“Anomalies and Interpretation –
Companies Act 2013”
- [Ref. Annual Return 2015]
- By CS Makarand Joshi
- makarandjoshi@mmjc.in
Coverage Confirmation of Compliance of which Acts? 1. Impact on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Anomalies and Interpretation Companies Act 2013 - [Ref. Annual Return 2015] - By CS Makarand Joshi - makarandjoshi@mmjc.in Coverage Confirmation of Compliance of which Acts? 1. Impact on private company which is sub of Public Company
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Contextual Interpretation – Rule of Contextual
SAR [MR 3] – requires comment about system Se. 134 – requires system Declaration in MGT 7 restricts to compliance of
What is the status of private company which is
“PRIVODED THAT a company which is subsidiary of
Hillcrest Judgement? Gharda Chemicals Judgement?
Se.2(52) [2013 Act] – Listed Company means a
Se. 2 (23A) [1956 Act] – Listed Public Companies
‘Securities’ [SCRA ] .. Includes shares / debentures
Naresh K. Aggarwala V. Canbank Financial
Se. 2(68)(i) – restricts the right to transfer its
Se. 2(68)(iii) – prohibits any invitation to public to
Re. 22 SEBI Debt Listing Regulation – grants
Literal Rule Vs. Purposive Interpretation [Mischief
Se. 62(2) only following modes are recognized– 1.
2.
3.
Whether dispatched by hand delivery is a violation? If violation of procedural provision does not result in
The major highlights of this definition are – This is an inclusive definition. It says ‘deposit’ includes any
There are 14 exclusions from the definition of deposit Here any other manner has to be read in the context of
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
as an advance for the supply of goods or provisions of
as advance accounted for in any manner, received in
as security deposit for performance of contract for supply of
as advance under long term projects for supply of capital
Se. 77 – duty of every company creating charge on its
2 (16) – charge means an interest or lien created on the
Se. 125 of earlier act – had exhaustive definition Se. 125 did not covered ‘lien’ specifically Capital Finance Co. Ltd. v Stokes (1968) 1 WLR 899: 1969 (1)
Se. 2(16) is inclusive definition and specifically covers lien
No loan shall be given under this section at a rate of
‘No loan…’ is negative and prohibitory language ‘Shall be given’ is about future actions What about continuing loans? Statutory provisions are prospective, unless provision
Loan made by Following entities are exempted from
In the ordinary course of business by – 1.
2.
3.
OR; BY Company engaged in the business of – 1.
2.
Sections Ordinary Course in Relation to 67 Lending 179 Acceptance of Deposit by Bank 180 Acceptance of Deposit by Bank 185 Providing loan, giving guarantee and security 186(11)(1)(a) Loan made, guarantee given or security provided 186(11)(1)(b)(iv) Acquisition of securities 188 ‘Transactions’ 195 ‘Communication’
v.
Body corporate covers foreign company Whether board or MD/ Manager of Holding
i.
Se. 297 – Contract for service Se. 188(1)(d) – availing or rendering of service Whether employment is service? It is service but excluded in service tax / consumer
Mischief Rule Literal Rule
Sub se. (1) of section 135 uses the word net profit Sub se. (5) of section 135 uses the word average
Explanation – for the purpose of this section
CSR Rules has different definition of ‘net profit’ Rule 3 of CSR Rules again refer to profits u/s 198