ip
Creating Agreement
ersh
Creating Agreement
Collaborative Problem Solving in Early I i d S i l Ed i
Partn
Intervention and Special Education
Creating Agreement Creating Agreement ip ersh Collaborative - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Creating Agreement Creating Agreement ip ersh Collaborative Problem Solving in Early Intervention and Special Education I i d S i l Ed i Partn EA P E/ ID ADRE CA ip J i tl D Jointly Developed By: l d B ersh Partn T he Co
Collaborative Problem Solving in Early I i d S i l Ed i
Intervention and Special Education
T he Co nso rtium F
A i t Di t T he I DE A Pa rtne rship
Appro pria te Dispute Re so lutio n I n Spe c ia l E duc a tio n (CADRE ) Pro je c t (a t NASDSE )
With funding fro m the US De pa rtme nt o f E duc a tio n, Offi f S i l E d ti P (OSE P)
Offic e o f Spe c ia l E duc a tio n Pro g ra ms (OSE P)
The following individuals & organizations participated
The following individuals & organizations participated in the development of this presentation
Ame r
ic an Assoc iation of Sc hool Administr ator s
Ca ro l Aue r
Ame r
ic an Oc c upational T he r apy Assoc iation (AOT A)
Ca ro l Gryde
Consor
tium for Appr
iate Dispute Re solution in E duc ation (CADRE )
L
llio tt
L
llio tt
Philip Mo se s Ma rsha ll Pe te r Jo hn Re ima n
Ri h d Z ll
Ric ha rd Ze lle r
A Par tne r ship
Jo a nne Ca shma n T
e rry Ja c kso n
y
F
ie sta E duc ativa
L
The following individuals & organizations participated
The following individuals & organizations participated in the development of this presentation
National Counc il on Inde pe nde nt L
iving
Ma ure e n Ho llo we ll
National E
duc ation Assoc iation (NE A)
Judy Ric ha rds
Ne w Yor
k L
amilie s T
(L IF T )
Ne w Yor
k L
amilie s T
(L IF T )
He le ne F
a llo n
Sc hool Soc ial Wor
k Assoc iation of Ame r ic a (SSWAA)
Ste ve Butto n
State wide Par
e nt Advoc ac y Ne twor k (SPAN)
Dia na MT
K Autin
Wisc onsin F
amily Assistanc e Ce nte r for E duc ation, T r aining & Suppor ts (F ACE T S)
T r aining & Suppor ts (F ACE T S)
Ne lsinia Ra mo s
Wisc onsin Spe c ial E
duc ation Me diation Syste m
Nissa n Ba r-L
e v
ssa a e
Ja n Se ra k
E
duc a tio na l o utc o me s will b e impro ve d
E
duc a tio na l o utc o me s will b e impro ve d whe n fa milie s, sc ho o ls a nd se rvic e pro vide rs a re wo rking to g e the r
p g g e ffe c tive ly.
Pro visio n o f tra ining a nd e duc a tio na l
sta ke ho lde rs e nha nc e s the c a pa c ity to i ll b ti b l l i
e ng a g e in c o lla b o ra tive pro b le m so lving a nd sha re d le a rning tha t is re spo nsive to individua l stude nts’ ne e ds
individua l stude nts ne e ds.
E
xpre sse d strug g le
T
wo o r mo re pe o ple
I
nte rde pe nde nt
Stro ng e mo tio n Pe rc e ive d b lo c ka g e
Needs Values
Controlling Collaborating
Compromising
Compromising
Perso
Accommodating Avoiding
Relationship Goals
Source: Thomas Killmann
Wha t is it:
Una sse rtive a nd unc o o pe ra tive Side ste p, po stpo ne , o r withdra w
fro m the issue fo r the pre se nt time
fro m the issue fo r the pre se nt time
Whe n to use it?
Whe n po te ntia l ha rm o utwe ig hs
g b e ne fits to re so lve
Whe n time is ne e de d to c o lle c t
info rma tio n o r c o o l do wn Perso
info rma tio n o r c o o l do wn
Relationship Goals
Wha t is it?
Sa c rific e yo ur o wn pe rso na l g o a ls
to sa tisfy the c o nc e rns o f the
Yie ld to a no the r po int o f vie w
Whe n to use it?
Whe n to use it?
Whe n re la tio nships a re mo st impo rta nt
Re a c h a q uic k, te mpo ra ry so lutio n
Perso
Relationship Goals
Wha t is it?
Pursue o wn e nds witho ut
Pursue o wn e nds witho ut
a g re e me nt o f o the rs
Ac hie ving o ne ’ s pe rso na l g o a ls
pa ra mo unt
Whe n to use it?
Whe n unpo pula r a c tio ns must b e
p p imple me nte d
Whe n yo ur fa mily o r o rg a niza tio n’ s
we lfa re is a t sta ke Perso
we lfa re is a t sta ke
Relationship Goals
Wha t is it?
F
ind e xpe die nt mutua lly
F
ind e xpe die nt, mutua lly a c c e pta b le a lte rna tive
Bo th pa rtie s g ive up so me thing
p g p g
Whe n to use it?
Whe n two pa rtie s o f e q ua l po we r
a re stro ng ly c o mmitte d to mutua lly
a re stro ng ly c o mmitte d to mutua lly e xc lusive g o a ls
T
Perso
p y c o mple x issue s
Relationship Goals
Wha t is it?
I
de ntifying c o nc e rns o f e a c h
I
de ntifying c o nc e rns o f e a c h pe rso n a nd finding a lte rna tive s tha t me e t b o th se ts o f ne e ds
F
inding a so lutio n tha t fully sa tisfie s
g y ne e ds a nd c o nc e rns o f b o th pe o ple
Whe n to use it?
Whe n re la tio nships & issue s a re b o th
impo rta nt
T
t f hi h lit Perso
a c c e pta nc e fo r a hig h-q ua lity de c isio n
Relationship Goals
Controlling Collaborating
Compromising
Compromising
Perso
Accommodating Avoiding
Relationship Goals
Source: Thomas Killmann
F
ina nc ia l c o sts
E
duc a tio na l c o sts: ta ke s e ne rg y a wa y fro m instruc tio n, c a n inte rfe re with d d i t
ne e de d c o nsiste nc y
Huma n c o sts: stre ss, b urno ut, ma rita l
disc o rd
disc o rd
Re la tio nships: hurts re la tio nships a mo ng
pe o ple who ha ve to wo rk to g e the r
pe o p e
e
So c ie ta l c o sts: pa re nts, fa milie s, sc ho o ls
divide d; b a d pre ss fo r spe c ia l e duc a tio n; i d t iti
misse d o ppo rtunitie s
I
nhe re nt in c o nflic t:
Ac tua l a nd pe rc e ive d po we r ma y diffe r Pa rtic ipa nts ma y no t b e e q uippe d/ suppo rte d to
pa rtic ipa te e ffe c tive ly ma y no t b e a b le to pa rtic ipa te
p p y y p p e ffe c tive ly
Cultura l diffe re nc e s ma y c o ntrib ute
Addre ssing Po we r I
mb a la nc e s
We ll-fa c ilita te d pro c e sse s a nd tra ine d pa rtic ipa nts
All vo ic e s e nc o ura g e d, suppo rte d, a nd we lc o me d Re la tio nships we ll-b uilt he lp o ve rc o me imb a la nc e
Wha t e lse c a n he lp re duc e po we r
Wha t e lse c a n he lp re duc e po we r imb a la nc e s?
Ste phe n Co ve y, “Ha b it 5”
Se ve n Ha b its o f Hig hly E ffe c tive Pe o ple
T
hink o f a time whe n so me o ne liste ne d
T
hink o f a time whe n so me o ne liste ne d to yo u.
Wha t did he / she do tha t ma de yo u
Wha t did he / she do tha t ma de yo u
fe e l he / she wa s liste ning ?
Wha t wa s his/ he r a ttitude to wa rd yo u?
a a s s/ e a ude o a d yo u?
F
F
sa ying fro m the ir pe rspe c tive , fra me o f
y g p p re fe re nc e , o r po int o f vie w.
The Chinese characters that make up the verb “to listen” tell us thi b t thi kill
something about this skill.
So me time s spe a ke rs just ne e d to b e
So me time s spe a ke rs just ne e d to b e
he a rd
So me time s liste ning c le a rs up c o nfusio n
So me time s liste ning c le a rs up c o nfusio n So me time s liste ning ide ntifie s a ne e d fo r
pro b le m so lving
p o b e so g
T
he HE ART
T
he HE ART
E MPAT HY, CARI NG & RE SPE CT
Ma in rule :
Ma in rule :
K E E P T HE F OCUS ON T HE OT HE R
Ba sic skill c luste rs fo r re fle c tive liste ning
Ba sic skill c luste rs fo r re fle c tive liste ning
Atte nding F
Re spo nding
Atte nding Skills
Atte nding Skills
Po sture Co nta c t (dista nc e , e ye s, to uc h)
G t
Ge sture s I
nte re ste d Sile nc e
E
ng a g e me nt Skills
g g
Ac kno wle dg e me nt Re spo nse s Ope n-E
nde d Que stio ns
Re spo nding Skills
Re spo nding Skills
Re fle c ting Co nte nt Re fle c ting F
e e ling
Re fle c ting Me a ning (Co nte nt linke d with fe e ling )
De ra il the c o nve rsa tio n
De ra il the c o nve rsa tio n T
a ke the fo c us o ff the o the r
Blo c k the o the r fro m finding a so lutio n
Blo c k the o the r fro m finding a so lutio n L
Dista nc e yo ur se lf fro m the o the r
Dista nc e yo ur se lf fro m the o the r Diminish the o the r’ s mo tiva tio n
Se nding So lutio ns E va lua ting Withdra wing
Se nding So lutio ns
Orde ring T
hre a te ning g
Judg ing Pra ising
g
Re a ssuring Dive rting
Mo ra lizing Advising Na me -Ca lling Dia g no sing
L
Que stio ning
Takes the focus off the other person
Position
Yo ur po sitio n re fle c ts WHATyo u wa nt.
I t t
Inte r e st
Yo ur unde rlying inte re st(s) re fle c t(s) WHY yo u c ho se tha t po sitio n
yo u c ho se tha t po sitio n.
Position… WHAT ? Inte r e st… WHY?
Jeanie Henderson
“I wa nt yo u to pla c e my da ug hte r in the ne ig hb o ring Sc ho o l Distric t’ s L D pro g ra m.”
“I
wa nt my so n re mo ve d fro m this spe c ia l e duc a tio n
y p c la ssro o m.”
“Yo ur so n c a n no t ha ve the sa me a ide fro m la st ye a r.” “I
wa nt the sc ho o l distric t to purc ha se a la pto p fo r my
wa nt the sc ho o l distric t to purc ha se a la pto p fo r my so n.”
“Yo ur da ug hte r will o nly ha ve Spe e c h & L
a ng ua g e se rvic e s o nc e a we e k ”
se rvic e s o nc e a we e k.
Always ask the “Why” que stion as you se ar c h
for the inte r e st be hind the position…
“ I
wa nt to unde rsta nd the re a so n(s) fo r
( ) yo ur re q ue st(s). Ca n yo u te ll me why yo u ha ve c ho se n this pa rtic ula r so lutio n? ”
“Why is this pa rtic ula r so lutio n so impo rta nt
to yo u…? ”
to yo u…?
T he pur pose of ne gotiation is to se r ve your
inte r e sts.
Co mmunic a te a nd e xpla in yo ur inte re sts.
p y
Ma ke yo ur inte re sts c o me a live .
A k l d th th t ’ i t t
Ac kno wle dg e the o the r pa rty’ s inte re sts. Sha re yo ur inte re sts a nd re a so ning first a nd
g pro po sa ls la te r.
Adapted from Roger Fisher and William Ury (1981), Getting to Yes, Negotiation Agreement without Giving In .
Aims no t to c ha ng e the o the r pe rso n, b ut to
c ha ng e ne g o tia tio n b e ha vio r
Shifts fro m ”yo ur po sitio n ve rsus mine ” to “yo u
a nd I ve rsus the pro b le m”
a nd I ve rsus the pro b le m
I
nvo lve s a mutua l e xplo ra tio n o f inte re sts to yie ld mo re c re a tive o ptio ns.
Use s o b je c tive c rite ria
Adapted from Highnam, K. (2001). Interest-based negotiation, CSSEA 2001 Fall Conference and AGM Surry B C Canada CSSEA; Fisher and Ury Getting to Yes
CSSEA 2001 Fall Conference and AGM. Surry B.C, Canada. CSSEA; Fisher and Ury, Getting to Yes.
T he stude nt sho uld b e pre se nt a nd
T he stude nt sho uld b e pre se nt a nd pa rtic ipa te a s muc h a s po ssib le in a ny me e ting re g a rding the ir se rvic e s.
y g g g
Se tting the Sta g e : E
nviro nme nt, E xpe c ta tio ns, P
Pro c e ss
E
sta b lish ra ppo rt a nd trust
Uninte rrupte d T
ime fo r e a c h pa rtic ipa nt
p p p
I
de ntify, c la rify, summa rize issue s
Disc uss issue s a nd liste n fo r c o mmo n g ro und Ge ne ra te po ssib le so lutio ns
Ge ne ra te po ssib le so lutio ns Co nside r po ssib le so lutio ns Build a g re e me nts a lo ng the wa y
For more information contact
For more information, contact
CADRE, the National Center on Dispute
Resolution in Special Education www.directionservice.org/cadre
~&~
The IDEA Partnership www.ideapartnership.org