crowdsourcing using location
play

crowdsourcing using location- based questionnaires Google - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

From passive to active crowdsourcing using location- based questionnaires Google StreetView to rebuild a cyclists experience Mobile Ghent 13 Kevin Baker Kevin.baker@ugent.be Kevin.baker@routeyou.com Motivation and scope Motivation and


  1. From passive to active crowdsourcing using location- based questionnaires Google StreetView to rebuild a cyclist’s experience Mobile Ghent ’13 Kevin Baker Kevin.baker@ugent.be Kevin.baker@routeyou.com

  2. Motivation and scope

  3. Motivation and scope

  4. Motivation and scope • We already look at what people do ...

  5. Motivation and scope

  6. Study design • Proof-of-concept: ASKme application Location Question Lickert scale answers Skip or dropout Google Street View

  7. Study design • Under the hood • X,Y • Bearing • Pitch • Question • Possible Answers • Answer Type • Date And Time • Token • User Id • Given Answers

  8. Results • Automaticaly generated Q-locations based on road database • Question based on road attribution: • “is there a cycling lane visible?”, “Overall suitability of the road for cycling?”, “Overal saftey of road?”, “Is this road paved or unpaved?”, ... • All Centers of road segment longer than 500 m • ± 250 000 Questions / Belgium and The Netherlands

  9. Results Set 1: unordered list of locations and Set 2: spatially gridded list of locations questions and questions • 6915 answers • 3993 answers • march 2013 – june 2013 • july 2013 – now • 64% unique locations • 61% unique locations

  10. Results • 10-Questions-set • Goal: analyze spread among answers on same location • 10 Street View images querying the suitability for a cyclist • Timeframe: 7 days • 2 question sets; self-selection of type of cyclist: recreational or race • 118 unique questionnaire sessions • 65 recreational cyclists/32 race cyclists/21 both • Total of 139 answered question sets • 8.4 % dropout • ± 5 - 10 seconds per image

  11. Results Very Suitable Q X Y RTYscore Suitable 1 3.301907 50.87629 0.775 Moderatly Suitable 2 3.297142 50.8778 3.872 3 5.792186 50.75135 1.663 Less Suitable 4 3.768525 50.87891 0.775 Not Suitable 5 4.250293 50.85228 2.846 6 5.93369 50.38827 2.984 7 3.739064 51.04478 0.913 8 5.790763 50.75148 1.663 9 3.839237 50.87856 2.057 10 4.262866 51.11538 1.663

  12. Discussion and challenges • Feasability to cover a large geographic region • What do you really want to know and which information is redundant • Unique source of Volunteered Geographic information when combined with other sources • Remodeling RTY Formula for ‘nicest cycling routing’ • Point vs Sequence of points • People don’t like 2D, they want 3D/4D • Limits of the Google API

  13. Q&A Kevin Baker • Contacts: Kevin.baker@ugent.be Kevin.baker@routeyou.com • Website: www.routeyou.com • ASKme: www.routeyou.com/en/page/view/636/ask-me-expressing-your- opinion-on-the-bikeability-of-roads.en

  14. 1

  15. 2

  16. 3

  17. 4

  18. 5

  19. 6

  20. 7

  21. 8

  22. 9

  23. 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend