abstract 3 rigidity and bivariate splines
play

Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines Bill Jackson School of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines Bill Jackson School of Mathematical Sciences Queen Mary, University of London England Circle Packings and Geometric Rigidity ICERM July 6 - 10, 2020 Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate


  1. Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines Bill Jackson School of Mathematical Sciences Queen Mary, University of London England Circle Packings and Geometric Rigidity ICERM July 6 - 10, 2020 Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  2. Matroids A matroid M is a pair ( E , I ) where E is a finite set and I is a family of subsets of E satisfying: ∅ ∈ I ; if B ∈ I and A ⊆ B then A ∈ I ; if A , B ∈ I and | A | < | B | then there exists x ∈ B \ A such that A + x ∈ I . Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  3. Matroids A matroid M is a pair ( E , I ) where E is a finite set and I is a family of subsets of E satisfying: ∅ ∈ I ; if B ∈ I and A ⊆ B then A ∈ I ; if A , B ∈ I and | A | < | B | then there exists x ∈ B \ A such that A + x ∈ I . A ⊆ E is independent if A ∈ I and A is dependent if A �∈ I . The minimal dependent sets of M are the circuits of M . The rank of A , r ( A ), is the cardinality of a maximal independent subset of A . The rank of M is the cardinality of a maximal independent subset of E . Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  4. Matroids A matroid M is a pair ( E , I ) where E is a finite set and I is a family of subsets of E satisfying: ∅ ∈ I ; if B ∈ I and A ⊆ B then A ∈ I ; if A , B ∈ I and | A | < | B | then there exists x ∈ B \ A such that A + x ∈ I . A ⊆ E is independent if A ∈ I and A is dependent if A �∈ I . The minimal dependent sets of M are the circuits of M . The rank of A , r ( A ), is the cardinality of a maximal independent subset of A . The rank of M is the cardinality of a maximal independent subset of E . The weak order on a set S of matroids with the same groundset is defined as follows. Given two matroids M 1 = ( E , I 1 ) and M 2 = ( E , I 2 ) in S , we say M 1 � M 2 if I 1 ⊆ I 2 . Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  5. The generic d -dimensional rigidity matroid A d -dimensional framework ( G , p ) is a graph G = ( V , E ) together with a map p : V → R d . Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  6. The generic d -dimensional rigidity matroid A d -dimensional framework ( G , p ) is a graph G = ( V , E ) together with a map p : V → R d . The rigidity matrix of ( G , p ) is the matrix R ( G , p ) of size | E | × d | V | in which the row associated with the edge v i v j is v i v j 0 . . . 0 p ( v i ) − p ( v j ) 0 . . . 0 p ( v j ) − p ( v i ) 0 . . . 0 ] . [ v i v j Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  7. The generic d -dimensional rigidity matroid A d -dimensional framework ( G , p ) is a graph G = ( V , E ) together with a map p : V → R d . The rigidity matrix of ( G , p ) is the matrix R ( G , p ) of size | E | × d | V | in which the row associated with the edge v i v j is v i v j 0 . . . 0 p ( v i ) − p ( v j ) 0 . . . 0 p ( v j ) − p ( v i ) 0 . . . 0 ] . [ v i v j The generic d -dimensional rigidity matroid R n , d is the row matroid of the rigidity matrix R ( K n , p ) for any generic p : V ( K n ) → R d . Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  8. The generic d -dimensional rigidity matroid A d -dimensional framework ( G , p ) is a graph G = ( V , E ) together with a map p : V → R d . The rigidity matrix of ( G , p ) is the matrix R ( G , p ) of size | E | × d | V | in which the row associated with the edge v i v j is v i v j 0 . . . 0 p ( v i ) − p ( v j ) 0 . . . 0 p ( v j ) − p ( v i ) 0 . . . 0 ] . [ v i v j The generic d -dimensional rigidity matroid R n , d is the row matroid of the rigidity matrix R ( K n , p ) for any generic p : V ( K n ) → R d . � d +1 � R n , d is a matroid with groundset E ( K n ) and rank dn − . 2 Its rank function has been determined (by good characterisations and polynomial algorithms) when d = 1 , 2. Determining its rank function for d ≥ 3 is a long standing open problem. Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  9. Abstract d -rigidity matroids Jack Graver (1991) chose two closure properties of R d , n and used them to define the family of abstract d -rigidity matroids on E ( K n ). Viet Hang Nguyen (2010) gave the following equivalent definition: M is an abstract d -rigidity matroid iff � d +1 rank M = dn − � , and every K d +2 ⊆ K n is a circuit in M . 2 Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  10. Abstract d -rigidity matroids Jack Graver (1991) chose two closure properties of R d , n and used them to define the family of abstract d -rigidity matroids on E ( K n ). Viet Hang Nguyen (2010) gave the following equivalent definition: M is an abstract d -rigidity matroid iff � d +1 rank M = dn − � , and every K d +2 ⊆ K n is a circuit in M . 2 Conjecture [Graver, 1991] For all d , n ≥ 1, R d , n is the unique maximal element in the family of all abstract d -rigidity matroids on E ( K n ). Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  11. Abstract d -rigidity matroids Jack Graver (1991) chose two closure properties of R d , n and used them to define the family of abstract d -rigidity matroids on E ( K n ). Viet Hang Nguyen (2010) gave the following equivalent definition: M is an abstract d -rigidity matroid iff � d +1 rank M = dn − � , and every K d +2 ⊆ K n is a circuit in M . 2 Conjecture [Graver, 1991] For all d , n ≥ 1, R d , n is the unique maximal element in the family of all abstract d -rigidity matroids on E ( K n ). Graver verified his conjecture for d = 1 , 2. Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  12. Abstract d -rigidity matroids Jack Graver (1991) chose two closure properties of R d , n and used them to define the family of abstract d -rigidity matroids on E ( K n ). Viet Hang Nguyen (2010) gave the following equivalent definition: M is an abstract d -rigidity matroid iff � d +1 rank M = dn − � , and every K d +2 ⊆ K n is a circuit in M . 2 Conjecture [Graver, 1991] For all d , n ≥ 1, R d , n is the unique maximal element in the family of all abstract d -rigidity matroids on E ( K n ). Graver verified his conjecture for d = 1 , 2. Walter Whiteley (1996) gave counterexamples to Graver’s conjecture for all d ≥ 4 and n ≥ d + 2 using ‘cofactor matroids’. Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  13. Bivariate Splines and Cofactor Matrices Given a polygonal subdivision ∆ of a polygonal domain D in the plane, a bivariate function f : D → R is an ( s , k ) -spline over ∆ if it is defined as a polynomial of degree s on each face of ∆ and is continuously differentiable k times on D . Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  14. Bivariate Splines and Cofactor Matrices Given a polygonal subdivision ∆ of a polygonal domain D in the plane, a bivariate function f : D → R is an ( s , k ) -spline over ∆ if it is defined as a polynomial of degree s on each face of ∆ and is continuously differentiable k times on D . The set S k s (∆) of ( s , k )-splines over ∆ forms a vector space. Obtaining tight upper/lower bounds on dim S k s (∆) (over a given class of subdivisions ∆) is an important problem in approximation theory. Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  15. Bivariate Splines and Cofactor Matrices Given a polygonal subdivision ∆ of a polygonal domain D in the plane, a bivariate function f : D → R is an ( s , k ) -spline over ∆ if it is defined as a polynomial of degree s on each face of ∆ and is continuously differentiable k times on D . The set S k s (∆) of ( s , k )-splines over ∆ forms a vector space. Obtaining tight upper/lower bounds on dim S k s (∆) (over a given class of subdivisions ∆) is an important problem in approximation theory. Whiteley (1990) observed that dim S k s (∆) can be calculated from the rank of a matrix C k s ( G , p ) which is determined by the the 1-skeleton ( G , p ) of the subdivision ∆ (viewed as a 2-dim framework), and that rigidity theory can be used to investigate the rank of this matrix. His definition of C k s ( G , p ) makes sense for all 2-dim frameworks (not just frameworks whose underlying graph is planar). Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  16. Cofactor matroids Let ( G , p ) be a 2-dimensional framework and put p ( v i ) = ( x i , y i ) for v i ∈ V ( G ). For v i v j ∈ E ( G ) and d ≥ 1 let D d ( v i , v j ) = (( x i − x j ) d − 1 , ( x i − x j ) d − 2 ( y i − y j ) , . . . , ( y i − y j ) d − 1 ) . Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

  17. Cofactor matroids Let ( G , p ) be a 2-dimensional framework and put p ( v i ) = ( x i , y i ) for v i ∈ V ( G ). For v i v j ∈ E ( G ) and d ≥ 1 let D d ( v i , v j ) = (( x i − x j ) d − 1 , ( x i − x j ) d − 2 ( y i − y j ) , . . . , ( y i − y j ) d − 1 ) . The C d − 2 d − 1 -cofactor matrix of ( G , p ) is the matrix C d − 2 d − 1 ( G , p ) of size | E | × d | V | in which the row associated with the edge v i v j is v i v j � − D d ( v i , v j ) � 0 . . . 0 D d ( v i , v j ) 0 . . . 0 0 . . . 0 v i v j . Bill Jackson Abstract 3-Rigidity and Bivariate Splines

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend