w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m N Y S E : D N R
Corporate Presentation
June 2018
Corporate Presentation June 2018 N Y S E : D N R w w w . d e n b u - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Corporate Presentation June 2018 N Y S E : D N R w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements: The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking
w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m N Y S E : D N R
June 2018
N Y S E : D N R 2 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Forward-Looking Statements: The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be or may concern, among other things, financial forecasts, future hydrocarbon prices and timing, the degree and length of any price recovery for oil, current or future liquidity sources or their adequacy to support our anticipated future activities, our ability to further reduce our debt levels, possible future write-downs of oil and natural gas reserves, together with assumptions based on current and projected oil and gas prices and oilfield costs, current or future expectations or estimations of our cash flows or the impact of changes in commodity prices on cash flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, availability of advantageous commodity derivative contracts or the predicted cash flow benefits therefrom, forecasted capital expenditures, drilling activity or methods, including the timing and location thereof, the nature of any future asset sales or the timing or proceeds thereof, estimated timing of commencement of carbon dioxide (CO2) flooding of particular fields or areas, timing of CO2 injections and initial production responses in tertiary flooding projects, development activities, finding costs, anticipated future cost savings, capital budgets, interpretation or prediction of formation details, production rates and volumes or forecasts thereof, hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, CO2 reserves and supply and their availability, potential reserves, barrels or percentages of recoverable original oil in place, potential increases in worldwide tariffs or other trade restrictions, the likelihood, timing and impact of increased interest rates, the impact of regulatory rulings or changes, anticipated outcomes of pending litigation, prospective legislation affecting the oil and gas industry, environmental regulations, mark-to-market values, competition, long-term forecasts of production, rates of return, estimated costs, changes in costs, future capital expenditures and overall economics, worldwide economic conditions and other variables surrounding our estimated original oil in place, operations and future plans. Such forward-looking statements generally are accompanied by words such as “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “predict,” “forecast,” “to our knowledge,” “anticipate,” “projected,” “preliminary,” “should,” “assume,” “believe,” “may” or other words that convey, or are intended to convey, the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such forward-looking information is based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, and assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could significantly and adversely affect current plans, anticipated actions, the timing of such actions and our financial condition and results of operations. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from expectations, estimates or assumptions expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are fluctuations in worldwide oil prices or in U.S. oil prices and consequently in the prices received or demand for our oil and natural gas; decisions as to production levels and/or pricing by OPEC or production levels by U.S. shale producers in future periods; levels of future capital expenditures; effects of our indebtedness; success of our risk management techniques; accuracy of our cost estimates; availability or terms of credit in the commercial banking or other debt markets; fluctuations in the prices of goods and services; the uncertainty of drilling results and reserve estimates; operating hazards and remediation costs; disruption of operations and damages from well incidents, hurricanes, tropical storms, forest fires, or other natural occurrences; acquisition risks; requirements for capital or its availability; conditions in the worldwide financial, trade and credit markets; general economic conditions; competition; government regulations, including changes in tax or environmental laws
above, and the uncertainties set forth from time to time in our other public reports, filings and public statements including, without limitation, the Company’s most recent Form 10-K. Statement Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures: This presentation also contains certain non-GAAP financial measures including adjusted cash flows from operations. Any non-GAAP measure included herein is accompanied by a reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure along with a statement on why the Company believes the measure is beneficial to investors, which statements are included at the end of this presentation. Note to U.S. Investors: Current SEC rules regarding oil and gas reserves information allow oil and gas companies to disclose in filings with the SEC not only proved reserves, but also probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions of such terms. We disclose only proved reserves in our filings with the SEC. Denbury’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017 were estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, an independent petroleum engineering firm. In this presentation, we may make reference to probable and possible reserves, some of which have been estimated by our independent engineers and some of which have been estimated by Denbury’s internal staff of
guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates, as well as the estimates of probable and possible reserves, are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and are subject to greater uncertainties, and accordingly the likelihood of recovering those reserves is subject to substantially greater risk.
N Y S E : D N R 3 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
A Unique Energy Business
Extraordinarily Geared to Crude Oil
Value Sustaining with Organic Growth Upside
Intensely Focused on Execution and Results
A Carbon Conscious Producer
sourced CO2 into our reservoirs Rocky Mountain Region
Pla lano HQ
Gulf Coast Region
1Q18 Production
60,338 BOE/d
Proved O&G Reserves
260 MMBOE
Proved CO2 Reserves
6.4 Tcf
N Y S E : D N R 4 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% DNR Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J Peer K Peer L Peer M Peer N Peer O Peer P
Source: Bloomberg and Company filings for period ended 3/31/2018. Peers include CPG, CLR, CRC, CRZO, EPE, LPI, MUR, NFX, OAS, OXY, PDCE, RSPP, SM, SN, WLL and WPX.
1Q18 % Liq iquid ids Production
Peer Average (% Liquids)
NGL Production Oil Production
(1)
1) NGL production is not reported separately for this peer.
(1) (1)
97% 97% Peer Average (% Oil)
N Y S E : D N R 5 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F DNR Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J Peer K Peer L Peer M Peer N Peer O Peer P Peer Q Peer R Peer S Peer T Peer U Peer V Operating Margin per BOE 40.34 38.63 37.60 35.91 35.27 34.81 34.45 33.64 32.92 32.76 32.64 30.71 30.46 29.92 29.36 28.72 27.85 26.30 26.13 25.83 22.20 16.66 12.31 Lifting Cost per BOE 8.57 13.97 11.23 10.26 11.85 10.30 28.16 11.41 11.11 7.33 8.62 14.06 9.89 11.69 22.58 5.93 6.41 10.08 9.15 11.93 11.78 11.09 8.91 Revenue per BOE 48.91 52.60 48.83 46.17 47.12 45.11 62.61 45.05 44.03 40.09 41.26 44.77 40.35 41.61 51.94 34.65 34.26 36.38 35.28 37.76 33.98 27.75 21.22
$- $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40
Peer Average
Hig ighest re revenue per r BOE in in t the p peer r gro roup 1Q18 Peer r Opera ratin ing Marg rgin ins ($ ($/BOE)
(1) (2) (3)Source: Company filings for the period ended 3/31/2018. Peers include CLR, COP, CRC, CRZO, CXO, DVN, EPE, LPI, MRO, MUR, NBL, NFX, OAS, OXY, PDCE, PXD, RRC, RSPP, SM, SN, WLL, and WPX. 1) Operating margin calculated as revenues less lifting costs. 2) Lifting cost calculated as lease operating expenses, marketing/transportation expenses and production and ad valorem taxes. 3) Revenues exclude gain/loss on derivative settlements.
N Y S E : D N R 6 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m Reserves Summary(1) (MMBOE)
Proved + + Tert rtiary Potential Tert rtiary y Reserv rves Proved 127 Potential 308 No Non-Tertiary Reserv rves Proved 21 Tot
l MMBOE(2
(2)
456 456 Tert rtiary y Pot
y Fie Field ld(3) Mature Area 30 Citronelle 25 Conroe 130 Delhi 30 Hastings 30 – 70 Heidelberg 25 Manvel 8 – 12 Oyster Bayou 15 Tinsley 25 Thompson 20 – 40 Webster 40 – 75
5 – 10
Denbury Operated Pipelines Denbury Planned Pipelines Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields – Potential CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates Industrial CO2 Sources Naturally-Occurring CO2 Source Not
: See “Slide Notes” on slide 19 in the appendix to this presentation for footnote explanations.
N Y S E : D N R 7 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Reserves Summary(1) (MMBOE)
Proved + + Tert rtiary Potential Tert rtiary y Reserv rves Proved 26 Potential 359 No Non-Tertiary Reserv rves Proved 86 Tot
l MMBOE(2
(2)
471 471 Tert rtiary y Pot
y Fie Field ld(3) Bell Creek 20 – 40 Cedar Creek Anticline Area 260 – 290 Gas Draw 10 Grieve 5 Hartzog Draw 30 – 40 Salt Creek 25 – 35
Denbury Operated Pipelines Denbury Planned Pipelines Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields – Potential CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates CO2 Resources Owned or Contracted Pipelines Owned by Others Not
: See “Slide Notes” on slide 19 in the appendix to this presentation for footnote explanations.
N Y S E : D N R 8 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
1H18 2H18 Development Oyster Bayou Facility Expansion Bell Creek Phase 5 Response West Yellow Creek Response CCA EOR Investment Decision Grieve Field Startup Delhi Tuscaloosa Infill Exploitation Cedar Creek Anticline (Mission Canyon) Tinsley (Perry) Tinsley (Cotton Valley) Hartzog Draw Deep Financial Houston Surface Acreage Sales Extend Bank Line & Maintain Liquidity
Safety & Environment Value Culture Project Delivery Capital Discipline Reservoir Management
A Foundation of Strong Execution
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
N Y S E : D N R 9 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m $155 $95 $20 $45 Tertiary Non-Tertiary CO Sources & Other Other Capitalized Items
$300 - $325 Million
2018 Development Capital Budget (1)
2
1) Excludes ~$30 million of capitalized interest. 2) Includes capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre- production tertiary startup costs.
Tertiary Bell Creek Field Phase 6 development Delhi Field Tuscaloosa infill development Heidelberg Field Facility upgrades West Yellow Creek Field EOR development Non-Tertia iary Cedar Creek Anticline Exploitation Waterflood expansion Infill drilling Hartzog Draw Field Exploitation Tinsley Field Exploitation Significant Capital Projects
~ ~ ~ ~
In Millions
(2)
N Y S E : D N R 10 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
(2)
FY2016 2017 2018
2
2018 Production Guidance (BOE/d)
60,298 60,000 - 64,000 ~$300-325 MM CapEx $241 MM CapEx (Prelim.)
2017 2018
2018 Production Growth Drivers Bell Creek Phase 1-4 performance + Phase 5 response Cedar Creek Anticline Mission Canyon exploitation drilling + conventional development Delhi Tuscaloosa infill development Grieve First tertiary production Hastings Full-year impact of 2017 redevelopment Oyster Bayou Increased recycle capacity Salt Creek Full-year of production West Yellow Creek First tertiary production
Preliminary
N Y S E : D N R 11 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Denbury’s 600,000 acre asset base
unrisked(1)
extensive proprietary 3D seismic data set
accelerate program
resource potential in 2018
de-risking multi-well follow-on program
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Potential EUR, MMBOE(1)
Increasing Probability of Success
Mission Canyon-Pennel
Lower Higher
Size of circles = Cost to test Costs per test range from $0.5MM – $8MM
30 28
Not
: See “Slide Notes” on slide 19 the appendix to this presentation for footnote explanations.
Large Short-Cycle Opportunity Set
N Y S E : D N R 12 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Mission Canyon Exploitation
1) EUR resource potential represents total recoverable reserves estimated by the Company based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which in addition to probable and possible reserves also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. See slide 2 “Cautionary Statements” for additional information.
1st well
from all 3 MC wells was > 3,000 BOPD
N Y S E : D N R 13 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Overview
vertical well recovery; plan to develop with horizontal wells
Fault Blocks
finished completion, preparing to flow test
per well
West Fault Block North Fault Block East Fault Block Recovery Factor
Well 1 April 18)
Mississippi
N Y S E : D N R 14 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Johnson Counties, WY
Niobrara, Shannon, Parkman, and Mowry formations
$4,000 – $12,000 per acre
horizons in 2H 2018
x x x x x Mowry: 1,336 BOED IP Rate, 83% Oil Turner/Frontier 1,393 BOED IP Rate, 91% Oil Niobrara: 1,617 BOED IP Rate, 81% Oil Shannon: 449 BOED IP Rate, 94% Oil Parkman: 1,166 BOED IP Rate, 96% Oil
HDU
South Dakota Nebraska North Dakota Montana WyomingHartzog Draw Exploitation
N Y S E : D N R 15 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Debt Principal Reduction Since 12/31/14
$2,852 $826 $826
$144
$1,071 $1,071 $324 $212 $212 $395 $450 $450
12/31/14 3/31/18 3/31/18 Pro Forma
$3,5 ,571 $2,5 ,559
(In millions)
$450 $615 $204 $456 $315 $308 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Pipeline / Capital Lease Debt
3/31/18 Pro Forma Debt Maturity Profile
(In millions)
1) 3/31/18 debt principal balances pro forma for the impact of the April 2018 conversion of $85 million 3½% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 and the May 2018 conversion of $59 million 5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023.
(1)
Over $1 Billion Debt Reduction >$500 million of bank line availability at 3/31/18
$2,7 ,703
Convertible Sr. Notes(1)
N Y S E : D N R 16 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
in millions Trailing 12 months Trailing 12 months (excl. hedges) 1Q18 1Q18 (excl. hedges) Adjusted EBITDAX(1) $487 $541 $142 $175 1Q18 Annualized 568 700 3/31/18 Pro Forma Debt Principal(2) 2,559 2,559 2,559 2,559 Debt/Adjusted EBITDAX(1) 5.3x 4.7x 4.5x 3.7x
1) A non-GAAP measure. See press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed May 8, 2018 for additional information, as well as slide 32 indicating why the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful for investors. 2) 3/31/18 debt principal balances pro forma for the impact of the April 2018 conversion of $85 million 3½% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 and the May 2018 conversion of $59 million 5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023.
N Y S E : D N R 17 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
2018 2019 Detail as s of f Ju June 1, , 2018 1H 2H 1H 2H Fix ixed Pric rice Swaps WTI TI NYMEX Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 15,500 15,500 ─ ─ Swap Price(1) $50.13 $50.13 ─ ─ Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 5,000 5,000 3,500 ─ Swap Price(1) $56.54 $56.54 $59.05 ─ Argus s LLS LLS Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 5,000 5,000 ─ ─ Swap Price(1) $60.18 $60.18 ─ ─ 3-Way Co Coll llars WTI TI NYMEX Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 15,000 15,000 8,500 12,000 Sold Put Price/Floor Price/Ceiling Price(1)(2) $36.50/$46.50/$53.88 $36.50/$46.50/$53.88 $47/$55/$66.71 $47/$55/$66.23 Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) ─ ─ 8,000 8,000 Sold Put Price/Floor Price/Ceiling Price(1)(2) ─ ─ $50/$58/$73.26 $50/$58/$73.26 Total Volumes Hedged 40,500 40,500 20,000 20,000 Ba Basis sis Swaps Argus s LLS LLS Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 20,000 ─ ─ ─ Swap Price(1)(3) $4.17 ─ ─ ─ Total Volumes Hedged 20,000 ─ ─ ─
1) Averages are volume weighted. 2) If oil prices were to average less than the sold put price, receipts on settlement would be limited to the difference between the floor price and sold put price. 3) The basis swap contracts establish a fixed amount for the differential between Argus WTI and Argus LLS on a trade-month basis for the periods indicated.
N Y S E : D N R 18 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
N Y S E : D N R 19 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Slid lide 6 – Gulf lf Coast Regio ion
1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/17 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of 12/31/16 (with the exception of West Yellow Creek, estimated as of 3/31/17), using the mid- point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. See slide 2, “Cautionary Statements” for additional information. 2) Total reserves in the table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to non-tertiary exploitation
3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves.
Slid lide 11 – Exp xploitation – A New Dim imensio ion for Growth
1) Risked, unrisked, and EUR resource potential represents total recoverable reserves estimated by the Company based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which, in addition to probable and possible reserves also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. See slide 2, “Cautionary Statements” for additional information.
Slid lide 7 – Rocky Mountain Regio ion
1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/17 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of 12/31/16 (with the exception of Salt Creek, estimated as of 6/30/17), using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. See slide 2, “Cautionary Statements” for additional information. 2) Total reserves in the table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to non-tertiary exploitation
3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves.
N Y S E : D N R 20 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
CO CO2 EOR can pro roduce about as much oil il as pri rimary or r secondary re recovery(1)
17% 18% 20%
Recovery of Original Oil in Place (“OOIP”)
CO2 EOR
(Tertiary)
Secondary
(Waterfloods)
Primary
1) Based on OOIP at Denbury’s Little Creek Field
~ ~ ~
CO2 moves through formation mixing with oil, expanding and moving it toward producing wells CO2 Pipeline CO2 Injection Well Production Well
Oil Formation
N Y S E : D N R 21 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
50 100 150 200 250 300 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 MBbls ls/d Gulf Coast/Other Mid-Continent Rocky Mountains Permian Basin
CO CO2 EOR Oil il Production by Regio ion(1
(1)
Jackson Dome Bravo Dome LaBarge Lost Cabin DGC McElmo Dome Naturally Occurring CO2 Source Industrial-Sourced CO2 Air Products Nutrien Sheep Mountain
1) Source: Advanced Resources International
Sig ignificant CO2 Supply by Region Gulf f Coast Region » Jackson Dome, MS (Denbury Resources) » Air Products (Denbury Resources) » Nutrien (Denbury Resources) » Petra Nova (Hilcorp) Perm rmian Basin Region » Bravo Dome, NM (Kinder Morgan, Occidental) » McElmo Dome, CO (ExxonMobil, Kinder Morgan) » Sheep Mountain, CO (ExxonMobil, Occidental) Rocky Mountain Region » LaBarge, WY (ExxonMobil, Denbury Resources) » Lost Cabin, WY (ConocoPhillips) Canada » Dakota Gasification (Whitecap, Apache) Sig ignificant CO2 EOR Operators by Region Gulf Coast Region » Denbury Resources » Hilcorp Perm rmian Basin Region » Occidental » Kinder Morgan Rocky Mountain Region » Denbury Resources » Devon » FDL » Chevron Canada » Whitecap » Apache
Petra Nova
N Y S E : D N R 22 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
1) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR. 2) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO2 EOR. 3) Using approximate mid-points of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors.
33 33-83 Bill illion of
chnically lly Recoverable Oil il(1,
(1,2)
(a (amounts in in bill illion ions of
Permian 9-21 21 East & Central l Texas 6-15 15 Mid id-Contin inent 6-13 13 Cali lifornia 3-7 So South East Gu Gulf Coast 3-7 Rocki kies 2-6 Oth ther 0-5 Mich ichigan/Ill llin inois 2-4 Will illiston 1-3 Appalachia 1-2
Up to 83 Billion Barrels of Technically Recoverable Oil – U.S Lower 48(1)(2)
Denbury’s fields represent ~10% of f total l potentia ial(3
(3)
LA
3.7 .7 to
to 9.1
.1
Bil illion Barr rrels
Gu Gulf Coast Re Region(2)
2.8 .8 to
to 6.6
.6
Bil illion Barr rrels
Ro Rocky y Mou
Region(2) MT ND WY TX MS
CO2 Source Owned or Contracted Existing Denbury CO2 Pipelines Planned Denbury CO2 Pipeline Denbury owned oil fields CO2 Pipeline owned by Others
N Y S E : D N R 23 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Jackson Dome
Industrial-Sourced CO2
Current Sources
Future Potential Sources
LaBarge Area
Shute Creek – ExxonMobil Operated
could receive up to ~115 MMcf/d of CO2 by 2021 at current plant capacity
Lost Cabin – ConocoPhillips Operated
current plant capacity
Gulf Coast CO2 Supply Rocky Mountain CO2 Supply
1) Reported on a gross (8/8th’s) basis. 2) Planned but not currently under construction. Estimated CO2 capture date could be as early as 2021, with estimated potential CO2 volumes >200 MMcf/d.
Abundant CO2 Supply & No Significant Capital Required for Several Years
N Y S E : D N R 24 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
$450 $538 $615 $204 $456 $315 $308 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Bank Credit Facili lity:
availability as of 3/31/18
concerns at current strip prices
Change in in Bank Cre redit Facility Ample Li Liquidity & No Near-Term Note Maturities
$ in millions. Balances as of 3/31/18 except where noted. $ in millions
12/31/17 Bank Facility Ending Balance 3/31/18 Bank Facility Ending Balance Adjusted Cash Flow from Operations(1), Net of CapEx Repayment of Non-Bank Debt Changes in Working Capital & Other
1) Cash flow from
working capital changes (a non-GAAP measure). See press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed May 8, 2018 for additional information, as well as slide 33 indicating why the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful for investors.
$1,050
Undrawn Availability Drawn LC’s Borrowing Base
6⅜% 5½% 9% 9¼%
Adjusted for Conversion of 3½% Notes due 2024 (April 2018) and 5% Notes due 2023 (May 2018) 2021 2022
Adjusted Cash Flow(1) $125 Development Capital $(48) Total $77
Maturity Date
4⅝%
$300 - $400
YE2018 Bank Facility Est. Ending Balance
N Y S E : D N R 25 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m Commitments & borrowing base $1.05 billion Scheduled redeterminations Semiannually – May 1st and November 1st Maturity date December 9, 2019 Permitted bond repurchases Up to $225 million of bond repurchases (~$148 million remaining as of 3/31/18) Junior lien debt Allows for the incurrence of up to $1.2 billion of junior lien debt (subject to customary requirements) (~$129 million remaining) Anti-hoarding provisions If > $250 million borrowed, unrestricted cash held in accounts is limited to $225 million Pricing grid
1) Based solely on bank debt.
Utilization Based Libor margin (bps) ABR margin (bps) Undrawn pricing (bps) X >90% 350 250 50 >=75% X <90% 325 225 50 >=50% X <75% 300 200 50 >=25% X <50% 275 175 50 X <25% 250 150 50
Fina inancia ial Perf rformance Covenants 2018 2018 2019 2019 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q4 Q4 Senior secured debt(1) to EBITDAX (max) 2.5x EBITDAX to interest charges (min) 1.25x Current ratio (min) 1.0x
N Y S E : D N R 26 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
$200 $250 $300 $350 $400
Capi apital l Bud udget
In millions, unless otherwise noted
In millions 2018E(1) Adjusted cash flow from operations(2) $430 – $480 Interest payments treated as debt reduction (90) Adjusted total, net $340 – $390 Development capital $300 – $325 Capitalized interest 30 Total capital costs $330 – $355 Net excess cash flow $10 – $35 2018E Budgeted Sources & Uses
Es
ash Flo Flow Ra Range e @ $ $55/Bbl (I (Inc ncluding Hed edges)(1)
1) Estimated ranges based on assumed $55/Bbl NYMEX oil prices, forecasts and assumptions as of February 9, 2018. 2) Cash flow from operations before working capital changes (a non-GAAP measure). See press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed May 8, 2018 for additional information, as well as slide 33 indicating why the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful for investors.
Excluding hedges, each $5 change in oil price impacts cash flow by ~$100 million
Capitalized Interest ($30MM) Development Capital Budget ($300MM – $325MM)(1) Adjusted Cash Flow(2), less int. payments treated as debt
N Y S E : D N R 27 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Field 2015 2016 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 2017 1Q18 Delhi 3,688 4,155 4,991 4,965 4,619 4,906 4,869 4,169 Hastings 5,061 4,829 4,288 4,400 4,867 5,747 4,830 5,704 Heidelberg 5,785 5,128 4,730 4,996 4,927 4,751 4,851 4,445 Oyster Bayou 5,898 5,083 5,075 5,217 4,870 4,868 5,007 5,056 Tinsley 8,119 7,192 6,666 6,311 6,506 6,241 6,430 6,053 Bell Creek 2,221 3,121 3,209 3,060 3,406 3,571 3,313 4,050 Salt Creek — — — 23 2,228 2,172 1,115 2,002 Other Tertiary 4 11 14 10 19 7 13 57 Mature area(1) 10,826 9,029 8,097 7,727 7,431 7,225 7,616 7,174 Total tertiary production 41,602 38,548 37,070 36,709 38,873 39,488 38,044 38,710 Gulf Coast non-tertiary 8,526 6,284 6,170 6,466 5,406 5,821 5,963 5,706 Cedar Creek Anticline 17,997 16,322 15,067 15,124 14,535 14,302 14,754 14,437 Other Rockies non-tertiary 2,743 1,844 1,626 1,475 1,514 1,533 1,537 1,485 Total non-tertiary production 29,266 24,450 22,863 23,065 21,455 21,656 22,254 21,628 Total continuing production 70,868 62,998 59,933 59,774 60,328 61,144 60,298 60,338 2016 property divestitures 1,993 1,005 — — — — — — Total production 72,861 64,003 59,933 59,774 60,328 61,144 60,298 60,338
1) Mature area includes Brookhaven, Cranfield, Eucutta, Little Creek, Lockhart Crossing, Mallalieu, Martinville, McComb, and Soso fields.
Average Daily Production (BOE/d)
N Y S E : D N R 28 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
$ per barrel 2015 2016 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 2017 1Q18 Tertiary Oil Fields Gulf Coast Region $0.60 $(1.35) $(1.58) $(1.01) $(0.10) $2.84 $0.06 $1.87 Rocky Mountain Region (2.74) (2.16) (1.74) (1.75) (0.83) (1.09) (0.96) 0.22 Gulf Coast Non-Tertiary (0.19) (1.89) (0.42) 0.59 0.90 4.18 1.26 3.26 Cedar Creek Anticline (5.49) (3.77) (2.08) (1.93) (0.96) (0.57) (1.43) (0.11) Other Rockies Non-Tertiary (8.12) (8.63) (3.41) (3.20) (2.08) (1.65) (2.72) (1.30) Denbury Totals $(1.55) $(2.29) $(1.64) $(1.16) $(0.34) $1.70 $(0.32) $1.29
Crude Oil Differentials
During 1Q18, ~65% of our crude oil was based on, or partially tied to, the LLS index price 1Q18 was the strongest Rocky Mountain differential the Company has ever realized
N Y S E : D N R 29 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
$ per BOE 2015 2016 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 2017 1Q18 CO2 Costs $2.66 $2.16 $2.86 $2.36 $3.22 $3.02 $2.86 $3.16 Power & Fuel 5.59 5.29 5.93 6.04 6.18 5.72 5.97 6.95 Labor & Overhead 5.31 5.41 6.34 6.41 6.24 6.24 6.32 6.64 Repairs & Maintenance 1.33 0.84 0.95 0.83 0.76 0.84 0.84 0.84 Chemicals 1.14 1.02 1.15 1.05 1.01 0.95 1.04 1.03 Workovers 2.40 1.87 2.65 2.68 2.26 2.20 2.44 2.85 Other 1.38 0.97 1.23 1.09 1.07 0.88 1.06 0.33 Total Normalized LOE(1) $19.81 $17.56 $21.11 $20.46 $20.74 $19.85 $20.53 $21.80 Special or Unusual Items(2) (0.51) — — — 0.48 (1.21) (0.18) — Thompson Field Repair Costs(3) 0.07 0.15 — — — — — — Total LOE $19.37 $17.71 $21.11 $20.46 $21.22 $18.64 $20.35 $21.80 Oil Pricing NYMEX Oil Price $48.85 $43.41 $51.95 $48.32 $48.12 $55.47 $50.96 $62.96 Realized Oil Price(4) $47.30 $41.12 $50.31 $47.16 $47.78 $57.17 $50.64 $64.25
1) Normalized LOE excludes special or unusual items and Thompson Field repair costs (see footnotes 2 and 3 below). 2) Special or unusual items consist of a reimbursement for a retroactive utility rate adjustment ($10MM) and an insurance reimbursement for previous well control costs ($4MM), both in 2015, cleanup and repair costs associated with Hurricane Harvey ($3MM) in 3Q17, and an adjustment for pricing related to one of
4Q17. 3) Represents repair costs to return Thompson Field to production following weather-related flooding in 2Q16 and 2Q15. 4) Excludes derivative settlements.
Total Operating Costs
N Y S E : D N R 30 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 Industrial Sourced 16% 16% 15% 15% 18% 22% 22% 23% 23% 25% 22% 22% 26% 24% 25% 28% 29% Tax 0.028 0.031 0.039 0.030 0.025 0.038 0.045 0.040 0.047 0.053 0.052 0.048 0.045 0.040 0.041 0.042 0.043 Purchases 0.243 0.300 0.285 0.207 0.171 0.183 0.169 0.161 0.163 0.233 0.215 0.184 0.222 0.200 0.207 0.073 0.185 OPEX 0.111 0.120 0.113 0.113 0.120 0.148 0.131 0.185 0.124 0.144 0.138 0.160 0.142 0.140 0.209 0.166 0.167 NYMEX Crude Oil 98.60 103.0 97.31 73.04 48.83 57.99 46.70 42.15 33.73 45.56 45.02 49.25 51.95 48.32 48.12 55.48 62.96
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 $0.50 NYMEX Cr Crude Oil il Pri rice / / Bb Bbl CO CO2 Co Costs / / Mcf (1)
(1)
1) Excludes DD&A on CO2 wells and facilities; includes Gulf Coast & Rocky Mountain industrial-source CO2 costs. 2) CO2 costs include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome in 3Q17 and 4Q15 of $3 million ($0.08 per Mcf) and $3 million ($0.05 per Mcf), respectively, and a downward adjustment in 4Q17 for pricing related to one of our industrial CO2 sources of $7 million ($0.12 per Mcf)
OPEX Purchases Tax NYMEX Crude Oil Price Industrial-Sourced CO2 %
(2) (2) (2)
N Y S E : D N R 31 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
commercial and residential development
parcels
Conroe Webster
Pearland The Woodlands
45
242 1314
League City Pasadena Conroe
45
Sam Houston Tollway
Surface Acreage Surface Acreage
N Y S E : D N R 32 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Reconcili iliation of
t in income (G (GAAP measure) to
adju justed EBITDAX (n (non-GAAP measure) 1) Excludes pro forma adjustments related to qualified acquisitions or dispositions under the Company’s senior secured bank credit facility. Adjusted EBITDAX is a non-GAAP financial measure which is calculated based upon (but not identical to) a financial covenant related to “Consolidated EBITDAX” in the Company’s senior secured bank credit facility, which excludes certain items that are included in net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Items excluded include interest, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, impairments, and items that the Company believes affect the comparability of operating results such as items whose timing and/or amount cannot be reasonably estimated or are non-recurring. Management believes Adjusted EBITDAX may be helpful to investors in order to assess the Company’s operating performance as compared to that of other companies in its industry, without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical costs basis. It is also commonly used by third parties to assess leverage, and the Company’s ability to incur and service debt and fund capital expenditures. Adjusted EBITDAX should not be considered in isolation, as a substitute for, or more meaningful than, net income, cash flow from operations, or any other measure reported in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDAX may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of another company because all companies may not calculate Adjusted EBITDAX, EBITDAX or EBITDA in the same manner. 2017 2017 2018 2018 In millions Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q4 Q4 FY FY Q1 Q1 TTM Net in income (G (GAAP measure) $22 $22 $14 $14 $0 $0 $127 $127 $163 $163 $40 $40 $181 $181 Adjustments to reconcile to Adjusted EBITDAX Interest expense 27 24 25 23 99 17 89 Income tax expense (benefit) 21 10 (14) (134) (117) 14 (124) Depletion, depreciation and amortization 51 51 52 53 207 52 208 Noncash fair value adjustments on commodity derivatives (52) (22) 25 78 29 15 96 Stock-based compensation 4 5 3 3 15 3 14 Noncash, non-recurring and other(1) 3 4 11 7 25 1 23 Adju justed EBITDAX (n (non-GAAP measure) $76 $76 $86 $86 $102 $102 $157 $157 $421 $421 $142 $142 $487 $487
N Y S E : D N R 33 w w w . d e n b u r y. c o m
Reconcili iliation of
t in income (lo (loss) (G (GAAP measure) to ad adju justed cash flo flows fr from op
(non-GAAP measure) to
flows fr from op
(GAAP measure) Adjusted cash flows from operations is a non-GAAP measure that represents cash flows provided by operations before changes in assets and liabilities, as summarized from the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Adjusted cash flows from operations measures the cash flows earned or incurred from operating activities without regard to the collection or payment of associated receivables or payables. Management believes that it is important to consider this additional measure, along with cash flows from operations, as it believes the non-GAAP measure can often be a better way to discuss changes in operating trends in its business caused by changes in production, prices, operating costs and related factors, without regard to whether the earned or incurred item was collected or paid during that period. 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 2018 In millions Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q4 Q4 FY FY Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q4 Q4 FY FY Q1 Q1 Net in income (lo (loss) (G (GAAP measure)
$(18 (185) $(38 (381) $(25 (25) $(38 (386) $(97 (976) $22 $22 $14 $14 $0 $0 $127 $127 $163 $163 $40 $40
Adjustments to reconcile to adjusted cash flows from
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
77 67 55 647 846 51 51 52 53 208 52
Deferred income taxes
(95) (223) (14) (212) (543) 35 16 (15) (132) (96) 15
Stock-based compensation
1 3 6 5 15 4 5 3 3 15 3
Noncash fair value adjustments on commodity derivatives
95 150 (29) (5) 212 (52) (22) 25 78 30 15
Gain on debt extinguishment
(95) (12) (8) – (115) – – – – – –
Write-down of oil and natural gas properties
256 479 76 – 811 – – – – – –
Other
3 10 1 4 14 2 1 3 5 9 –
Adju justed cash flo flows fr from op
(non-GAAP measure)
$57 $57 $93 $93 $62 $62 $53 $53 $264 $264 $62 $62 $65 $65 $68 68 $134 $134 $329 $329 $125 $125
Net change in assets and liabilities relating to
(55) (32) 34 7 (45) (38) (12) (2) (10) (62) (33)
Cash flo flows fr from op
(GAAP measure)
$2 $2 $61 $61 $96 $96 $60 $60 $219 $219 $24 $24 $53 $53 $66 66 $124 $124 $267 $267 $92 $92