycl clists

  • 1. Children/Elderly

Needs a facility completely separated from the roadway such as a multiuse trail.

  • 2. Interested but Concerned

Cyclists who would like to ride their bike but have fears which are usually caused by vehicles. This type

  • f cyclist needs low speeds, low

volumes, and a separated facility such as a buffered bike lane.

  • 3. Enthused and Confident

Cyclists who feel comfortable riding along a corridor next to vehicles at lower speeds and with facilities such as a bike lane

  • r signage.
  • 4. Strong and Fearless

Cyclists who will ride along a corridor regardless of the conditions. These users have no problem sharing the lane with a vehicle traveling at speeds greater than 40 mph.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

BCL 4 BCL 3 BCL 2 BCL 1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Urban Bi Bikeway N Network rk

  • Residential streets with low traffic volumes and low

speeds so the priority mode can be given to bicycles and pedestrians

  • These streets make ideal connections between more

defined on-street facilities and multi-use paths

  • Urban Bikeway Network may include:
  • Uniform signage
  • Traffic calming
  • On-street markings
  • Branding Opportunities

Source: BikePortland.org Source: Seattle Neighborhood Greenway, Greenway Phinney

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Community O Outreach

  • Stakeholder Meetings
  • Joint City/County Bicycling Workgroup
  • Meetings with avid cyclists around the community
  • Universities
  • City and County Staff
  • StarMetro
  • FDEP Office of Greenways and Trails
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Focus A s Area ea Worksh shops s

  • Public Workshops:

 Market Square and Northeast Neighborhoods  FAMU, Southwest Area Neighborhoods  TCC, FSU, and Downtown Tallahassee  Midtown and Central Area Neighborhoods

  • Apalachee Parkway Neighborhoods
  • Scheduled for November 27th
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Focus A s Area ea Worksh shops s

  • Existing conditions for pedestrian and bicycling

facilities

  • Minimum tolerance exercise
  • Majority of participants have identified

themselves as “interested but concerned” when it comes to bicycling

  • Ideal routes mapping
  • Showing us where people ride, where they want

to ride, and where pedestrian crossings are desired

  • Review of project goals and evaluation criteria
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Focus A s Area ea Worksh shops s

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Recommen endation Evaluation C Criter eria

Saf afety y – Focus on infrastructure improvements in known crash areas Co Comfort rt – Reduce motorist conflict and promote shaded, easy to ride routes Connec ecti tivity – Connect users with destinations in and around the City Hea Health th – Promote healthier lifestyles through improved facilities and increased use Multimod modal – Develop usable routes for pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders while not limiting motorists Equity ty – Improve transportation options for disadvantaged populations and in underserved areas Within M Multimodal Transportation D Distr trict ( (MMTD) ) – Prioritize the development of pedestrian, cyclist, and transit facilities within the MMTD

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Asses sessm smen ent o

  • f P

Poten ential R Rout utes s

MICCOSUKEE ROAD

  • 32 ft
  • On-street parking
  • Bicycle Comfort Level 2
  • Posted Speed Limit – 30 mph

GEORGIA STREET

  • 28.9 ft
  • On-street parking
  • Bicycle Comfort Level 3
  • Posted Speed Limit – 30 mph
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Next xt S Steps

  • Summarize Focus Area input
  • Evaluation of ideal routes
  • North/South connections
  • East/West connections
  • Community connections
  • Public Open House – February 2019
  • Development of Draft and Final Master Plan

Thank ank you! u!