Cosmological Singularities from Matrices Sumit R. Das Space-time - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cosmological Singularities from Matrices Sumit R. Das Space-time - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cosmological Singularities from Matrices Sumit R. Das Space-time from Matrices A common slogan in string theory is that space and time are not fundamental, but derived concepts which emerge out of more fundamental structures. In most
Space-time from Matrices
¢ A common slogan in string theory is that space
and time are not fundamental, but derived concepts which emerge out of more fundamental structures.
¢ In most cases we do not know much about this
fundamental structure.
¢ However in some cases we have some hint –
these are situations where the space-time physics has a holographic description – usually in terms of a field theory of matrices.
¢ More precisely – the holographic description is
a theory of open strings which live in a lower number of dimensions. These reduces to gauge field theories with gauge groups e.g. SU(N) in some limits.
¢ Closed Strings emerge as collective
descriptions of the gauge invariant dynamics.
¢ In these cases the fundamental structures are
the matrices of these gauge theories.
Examples
Closed String Theory Open String Theory
2 dimensional strings Matrix Quantum Mechanics M theory/ critical string SUSY Matrix Quantum in light cone gauge Mechanics/ 1+1 YM Strings in 3+1 dimensional N=4 Yang-Mills
5 5
S AdS ¥
¢ These holographic descriptions have played a
crucial role in our understanding of puzzling aspects of quantum gravitational physics, e.g. Black Holes
¢ Can we use these to address some puzzling
questions in time-dependent space-times – in particular cosmologies where time appears to begin or end – e.g. Big Bangs or Big crunches ?
¢ Can we ask what do we even mean when we say
that time begins or ends ?
¢ In this talk I will discuss some recent attempts in
this direction.
2d Closed String from Double scaled Matrix Quantum Mechanics
¢ - hermitian matrix
¢ Gauging – states are singlet under SU(N) ¢ Eigenvalues are fermions. Single particle
hamiltonian
¢ Density of fermions
) (t M ij N N ¥
] ) [( 2 1
2 2
M M D Tr dt S
t
- = Ú
¢ To leading order in 1/N dynamics of the scalar
field given by the action
¢ This collective field theory would be in fact the
field theory of closed strings in two dimensions
¢ The fundamental quantum description is in
terms of fermions
¢ Collective field theory used to find the emergent
space-time as seen by closed strings
Ground State and fluctuations
p x
¢ Filled fermi sea ¢ Collective field ¢ Fluctuations
Two scalar fields for the two sides.
m 2
) , 2 ( = ± t m h
¢ The quadratic action for fluctuations ¢ Metric determined up to conformal factor ¢ These two massless scalars are related to the only
two dynamical fields of 2d string theory by a transform which is non-local at the string scale. Both these scalars live in the same space-time
¢ Minkowskian coord. ¢ is independent of
time
¢ Any other conformal
frame will destroy this property
int
H
Penrose Diagram
Diagram should be fuzzy at string scale
A Time-dependent solution
S.R.D. and J. Karczmarek, PRD D71 (2005) 086006
¢ An infinite symmetry of
the theory generates time dependent solutions, e.g.
p x
What kind of space-time is perceived by fluctuations around this solution ?
- Æ
t
finite t Æ
¢ Fluctuations around any classical solution are
massless scalars with metric conformal to
¢ To get the causal structure we need to go to
Minkowskian coordinates in which the interactions are time independent
¢ For this solution ¢ As ¢ The space-time
generated has a space like boundary
- £
£
- t
£ £
- t
t t
e e e
2
1+ =
t
The Matrix model time however runs over the full range
¢ This is a geodesically incomplete space-time. The
space-like boundary has regions of strong coupling
¢ Normally one would simply extend the space-time
to complete it
¢ However in this case there is a fundamental
definition of time provided by the matrix model – t
¢ The space-time perceived by closed strings is an
emergent description
It does not make sense to extend the space-time
What happens there ?
¢ There are few other solutions we found which
have more complicated Penrose diagrams but share the feature that the boundary appears space-like.
¢ At the space-like boundary the closed string
theory is strongly coupled except for large values
- f
¢ However the open string theory – i.e. the theory of
fermions is still free, and things are in principle computable
¢ Most likely, we cannot assign a reasonable
space-time description
s
Space-time in Matrix String Theory for Type IIA
¢ By a standard chain of dualities, Type IIA string
theory with a compact light cone direction with radius R and with momentum is equivalent to 1+1 dimensional SU(N) Yang- Mills theory with
- n a spatial circle of radius
2 s s YM
l g R g =
R l R
s 2
=
R J p =
} ] , [ 4 1 ) ( {
2 2 2 2 2 J I s I s
X X g X D F g d d Tr S + + = Ú
m ts
s t
When the potential term restricts the scalar fields to be diagonal Action becomes that of Green-Schwarz string in light cone gauge
) ( ) 2 ( ) ( ) 2 ( ) ( ) 2 (
1 3 2 2 1
s p s s p s s p s X X X X X X
N
= + = + = +
Single String
fi
Æ
s
g
In flat space
fi
Usual space and time Smaller cycles = Multiple strings Matrices
J J F X ¥ : ,
Time dependent couplings
¢ Craps, Sethi and Verlinde : Consider Matrix String
Theory in a background with flat string frame metric, but a dilaton
} ] , [ 4 ) ( {
2 2 2 2 2 J I s Q I Q s
X X g e X D F e g d d Tr S
t m ts t
s t + + =
- Ú
At usual Green-Schwarz string in light cone gauge At non-abelian excitations – no conventional space-time
+• Æ t
- Æ
t
+
- =
F Qx t =
+
x
However the Yang-Mills theory is weakly coupled here
An alternative view
¢ Equivalently the YM
theory can be thought to have a constant coupling, but living on the future wedge of the Milne universe
) (
2 2 2 2
s t
t
d d e ds
Q
+
- =
Constant t
- =
t
Big Bang Singularity
As in the two dimensional example, the fundamental time
- f the Matrix Theory runs over the full range, but in this
interpretation there is a beginning of “time”
PP Wave Big Bangs
S.R.D. and J. Michelson- hep-th/0508068
¢ Motivation : to find a situation where there is
some control of the precise nature of non-abelian excitations
¢ Possible for pp-wave solutions with null linear
dilatons
+
= + H
- =
+ +
- +
Qx
e F x d dx x dx dx ds m
123 2 2
2
) ( ) )( ( 2
+
=
+ Qx
e F 3
8
m
+
- =
F Qx
[ ] [ ]
2 7 2 4 2 2 8 2 3 2 1 2
) ( ... ) ( 6 ) ( ) ( ... ) ( 3 x x x x x + + ˜ ¯ ˆ Á Ë Ê + + + + ˜ ¯ ˆ Á Ë Ê = H m m
Pp-wave Matrix String Action
2 2 2 2 2
] , [ 4 ) ( {
J I s Q I Q s bosonic
X X g e X D F e g d d Tr S
t m ts t
s t + + =
- Ú
] ) ( ... ) [( 18
2 3 2 1 2
X X M + +
- ]
) ( ... ) [( 72
2 7 2 4 2
X X M + +
- c
b a abc Q s Q s
X X X e g M i F X e g M e
t ts t
3 3
8
- R
l M
s 2
m =
Due to RR background flux Due to Metric
t Q s s
e g g
- Æ
3 , 2 , 1 , , = c b a
¢ By rescaling fields and coordinates may write
action in the form
¢ semiclassical limit in which classical
solutions important
¢ In this case the classical solutions are fuzzy
spheres with time-dependent sizes
¢ For large N these are spherical D2 branes in the
- riginal IIA string theory
) 1 , 1 ( ) ( ) , (
2S
Mg g M S
s s =
1 >>
s
Mg
a a
J S X ) ( ) , ( t s t =
c ab c b a
J i J J e = ] , [
1 2 3
¢ Dynamics governed by the action
¢ In the original IIA theory, these fuzzy spheres are
spherical D2 branes which become smooth for large
- J. The DBI+CS action is in precise agreement with
above action in this limit.
¢ Equation of motion may be solved analytically for
specific initial conditions, but not for generic ones
Ú
˙ ˙ ˚ ˘ Í Í Î È ˜ ¯ ˆ Á Ë Ê
- ˜
¯ ˆ Á Ë Ê
- =
- 2
2 2 2 2 2
3 1 8 ) 1 ( S e Mg S g e d dS d d J J S
Q s s Q t t
t t s
¢ For generic initial
conditions at the big bang the size of the fuzzy spheres vanish at late times
¢ Similarly, very small
fuzzy spheres at late times grow large at early times
t
At the big bang a typical state consists of these fuzzy spheres as well as
- Strings. At late times only strings survive
¢ We do not have a Sen-Seiberg type
derivation of this action
¢ We derived this action by starting with the
action of multiple D0 branes in the background – following Myers, Taylor and van Raamsdonk.
¢ The fact that the equations and properties of
these fuzzy spheres agree with those of smooth D2 branes in the large-J limit provides a check.
IIB Big Bangs
¢ Now we have a 2+1
dimensional YM
¢ For small the
Kaluza-Klein modes of the YM in the direction decouple and we have a 1+1 dim YM which becomes usual GS string theory in light cone gauge
R J p R x x R x x l g IIB
B s s
= + ª + ª
- p
p 2 2 , :
8 8
4 2 2 2 2
2 2 ) , ( : ) (
s s B YM s s s
l g RR g g R l R l YM N SU = + ª + ª
- p
r r p s s r s
r
s
g
¢ In the presence of a
null linear dilaton the YM theory is weakly coupled at early times and there are fuzzy ellipsoids
¢ But now there is a new
effect : the masses of the KK modes become time dependent
t Q s s n
e l g nR M m
2 2 2 2 2
˜ ˜ ¯ ˆ Á Á Ë Ê + =
Particle Production A state which does not contain any such KK mode at late time is a state with a thermal distribution
- f these modes at the big bang
In IIB these are D1 branes wrapped around the null compact direction
Initial conditions ?
If we want only usual strings in the asymptotic
future the theory seems to require a squeezed state of D1 branes near the big bang. Is this a preferred initial condition? Maybe we can address questions of quantum cosmology in this toy model.
Big Bangs in AdS/CFT
(with J. Michelson, S. Trivedi)
¢ The Type IIB in pp-wave has two holographic
descriptions The first is the 2+1 dimensional Matrix membrane theory we described.
¢ However this is also dual to the large R charge
sector of a 3+1 dimensional YM theory via AdS/CFT and BMN – some version of quiver gauge theory
¢ We have been able to find a whole class of
cosmological gravity solutions which potentially have CFT duals – but Penrose limit not clear.