contractual regimes in petroleum and mining
play

Contractual Regimes in Petroleum and Mining 11 12 May 2011 Quito, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Contractual Regimes in Petroleum and Mining 11 12 May 2011 Quito, Ecuador Presentation Outline Brief overview of common types of Contracts in Petroleum and Mining PSAs Tax/Royalty Service Agreements Differences,


  1. Contractual Regimes in Petroleum and Mining 11 – 12 May 2011 Quito, Ecuador

  2. Presentation Outline • Brief overview of common types of Contracts in Petroleum and Mining • PSAs • Tax/Royalty • Service Agreements • Differences, Similarities and Trends

  3. Purpose of a Contract • A contract is the instrument by which the State grants the right to exploit petroleum or minerals and codifies the rights the responsibilities of the parties. • Contracts should conform to the State’s legal regime.

  4. Types of Contracts e.g. UK, US, Australia e.g. Indonesia, Angola e.g. Iraq, Bolivia

  5. Types of Agreement • Concession (Royalty/Tax System) – Right to produce and sell from a license area with a fixed royalty on production and tax on profit • Production Sharing Contract – Right to produce and sell sufficient petroleum to recover costs and an agreed share of ‘profit oil’. Government has right to lift and sell its own share of production • Service contract – Companies are paid a fixed fee per barrel to cover costs and an agreed margin

  6. Fiscal Regimes are Complex in detail Courtesy Graham Kellas

  7. Royalty/Tax System Revenue From Mining/Petroleum Royalty Gross Revenue To Investor Profit Production Cost After-Tax Profit Profit Tax Investor’s Govt. Dividend Equity Dividend W/H (minus W/H tax) tax Government Revenue Investor Return

  8. Angola PSA Structure Total Oil Extracted Cost Oil Profit Oil Sales by Private Sales by Sonangol Companies Sonangol 90% of Profit Tax: 50% of Keeps 10% of Revenues Go its Revenues to Treasury their Profits

  9. Bolivia Operating Contract (2006) Crude Gas Sales by YPFB After-Royalty Net (50%) IDH (32%) + Royalty (18%) Recoverable Costs Distributable Profits [C/F = YPFB Contractor Fee C/F Share* (Retribución al Titular)] [P/T = After- Company Tax P/T Profits Tax Profit (25%)] * YPFB Share in Profits ranges Investor Government Revenue from 1 – 72%, based on a formula Return incorporating profitability, production levels, and price

  10. Source: Daniel Johnston (1994) Government Take at $20/BBL and $60/BBL, changes are a function of design. Government Take @ $20/BBL & $60/BBL Participation % ERR % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% US OCS Deepwater 0 0 Few systems are New Zealand 0 5 UK 0 0 progressive today Trinidad Deepwater 25+ 0-25 Philippines 0 13.5 World Average 30 20 Gabon 10 22 Azerbaijan AIOC 10 0 Malaysia Deepwater 13 15 Indonesia 3rd Gen 10 5 Russia Sakhalin II $20 $60 Oil Price 0 6 Egypt Onshore 0 38 R/T Nigeria Shelf 0 18 PSC UAE ‘OPEC Terms’ 12.5 60 Libya Avg 2005 81.5 SA 81.5 Venezuela 1996 35 35 World Avg Libya Block 124 89 89

  11. SERVICE CONTRACT INCENTIVES IN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON • Bolivia Service Contract (2010) • Service fee with remuneration of Production Costs • Incentive to increase investment/costs • Risk of “gold plating” and/or inducing corruption • Need for Transparency in remuneration of costs • On the other hand, is also a subsidization of Contractor investments in new and high-technology

  12. SERVICE CONTRACT INCENTIVES IN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON • Ecuador Service Contract (2010) • Two-tier Tariff • Tariff 1: Pure service fee based on fee-per-barrel • Company negotiates a Tariff rate-per-barrel • Service Fee=Tariff*production • Incentive to reduce investment/costs • Tariff 2: Risk Remuneration • Not set in contract, to be negotiated after demonstrated existence of New Fields or Increase in the recovery factor of Commercially Exploitable Reserves (Clause 12.3) • Tariff 2 negotiation must include (1) Capital Investment, (2) estimation of Operating Expense, and (3) a reasonable profit of X amount (set by contract, between 20-25%) • Incentive to undertake risk investment

  13. SERVICE CONTRACT INCENTIVES IN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON • Fee-per-barrel Service Contracts & Price Increases

  14. SERVICE CONTRACT INCENTIVES IN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON • Mexico Integrated Service Contract (2010) • Service fee based on fee-per-barrel • Company bids on Tariff rate-per-barrel • Service Fee=Tariff*production • Incentive to limit investment/costs • Progressive Remuneration Plan • Possible adjustment for R-Factor or depletion allowance (“squeeze”) • Neutral to Contractor

  15. Other types of agreements to be aware of • Infrastructure linked agreements • Joint Operating Agreements (JOA’s) • Unitisation Agreements

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend