CORPORATE PRESENTATION June 2018 TSX: VII.TO 7G CORPORATE PROFILE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

corporate presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CORPORATE PRESENTATION June 2018 TSX: VII.TO 7G CORPORATE PROFILE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CORPORATE PRESENTATION June 2018 TSX: VII.TO 7G CORPORATE PROFILE 7G Capitalization & Key Corporate Statistics Ticker symbol - TSX VII Share Price (1) $16.78 Basic Market Cap (1) $6.0 billion Net Debt (2)(4) $2.1 billion Enterprise


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TSX: VII.TO

June 2018

CORPORATE PRESENTATION

slide-2
SLIDE 2

50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 Alberta Condensate Production (bbl/d) Other Seven Generations

7G CORPORATE PROFILE

7G Capitalization & Key Corporate Statistics

Ticker symbol - TSX VII Share Price(1) $16.78 Basic Market Cap(1) $6.0 billion Net Debt(2)(4) $2.1 billion Enterprise Value(5) $8.1 billion Available Funding(3)(4) $1.3 billion Q1 2018 Production 188 Mboe/d (58% liquids) Q1 2018 Funds from Operations(4) $381 million

(1) May 31, 2018 share price & shares outstanding (2) US$1.575B in senior unsecured notes converted at $1.296 CAD/USD less adjusted net working capital deficiency as of March 31, 2018 of $87.4 MM (3) Adjusted working capital deficiency as of March 31, 2018 of $87.4 MM plus available credit facility (4) Non-IFRS Financial Measure. For additional information see “Non-IFRS Measures Advisory” in the “Important Notice” that appears at the end of the presentation (5) Enterprise value is calculated as the sum of basic market capitalization and net debt

Alberta’s Largest Condensate Producer

Source: Peters & Co. Limited Equity Research – April 2018 7G condensate production currently accounts for approx. 20% of Alberta supply 2018 Alberta condensate demand is estimated to be approx. 550,000 bbl/d

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2018 BUDGET: SETTING THE STAGE FOR FREE CASH FLOW VISIBILITY

2018 Production Guidance(1) (boe/d) 200,000 – 210,000 55% - 60% liquids 14% - 20% annual growth 2018 Capital Program(1) ($MM) $1,675 – $1,775 2018 Funds from Operations ($MM) (1)(2) $1,300 – $1,350 @ US$50/bbl $1,450 – $1,525 @ US$55/bbl $1,600 – $1,675 @ US$60/bbl 2019 Production Outlook(1) (boe/d) 220,000 – 240,000 ~55% liquids 7% - 17% growth Targeting a funds flow budget (at US$55/bbl WTI)

1) For additional information see “Forward Looking Information Advisory” and “Non-IFRS measures Advisory” in the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation. 2) Assumptions: WTI US$50/bbl low / US$60/bbl high; US$3.00/MMBtu NYMEX; AECO Basis (US$1.15/MMbtu); USD / CAD $0.78; Dawn Basis (US$0.10/MMbtu); Chicago Basis (US$0.15/MMbtu); Condensate as a % of WTI: 98%; NGLs as a % of WTI: C4 60%, C3 35%; C2 pricing consistent with the Company’s processing and marketing agreements.

2018 capital program is designed to produce strong 2019 production and cash flow growth Processing Capacity & Corporate Production (mboe/d)

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LEVEL 1 CORPORATE POLICY

Stakeholder Differentiation

We believe that companies have only the rights given to them by society. While people have a natural entitlement to basic rights, corporations are an instrument created by society to provide its needs and ought to have no expectation of basic entitlements other than equitable rights with other corporations, including those wholly owned by a person. We recognize that rights, sufficient to build and

  • perate an energy project, can be granted and taken away by society. Over the longer term, companies can only expect to thrive if they

serve the legitimate needs of society in which they exist. To thrive, companies must differentiate, rise above the pack, standout as being among the best with all of their stakeholders. At Seven Generations Energy Ltd., we acknowledge this granted entitlement and accept from our stakeholders a duty to thrive and an understanding of the need to differentiate. Specifically, in acceptance of this challenge to differentiate with all stakeholders, we acknowledge:

The need of society for us to conduct our business in a way that protects the natural beauty of the environment and preserves the capacity of the earth to meet the needs

  • f present and future generations;

The need of our business partners and infrastructure customers to be treated fairly and attentively; The need of Canada and Alberta for us to obey all regulations and to proactively assist with the formulation

  • f new policy that enables our company and our industry

to better serve society; The need of our suppliers and service providers to be treated fairly and paid promptly for equipment and services provided to us and to receive feedback from us that can help them to be competitive and thrive in their businesses; The need of the communities where we operate to be engaged in the planning of our projects and to participate in the benefits arising from them as they are built and operated; The need of our employees to be compensated fairly and provided a safe, healthy and happy work environment including a healthy work life – outside life balance; and The need of our shareholders and capital providers to have their investment managed responsibly and ethically and to earn strong returns.

We see ourselves as being in the service business, serving the needs of our stakeholders. We seek satisfaction for all stakeholders. Differentiation is imperative. We support an open and competitive business environment, recognizing in the competitive world that we envision, only those who best serve their stakeholders can expect the support required to survive for the longer term.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Targeting a balanced budget in 2019 Growing cash flow with improved execution and market access Cash flow self-sufficiency

7G IS DESIGNED TO DELIVER

Profitable growth 7% to 14% production CAGR

  • ver five years

Organic growth to 300,000 - 350,000 boe/d production by 2022 Industry-leading returns Delivering a 10% to 15% ROCE target Compensation will be tied to returns Financial sustainability Continue to maintain a strong balance sheet Debt to funds flow below 2.0 times

Notes: For additional information see “Forward Looking Information Advisory” and “Non-IFRS Measures Advisory” in the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation.

Differentiated characteristics position 7G for long-term value creation

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

12% 5% 7% 5% 15% 6% 6% 4% 19% 8% 9% 9% – 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% VII Top Canadian Liquids-Rich Gas Peers Top Canadian Gas Weighted Peers Top U.S. Growth Peers CROIC (%) 2015A 2016A 2017A

DELIVERING BEST IN CLASS CORPORATE RETURNS

Historical Cash Return on Invested Capital (CROIC)(1)(2)

(1) CROIC calculated as FactSet EBITDA divided by gross PP&E. FactSet EBITDA and CROIC are non-IFRS financial measures. (2) For additional information see “Forward Looking Information Advisory” and “Non-IFRS Measures Advisory” in the “Important Notice” that appears at the end of the presentation.

VII

Source: CIBC World Markets Peer groups are comprised of: Liquids-Rich - ARX, CR, KEL, NVA | Gas – AAV, BIR, PEY, PPY, SRX, TOU | U.S. Growth – AR, COG, EOG, EQT, PXD, RRC, SWN

Historical Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) (2)

  • 5.0%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E

ROCE (%)

VII US Small/Mid Caps Cdn Large Caps US Large Caps Cdn Small/Mid Caps

Source: Macquarie Capital Markets prepared the graph and 7G modified the graph to add the Company’s future ROCE target and reported 2017 ROCE.

7G targeted ROCE

  • f 10% to 15%

7G 2017 ROCE of 9.8%

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

LIQUIDS PRODUCTION DRIVING REVENUE

1) Assumptions: US$60/bbl, $0.81 USD/CAD, NYMEX HH price of US$3.00/MMbtu, Chicago CG basis of -US$0.15/MMbtu, AECO basis of -US$1.15/MMbtu. 2) Notes: For additional information see “Forward Looking Information Advisory” in the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation.

7G Realized Condensate Price vs. WTI

Source: Bloomberg Source: NGX

36% 22% 42% Condensate NGLs Natural Gas 61% 10% 29% Condensate NGLs Natural Gas

2018 Forecasted Revenue by Product(1)(2) 7G Realized Gas Price vs. AECO 7G Production Mix – Q1 2018 Actuals

$35.00 $45.00 $55.00 $65.00 $75.00 $85.00 C$/bbl

7G Realized WTI (C$/bbl)

$0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 C$/Mcf

7G Realized AECO 7A AECO 5A Initiation of Alliance long haul transportation

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

$0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 Montney - Nest 2 Montney - Attachie Eagle Ford Wet Tier 1 Montney - Doe Montney - Dawson Montney - Gundy NE Marcellus Dry Tier 1 Montney - Bilbo Montney - Sunrise Alpine High Montney - Sundown Montney - Groundbirch Montney - Elmworth SCOOP Woodford Wet Gas / Condy Montney - Gordondale Montney - Glacier Montney - Townsend Montney - Nest 1 Montney - Blair Montney - Pouce Coupe SW Marcellus Dry Tier 1 Terryville / N LA Montney - West Septimus Eagle Ford Dry Gas Tier 1 Montney - Parkland NE Marcellus Dry Tier 2 OH Utica Dry Haynesville PA Utica Dry SW Marcellus Dry Tier 2 Marcellus Wet Montney - Gold Creek gas Eagle Ford Wet Tier 2 Montney - Septimus Barnett Rich Utica Wet Meramec Wet Gas Pinedale Fayetteville Core / Moorefield Piceance Cana Wet Gas Cana Lean Gas SCOOP Sycamore Wet Gas Utica Condensate Breakeven HHub Price ($/mcfe) at 30%

TOP TIER LIQUIDS RICH MONTNEY ASSETS

Among the lowest supply cost natural gas in North America North American Natural Gas Supply Cost

Source: TPH Canada equity research November 2017 Assumes: US$50/bbl WTI, ($0.95USD/MMbtu) AECO basis, $0.79 USD/CAD for 30% after tax IRR Montney US Play

VII 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Budget

GROWING ON AN ABSOLUTE AND PER SHARE BASIS

1) For additional information see “Forward Looking Information Advisory” and “Non-IFRS measures Advisory” in the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation. 2) Assumptions: WTI US$50/bbl low / US$60/bbl high; US$3.00/MMBtu NYMEX; AECO Basis (US$1.15/MMbtu); USD / CAD $0.78; Dawn Basis (US$0.10/MMbtu); Chicago Basis (US$0.15/MMbtu); Condensate as a % of WTI: 98%; NGLs as a % of WTI: C4 60%, C3 35%; C2 pricing consistent with the Company’s processing and marketing agreements.

Production - MBOE/D(1) Funds Flow - $MM(1)(2)

50 100 150 200 250 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Budget

Production per Share - MBOE/D per MM Shares OS(1)

$0 $250 $500 $750 $1,000 $1,250 $1,500 $1,750 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Budget

Funds Flow per Share - $ per Share(1)(2)

$0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Budget

A history of delivering best-in-class growth for our shareholders

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

LAYERS OF INVESTMENT: ALREADY PRODUCING FREE CASH FLOW

  • Funds From Operations above sustaining

capital for past 5 years

  • Strategic investments in growth and

infrastructure to enhance value of the Montney asset base

  • 2019 – targeting a capital investment

budget equal to Funds From Operations

  • 2020 – free cash flow at US$55/bbl

WTI(1)(2)

Layers of Capital Investment(1)(2)

1) For additional information see “Forward Looking Information Advisory” and “Non-IFRS Measures Advisory” in the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation. 2) Assumptions: WTI US$50/bbl low / US$55/bbl high; US$3.00/MMBtu NYMEX; AECO Basis (US$1.15/MMbtu); USD / CAD $0.78; Dawn Basis (US$0.10/MMbtu); Chicago Basis (US$0.15/MMbtu); Condensate as a % of WTI: 98%; NGLs as a % of WTI: C4 60%, C3 35%; C2 pricing consistent with the Company’s processing and marketing agreements.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LIQUIDS GROWTH THAT DRIVES CORPORATE RETURNS

Condensate Production - bbls/d 7G is Canada’s largest condensate producer NGL Production - bbls/d

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 2P Reserves: 1.7 billion BOE
  • Contingent Resources (risked): 1.3 bllion BOE
  • Prospective Resources (risked): 740 MMBOE
  • ~800 Montney Sections
  • ~1,400 Nest Locations(1)
  • Nest 1 – 500 Locations
  • Nest 2 – 700 Locations
  • Nest 3 – 200 Locations
  • ~900 Wapiti & Rich Gas Locations(1)
  • ~800 net Lower Montney sections
  • ~315 net Deep Southwest sections
  • ~230 net sections of Cretaceous Rights
  • ~120 identified Falher & Wilrich locations(1)
  • Other potential: Dunvegan, Peace river,

Bullhead Group

RESERVES & RESOURCES

Inventory Depth 7G Reserves & Resources by Classification & Play Area(1)

Notes: (1) For additional information see “Forward-Looking Information Advisory”, “Presentation of Oil & Gas Information” and “Note Regarding Potential Drilling Opportunities” in the “Important Notice” at the end of the presentation.

Multi decade drilling inventory identified through reserve and resource reports

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

KEY RESERVE METRICS

(1) Based upon reserve reports with effective dates: December 31, 2014; December 31, 2015; December 31, 2016 & December 31, 2017. Please refer to the “Presentation of Oil & Gas Information” in the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation.

Year End 2P Reserves (MMBoe)(1)

789 859 1,535 1,695 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2014 2015 2016 2017 PDP 1P 2P

Year End Finding Development & Acquisition Costs ($/BOE) (1)

$22.45 $15.17 $19.64 $16.06 $8.61 $12.70 $11.68 $10.13 $9.86 $0.00 $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00 2016 2017 3 Year Avg PDP 1P 2P

27.1X 17.2X 17.0X 10.7X 0.0X 5.0X 10.0X 15.0X 20.0X 25.0X 30.0X 2014 2015 2016 2017

2P NPV - 10% Discount, Before Tax ($MM) (1)

$7,108 $6,507 $9,996 $11,988 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 2014 2015 2016 2017

2P Future Development Capital / Funds From Operations(1)

YoY PDP Growth

  • f 27% in 2017

2017 1P and 2P recycle ratios of 2.6x and 2.2x, respectively 68% growth in NPV since 2014, despite decreasing commodity prices Funds Flow growth

  • utpacing increases in

Future Development Capital 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

HISTORICAL TYPE CURVES

Condensate Type Curves (bbls/d) - Monthly Raw Gas Type Curves (Mcf/d) - Monthly

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 Nest 1 Nest 2 Nest 3 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 Nest 1 Nest 2 Nest 3

Note: Other Type-curve Assumptions: For a description of the assumptions that have been made by the company in preparing its type-curves and in determining the estimated number of potential drilling opportunities, and for important additional information about the company’s type-curve forecasts and estimates of potential drilling opportunities, please refer to the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation.

Notes: For additional information see “Forward Looking Information Advisory” and “Note Regarding Type-Curves” in the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation.

Well/Capital Assumptions Nest 1

(2014)

Nest 2

(2016)

Nest 3

(2017)

Lateral length

(m)

2,200 2,700 2,500

Stage count

(#)

28 28 40

Tonnage

(Tonnes/stage)

120 160 200

Total well cost (DCET)

($MM)

$9.5 $11.0 $11.0

Production

Condensate production

(bbls/d)

678 1,127 674

NGL production

(bbls/d)

230 457 559

Raw gas production

(mcf/d)

3,648 6,336 11,922

Condensate gas ratio

(bbls/MMcf)

135 118 53

Condensate production

(bbls/d)

316 564 383

NGL production

(bbls/d)

141 330 324

Raw gas production

(mcf/d)

2,232 4,573 6,904

#

500 700 200

IP 365 Inputs Potential drilling opportunities IP 30

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

DIFFERENTIATED MARKET ACCESS STRATEGY

Peer-leading, diversified natural gas realizations & access to a premium Alberta condensate market

Note: 1) Volumes represent 2020 commitment levels. Transportation commitments are not additive 2) Source: IHSMarkit Long-Term NGL Supply & Demand Outlook, May 31, 2017

  • 200

400 600 800 1,000 1,200 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 Thousand Barrels per Day (MBOE/d) Total Demand Domestic Production

Source: ARC Financial

Gas Market Diversification(1) Canadian Condensate Supply and Demand(2)

Forecast

Imports

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

THE 7G VALUE PROPOSITION

Asset Quality

Inventory

  • Among North America’s lowest supply cost liquids-rich natural gas producers
  • Canada’s largest condensate producer
  • ~ 800 net sections of Montney rights with decades of drilling opportunities
  • ~1,400 drilling opportunities within the Nest core development area

Balance Sheet

  • Conservative balance sheet with a debt to funds flow ratio below 2.0 times
  • A consistent risk management program helping to lock in returns

Market Diversity

  • A diversified product mix with multi end market exposures across North America
  • A natural gas marketing portfolio that provides takeaway out of Alberta

Control of Operations

  • Average 96% working interest across ~800 section Montney position
  • Majority of infrastructure is 7G owned and operated

Profitable Growth

  • Track record of consistent per share production and funds flow growth
  • Industry leading return on capital employed with a target of 10% to 15%

Notes: For additional information see “Forward Looking Information Advisory”, “note Regarding Potential Drilling Opportunities” and “Non-IFRS Measures Advisory” in the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation.

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Appendix

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CURRENT HEDGE POSITION

Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2020 2020 Q1 2021 Q2 2021 H1 2021 Liquids Hedging Total WTI Hedged - bbl/d 30,000 32,000 35,000 34,000 32,750 34,000 30,000 28,000 22,000 28,500 19,000 17,000 15,000 11,000 15,500 5,000 2,500 CAD WTI Hedged - bbl/d 28,000 28,000 31,000 30,000 29,250 30,000 26,000 22,000 16,000 23,500 12,000 10,000 8,000 4,000 8,500 CAD WTI Average Bought Put (Floor) - C$/bbl $60.14 $60.14 $58.39 $58.17 $59.17 $58.17 $57.88 $58.18 $58.13 $58.09 $57.50 $57.00 $56.25 $57.50 $57.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CAD WTI Average Sold Call (Ceiling) - C$/bbl $76.76 $76.76 $76.42 $76.44 $76.59 $76.44 $75.83 $76.11 $74.90 $75.93 $72.81 $71.38 $70.28 $70.33 $71.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CAD WTI Puts Sold - bbl/d** 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 10,000 6,000 2,000 7,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,500 CAD WTI Average Sold Put - C$/bbl** $40.83 $40.83 $40.83 $40.83 $40.83 $40.83 $41.00 $41.67 $40.00 $41.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 $40.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 USD WTI Hedged - bbl/d 2,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 3,500 4,000 4,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 5,000 2,500 USD WTI Average Bought Put (Floor) - US$/bbl $52.25 $53.57 $53.57 $53.57 $53.38 $53.57 $53.57 $52.38 $52.38 $52.85 $52.04 $52.04 $52.04 $52.04 $52.04 $51.95 $0.00 $51.95 USD WTI Average Sold Call (Ceiling) - US$/bbl $57.30 $57.94 $57.94 $57.94 $57.85 $57.94 $57.94 $58.58 $58.58 $58.32 $58.80 $58.80 $58.80 $58.80 $58.80 $59.39 $0.00 $59.39 Natural Gas Hedging Total Gas Hedged - MMbtu/d 246,869 266,869 266,869 256,869 259,369 216,869 256,869 226,869 196,869 224,369 139,478 79,478 59,478 59,478 84,478 30,000 15,000 Gas Hedged - NYMEX HH - MMbtu/d 60,000 60,000 60,000 45,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 80,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 42,500 30,000 15,000 Average NYMEX HH Swap - USD/Mmbtu $0.00 $2.95 $2.95 $2.95 $2.95 $2.95 $2.95 $2.95 $2.95 $2.95 $2.92 $2.83 $2.83 $2.83 $2.87 $2.83 $0.00 $2.83 Gas Hedged - Chi CG - MMbtu/d 190,000 150,000 150,000 140,000 157,500 100,000 140,000 110,000 80,000 107,500 50,000 40,000 20,000 20,000 32,500 Average Chi CG Swap - USD/MMbtu $2.89 $2.85 $2.85 $2.84 $2.86 $2.83 $2.87 $2.84 $2.83 $2.84 $2.76 $2.73 $2.71 $2.71 $2.74 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Gas Hedged - AECO - GJ/d 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Average AECO Bought Put (Floor) - C$/GJ $2.44 $2.44 $2.44 $2.44 $2.44 $2.44 $2.44 $2.44 $2.44 $2.44 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Average AECO Sold Call (Ceiling) - C$/GJ $2.85 $2.85 $2.85 $2.85 $2.85 $2.85 $2.85 $2.85 $2.85 $2.85 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $2.13 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Natural Gas Basis Hedging Basis Hedged - Chi CG - GJ/d 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 Average Chi CG Basis Swap - US$/MMbtu $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

  • $0.22
  • $0.22
  • $0.22
  • $0.22
  • $0.22
  • $0.22

$0.00

  • $0.22

FX Hedging USD Notional Hedged ($MM) $60.0 $52.3 $52.8 $50.1 $215.1 $38.7 $36.5 $28.8 $20.8 $124.8 $17.5 $14.9 $9.9 $9.9 $52.3 $5.0 $5.0 $9.9 Average Rate 1.3098 1.3114 1.3092 1.3096 1.3100 1.2905 1.2894 1.2866 1.2990 1.2907 1.2740 1.2646 1.2479 1.2479 1.2614 1.2500 1.2500 1.2500 **Represents volumes and prices for additional puts sold for 3-way WTI collars 2018 2019 2020 2021 Hedge Position March 31, 2018

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2018 BUDGET DETAIL

Notes: For additional information see “Forward Looking Information Advisory” in the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation.

  • 2018 well activity:
  • 85 to 95 wells drilled
  • 90 to 100 wells completed
  • 80 to 90 wells on production
  • Nest well cost of $11.5 MM
  • Drill: $3.5 MM
  • Complete: $7.0 MM
  • Tie-in $1.0 MM
  • Costs exclude delineation and water wells
  • Cash Cost Assumptions:
  • Royalties: 5% to 8%
  • Operating expense: $4.50/BOE to $5.00/BOE
  • Transportation expense: $7.00/BOE to $7.50/BOE
  • Interest expense: $1.85/BOE to $2.00/BOE
  • G&A expense: $0.65/BOE to $0.75/BOE

2018 Budget Assumptions

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

UPSIDE POTENTIAL – UPPER MONTNEY EXTENSION AND SECONDARY TARGETS

For illustrative purposes, not to scale.

Gross Acres Net Acres Gross Sections Net Sections Average WI

158,880 120,048 248 188 76% 164,480 120,535 257 188 73% 173,920 140,715 272 220 81% 167,200 133,610 261 209 80% 171,840 142,943 269 223 83% 170,880 142,343 267 222 83% 170,880 142,343 267 222 83% 179,156 158,573 280 248 89% 179,156 158,573 280 248 89% 424,916 406,791 664 636 96% 425,236 407,431 664 637 96% 501,716 481,351 784 752 96%

Upper Lower

Duvernay 264,916 257,023 414 402 97% 566,036 5,290,954 884 828 94%

(1) Totals are not additive due to overlapping rights. *Commingling Potential

505,318 824 790 96%

TOTAL ACREAGE(1)

Cadomin* Nikanassin Nordegg Charlie Lake* Montney 527,476 2WS Dunvegan* Cadotte* Falher* Wilrich Gething* 7G ACREAGE HELD BY ZONE (March 31, 2018)

Zone

Cardium 1WS

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL INFORMATION

1) Starting in 2018, Seven Generations began presenting C5+ in the NGL mix as a condensate volume (previously reported as an NGL volume). 2017 and 2016 liquids and natural gas sales have been adjusted to confirm to this current period presentation 2) Figures in the table above are presented net of the cost of condensate and natural gas that was purchased and re-sold in respect of the Company's transportation commitment optimization activities. Refer to the Company's Q1 2018 MD&A as filed on SEDAR for additional information. 3) Figure is a non IFRS financial measure. Refer to the Company's Q1 2018 MD&A as filed on SEDAR for additional information. 4) Certain prior period figures have been re-classified to conform with current period presentation.

VII - Recent Quarterly Results OPERATING RESULTS Q1 2018 Q4 2017 Q3 2017 Q2 2017 Q1 2017 Q4 2016 Q3 2016 Q2 2016 Q1 2016 YE 2017 YE 2016 Average daily production (1) Condensate (mbbl/d) 67.3 70.0 64.5 59.0 51.6 47.2 50.6 42.5 31.0 61.3 42.9 Natural gas (MMcf/d) 473.3 493.4 453.2 409.6 384.5 334.0 314.0 290.0 225.0 435.5 291.0 NGLs (mbbl/d) 41.5 45.1 43.9 38.0 37.4 29.4 29.7 26.5 20.0 41.1 26.4 Total (mboe/d) 187.7 197.3 183.9 165.2 153.1 132.3 132.6 117.4 88.5 175.0 117.8 CGR Ratio 142 142 142 144 134 141 161 147 138 141 147 LGR Ratio 88 91 97 93 97 88 95 91 89 94 91 Realized Prices Condensate ($/bbl) 73.40 67.95 54.62 58.33 63.84 57.03 49.31 53.65 39.56 61.26 50.25 Natural gas ($/Mcf) 4.11 3.75 3.46 4.09 4.36 4.15 3.92 2.62 3.24 3.88 3.53 NGLs ($/bbl) 13.33 18.30 15.17 11.42 12.45 12.81 6.84 4.48 5.61 14.56 8.53 39.63 37.65 31.30 33.60 35.52 33.67 29.64 26.91 23.34 34.56 28.92 FINANCIAL RESULTS Condensate ($MM) 444.5 437.3 324.1 313.2 296.5 247.8 229.7 200.3 110.2 1,371.1 788.0 Natural gas ($MM) 175.2 170.1 144.1 152.4 150.8 127.3 113.3 69.0 66.6 617.4 376.2 NGLs ($MM) 49.8 75.9 61.3 39.5 42.1 34.7 18.7 18.1 11.2 218.8 82.7 Liquids and natural gas sales (1)(2) ($MM) 669.5 683.3 529.5 505.1 489.4 409.8 361.7 287.4 188.0 2,207.3 1,246.9 Royalties ($MM) (18.9) (21.5) (14.5) (9.3) (16.8) (11.9) (0.4) 18.6 (13.0) (62.1) (6.7) Operating expense ($MM) (96.8) (103.3) (91.8) (93.9) (68.8) (59.1) (47.0) (44.8) (31.0) (357.8) (181.9) Transportation, processing and other expense ($MM) (119.2) (114.4) (102.7) (82.3) (72.0) (72.0) (74.7) (56.2) (35.7) (371.4) (238.6) Netback prior to hedging ($MM) 434.6 444.1 320.5 319.6 331.8 266.8 239.6 205.0 108.4 1,416.0 819.8 Realized hedging gain (loss) ($MM) (13.1) 6.9 14.2 1.8 (7.2) 5.8 19.2 29.5 36.3 15.7 90.8 Netback after hedging ($MM) 421.5 451.0 334.7 321.4 324.6 272.6 258.8 234.5 144.7 1,431.7 910.6 General and administrative expense ($MM) (10.9) (11.8) (11.0) (12.3) (10.9) (10.8) (7.3) (10.0) (8.0) (46.0) (36.1) Finance expense and other ($MM) (29.8) (35.4) (39.4) (41.0) (41.6) (42.1) (39.4) (26.9) (26.1) (157.4) (134.5) Funds from operations (3) ($MM) 380.8 403.8 284.3 268.1 272.1 219.7 212.1 197.6 110.6 1,228.3 740.0 Netbacks Oil and natural gas revenue ($/boe) 39.63 37.65 31.30 33.60 35.52 33.67 29.64 26.91 23.34 34.56 28.92 Royalties ($/boe) (1.12) (1.18) (0.86) (0.62) (1.22) (0.98) (0.04) 1.74 (1.61) (0.97) (0.16) Operating expense ($/boe) (5.73) (5.69) (5.43) (6.24) (4.99) (4.86) (3.85) (4.20) (3.85) (5.60) (4.22) Transportation, processing and other expense ($/boe) (7.06) (6.30) (6.07) (5.47) (5.22) (5.92) (6.12) (5.26) (4.43) (5.81) (5.53) Operating netback prior to hedging ($/boe) 25.72 24.48 18.94 21.27 24.09 21.91 19.63 19.19 13.45 22.18 19.01 Realized hedging gain (loss) ($/boe) (0.78) 0.38 0.84 0.12 (0.52) 0.48 1.58 2.77 4.50 0.25 2.11 Operating netback (3) ($/boe) 24.94 24.86 19.78 21.39 23.57 22.39 21.21 21.96 17.95 22.43 21.12 General and administrative expense ($/boe) (0.65) (0.65) (0.65) (0.82) (0.79) (0.98) (0.60) (0.94) (0.99) (0.72) (0.84) Finance expense and other ($/boe) (1.75) (1.96) (2.33) (2.74) (3.03) (3.36) (3.23) (2.52) (3.23) (2.48) (3.12) Funds flow netback ($/boe) 22.54 22.25 16.80 17.83 19.75 18.05 17.38 18.50 13.73 19.23 17.16 Capital investments Drilling and completions ($MM) 319.6 167.4 252.8 342.3 259.4 186.7 133.4 125.0 152.6 1,021.9 597.7 Facilities and infrastructure ($MM) 207.0 115.0 176.5 153.9 85.2 78.5 62.6 88.1 107.9 530.6 337.1 Land and other ($MM) 56.0 39.9 25.0 16.3 17.7 18.6 11.7 6.2 6.7 98.9 43.2 Total capital investments(4) ($MM) 582.6 322.3 454.3 512.5 362.3 283.8 207.7 219.3 267.2 1,651.4 978.0

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

WELL RESULTS WITHIN THE NEST

  • Rates are raw gas and condensate field estimates as of April 1st, 2018 and are not normalized for lateral length
  • Producing days only include days that wells had non-zero natural gas or condensate production
  • Rates reflect historical results of wells completed by 7G and excludes wells acquired as part of the significant acquisition that was completed in 2016

Nest 2 Gas C5+ Total C5 +Yield Wells

Mcf/d bbls/d boe/d bbl/MMcf (#)

IP30 4,561 1,056 1,816 232 267 IP90 4,497 861 1,611 192 244 IP180 4,076 685 1,364 168 231 IP270 3,731 558 1,180 150 203 IP365 3,369 484 1,045 144 173 Nest 1 Gas C5+ Total C5 +Yield Wells

Mcf/d bbls/d boe/d bbl/MMcf (#)

IP30 1,977 757 1,086 383 20 IP90 2,041 546 886 267 19 IP180 2,177 397 760 182 15 IP270 2,038 339 678 166 15 IP365 1,917 296 616 155 15

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

INVENTORY OF NEST 1, NEST 2 & NEST 3 MONTNEY WELLS

Total Nest Drilling Phase Completion Phase Tie-in Phase In Progress Well Inventory Producing Wells Wells down due to Concurrent Ops July 1, 2017 24 49 73 238 19 October 1, 2017 17 35 52 273 22 January 1, 2018 17 31 48 296 April 1, 2018 31 35 66 337 16 *Well activity shown includes only Upper/Middle Montney wells in the Nest Area. **2 producing wells previously classified as Non-Nest classified as Nest 3. Nest 1 Drilling Phase Completion Phase Tie-in Phase In Progress Well Inventory Producing Wells Wells down due to Concurrent Ops July 1, 2017 1 1 2 18 October 1, 2017 5 2 7 19 January 1, 2018 7 7 19 April 1, 2018 1 2 3 24 Nest 2 Drilling Phase Completion Phase Tie-in Phase In Progress Well Inventory Producing Wells Wells down due to Concurrent Ops July 1, 2017 23 48 71 220 19 October 1, 2017 12 33 45 254 22 January 1, 2018 17 24 41 275 April 1, 2018 28 33 61 311 16 Nest 3** Drilling Phase Completion Phase Tie-in Phase In Progress Well Inventory Producing Wells Wells down due to Concurrent Ops January 1, 2018 2 April 1, 2018 2 2 2

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

INFRASTRUCTURE SUMMARY

Integrated processing, gathering and distribution infrastructure across entire land base

Natural Gas Processing:

  • 760 MMcf/d capacity
  • 510 MMcf/d owned &
  • perated
  • Access to 3rd party capacity
  • f up to 250 MMcf/d
  • Building an additional 250

MMcf/d at Gold Creek

Condensate Stabilization:

  • 80 mbbl/d capacity
  • 60 mbbl/d owned & operated
  • Access 3rd party capacity of

up to 20 mbbl/d

Infrastructure Footprint

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

SUPER PADS: LIFT, EFFICIENCY, REDUNDANCY

GAS & C5+ (2-phase) Artificial gas lift line Condensate stabilizer Central gas plant Gas sales Liquids sales (single phase transmission of high pressure rich gas) (NGL’s) (single phase transmission of condensate)

Super Pad Schematic

7G’s 16-21 Super Pad

  • Innovative field-distributed pads
  • Efficient gathering of single-phase

products in segregated systems

  • Benefits:
  • High pressure gas for artificial lift
  • Low flowing wellhead pressures
  • Majority of pads have dehydration

capacity and H2S chemical treatment

  • Setup for future connection to water

pipeline infrastructure and disposal

  • Modular and scalable for resource

development

  • 12 super pads operating with a combined

capacity of approximately 800MMcf/d

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

SWEET SPOT OF THE MONTNEY

Sources: Canadian Discovery Ltd. & Graham Davies Geological Consultants Ltd. (2008, 2011), & Steven Burnie (2011), BC Ministry of Energy & Mines, Alberta Geological Survey (modified by RBC & 7G) Lands as of 4/30/17

Thickness→ Large Resources in Place Over Pressured→ High Productivity Brittle Rock→ High Recovery Factor Lower Temperature→ High Liquids Content

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS Low GHGs

0.0126 carbon intensity(1)

GP Hospital

$1.7 million raised

Safety first

0.64 TRIF in 2017

  • Building a culture of safety
  • Total Recordable Incident

Frequency up 14%

  • Lost-Time Incident

Frequency down 40%

  • Among lowest carbon

intensity of Canadian producers

  • Independent verification:

Leak Detection and Repair Program “clearly working” to reduce methane emissions, says Stanford researcher.

  • 7G’s annual golf

tournament raised $1.7 million for the GP Regional Hospital Foundation in its first five years

Safety Environment Community

(1) Based upon 2016 data. Represents estimated metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per barrel of oil equivalent of production. For additional information regarding the company’s estimated carbon intensity, please refer to “Note Regarding Industry Metrics” in the “Important Notice” at the end of this presentation.

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

IMPORTANT NOTICE

General Advisory The information contained in this presentation does not purport to be all- inclusive or contain all information that readers may require. Prospective investors are encouraged to conduct their own analysis and review of Seven Generations Energy Ltd. (“Seven Generations”, “7G”, “VII”, the “company” or the “Company”) and of the information contained in this presentation. Without limitation, prospective investors should read the entire record of publicly filed documents relating to the Company, consider the advice of their financial, legal, accounting, tax and other professional advisors and such other factors they consider appropriate in investigating and analyzing the Company. An investor should rely only on the information provided by the Company and is not entitled to rely on parts of that information to the exclusion of others. The Company has not authorized anyone to provide investors with additional or different information, and any such information, including statements in media articles about Seven Generations, should not be relied upon. In this presentation, unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars, and per share amounts are presented on a diluted basis. An investment in the securities of Seven Generations is speculative and involves a high degree of risk that should be considered by potential investors. Seven Generations’ business is subject to the risks normally encountered in the oil and gas industry and, more specifically, the shale and tight liquids-rich natural gas sector of the oil and natural gas industry, and certain other risks that are associated with Seven Generations’ stage of development. An investment in the Company’s securities is suitable only for those purchasers who are willing to risk a loss of some or all of their investment and who can afford to lose some or all of their investment. Non-IFRS Measures Advisory In addition to using financial measures prescribed by International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), references are made in this presentation to “available funding”, “adjusted working capital”, “operating netback” (also referred to herein as “netback”), “funds from operations” (also referred to herein as “funds flow”), “net debt”, “adjusted EBITDA”, “return on capital employed” (or “ROCE”), “Factset EBITDA” and “cash return on invested capital” (or “CROIC”), which are measures that do not have any standardized meaning as prescribed by IFRS. Accordingly, the Company’s use of such terms may not be comparable to similarly defined measures presented by

  • ther entities and comparisons should not be made between such measures

provided by the Company and by other companies without also taking into account any differences in the way that the calculations were prepared. For further details about “available funding”, “adjusted working capital”, “operating netback” (also referred to herein as “netback”), “funds from operations” (also referred to herein as “funds flow”), “net debt”, “adjusted EBITDA”, “return on capital employed” (or ROCE), and reconciliations between those measures and the most directly comparable measures under IFRS for the most recently completed quarter, see “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” in the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis dated May 2, 2018 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, which is available on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com. “FactSet EBITDA” is calculated by a third party and differs from adjusted EBITDA primarily through the exclusion of realized hedging gains and losses. “Cash return on invested capital” (or “CROIC”) is FactSet EBITDA divided by the average unamortized cost of developed and producing oil and natural gas assets and is a performance measure of a company’s ability to generate returns on capital investments. The 2017 CROIC of 19% reflects FactSet EBITDA of $1,341.5 million divided by the average cost of oil and natural gas assets of $7,213.5 million. The 2016 CROIC of 15% reflects FactSet EBITDA

  • f $757.9 million divided by the average cost of oil and natural gas assets of

$5,104.6 million. The 2015 CROIC of 12% reflects FactSet EBITDA of $334.2 million divided by the average cost of oil and natural gas assets of $2,769.9 million. Forward-Looking Information Advisory This presentation contains certain forward-looking information and statements that involve various risks, uncertainties and other factors. The use of any of the words “anticipate”, “continue”, “estimate”, “expect”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “believe”, “plans”, “outlook”, “forecast” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking information or statements. This presentation contains certain forward-looking information and statements that involve various risks, uncertainties and other factors. The use of any of the words "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "expect", "may", "will", "should", "believe", "plans", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking information or

  • statements. In particular, but without limiting the foregoing, this presentation

contains forward-looking information and statements pertaining to the following: the Company’s strategies, objectives and competitive strengths; the Company’s development plans; the Company’s goal of having a balanced budget in 2019; plans to grow cash flow with improved execution and market access; planned production, including production per share, production growth and production guidance; targeted ROCE of 10%-15%; expectation that compensation will be tied to corporate returns; the maintenance of a strong balance sheet; targeted debt to funds flow ratio of below 2.0 times; expected long-term value creation; profitable future growth expected; forecasted future revenues and future funds from operations; anticipated liquids yields; future capital investments and allocation of capital; the number of wells to be drilled, completed and brought on production; expected well costs; forecasted NPVs and IRRs; estimated future costs, supply costs, break-even prices, cost reductions and cost performance; transportation and processing capacity, including third party gas processing and condensate stabilization capacity; expectation that the pace of growth will be dictated by the Company’s balance sheet and funds flow; expectation that strategic investments in growth and infrastructure will enhance the value of the Company’s Montney asset base; expectation that funds flow will surpass capital investments by 2020; processing capacity expected from the Gold Creek gas plant that is currently under construction; type-curve estimates; forecast revenue by product type; the estimated number of drilling locations or drilling opportunities; the expectation that the Company has decades of Montney drilling opportunities; expectation that consistent execution of the Company’s risk management program will lock in returns; forecasted royalties costs, operating costs, transportation costs, interest expenses and G&A expenses; commingling potential from secondary targets; planned water pipeline and disposal infrastructure; and pressure and temperature estimates within the Montney

  • formation. In addition, information and statements in this presentation relating

to reserves and resources and the estimated net present value of future cash flows to be generated from reserves are deemed to be forward-looking statements as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the reserves and resources described exist in the quantities predicted or estimated, and that the they can be profitably produced in the future. With respect to forward-looking information contained in this presentation, assumptions have been made regarding, among other things: future oil, NGLs and natural gas prices being consistent with current commodity price forecasts after factoring in quality adjustments at the company’s points of sale; the company’s continued ability to obtain qualified staff and equipment in a timely and cost-efficient manner; third party transportation and processing facilities will be operated in an efficient and reliable manner; drilling and completions techniques and infrastructure and facility design concepts that have been successfully applied by the Company elsewhere in its Kakwa River Project may be successfully applied to other properties within the Kakwa River Project; that wells drilled in the same fashion in the same formations in proximity to the type-wells that were used in 7G’s type-curve forecasts will deliver similar production results, including liquids yields; the geology and reservoir quality being relatively consistent within each of the Company’s separate asset areas; well results from future wells to be drilled in the Company’s asset areas being similar to wells that have been drilled in those areas to date, as well as the type-curve estimates for those areas; the consistency of the current regulatory regime and legal framework, including the laws and regulations governing the company’s oil and gas operations, royalties, taxes and environmental matters in the jurisdictions in which the Company conducts its business and any other jurisdictions in which the Company may conduct its business in the future; the company’s ability to market production of oil, NGLs and natural gas successfully to customers; that the company’s future production levels, amount of future investment, costs, royalties, unabsorbed demand charges, facilities downtime and development timing will be consistent with the company’s current development plans and budget; the applicability of new technologies for recovery and production of the company’s reserves and resources may improve capital and operational efficiencies in the future; the recoverability of the company’s reserves and resources; sustained future capital investment by the company; future cash flows from production; the Company’s future sources

  • f

funding; the Company’s future debt levels; geological and engineering estimates in respect

  • f the Company’s reserves and resources; the geography of the areas in

which the Company is conducting exploration and development activities, and the access, economic, regulatory and physical limitations to which the Company may be subject from time to time; the impact of competition on the Company; and the Company’s ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms. Assumptions made in the calculation of forecasted half-cycle and full-cycle economics, including forecasted NPVs, IRRs, price sensitivities, commodity prices and recovery factors are provided in footnotes proximate to those

  • disclosures. Assumptions made in connection with the Company’s budget and

related forecasts are provided in footnotes proximate to those disclosures and

  • n slide 19.

An assumption has also been made that further well delineation activities will confirm management’s estimates regarding reservoir quality of its properties that fall outside of the Company’s core development areas. With respect to the estimated number of drilling locations or potential drilling opportunities that are referenced herein, various assumptions have been made. These assumptions are described under the heading “Note Regarding Potential Drilling Opportunities” below. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking information as a result of the risks and risk factors that are set forth in the Company’s Annual Information Form dated March 13, 2018 (the “AIF”), which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, including, but not limited to: volatility in market prices and demand for oil, NGLs and natural gas, and hedging activities related thereto; general economic, business and industry conditions; variance of the Company’s actual capital costs, operating costs and economic returns from those anticipated; the ability to find, develop or acquire additional reserves and the availability of the capital or financing necessary to do so on satisfactory terms;

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

IMPORTANT NOTICE

risks related to the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas reserves and resources; negative public perception

  • f
  • il

sands development, oil and natural gas development and transportation, hydraulic fracturing and fossil fuels; actions by governmental authorities; changes in laws or regulations, including those pertaining to royalties or taxation; the rescission, or amendment to the conditions of, groundwater licenses of the Company; management of the Company’s growth; the ability to successfully identify and make attractive acquisitions, joint ventures or investments, or successfully integrate future acquisitions or businesses; the availability, cost or shortage of rigs, equipment, raw materials, supplies or qualified personnel; adoption or modification of climate change legislation by governments; the absence or loss of key employees; uncertainty associated with estimates of

  • il, NGLs and natural gas reserves and resources and the variance of such

estimates from actual future production; dependence upon processing facilities, compressors, gathering lines, pipelines and other facilities, certain of which the Company does not control; the ability to satisfy obligations under the Company’s firm commitment transportation arrangements; the uncertainties related to the Company’s identified drilling locations; the high- risk nature of successfully stimulating well productivity and drilling for and producing oil, NGLs and natural gas; operating hazards and uninsured risks; risk of fires, floods and natural disasters; the possibility that the Company’s drilling activities may encounter sour gas; execution risks associated with the Company’s business plan; failure to acquire or develop replacement reserves; the concentration of the Company’s assets in the Kakwa River Project area; unforeseen title defects; aboriginal claims; failure to accurately estimate abandonment and reclamation costs; development and exploratory drilling efforts and well operations may not be profitable or achieve the targeted return; horizontal drilling and completion technique risks and failure of drilling results to meet expectations for reserves or production; limited intellectual property protection for operating practices and dependence on employees and contractors; third-party claims regarding the Company’s right to use technology and equipment; expiry of certain leases for the undeveloped leasehold acreage in the near future; failure to realize the anticipated benefits

  • f acquisitions or dispositions; failure of properties acquired now or in the

future to produce as projected and inability to determine reserve and resource potential, identify liabilities associated with acquired properties or obtain protection from sellers against such liabilities; changes in the application, interpretation and enforcement of applicable laws and regulations; restrictions

  • n drilling intended to protect certain species of wildlife; potential conflicts of

interests; actual results differing materially from management estimates and assumptions; seasonality of the Company’s activities and the Canadian oil and gas industry; alternatives to and changing demand for petroleum products; extensive competition in the Company’s industry; changes in the Company’s credit ratings; dependence upon a limited number of customers; lower oil, NGLs and natural gas prices and higher costs; failure of seismic data used by the Company to accurately identify the presence of oil and natural gas; risks relating to commodity price hedging instruments; terrorist attacks or armed conflict; cyber security risks, loss of information and computer systems; inability to dispose of non-strategic assets on attractive terms; security deposits required under provincial liability management programs; reassessment by taxing authorities of the Company’s prior transactions and filings; variations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates; third-party credit risk including risk associated with counterparties in risk management activities related to commodity prices and foreign exchange rates; sufficiency of insurance policies; potential litigation; variation in future calculations of non- IFRS measures; sufficiency of internal controls; breach of agreements by counterparties and potential enforceability issues in contracts; impact of expansion into new activities on risk exposure; inability of the Company to respond quickly to competitive pressures; and the risks related to the common shares that are publicly traded and the Company’s senior notes and other indebtedness, including the potential inability to comply with the covenants in the credit agreement related to the Company’s credit facilities and/or the covenants in the indentures in respect of the Company’s senior unsecured notes. Financial outlook and future-oriented financial information contained in this presentation regarding prospective financial performance, financial position, cash flows or well economics is based on assumptions about future events, including economic conditions and proposed courses of action, based on management’s assessment of the relevant information that is currently

  • available. Projected operational information also contains forward-looking

information and is based on a number of material assumptions and factors, as are set out herein. Such projections may also be considered to contain future

  • riented financial information or a financial outlook. The actual results of the

Company’s operations for any period will likely vary from the amounts set forth in these projections, and such variations may be material. Actual results will vary from projected results. Financial outlook and future-oriented financial information has been included in this presentation to inform readers of the estimated implications of the capital investments planned by the company. Readers are cautioned that any such financial outlook and future-oriented financial information contained herein should not be used for purposes other than those for which it is disclosed herein. The forward-looking statements included in this presentation are expressly qualified by the foregoing cautionary statements and are made as of the date

  • f this presentation. The Company does not undertake any obligation to

publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements except as required by applicable securities laws. No assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct and such forward-looking statements included in this presentation should not be unduly relied upon. Certain information contained herein has been prepared by third-party sources (and is identified as such) and has not been independently audited or verified by the Company. Presentation of Oil and Gas Information Estimates of the Company’s reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources and the net present value of future net revenue attributable to the Company’s reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources are based upon the reports prepared by McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd. (“McDaniel”), the Company’s independent qualified reserves evaluator, as at the effective dates that are specified in this presentation. The estimates of reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources provided in this presentation are estimates only and there is no guarantee that the estimated reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources will be recovered. Actual reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources may be greater than or less than the estimates provided in this in this presentation and the differences may be material. Estimates of net present value of future net revenue attributable to the Company’s reserves do not represent fair market value and there is uncertainty that the net present value of future net revenue will be realized. There is no assurance that the forecast price and cost assumptions applied by McDaniel in evaluating Seven Generations’ reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources will be attained and variances could be material. There is no certainty that any portion of the prospective resources will be discovered. If discovered, there is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the prospective resources. There is also uncertainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any part

  • f

the contingent resources. This presentation includes estimates

  • f

contingent resources and prospective resources, as at December 31, 2017, that have been risked by McDaniel for the probability of loss or failure in accordance with the COGE Handbook. For contingent resources, the risk component relating to the likelihood that an accumulation will be commercially developed is referred to as the chance of development. Contingent resources in the “development pending” project maturity subclass have been assigned by McDaniel, as at December 31, 2017, in the upper and middle intervals of the Montney formation in certain parts of the Nest 1, Nest 2, Nest 3, Rich Gas and Wapiti areas. The COGE Handbook indicates that it is appropriate to categorize contingent resources in the development pending project maturity subclass where resolution of the final conditions for development are being actively pursued and there is a high chance of development. Contingent resources in the “development unclarified” project maturity subclass have been assigned by McDaniel, as at December 31, 2017, in the lower interval of the Montney formation in the northwest corner of the Wapiti area. The COGE Handbook indicates that it is appropriate to categorize contingent resources in the development unclarified project maturity subclass when the evaluation is incomplete and there is ongoing activity to resolve any risks or uncertainties. These resource estimates are not classified as reserves at this time, pending further reservoir delineation, project application, facility and reservoir design

  • work. There is uncertainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any

portion of the contingent resources. Prospective resources have both an associated chance of discovery and a chance of development. Not all exploration projects will result in discoveries. The chance that an exploration project will result in the discovery of petroleum is referred to as the chance of discovery. For an undiscovered accumulation, the chance of commerciality is the product of two risk components - the chance

  • f

discovery and the chance

  • f

development. McDaniel has subclassified the prospective resources that were evaluated, as at December 31, 2017 by maturity status, consistent with the requirements of the COGE

  • Handbook. The prospective resources associated with the upper and middle

intervals of the Montney formation in the Deep Southwest and Wapiti areas of the Project have been sub-classified as “prospect” by McDaniel, which the COGE Handbook defines as a potential accumulation within a play that is sufficiently well defined to present a viable drilling target. The prospective resources associated with the lower interval of the Montney formation across the Project area (with the exception of lower Montney properties in the Wapiti area that have been attributed development unclarified contingent resources by McDaniel) have been sub-classified as “lead” by McDaniel, which the COGE Handbook defines as a potential accumulation within a play that requires more data acquisition and/or evaluation in order to be classified as a prospect. The evaluation of the risks and the risking process relevant to the contingent resources and prospective resources estimates that are contained herein are described in the AIF, which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. The reserves and resources estimates contained in this presentation should be reviewed in connection with the AIF and the annual information forms for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, which contain important additional information regarding the independent reserve, contingent resource and prospective resource evaluations that were conducted by McDaniel and a description of, and important information about, the reserves and resources terms used in this

  • presentation. Each of the referenced annual information forms are available
  • n the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com.

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

IMPORTANT NOTICE

Note Regarding Industry Metrics This presentation includes certain industry metrics, including barrels of oil equivalent (“boes”), finding and development (“F&D”) costs, finding, development and acquisition (“FD&A”) costs, operating netbacks, recycle ratios and carbon intensity, which do not have standardized meanings or standard methods of calculation and therefore such measures may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies and should not be used to make comparisons. Such metrics have been included herein to provide readers with additional information to evaluate the Company’s performance; however, such measures are not reliable indicators of the future performance of the Company and future performance may not compare to the performance in previous periods and therefore such metrics should not be relied upon. Unless otherwise specified, all production is reported on the basis of the company’s working interest (operating and non-operating) before the deduction of royalties payable. Seven Generations has adopted the standard

  • f 6 Mcf:1 bbl when converting natural gas to oil equivalent. Condensate and
  • ther NGLs are converted to oil equivalent at a ratio of 1 bbl:1 bbl. Boes may

be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf:1 bbl is based roughly on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at 7G’s sales points. Given the value ratio based on the current price of oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl, utilizing a conversion ratio at 6 Mcf: 1 bbl may be misleading as an indication of value. Mcfe amounts have been calculated using the conversion ratio of 1 bbl: 6 Mcf when converting oil and condensate to natural gas equivalent. Mcfe amounts may be misleading particularly if used in isolation. A Mcfe conversion ratio of 1 bbl: 6 Mcf is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the

  • wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of oil as

compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency

  • f 1 bbl: 6 Mcf, utilizing a conversion ratio of 1 bbl: 6 Mcf may be misleading

as an indication of value. Recycle ratios are calculated as operating netback divided by F&D or FD&A costs per boe. For the purposes of calculating recycle ratios, operating netback was calculated on a per boe basis and was determined by deducting royalties,

  • perating and transportation and processing fees.

FD&A costs are calculated as the sum of exploration and development capital, plus acquisition capital, plus changes in future development costs for the given year, divided by total reserve additions for that year, based upon the independent reserves evaluations that were conducted by McDaniel. F&D costs are calculated as the sum of exploration and development costs, plus changes in future development costs (excluding future development capital associated with acquisitions and dispositions), divided by reserve additions (excluding reserves added via acquisitions), based upon the independent reserves evaluations that were conducted by McDaniel. Both F&D costs and FD&A costs have been presented since acquisition and disposition activity can result in reserve replacement metrics that are not indicative of the long-term cost structure that is expected from the Company’s assets. The carbon intensity estimates for 7G that are provided herein were calculated by the Company with the assistance of third parties. 7G quantified and reported its greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions using what is referred to as the “operational control” approach. 7G’s deemed organizational boundary included its corporate offices and all natural gas extraction and processing facilities (including well pads). 7G elected to report its Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions and not to report its Scope 3 GHG emissions. For the purposes of 7G’s GHG emissions reporting:

  • Scope 1 emissions were defined as direct emissions from GHG sources that

7G owned or controlled (including, but not limited to, emissions from stationary equipment, mobile combustion, and process emissions and fugitive emissions);

  • Scope 2 emissions were defined as indirect GHG emissions that resulted

from 7G’s consumption of energy in the form of purchased electricity; and

  • Scope 3 emissions were defined as 7G’s indirect emissions other than those

covered in Scope 2, including from all sources not owned or controlled by 7G, but which occurred as a result of 7G’s activities. Notably, 7G’s drilling and completion activities in the relevant periods were conducted by third parties and, consequently, those activities were deemed to be Scope 3. 7G used third parties to help quantify its GHG emissions. For the 2015 and 2016 reporting years, Deloitte LLP was retained by 7G to evaluate GHG emissions from all major facilities located in Alberta (gas plants, gas gathering systems and batteries) in accordance with Alberta’s Specified Gas Emitters Regulation (“SGER”) reporting program, Alberta’s Specified Gas Reporting Regulation and Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Program. To conduct this quantification, emission calculation methods were taken from the approved reference sources listed in the SGER guidance publication titled “Technical Guidance for Completing Specified Gas Baseline Emission Intensity Applications”. Additional quantification of Scope 1 GHG emissions (e.g., vented emissions and fugitives) was conducted by DXD Consulting Inc. (“DXD”) using API 2009 guidance and emissions factors. Scope 2 emissions were quantified by DXD using utility statements for all purchased electricity (i.e., Calgary and Grande Prairie offices and the Lator 1 facilities). For the 2016 reporting year, third party verification of both the SGER (i.e., Scope 1 GHG emissions) report developed on behalf of 7G by Deloitte LLP and the Carbon Disclosure Project’s (“CDP”) Climate Change 2017 Questionnaire and CDP Oil and Gas Sector Module 2017 (i.e., Scope 1 and 2 GHG) reports developed by 7G was conducted by Brightspot Climate Inc. This verification was completed in accordance with the ISO 14064:3 standard. Note Regarding Type-Curves For each of the type-curves provided herein, wells with significant deviation in completions technique have been excluded from the respective type-curve samples to avoid outlier effects. Non-producing days were also removed from the producing time plotted in the type-curves. When type-curves are used for budgeting purposes, facility constraints, expected downtime for concurrent

  • perations, facility outages and gas processing shrink adjustment factors are

then accounted for, but those assumptions and adjustments are not reflected in the type-curves themselves. All data reflected in the type-curves has been normalized to stage count by adjusting the data in direct proportion to the actual number of stages applied in the wells that comprise the data set. All data reflected is raw wellhead data. Condensate rates have been adjusted downwards to account for assumed shrinkage due to entrainment of NGLs in the wellhead separator liquid, as directly measured. This correction is the result of an empirical equation based upon internal observations of sample

  • data. Raw gas has not been adjusted and includes significant NGLs in the gas

stream. The Nest 1, Nest 2 and Nest 3 type-curves that have been provided in this presentation, have been estimated using a combination of a statistical approaches to early-life production from 7G’s Nest 1, Nest 2 and Nest 3 wells, matched to volumetric estimates attributable to properties in the Company’s Nest 1, Nest 2 and Nest 3 areas, respectively, based upon the Company’s understanding of the geology and reservoir parameters at the time the type- curves were developed. Early-life statistics use data from the the Nest 1, Nest 2 and Nest 3 wells, adjusted for stage count and lateral length on a producing rate versus time basis, a cumulative volume versus time basis, and a producing rate versus cumulative volume basis, to ensure a reasonable fit. The Nest 1 type-curve provided herein is the same type-curve that was provided in the Prospectus. It is based upon production data from wells that were drilled in 2014 and prior years and reflects a 2,200 m lateral well length and a 28 stage, 120 tonnes of proppant per stage completion design, utilizing N2 foam as the fracturing fluid. 11 wells drilled in the upper and middle Montney formation provide the statistical basis for the Nest 1 type-curve. The Nest 2 type-curve provided herein was created in the fourth quarter of

  • 2016. It is based upon production data from wells that were drilled in 2016 and

prior years and reflects a 2,700 m lateral well length and a 28 stage, 160 tonnes of proppant per stage completion design, utilizing N2 Foam as the fracturing fluid. 77 wells drilled in the upper and middle Montney formation provide the statistical basis for the Nest 2 type-curve. The Nest 3 type-curve provided herein was created in the fourth quarter of

  • 2017. It is based upon production data from wells that were drilled in 2017 and

prior years and reflects a 2,500 m lateral well length and a 40 stage, 200 tonnes of proppant per stage completion design, utilizing slickwater as the fracturing fluid. 4 wells drilled in the upper and middle Montney formation provide the statistical basis for the Nest 3 type-curve. The Company’s oil, natural gas and NGL reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources, as at December 31, 2017, were evaluated by McDaniel in its reports dated March 13, 2017 (the “McDaniel Reports”). In the McDaniel Reports, McDaniel assigned proved plus probable reserves to approximately 53% of the Nest 1 sections evaluated; best estimate contingent resources to approximately 47% of the Nest 1 sections evaluated; proved plus probable reserves to approximately 88% of the Nest 2 sections evaluated; best estimate contingent resources to approximately 12% of the Nest 2 sections evaluated; proved plus probable reserves to approximately 54% of the Nest 3 sections evaluated; best estimate contingent resources to approximately 40% of the Nest 3 sections evaluated and best estimate prospective resources to approximately 5% of the Nest 3 sections evaluated. The type-curve estimates in respect of the Wapiti & Rich Gas areas utilized in connection with the information shown in this presentation, including the number of drilling locations in those areas, are almost identical to the type- curves used by McDaniel in the preparation of the McDaniel Reports. The Wapiti & Rich Gas type-curves use a combination of statistical approaches to early-life production from wells that were drilled by Seven Generations’ competitors, matched to volumetric estimates that are attributable to properties in the Company’s Wapiti area based on expected reservoir

  • parameters. Early-life statistics use data from the type-wells, adjusted for

stage count and lateral length on a producing rate versus time basis, a cumulative volume versus time basis, and a producing rate versus cumulative volume basis, to ensure a reasonable fit. These type-curve estimates were created in the fourth quarter of 2015. They are based upon production data from wells that were drilled in 2015 and prior years and reflect a 2,200 m lateral well length and a 20 stage, 100 tonnes of proppant per stage completion design, utilizing slickwater as the fracturing fluid. 13 wells drilled in the upper and middle Montney formation provide the statistical basis for the Wapiti and Rich Gas type-curves. Recoverable hydrocarbon calculations use forecasted EUR factors applied to volumetric estimates and decline curves are used to align early statistical results with the forecasted EURs. The EURs for each type-curve area were estimated by qualified reserves evaluators from Seven Generations based on estimated resources, the estimated number of wells to be drilled in each section, estimated lateral well length and estimated recovery factors. EURs do not have any standardized meaning and readers are cautioned that the estimated EURs may not be comparable to EUR estimates prepared by other companies. Actual EURs may vary significantly from the Company’s estimates.

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

IMPORTANT NOTICE

The Company has opted to utilize internal type-curve forecasts that have been prepared by qualified reserves evaluators from 7G in this presentation, rather than the type-curves prepared by McDaniel because the internally generated type-curves are what the Company has used to determine its production guidance, capital budget and development plans. Type-curves do not have any standardized preparation methodology or meaning and readers are cautioned that the type-curves and related information shown in this presentation may not be comparable to similar information that is presented by other companies. Actual results may vary significantly from the Company’s type-curves and the Company’s related forecasts and estimates. Note Regarding Potential Drilling Opportunities The references to drilling locations or potential drilling opportunities that are contained herein have been prepared by qualified reserves evaluators from Seven Generations as at the date hereof. These estimated locations refer to the Company’s estimated drilling inventory that has yet to be developed. Of the 500 potential drilling locations or drilling opportunities that are estimated to be contained within the company’s Nest 1 area, 50% were attributed proved plus probable reserves and 50% were attributed best estimate contingent resources in the McDaniel Reports. Of the 700 potential drilling locations or drilling opportunities that are estimated to be contained within in the company’s Nest 2 area, 83% were attributed proved plus probable reserves and 17% were attributed best estimate contingent resources in the McDaniel Reports. Of the 200 potential drilling locations or drilling opportunities that are estimated to be contained within in the company’s Nest 3 area, 54% were attributed proved plus probable reserves, 41% were attributed best estimate contingent resources and 5% were attributed best estimate prospective resources in the McDaniel Reports. Of the 900 potential drilling locations or drilling opportunities that are estimated to be contained within the company’s Wapiti & Rich Gas area, 5% were attributed proved plus probable reserves, 70% were attributed best estimate contingent resources and 25% were attributed best estimate prospective resources in the McDaniel Reports. None of the 120 potential drilling locations or drilling opportunities identified in the Wilrich & Falher formations that are described in this presentation have been attributed reserves, contingent resources or prospective resources in the McDaniel Reports. For the purposes

  • f

estimating potential drilling locations

  • r

drilling

  • pportunities, the company has assumed well spacing of 12 wells per section

and a lateral well lengths of 2,500 metres based upon industry practice and internal review. The anticipated well spacing and lateral well length is expected to change

  • ver

time as technology and the Company’s understanding of the reservoir changes. For the purposes of the estimates, the Company has assumed that natural gas production will be delivered into the Alliance Pipeline and that liquids will be extracted at 7G’s wholly-owned plants in Alberta and also at Aux Sable’s facilities near Chicago, Illinois. The estimated drilling locations or drilling opportunities that do not have reserves, contingent resources or prospective resources attributed to them in the McDaniel Reports are based upon internal estimates and the evaluation of applicable geologic, seismic, engineering and reserves information. There is no certainty that the company will drill any

  • f

the identified drilling

  • pportunities or drilling locations and there is no certainty that such locations

will result in additional reserves, resources or production. The drilling locations

  • n which the company will actually drill wells, including the number and timing

thereof will be dependent upon the availability

  • f

funding, regulatory approvals, seasonal restrictions, oil and natural gas prices, costs, actual drilling results, additional reservoir information that is obtained, and other

  • factors. While certain of the estimated undeveloped drilling locations have

been de-risked by drilling existing wells in relative close proximity to such locations, many of the locations are further away from existing wells where management has less information about the characteristics of the reservoir and therefore there is more uncertainty as to whether wells will be drilled in such locations, and if wells are drilled in such locations there is more uncertainty that such wells will result in additional oil and natural gas reserves, resources or production. Oil and Gas Definitions “best estimate” is a classification of estimated resources described in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook, which is considered to be the best estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is equally likely that the actual quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best

  • estimate. Resources in the best estimate case have a 50% probability that the

actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the estimate. “COGE Handbook” means the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook maintained by the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (Calgary Chapter), as amended from time to time. “contingent resources” are the quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but which are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more

  • contingencies. Contingencies are conditions that must be satisfied for a

portion of contingent resources to be classified as reserves that are: (a) specific to the project being evaluated; and (b) expected to be resolved within a reasonable timeframe. Contingencies may include factors such as economic, legal, environmental, political and regulatory matters or a lack of

  • markets. It is also appropriate to classify as contingent resources the

estimated discovered recoverable quantities associated with a project in the early evaluation stage. “developed producing reserves” are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from completion intervals open at the time of the estimate. These reserves may be currently producing or, if shut in, they must have previously been on production, and the date of resumption of production must be known with reasonable certainty. “developed reserves” are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from existing wells and installed facilities or, if facilities have not been installed, that would involve a low expenditure (for example, when compared to the cost of drilling a well) to put the reserves on production. The developed category may be subdivided into producing and non-producing. “development pending” is a sub-classification of contingent resources estimates based upon project maturity which is appropriate where resolution

  • f the final conditions for development is being actively pursued (high chance
  • f development).

“development unclarified” is a sub-classification of contingent resources estimates based upon project maturity which is appropriate when the evaluation is incomplete and there is ongoing activity to resolve any risks or uncertainties. “gross” means: (i) in relation to the Company’s interest in production, reserves, contingent resources or prospective resources, its “company gross” production, reserves, contingent resources or prospective resources, which are the Company’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share before deduction of royalties and without including any royalty interests of the Company; (ii) in relation to wells, the total number of wells in which a company has an interest; and (iii) in relation to properties, the total area of properties in which the Company has an interest. “lead” is a sub-classification of prospective resources estimates based upon project maturity which is appropriate where a potential accumulation is within a play requires more data acquisition and/or evaluation in order to be classified as a prospect. “liquids” refers to oil, condensate and other NGLs. “net” means: (i) in relation to the Company’s interest in production or reserves, the Company’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share after deduction of royalty obligations, plus the Company’s royalty interest in production or reserves; (ii) in relation to the Company’s interest in wells, the number of wells obtained by aggregating the Company’s working interest in each of its gross wells; and (iii) in relation to the Company’s interest in a property, the total area in which the Company has an interest multiplied by the working interest owned by the Company. “probable reserves” are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves. “prospect” is a sub-classification of prospective resources estimates based upon project maturity which is appropriate where a potential accumulation within a play is sufficiently well defined to present a viable drilling target. “prospective resources” means quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from undiscovered accumulations by application of future development projects. Prospective resources have both an associated chance of discovery and a chance of development. “proved reserves” are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves. “reserves” are estimated remaining quantities of oil and natural gas and related substances anticipated to be recoverable from known accumulations, as of a given date, based on: (i) analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical and engineering data; (ii) the use of established technology; and (iii) specified economic conditions, which are generally accepted as being reasonable. Reserves are classified according to the degree of certainty associated with the estimates. “risked” means adjusted for the probability of loss or failure in accordance with the COGE Handbook. References in this presentation to “proved plus probable reserves”, “proved developed producing reserves”, “contingent resources” and “prospective resources”, refer to gross proved plus probable reserves, gross proved developed producing reserves, gross best estimate contingent resources and gross best estimate prospective resources, respectively.

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AECO avg bbl or bbls B Boe or BOE Btu °C CAD or C$ or $ CAGR Capex CDN CGR CG CROIC C2 C3 C4 C5+ d DCET Deep Southwest E EBITDA EUR ft FX F&D FD&A GJ GTN H1 H2S HH or Hhub hz IP IP 30 IP 90 IP 180 IP270 IP 365 IRR km kpa LNG LGR LPG m Mbbl Mboe physical storage and trading hub for natural gas on the TransCanada Alberta transmission system average barrels or barrels billion barrels of oil equivalent British thermal units Degrees celsius Canadian dollars compound annual growth rate capital expenditures Canadian condensate/gas ratio citygate cash return on invested capital ethane propane butane pentanes plus day drill, complete and tie-in the “Deep Southwest” area that is shown in the map in this presentation expected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization estimated ultimate recovery feet foreign exchange rate finding and development finding, development and acquisition Gigajoule Gas Transmission Northwest LLC first half of the year hydrogen sulfide Henry Hub horizontal initial production initial production for the first 30 days initial production for the first 90 days initial production for the first 180 days initial production for the first 270 days initial production for the first 365 days internal rate of return kilometres kilopascals liquefied natural gas liquid to gas ratio liquefied petroleum gas metres thousand of barrels thousands of barrels of oil equivalent Mcf mcfe MM MMboe MMbtu MMcf

  • MNTN. Hz

mo Nest Nest 1 Nest 2 Nest 3 NGL NGPL NGTL NGX NPV NPV10 NYMEX OPEX OS PDP PP&E Prospectus psi Q1 or 1Q Q2 or 2Q Q3 or 3Q Q4 or 4Q Rich Gas ROCE ROY SEDAR sh Super Pad TCPL TRIF TSX US USD or US$ Wapiti WI WTI YE YoY YTD 1P 2P $MM or MM$ Δ thousand cubic feet thousand cubic feet equivalent million million barrels of oil equivalent million British thermal units million cubic feet Montney horizontal well month the Nest 1, Nest 2 and Nest 3 areas combined the “Nest 1” area that is shown in the map in this presentation the “Nest 2” area that is shown in the map in this presentation the “Nest 3” area that is shown in the map in this presentation natural gas liquids Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America pipeline system NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. pipeline system Natural Gas Exchange Inc. net present value net present value discounted at an annual 10% discount rate New York Mercantile Exchange

  • perating expense
  • utstanding

gross proved developed producing reserves property, plant and equipment supplemented PREP Prospectus filed by the Company on October 29, 2014 pounds per square inch first quarter of the year second quarter of the year third quarter of the year fourth quarter of the year the “Rich Gas” area that is shown in the map in this presentation return on capital employed rest of year System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval share decentralized processing plants that separate field condensate and natural gas TransCanada Pipelines Total Recordable Incident Frequency Toronto Stock Exchange United States United Stated dollars the “Wapiti” area that is shown in the map in this presentation working interest West Texas Intermediate year-end year-over-year year to date gross total proved reserves gross total proved plus probable reserves millions of dollars Change

32