convergence of spectral measures and eigenvalue rigidity
play

Convergence of spectral measures and eigenvalue rigidity Elizabeth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Convergence of spectral measures and eigenvalue rigidity Elizabeth Meckes Case Western Reserve University ICERM, March 1, 2018 Macroscopic scale: the empirical spectral measure Macroscopic scale: the empirical spectral measure Suppose that M


  1. Convergence of spectral measures and eigenvalue rigidity Elizabeth Meckes Case Western Reserve University ICERM, March 1, 2018

  2. Macroscopic scale: the empirical spectral measure

  3. Macroscopic scale: the empirical spectral measure Suppose that M is an n × n random matrix with eigenvalues λ 1 , . . . , λ n . The empirical spectral measure µ of M is the (random) measure n µ := 1 � δ λ k . n k = 1

  4. Macroscopic scale: the empirical spectral measure Suppose that M is an n × n random matrix with eigenvalues λ 1 , . . . , λ n . The empirical spectral measure µ of M is the (random) measure n µ := 1 � δ λ k . n k = 1

  5. ✶ Wigner’s Theorem

  6. Wigner’s Theorem For each n ∈ N , let { Y i } 1 ≤ i , { Z ij } 1 ≤ i < j be independent collections of i.i.d. random variables, with E Z 2 E Y 2 1 < ∞ . E Y 1 = E Z 12 = 0 12 = 1 Let M n be the symmetric random matrix with diagonal entries Y i and off-diagonal entries Z ij or Z ji . The empirical spectral measure µ n of 1 √ n M n is close, for large n , to the semi-circular law: 1 � 4 − x 2 ✶ | x |≤ 2 dx . 2 π

  7. ♣ Other examples

  8. ♣ Other examples The circular law (Ginibre): The empirical spectral measure of a large random matrix with i.i.d. Gaussian entries is approximately uniform on a disc.

  9. Other examples The circular law (Ginibre): The empirical spectral measure of a large random matrix with i.i.d. Gaussian entries is approximately uniform on a disc. The classical compact groups (Diaconis–Shahshahani): The empirical spectral measure of a uniform random matrix in O ( n ) , U ( n ) , S ♣ ( 2 n ) is approximately uniform on the unit circle when n is large.

  10. Other examples Truncations of random unitary matrices (Petz–Reffy): Let U m be the upper-left m × m block of a uniform random matrix in U ( n ) , and let α = m n .

  11. Other examples Truncations of random unitary matrices (Petz–Reffy): Let U m be the upper-left m × m block of a uniform random matrix in U ( n ) , and let α = m n . For large n , the empirical spectral measure of U m is close to the measure with density 0 < | z | < √ α ; � 2 ( 1 − α ) α ( 1 −| z | 2 ) 2 , f α ( z ) = 0 , otherwise .

  12. Other examples Truncations of random unitary matrices (Petz–Reffy): Let U m be the upper-left m × m block of a uniform random matrix in U ( n ) , and let α = m n . For large n , the empirical spectral measure of U m is close to the measure with density 0 < | z | < √ α ; � 2 ( 1 − α ) α ( 1 −| z | 2 ) 2 , f α ( z ) = 0 , otherwise . α = 4 α = 2 5 5 Figures from “Truncations of random unitary matrices”, ˙ Zyczkowski–Sommers, J. Phys. A, 2000

  13. Other examples Brownian motion on U ( n ) (Biane): Let { U t } t ≥ 0 be a Brownian motion on U ( n ) ; i.e., a solution to dU t = U t dW t − 1 2 U t dt , with U 0 = I and W t a standard B.M. on u ( n ) . There is a deterministic family of measures { ν t } t ≥ 0 on the unit circle such that the spectral measure of U t converges weakly almost surely to ν t .

  14. Other examples Brownian motion on U ( n ) :

  15. Levels of randomness

  16. Levels of randomness Let µ n be the (random) spectral measure of an n × n random matrix, and let ν be some deterministic measure which supposedly approximates µ n .

  17. Levels of randomness Let µ n be the (random) spectral measure of an n × n random matrix, and let ν be some deterministic measure which supposedly approximates µ n . The annealed case: The ensemble-averaged spectral measure is E µ n : � � fd ( E µ n ) := E fd µ n .

  18. Levels of randomness Let µ n be the (random) spectral measure of an n × n random matrix, and let ν be some deterministic measure which supposedly approximates µ n . The annealed case: The ensemble-averaged spectral measure is E µ n : � � fd ( E µ n ) := E fd µ n . One may prove that E µ n ⇒ ν , possibly via explicit bounds on d ( E µ n , ν ) in some metric d ( · , · ) .

  19. Levels of randomness The quenched case:

  20. Levels of randomness The quenched case: ◮ Convergence weakly in probability or weakly almost surely: for any bounded continuous test function f , � � � � a . s . P fd µ n − → fd ν or fd µ n − − → fd ν.

  21. Levels of randomness The quenched case: ◮ Convergence weakly in probability or weakly almost surely: for any bounded continuous test function f , � � � � a . s . P fd µ n − → fd ν or fd µ n − − → fd ν. ◮ The random variable d ( µ n , ν ) : Look for ǫ n such that with high probability (or even probability 1), d ( µ n , ν ) < ǫ n .

  22. Microscopic scale: eigenvalue rigidity

  23. Microscopic scale: eigenvalue rigidity In many settings, eigenvalues concentrate strongly about “predicted locations”.

  24. Microscopic scale: eigenvalue rigidity In many settings, eigenvalues concentrate strongly about “predicted locations”. 1.0 0.5 - 1.0 - 0.5 0.5 1.0 - 0.5 - 1.0

  25. The eigenvalues of U m for m = 1 , 5 , 20 , 45 , 80, for U a realization of a random 80 × 80 unitary matrix.

  26. Theorem (E. M.–M. Meckes) Let 0 ≤ θ 1 < θ 2 < · · · < θ n < 2 π be the eigenvalue angles of U p , where U is a Haar random matrix in U ( n ) . For each j and t > 0 ,     t 2 �� � � � θ j − 2 π j � > 4 π    . � � N t ≤ 4 exp  − min , t P � � � � N N + 1 p log   p

  27. Concentration of empirical spectral measures 2-D Coulomb gases

  28. Concentration of empirical spectral measures 2-D Coulomb gases Coulomb transport inequality (Chafa¨ ı–Hardy–Ma¨ ıda): Consider the 2-D Coulomb gas model with Hamiltonian n � � H n ( z 1 , . . . , z n ) = − log | z j − z k | + n V ( z j ); j � = k j = 1 let µ V denote the equilibrium measure. There is a constant C V such that d BL ( µ, µ V ) 2 ≤ W 1 ( µ, µ V ) 2 ≤ C V [ E V ( µ ) − E V ( µ V )] , where E V is the modified energy functional � E V ( µ ) = E ( µ ) + Vd µ.

  29. Truncations of random unitary matrices Let U be distributed according to Haar measure in U ( n ) and let � n 1 ≤ m ≤ n . Let U m denote the top-left m × m block of m U . The eigenvalue density of U m is given by m 1 1 − m n | z j | 2 � n − m − 1 � � | z j − z k | 2 � d λ ( z 1 ) · · · d λ ( z n ) , ˜ c n , m 1 ≤ j < k ≤ m j = 1 which corresponds to a two-dimensional Coulomb gas with external potential  � − n − m − 1 1 − m n � n | z | 2 � log | z | < m ; .  m ˜ V n , m ( z ) = � n ∞ , | z | ≥ m . 

  30. Truncations of random unitary matrices Theorem (M.–Lockwood) Let µ m , n be the spectral measure of the top-left m × m block of � n m U, where U is a random n × n unitary matrix and 1 ≤ m ≤ n − 2 log ( n ) . Let α = m n , and let ν α have density 2 ( 1 − α ) � 0 < | z | < 1 ; ( 1 − α | z | 2 ) 2 , g α ( z ) = 0 , otherwise . then P [ d BL ( µ m , n , ν α ) > r ] ≤ e − C α m 2 r 2 + 2 m [ log ( m )+ C ′ α ] + e − cn , � � 1 where C α = min log ( α − 1 ) , 1 and � log ( 1 α ) , α → 0 ; C ′ α ∼ log ( 1 − α ) , α → 1 .

  31. Concentration of empirical spectral measures Ensembles with concentration properties

  32. Concentration of empirical spectral measures Ensembles with concentration properties If M is an n × n normal matrix with spectral measure µ M and f : C → R is 1-Lipschitz, it follows from the Hoffman-Wielandt inequality that � M �→ fd µ M 1 is a √ n -Lipschitz function of M .

  33. Concentration of empirical spectral measures Ensembles with concentration properties If M is an n × n normal matrix with spectral measure µ M and f : C → R is 1-Lipschitz, it follows from the Hoffman-Wielandt inequality that � M �→ fd µ M 1 is a √ n -Lipschitz function of M . ⇒ For any reference measure ν , = M �→ W 1 ( µ M , ν ) 1 is √ n -Lipschitz

  34. ♣ Concentration of empirical spectral measures Many random matrix ensembles satisfy the following concentration property: Let F : S ⊆ M N → R be 1-Lipschitz with respect to � · � H . S . . Then �� � ≤ Ce − cNt 2 . � > t � � F ( M ) − E F ( M ) P

  35. ♣ Concentration of empirical spectral measures Many random matrix ensembles satisfy the following concentration property: Let F : S ⊆ M N → R be 1-Lipschitz with respect to � · � H . S . . Then �� � ≤ Ce − cNt 2 . � > t � � F ( M ) − E F ( M ) P Some Examples:

  36. ♣ Concentration of empirical spectral measures Many random matrix ensembles satisfy the following concentration property: Let F : S ⊆ M N → R be 1-Lipschitz with respect to � · � H . S . . Then �� � ≤ Ce − cNt 2 . � > t � � F ( M ) − E F ( M ) P Some Examples: ◮ GUE; Wigner matrices in which the entries satisfy a c quadratic transportation cost inequality with constant N . √

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend