coverage in heterogeneous coverage in heterogeneous
play

Coverage in Heterogeneous Coverage in Heterogeneous Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Coverage in Heterogeneous Coverage in Heterogeneous Networks Xiaoli Chu King s College London UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 Outline Introduction Heterogeneous networks Heterogeneous networks Challenges Coverage in


  1. Coverage in Heterogeneous Coverage in Heterogeneous Networks Xiaoli Chu King ’ s College London UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010

  2. Outline • Introduction ▫ Heterogeneous networks Heterogeneous networks ▫ Challenges • Coverage in heterogeneous networks ▫ System model ▫ Outage probability analysis ▫ Maximum density of co-channel femtocell transmissions y ▫ Femtocell transmit power • Simulation results ▫ Analytical results verified by simulations A l ti l lt ifi d b i l ti ▫ Low attenuation vs. high attenuation environments • Conclusions • Future work UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 2 -

  3. Introduction UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010

  4. Why Heterogeneous? Why Heterogeneous? • Needs for substantial improvements in cellular capacity and coverage and coverage ▫ Radio link improvement alone cannot meet increasing demands ▫ Traffic demand and channel condition vary with time and location • Improve spectral efficiency/area/cost ▫ Need to increase cell density cost-effectively ▫ Network topology provides gains beyond radio technology p gy p g y gy • Heterogeneous networks ▫ Deploy macro-, pico-, femto-cells, and relays in the same spectrum ▫ Improve coverage and capacity through better spatial reuse I d it th h b tt ti l ▫ Address hot-spot needs and coverage holes ▫ Lower traffic load on macrocells UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 4 -

  5. Deployment Deployment • Initial coverage with macro base stations (MBS) • Add pico, femto and relay stations for capacity increase, hot spots, indoor coverage, etc. • Pico, femto and relay stations require lower power, offer flexible site acquisition, and add little or no backhaul expense. Source: Intel Labs UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 5 -

  6. Heterogeneous Networks Heterogeneous Networks • Macrocells ▫ Operator-deployed BSs use dedicated backhaul p p y ▫ Open to public access ▫ P Tx ~ 43 dBm, G ~ 12-15 dBi • Picocells Picocells ▫ Operator-deployed BSs use dedicated backhaul ▫ Open to public access ▫ P T ~ 23-30 dBm G ~ 0-5 dBi 23 30 dBm, G 0 5 dBi P Tx • Femtocells ▫ User-deployed BSs use user’s broadband connection as backhaul ▫ Open access closed access or a hybrid access policy ▫ Open access, closed access, or a hybrid access policy ▫ P Tx ≤ 23 dBm, G ~ 0-2 dBi • Relays ▫ Operator-deployed BSs use over-the-air link to MBS as backhaul O t d l d BS th i li k t MBS b kh l ▫ P Tx ~ 23-30 dBm, G ~ 0-5 dBi UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 6 -

  7. HN Characteristics HN Characteristics • Coexistence of potentially different access technologies • Different cell scales: macro > micro > pico > femto • BSs owned by operators, enterprises and consumers • Wired or wireless backhaul with guaranteed or best-effort QoS Wi d i l b kh l ith t d b t ff t Q S • Femtocells potentially offer coverage only to subscribed UEs Source: Qualcomm UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 7 -

  8. Challenges Challenges • Maintain uniform user experience ▫ More cell-edges created ▫ Near-far effect ▫ Closed-access femtocells in co-channel deployments ▫ Relay stations may have different duplexing schedules • Handoff decisions have to consider backhaul capacity, H d ff d i i h t id b kh l it especially for relays and femtocells • Optimized use of radio resources Optimized use of radio resources • Inter-cell interference management ▫ Lack of coordination between cells ▫ Scalability, security and limited backhaul bandwidth UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 8 -

  9. Femtocells Femtocells • Femtocells are low-power wireless access points that operate in licensed spectrum to connect standard mobile devices to a li d t t t t d d bil d i t mobile operator’s network using residential DSL or cable broadband connections [Source: Femto Forum]. UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 9 -

  10. Coverage Coverage • Inter-cell interference creates dead spots where UE QoS cannot be guaranteed. t b t d ▫ Location w.r.t. MBS ▫ Path loss, shadowing, fading Path loss shadowing fading • Minimum distance of an FAP from the MBS s.t. a femto outage probability (OP) constraint outage probability (OP) constraint • Maximum density of simultaneously transmitting co- channel femtocells meeting a macro/femto OP constraint • Maximum allowed transmit power of FAPs s.t. a macro OP constraint • Minimum required transmit power of FAPs s.t. a femto OP Mi i i d t it f FAP t f t OP constraint UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 10 -

  11. Coverage Analysis g y UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010

  12. S S ystem Model ystem Model • OFDMA downlink of collocated spectrum-sharing macrocell and closed-access femtocells ▫ A central MBS covers a disc area with radius r M ▫ Femtocells of radius r F are randomly distributed on R 2 as a are randoml distrib ted on R 2 as a Femtocells of radi s spatial Poisson point process (SPPP) with a density of λ F . ▫ N F femtocells per cell site on average p g F ▫ U F indoor UEs per femtocell, each located on cell edge ▫ MBS transmit power is P M,Tx per RB ▫ FAP transmit power is P F,Tx per RB ▫ Each FAP transmits with a probability ρ within each RB. ▫ Spatial intensity of simultaneously transmitting co-channel S ti l i t it f i lt l t itti h l FAPs is u F = λ F ρ . UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 12 -

  13. Channel Model Channel Model • Each subchannel sees Rayleigh flat fading and lognormal shadowing • Path loss follows the IMT-2000 channel model ▫ MBS to outdoor UE α α = φ φ = -7.1 3 PL PL 10 10 D D M f f D D M M M M M M M c M M ▫ MBS to indoor UE α α α = φ = φ ξ = -7.1 3 ξ PL 10 FM FM FM D D f D FM FM FM M FM c FM ▫ Home FAP to indoor UE α α = φ = 3 . 7 PL 10 F F D D F F F F ▫ FAP to outdoor UE FAP to outdoor UE α α = φ = φ ξ PL D MF D MF MF MF MF F MF ▫ Interfering FAP to indoor UE α α = φ = φ ξ 2 2 PL FF FF D D FF FF FF F FF ▫ ξ denotes wall-penetration loss UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 13 -

  14. Femtocell DL S Femtocell DL S IR IR • For a given RB, the received SIR at an FUE is − − α 1 1 φ P H Q r F = F F F F F SIR ∑ F − − α − − α 1 1 φ + φ P H Q D FM P H Q D FF M FM FM FM FM F FF FF FF FF i i i ∈ Φ i i ▫ P F = P F,Tx G FAP G UE , P M = P M,Tx G MBS G UE ; ▫ D FM is the distance from the MBS to the FUE, D FF i is the distance f from interfering FAP i to the FUE; i t f i FAP t th FUE ▫ α F , α FM and α FF are path loss exponents from the home FAP, the MBS and an interfering FAP to the FUE, respectively; g p y ▫ H F , H FM and H FF i are unit-mean exponential channel power gains; ▫ Q F ~ LN( ζμ F , ζ 2 σ F 2 ), Q FM ~ LN( ζμ FM , ζ 2 σ FM 2 ) and Q FF i ~ LN( ζμ FF , ζ 2 σ FF 2 ) denote lognormal shadowing ζ denote lognormal shadowing, ζ = 0.1ln10; 0 1l 10 ▫ Φ is the set of FAPs transmitting in the given RB, with intensity u F . UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 14 -

  15. Macrocell DL S Macrocell DL S IR IR • Co-channel interference from neighboring macrocells is ignored. • For a given RB, the received SIR at an MUE is S − α − φ 1 M P H Q D = M M M M M SIR ∑ ∑ M − − α 1 F φ φ MF MF P P H H Q Q D D MF MF MF MF i i i ∈ Φ i ▫ D M is the distance from the MBS to the MUE, D MF i is the distance from FAP i to the MUE; i to the MUE; ▫ α M and α MF are path loss exponents from the MBS and an FAP to the MUE; ▫ H M and H MF i denote unit-mean exponential channel power gains; ▫ Q M ~ LN( ζμ M , ζ 2 σ M 2 ) and Q MF i ~ LN( ζμ MF , ζ 2 σ MF 2 ) denote lognormal shadowing. UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 15 -

  16. Femto Outage Probability Femto Outage Probability • Outage probability of an FUE w.r.t. the target SIR γ F ⎛ ⎛ ⎞ ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ( ) S < γ = < γ F P SIR P ⎜ ⎟ ∑ F F − α F − + φ 1 ⎜ ⎟ FF I P H Q D FM F FF FF FF FF i i i ⎝ ⎝ ⎠ ⎠ ∈ Φ Φ i i ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ S S ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ = < γ + < γ ≥ γ F F P P SIR , ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ F F F F ⎝ ⎝ ⎠ ⎠ ⎝ ⎝ ⎠ ⎠ I I I I FM FM FM FM • Based on the stochastic geometry theory and for an FUE at a distance d FM from the MBS, ⎛ ⎛ α ⎞ ⎞ φ γ ( ) P r F ~ ~ ~ ~ ⎜ ⎟ < γ = ≈ μ − μ σ 2 + σ 2 + M F F F P SIR ; , D d F ⎜ ⎟ ϑ F F FM FM F FM F FM α φ ⎝ ⎠ P d FM F FM FM ( ) ⎧ ⎧ ⎫ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ 2 ⎪ ⎪ − ~ ( ) ( ~ ( ~ + χ σ + μ 2 2 σ + μ 2 α − ⎢ − κ a b − γ ⎥ b 1 exp ⎨ ⎬ F F w v u e n m e FM FM m FF F F F n m ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎣ ⎦ N M ⎩ ⎭ ∑∑ ∑∑ ( ( ) ) ~ ~ ( ( ) ) χ π + χ 2 b b a b e m = = 1 1 n m n m UC4G Beijing Workshop August 2010 - 16 -

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend