COUNTS AND MIS IST-NETTING IN IN AFROTEMPERATE FORESTS Study Area - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
COUNTS AND MIS IST-NETTING IN IN AFROTEMPERATE FORESTS Study Area - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
BIR IRD SPECIES DETECTION EFFIC ICACY OF POIN INT COUNTS AND MIS IST-NETTING IN IN AFROTEMPERATE FORESTS Study Area 6 Afrotemperate forests in the Eastern Cape Per forest: 10 point count stations 1700 mist-net hours How
Study Area
- 6 Afrotemperate forests in the
Eastern Cape
- Per forest:
- 10 point count stations
- 1700 mist-net hours
- How well can these methods
detect bird species?
Checklist construction
- QDGCs over each forest
- SABAP2 + survey species lists
- Assess for forest-utilization
- Migrants included
- Nocturnal birds + vagrants omitted
- 187 forest-utilising species in EC
- Functional trait categories from Martin et
- al. (2017)
- Functional traits from local literature
Variable Level Number
- f species
% of Total Odds ratio P Intercept
- 0.04
<0.001 Method Point 118 68.6 10.39 <0.001 Net 55 32.0 1.00
- Size
Small 77 70.64 5.11 <0.001 Medium 22 88 4.49 0.004 Large 20 52.63 1.00
- Stratum
Understorey 15 100 18.36 <0.001 Mid-storey 5 100 22.17 0.015 Canopy 48 96.00 13.63 <0.001 Edge 41 48.24 1.94 0.19 Aerial 10 58.82 1.00
- Specialisation
Specialist 31 100 1.17 0.76 Generalist 28 87.50 1.00
- Woodland
40 57.97 0.37 0.03 Open 20 50 0.51 0.19
Bush Blackcap Lioptilus nigricapillus
Best-ranked model predicting species detection
Discussion
- Martin et al. (2017) assessed survey methods in
two global forest:
- Point counts > mist-netting in both forests
- Point counts better in higher canopied forests
- Mist-netting comparatively better in the low-
canopied forests with species-rich understorey
- Species-poor understoreys in EC forests
- Point counts are more reliable in EC forests
- Biases need to be determined for different
habitats + regions
- Survey biases to be understood for accurate
ecological inferences
Acknowledgements
- Foundational Biodiversity Information Programme (FBIP) of the
National Research Foundation (NRF) for project funding
- Managers of DAFF state forests and ECPTA reserves for permission and
assistance with fieldwork
- Andrew Wannenburgh for assistance in creating the map of surveyed
forests
- Daan Nel for assistance with logistic regression modelling